Jamie Ritchey

Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Evidence exists to suggest a pattern of increasing early diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of the study was to analyze patterns of disease presentation and outcome of RCC by AJCC stage using data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) over a 12‐year period.

Validation of the 6th edition AJCC pancreatic cancer staging system: Report from the National Cancer Database

With the development of stage‐specific treatments for pancreatic cancer, controversies exist concerning optimal clinical and pathologic staging. The most recent edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual 6th Edition included some notable modifications. In anticipation of the 7th editions publication, the authors evaluated the predictive ability of the current pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging system.

Decreasing Size at Diagnosis of Stage 1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis From the National Cancer Data Base, 1993 to 2004

PURPOSE The proportion of renal cell carcinoma cases diagnosed at stage I is known to be increasing significantly. We characterized stage I tumors further in terms of tumor size at diagnosis using a large national cancer registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base captures approximately 75% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases in the United States. The database was queried for all adults who were diagnosed between 1993 and 2004 with stage I renal cell carcinoma. Trends were assessed in mean size with time as well as in the proportion of stage I tumors diagnosed at less than 2.0, less than 2.5 and less than 3.0 cm. RESULTS There were 104,150 patients in the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed with stage I renal cell carcinoma during the study period. A total of 10,279 stage I tumors (9.9%) were less than 2.0 cm, 26,621 (25.6%) were 2.5 cm or less and 39,879 (38.3%) were 3.0 cm or less. Analysis of stage I renal cell carcinoma diagnoses with time demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the proportion of renal masses 3.0 cm or less between 1993 and 2004 (32.5% vs 43.4%). Of tumors 3.0 cm or less the proportion smaller than 2.0 cm increased significantly during the study period from 24.1% in 1993 to 29.4% in 2004. Mean tumor size decreased from 4.1 to 3.6 cm between 1993 and 2004 (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Tumor size at diagnosis is decreasing with time in patients with stage I renal cell carcinoma. These data likely underestimate the proportion of all enhancing renal masses diagnosed at a small size. Patients with small masses may be appropriate candidates for nephron sparing surgery, energy based ablative therapy or active surveillance. Better technologies are needed to determine the diagnosis and prognosis of small enhancing renal masses.

Evidence-Based Gallbladder Cancer Staging: Changing Cancer Staging by Analysis of Data From the National Cancer Database

Background:A recent revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for gallbladder cancer (6th Edition) involved some major changes. Most notably, T2N0M0 tumors were moved from stage II to stage IB; T3N1M0 disease was moved from stage III to stage IIB; and T4NxM0 (x = any) tumors were moved from stage IVA to stage III. Methods:In order to determine if these changes were justified by data, an analysis of the 10,705 cases of gallbladder cancer collected between 1989 and 1996 in the NCDB was performed. All patients had >5 year follow-up. Results:The staging according to the 6th Edition provided no discrimination between stage III and IV. Five-year survivals for stage IIA, IIB, III, and IV (6th Edition) were 7%, 9%, 3%, 2% respectively. The data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were used to derive a proposed new staging system that builds upon Edition 5 and had improved discrimination of stage groups over previous editions. Conclusions:Changes in staging systems should be justified by data. Multicenter databases, including the NCDB, represent important resources for verification of evidence-based staging systems.

Variations in Quality of Care for Men With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE The commencement of quality-improvement initiatives such as Pay for Performance and the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement has underscored calls to evaluate the quality of cancer care on a patient level for nationally representative samples. METHODS We sampled early-stage prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2000 through 2001 from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base and explicitly reviewed medical records from 2,775 men (weighted total = 55,160 cases) treated with radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy. We determined compliance with 29 quality-of-care disease-specific structure and process indicators developed by RAND, stratified by race, geographic region, and hospital type. RESULTS Overall compliance exceeded 70% for structural and pretherapy disease assessment indicators but was lower for documentation of pretreatment functioning (46.4% to 78.4%), surgical pathology (37.1% to 86.3%), radiation technique (62.6% to 88.3%), and follow-up (55%). Geographic variations were observed as higher compliance in the South Atlantic division than the New England division for having at least one board-certified urologist (odds ratio [OR], 9.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 45.0), at least one board-certified radiation oncologist (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.0), use of Gleason grading (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2 to 13.8), and administering total radiation dose >or= 70 Gy (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.1). Teaching/research hospitals and Comprehensive Cancer Centers had higher compliance than Community Cancer Centers, whereas racial differences were not observed for any indicator. CONCLUSION The significant and unwarranted variations observed for these quality indicators by census division and hospital type illustrate the inconsistencies in prostate cancer care and represent potential targets for quality improvement. The lack of racial disparities suggests equity in care once a patient initiates treatment.

Sex differences in renal cell cancer presentation and survival: an analysis of the National Cancer Database, 1993-2004.

PURPOSE We analyzed patterns of disease presentation and outcome of renal cell carcinomas by gender using data from the National Cancer Database during a 10-year period. We hypothesized that women presented with lower stage disease and had increased survival than men due to increased imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database is a nationwide oncology data set that currently captures approximately 75% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases from more than 1,400 facility based cancer registries in the United States annually since 1985. The National Cancer Database was queried for adults with renal cell carcinoma diagnosed between 1993 and 2004. Cases were examined according to gender in relation to mean age, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, histology, grade, tumor size, mortality and race. RESULTS We identified a total of 236,930 patients with renal cell carcinoma diagnosed between 1993 and 2004 from the National Cancer Database. A total of 89,243 (37.7%) were female and 147,687 (62.3%) were male. Mean age was greater in females (64.3) than in males (62.9) (p <0.001). Women had a higher percentage of stage I tumors (54.1% vs 48.5%, p <0.001). Progressive stage migration was documented in men and women. A trend toward increased survival was noted in women relative to men that did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Results from this study show a ratio of 1.65 of renal cell carcinoma for males compared to females. Women are more likely than men to have stage I tumors. Both men and women have demonstrated stage migration, although women more so than men.

Surveillance of urothelial carcinoma: stage and grade migration, 1993-2005 and survival trends, 1993-2000.

Previous investigators have detected shifts to lower stages at diagnosis for renal cell carcinoma and prostate cancer. The authors investigated whether a similar pattern is seen for urothelial carcinomas of the bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis and sought to identify changes in cancer grade and survival trends from 1993 to 2005.

Treatment Choice and Quality of Care for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

Background:Variations in patterns of care and treatment outcomes suggest differences in the quality of care for men treated for localized prostate cancer. Objective:We sought to compare adherence with quality indicators for prostate cancer care among men treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. Research Design and Subjects:We sampled 5230 men diagnosed in 2000 or 2001 with early-stage prostate cancer from 984 facilities reporting to the National Cancer Data Base. Our analytic cohort includes 2604 men (from 770 facilities) treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation. Main Outcome Measure:Subject-level compliance with the RAND quality indicators for localized prostate cancer care, stratified by treatment. We applied sampling weights to obtain national estimates of quality indicator adherence. Results:The weighted samples represent 24,547 and 27,125 men treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy, respectively. Compliance with several quality indicators approached 100% in both treatment groups; however treatment-specific variations were noted. Men receiving radiation were less likely than those undergoing surgery to be treated in facilities with a board-certified urologist (odds ratio [OR] = 0.4, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.2–0.8). Adherence with process of care indicators was appreciably higher among radiation subjects, including documentation of clinical stage (OR = 7.5, 95% CI = 4.8–11.9), pretherapy assessment of urinary (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.9–4.2) and sexual (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2–2.2) function, and discussion of treatment options (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1–2.9). Conclusions:Documented compliance with process of care quality indicators among men with localized prostate cancer appears superior for those treated with external beam radiation compared with those treated surgically.

Renal cell carcinoma: assessment of key pathologic prognostic parameters and patient characteristics in 47 909 cases using the National Cancer Data Base

On the basis of the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we describe the disease characteristics and use of conventional prognostic parameters in a hospital-based cohort of pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Between 1993 and 1998, the NCDB obtained 149 424 cases of kidney (and renal pelvis) cancers from registries all over the United States. This database was queried for 47 909 histologically specified RCCs. Survival outcome was analyzed based on conventional clinical and pathologic parameters reported to the database (up to 2003). Renal cell carcinoma was more common in men (male-female ratio = 1.6:1). The mean age was 62.6 years. Most (66.6%) were organ-confined (stage I/II) at the time of diagnosis. The mean tumor size was 6.49 cm. The 5-year observed survival of RCC was 62.9% for male and 68.1% for female and was 81.0% for younger than 40 years old and 64.2% for older than 40 years old. The 5-year observed survival of RCC patients by the fifth edition 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging were stages I, 77.8%; II, 72.8%; III, 55.0%; and IV, 16.9%, demonstrating a dramatic decline in patient survival at stage IV. By reported pathologic grade, significant stratification was achieved in the observed survival for RCC overall irrespective of histologic subtypes (grade 1, 77.8%; 2, 69.6%; 3, 48.8%; and 4, 35.3% 5-year observed survival). These large NCDB data in RCC confirm the importance of pathologic evaluation of traditional prognostic parameters of stage and grade in RCC and is a powerful resource in defining cancer patient characteristics and analysis of prognostic variables that helps influence future cancer care planning and resource allocation.

The quality of surgical pathology care for men undergoing radical prostatectomy in the U.S.

The authors assessed adherence with the College of American Pathologists (CAP) radical prostatectomy (RP) practice protocol in a national sample of men who underwent RP for early‐stage prostate cancer.