Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jamie R. McClelland is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jamie R. McClelland.


IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | 2011

Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge

K. Murphy; B. van Ginneken; Joseph M. Reinhardt; Sven Kabus; Kai Ding; Xiang Deng; Kunlin Cao; Kaifang Du; Gary E. Christensen; V. Garcia; Tom Vercauteren; Nicholas Ayache; Olivier Commowick; Grégoire Malandain; Ben Glocker; Nikos Paragios; Nassir Navab; V. Gorbunova; Jon Sporring; M. de Bruijne; Xiao Han; Mattias P. Heinrich; Julia A. Schnabel; Mark Jenkinson; Cristian Lorenz; Marc Modat; Jamie R. McClelland; Sebastien Ourselin; S. E. A. Muenzing; Max A. Viergever

EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intra patient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the con figuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.


Medical Image Analysis | 2013

Respiratory Motion Models: A Review

Jamie R. McClelland; David J. Hawkes; Tobias Schaeffter; Andrew P. King

The problem of respiratory motion has proved a serious obstacle in developing techniques to acquire images or guide interventions in abdominal and thoracic organs. Motion models offer a possible solution to these problems, and as a result the field of respiratory motion modelling has become an active one over the past 15 years. A motion model can be defined as a process that takes some surrogate data as input and produces a motion estimate as output. Many techniques have been proposed in the literature, differing in the data used to form the models, the type of model employed, how this model is computed, the type of surrogate data used as input to the model in order to make motion estimates and what form this output should take. In addition, a wide range of different application areas have been proposed. In this paper we summarise the state of the art in this important field and in the process highlight the key papers that have driven its advance. The intention is that this will serve as a timely review and comparison of the different techniques proposed to date and as a basis to inform future research in this area.


Medical Physics | 2008

Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: A multi-institution study

Rojano Kashani; Martina Hub; James M. Balter; Marc L. Kessler; Lei Dong; Lifei Zhang; Lei Xing; Yaoqin Xie; David J. Hawkes; Julia A. Schnabel; Jamie R. McClelland; Sarang C. Joshi; Quan Chen; Weiguo Lu

The looming potential of deformable alignment tools to play an integral role in adaptive radiotherapy suggests a need for objective assessment of these complex algorithms. Previous studies in this area are based on the ability of alignment to reproduce analytically generated deformations applied to sample image data, or use of contours or bifurcations as ground truth for evaluation of alignment accuracy. In this study, a deformable phantom was embedded with 48 small plastic markers, placed in regions varying from high contrast to roughly uniform regional intensity, and small to large regional discontinuities in movement. CT volumes of this phantom were acquired at different deformation states. After manual localization of marker coordinates, images were edited to remove the markers. The resulting image volumes were sent to five collaborating institutions, each of which has developed previously published deformable alignment tools routinely in use. Alignments were done, and applied to the list of reference coordinates at the inhale state. The transformed coordinates were compared to the actual marker locations at exhale. A total of eight alignment techniques were tested from the six institutions. All algorithms performed generally well, as compared to previous publications. Average errors in predicted location ranged from 1.5 to 3.9 mm, depending on technique. No algorithm was uniformly accurate across all regions of the phantom, with maximum errors ranging from 5.1 to 15.4 mm. Larger errors were seen in regions near significant shape changes, as well as areas with uniform contrast but large local motion discontinuity. Although reasonable accuracy was achieved overall, the variation of error in different regions suggests caution in globally accepting the results from deformable alignment.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2016

First Clinical Investigation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Deformable Registration for Adaptive Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer

Catarina Veiga; Guillaume Janssens; Ching-Ling Teng; Thomas Baudier; L. Hotoiu; Jamie R. McClelland; Gary J. Royle; Liyong Lin; Lingshu Yin; James M. Metz; Timothy D. Solberg; Zelig Tochner; Charles B. Simone; J McDonough; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo

PURPOSE An adaptive proton therapy workflow using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is proposed. It consists of an online evaluation of a fast range-corrected dose distribution based on a virtual CT (vCT) scan. This can be followed by more accurate offline dose recalculation on the vCT scan, which can trigger a rescan CT (rCT) for replanning. METHODS AND MATERIALS The workflow was tested retrospectively for 20 consecutive lung cancer patients. A diffeomorphic Morphon algorithm was used to generate the lung vCT by deforming the average planning CT onto the CBCT scan. An additional correction step was applied to account for anatomic modifications that cannot be modeled by deformation alone. A set of clinical indicators for replanning were generated according to the water equivalent thickness (WET) and dose statistics and compared with those obtained on the rCT scan. The fast dose approximation consisted of warping the initial planned dose onto the vCT scan according to the changes in WET. The potential under- and over-ranges were assessed as a variation in WET at the targets distal surface. RESULTS The range-corrected dose from the vCT scan reproduced clinical indicators similar to those of the rCT scan. The workflow performed well under different clinical scenarios, including atelectasis, lung reinflation, and different types of tumor response. Between the vCT and rCT scans, we found a difference in the measured 95% percentile of the over-range distribution of 3.4 ± 2.7 mm. The limitations of the technique consisted of inherent uncertainties in deformable registration and the drawbacks of CBCT imaging. The correction step was adequate when gross errors occurred but could not recover subtle anatomic or density changes in tumors with complex topology. CONCLUSIONS A proton therapy workflow based on CBCT provided clinical indicators similar to those using rCT for patients with lung cancer with considerable anatomic changes.


Physics in Medicine and Biology | 2011

Inter-fraction variations in respiratory motion models

Jamie R. McClelland; Simon Hughes; Marc Modat; A. Qureshi; Shahreen Ahmad; David Landau; Sebastien Ourselin; David J. Hawkes

Respiratory motion can vary dramatically between the planning stage and the different fractions of radiotherapy treatment. Motion predictions used when constructing the radiotherapy plan may be unsuitable for later fractions of treatment. This paper presents a methodology for constructing patient-specific respiratory motion models and uses these models to evaluate and analyse the inter-fraction variations in the respiratory motion. The internal respiratory motion is determined from the deformable registration of Cine CT data and related to a respiratory surrogate signal derived from 3D skin surface data. Three different models for relating the internal motion to the surrogate signal have been investigated in this work. Data were acquired from six lung cancer patients. Two full datasets were acquired for each patient, one before the course of radiotherapy treatment and one at the end (approximately 6 weeks later). Separate models were built for each dataset. All models could accurately predict the respiratory motion in the same dataset, but had large errors when predicting the motion in the other dataset. Analysis of the inter-fraction variations revealed that most variations were spatially varying base-line shifts, but changes to the anatomy and the motion trajectories were also observed.


Physics in Medicine and Biology | 2008

Planning lung radiotherapy using 4D CT data and a motion model

Ruth Colgan; Jamie R. McClelland; D McQuaid; Philip M. Evans; David J. Hawkes; J Brock; David Landau; S Webb

This work is a feasibility study to use a four-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) dataset generated by a continuous motion model for treatment planning in lung radiotherapy. The model-based 4D CT data were derived from multiple breathing cycles. Four patients were included in this retrospective study. Treatment plans were optimized at end-exhale for each patient and the effect of respiratory motion on the dose delivery investigated. The accuracy of the delivered dose as determined by the number of intermediate respiratory phases used for the calculation was considered. The time-averaged geometry of the anatomy representing the mid-ventilation phase of the breathing cycle was generated using the motion model and a treatment plan was optimized for this phase for one patient. With respiratory motion included, the mid-ventilation plan achieved better target coverage than the plan optimized at end-exhale when standard margins were used to expand the clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV). Using a margin to account for set-up uncertainty only, resulted in poorer target coverage and healthy tissue sparing. For this patient cohort, the results suggest that conventional three-dimensional treatment planning was sufficient to maintain target coverage despite respiratory motion. The motion model has proved a useful tool in 4D treatment planning.


Medical Image Analysis | 2014

High-resolution dynamic MR imaging of the thorax for respiratory motion correction of PET using groupwise manifold alignment

Christian F. Baumgartner; Christoph Kolbitsch; Daniel R. Balfour; Paul Marsden; Jamie R. McClelland; Daniel Rueckert; Andrew P. King

Respiratory motion is a complicating factor in PET imaging as it leads to blurring of the reconstructed images which adversely affects disease diagnosis and staging. Existing motion correction techniques are often based on 1D navigators which cannot capture the inter- and intra-cycle variabilities that may occur in respiration. MR imaging is an attractive modality for estimating such motion more accurately, and the recent emergence of hybrid PET/MR systems allows the combination of the high molecular sensitivity of PET with the versatility of MR. However, current MR imaging techniques cannot achieve good image contrast inside the lungs in 3D. 2D slices, on the other hand, have excellent contrast properties inside the lungs due to the in-flow of previously unexcited blood, but lack the coverage of 3D volumes. In this work we propose an approach for the robust, navigator-less reconstruction of dynamic 3D volumes from 2D slice data. Our technique relies on the fact that data acquired at different slice positions have similar low-dimensional representations which can be extracted using manifold learning. By aligning these manifolds we are able to obtain accurate matchings of slices with regard to respiratory position. The approach naturally models all respiratory variabilities. We compare our method against two recently proposed MR slice stacking methods for the correction of PET data: a technique based on a 1D pencil beam navigator, and an image-based technique. On synthetic data with a known ground truth our proposed technique produces significantly better reconstructions than all other examined techniques. On real data without a known ground truth the method gives the most plausible reconstructions and high consistency of reconstruction. Lastly, we demonstrate how our method can be applied for the respiratory motion correction of simulated PET/MR data.


