Jamil Asselah
McGill University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jamil Asselah.
Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2016
Eve Simoneau; Reema Alanazi; Jumanah Y AlShenaifi; Nouran Molla; Murad Aljiffry; Ahmad Medkhali; L.N. Boucher; Jamil Asselah; Peter Metrakos; Mazen Hassanain
Treatment strategies for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) such as major hepatectomy and portal vein embolization (PVE) rely on liver regeneration. We aim to investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration occurring after PVE and after major hepatectomy.
Cell Reports | 2017
Paul Savage; Alexis Blanchet-Cohen; Timothée Revil; Dunarel Badescu; Sadiq M. Saleh; Yu-Chang Wang; Dongmei Zuo; Leah Liu; Nicholas Bertos; Valentina Muñoz-Ramos; Mark Basik; Kevin Petrecca; Jamil Asselah; Sarkis Meterissian; Marie-Christine Guiot; Atilla Omeroglu; Claudia L. Kleinman; Morag Park; Jiannis Ragoussis
Therapies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have variable and unpredictable responses in breast cancer. Screening triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), we identify a subset responsive to EGFR inhibition by gefitinib, which displays heterogeneous expression of wild-type EGFR. Deep single-cell RNA sequencing of 3,500 cells from an exceptional responder identified subpopulations displaying distinct biological features, where elevated EGFR expression was significantly enriched in a mesenchymal/stem-like cellular cluster. Sorted EGFRhi subpopulations exhibited enhanced stem-like features, including ALDH activity, sphere-forming efficiency, and tumorigenic and metastatic potential. EGFRhi cells gave rise to EGFRhi and EGFRlo cells in primary and metastatic tumors, demonstrating an EGFR-dependent expansion and hierarchical state transition. Similar tumorigenic EGFRhi subpopulations were identified in independent PDXs, where heterogeneous EGFR expression correlated with gefitinib sensitivity. This provides new understanding for an EGFR-dependent hierarchy in TNBC and for patient stratification for therapeutic intervention.
British Journal of Cancer | 2017
Victoria Mandilaras; Nathaniel Bouganim; Hui Yin; Jamil Asselah; Laurent Azoulay
Background:Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used antihypertensives. Recently, these drugs have been associated with a protective effect against pancreatic cancer, but data on this putative association remain limited. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine whether the use of ACEIs and/or ARBs is associated with a decreased risk of pancreatic cancer.Methods:We conducted a population-based cohort study, using a nested case–control analysis within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink population. The cohort consisted of all patients newly treated with antihypertensive drugs between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2009, with follow-up until 31 December 2010. Cases were patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer, which were matched with up to 10 controls on age, sex, calendar year of cohort entry, and duration of follow-up. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of pancreatic cancer incidence associated with ever use of ACEIs and ARBs. A secondary analysis was conducted to assess whether the incidence of pancreatic cancer varied with cumulative duration of use of these drugs.Results:A cohort of 547 566 was assembled. During 3 040 332 person-years of follow-up, a total of 866 patients were newly diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (rate: 3/10 000 per year) and matched to 8636 controls. Overall, when compared with other antihypertensive drugs, the use of ACEIs was not associated with a decreased risk of pancreatic cancer overall (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86–1.17) or according to cumulative duration of use. The use of ARBs was not associated with a decreased risk of pancreatic cancer overall (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75–1.15), whereas a cumulative duration of use of 1–3 years was associated with a 38% decrease (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41–0.94), which returned to the null after >3 years of use (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.74–1.46).Conclusions:The use of ARBs and ACEIs was not associated with an overall decreased risk of pancreatic cancer when compared with patients using other antihypertensive drugs. Additional research is needed to determine whether ARBs may confer a short-term protective effect.
JCO Precision Oncology | 2018
Alyssa L. Smith; Cavin Wong; Adeline Cuggia; Ayelet Borgida; Spring Holter; Anita Hall; Ashton Connor; Claire Bascuñana; Jamil Asselah; Nathaniel Bouganim; Véronique Poulin; Jacques Jolivet; Petro Vafiadis; Philippe Le; Guillaume Martel; Frédéric Lemay; Annie Beaudoin; Khashayar Rafatzand; Prosanto Chaudhury; Jeffrey Barkun; Peter Metrakos; Victoria Marcus; Atilla Omeroglu; George Chong; Mohammad Akbari; William D. Foulkes; Steven Gallinger; George Zogopoulos
PurposeWe investigated the translational value of reflex testing for germline mutations in four homology-directed DNA repair predisposition genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM) in consecutive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.MethodsOne hundred fifty patients with French-Canadian (FC) ancestry were evaluated for founder mutations, and 114 patients were subsequently assessed by full gene sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for nonfounder mutations. Two hundred thirty-six patients unselected for ancestry were also assessed for mutations by full gene sequencing.ResultsThe FC founder mutation prevalence among the 150 patients was 5.3% (95% CI, 2.6% to 10.3%), and the nonfounder mutation prevalence across the four genes among the 114 patients tested was 2.6% (95% CI, 0.6% to 7.8%). In the case series unselected for ancestry, 10.0% (95% CI, 2.7% to 26.4%) of patients reporting Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry carried an AJ founder mutation, with no nonfounder mutations identified...
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2014
Amin Madani; Jonathan Spicer; Thierry Alcindor; Marc David; Marie Vanhuyse; Jamil Asselah; David S. Mulder; Lorenzo E. Ferri
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Jill Lacy; Fabienne Portales; Pascal Hammel; Roberto A. Pazo Cid; José Luis Manzano Mozo; Edward J. Kim; Scot Dowden; Christophe Borg; Javier Sastre; Venu Gopal Bathini; Eric Terrebonne; Daniel Lopez-Trabada; Fernando Rivera; Jamil Asselah; Azzurra Damiani; Jimmy J. Hwang; Teng Jin Ong; Thom Nydam; Jack Shiansong Li; Philip A. Philip
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
David J. Dabbs; Charles E. Cox; Steven C. Shivers; Nathaniel Bouganim; Jamil Asselah; Ramy Saleh; Lisa Eileen Blumencranz; Alberto J. Montero; Benjamin C. Calhoun; Tina Treece; William Audeh
Cancer Research | 2018
Hellen Kuasne; Paul Savage; Constanza Martinez Ramirez; Leah Liu; Valentina Muñoz-Ramos; Virginie Pilon; Anie Monast; Radia Johnson; Nicholas R. Bertos; Jamil Asselah; Nathaniel Bouganim; Kevin Petrecca; Sarkis Meterissian; Atilla Omeroglu; Mark Basik; Morag Park
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Victoria Mandilaras; Nathaniel Bouganim; Jamil Asselah; Hui Yin; Laurent Azoulay
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Sara Victoria Soldera; Nathaniel Bouganim; Jamil Asselah; Hui Yin; