James W. Vallance

Dynamics of seismogenic volcanic extrusion at Mount St Helens in 2004-05.

The 2004–05 eruption of Mount St Helens exhibited sustained, near-equilibrium behaviour characterized by relatively steady extrusion of a solid dacite plug and nearly periodic shallow earthquakes. Here we present a diverse data set to support our hypothesis that these earthquakes resulted from stick-slip motion along the margins of the plug as it was forced incrementally upwards by ascending, solidifying, gas-poor magma. We formalize this hypothesis with a dynamical model that reveals a strong analogy between behaviour of the magma–plug system and that of a variably damped oscillator. Modelled stick-slip oscillations have properties that help constrain the balance of forces governing the earthquakes and eruption, and they imply that magma pressure never deviated much from the steady equilibrium pressure. We infer that the volcano was probably poised in a near-eruptive equilibrium state long before the onset of the 2004–05 eruption.

Mount St. Helens reawakens

Following 18 years of relative quiescence, Mount St. Helens volcano (MSH) became restless and began erupting again during September–December 2004. n nOn 23 September, the U.S. Geological Surveys (USGS) David A. Johnston Cascades Volcano Observatory (CVO) and the Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network (PNSN) at the University of Washington detected the onset of a shallow earthquake swarm beneath the 1980–1986 lava dome. The Mount St. Helens Emergency Response Plan defines three alert levels that differ from normal background activity: Level 1, Notice of Volcanic Unrest (unusual activity detected); Level 2, Volcano Advisory (eruption likely but not imminent); and Level 3, Volcano Alert (eruption imminent or in progress).

Mount St. Helens: A 30-Year Legacy of Volcanism

The spectacular eruption of Mount St. Helens on 18 May 1980 electrified scientists and the public. Photodocumentation of the colossal landslide, directed blast, and ensuing eruption column—which reached as high as 25 kilometers in altitude and lasted for nearly 9 hours—made news worldwide. Reconnaissance of the devastation spurred efforts to understand the power and awe of those moments (Figure 1). n nThe eruption remains a seminal historical event—studying it and its aftermath revolutionized the way scientists approach the field of volcanology. Not only was the eruption spectacular, but also it occurred in daytime, at an accessible volcano, in a country with the resources to transform disaster into scientific opportunity, amid a transformation in digital technology. Lives lost and the impact of the eruption on people and infrastructure downstream and downwind made it imperative for scientists to investigate events and work with communities to lessen losses from future eruptions.