Physica Medica | 2014

Challenges of radiotherapy: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013

Antje Knopf; Simeon Nill; Indra Yohannes; Christian Graeff; S Dowdell; Christopher Kurz; Jan-Jakob Sonke; A. Biegun; S. Lang; Jamie R. McClelland; Benjamin A. S. Champion; Martin F. Fast; Jens Wölfelschneider; Chiara Gianoli; Antoni Rucinski; Guido Baroni; Christian Richter; Steven van de Water; C Grassberger; Damien C. Weber; P.R. Poulsen; Shinichi Shimizu; Christoph Bert

This report, compiled by experts on the treatment of mobile targets with advanced radiotherapy, summarizes the main conclusions and innovations achieved during the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013. This annual workshop focuses on research aiming to advance 4D radiotherapy treatments, including all critical aspects of time resolved delivery, such as in-room imaging, motion detection, motion managing, beam application, and quality assurance techniques. The report aims to revise achievements in the field and to discuss remaining challenges and potential solutions. As main achievements advances in the development of a standardized 4D phantom and in the area of 4D-treatment plan optimization were identified. Furthermore, it was noticed that MR imaging gains importance and high interest for sequential 4DCT/MR data sets was expressed, which represents a general trend of the field towards data covering a longer time period of motion. A new point of attention was work related to dose reconstructions, which may play a major role in verification of 4D treatment deliveries. The experimental validation of results achieved by 4D treatment planning and the systematic evaluation of different deformable image registration methods especially for inter-modality fusions were identified as major remaining challenges. A challenge that was also suggested as focus for future 4D workshops was the adaptation of image guidance approaches from conventional radiotherapy into particle therapy. Besides summarizing the last workshop, the authors also want to point out new evolving demands and give an outlook on the focus of the next workshop.


Physica Medica | 2016

Required transition from research to clinical application: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshops 2014 and 2015

Antje-Christin Knopf; Kristin Stützer; Christian Richter; Antoni Rucinski; Joakim da Silva; Justin Phillips; Martijn Engelsman; Shinichi Shimizu; René Werner; Annika Jakobi; Orcun Goksel; Ye Zhang; T O'Shea; Martin F. Fast; Rosalind Perrin; Christoph Bert; Ilaria Rinaldi; Erik W. Korevaar; Jamie R. McClelland

Since 2009, a 4D treatment planning workshop has taken place annually, gathering researchers working on the treatment of moving targets, mainly with scanned ion beams. Topics discussed during the workshops range from problems of time resolved imaging, the challenges of motion modelling, the implementation of 4D capabilities for treatment planning, up to different aspects related to 4D dosimetry and treatment verification. This report gives an overview on topics discussed at the 4D workshops in 2014 and 2015. It summarizes recent findings, developments and challenges in the field and discusses the relevant literature of the recent years. The report is structured in three parts pointing out developments in the context of understanding moving geometries, of treating moving targets and of 4D quality assurance (QA) and 4D dosimetry. The community represented at the 4D workshops agrees that research in the context of treating moving targets with scanned ion beams faces a crucial phase of clinical translation. In the coming years it will be important to define standards for motion monitoring, to establish 4D treatment planning guidelines and to develop 4D QA tools. These basic requirements for the clinical application of scanned ion beams to moving targets could e.g. be determined by a dedicated ESTRO task group. Besides reviewing recent research results and pointing out urgent needs when treating moving targets with scanned ion beams, the report also gives an outlook on the upcoming 4D workshop organized at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) in the Netherlands at the end of 2016.


Physics in Medicine and Biology | 2013

Building motion models of lung tumours from cone-beam CT for radiotherapy applications

James S. Martin; Jamie R. McClelland; Connie Yip; Christopher Thomas; Claire Hartill; Shahreen Ahmad; Richard O'Brien; Ivan Meir; David Landau; David J. Hawkes

A method is presented to build a surrogate-driven motion model of a lung tumour from a cone-beam CT scan, which does not require markers. By monitoring an external surrogate in real time, it is envisaged that the motion model be used to drive gated or tracked treatments. The motion model would be built immediately before each fraction of treatment and can account for inter-fraction variation. The method could also provide a better assessment of tumour shape and motion prior to delivery of each fraction of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. The two-step method involves enhancing the tumour region in the projections, and then fitting the surrogate-driven motion model. On simulated data, the mean absolute error was reduced to 1 mm. For patient data, errors were determined by comparing estimated and clinically identified tumour positions in the projections, scaled to mm at the isocentre. Averaged over all used scans, the mean absolute error was under 2.5 mm in superior-inferior and transverse directions.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jamie R. McClelland's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. Hawkes

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shahreen Ahmad

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Modat

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catarina Veiga

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steve Halligan

University College London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge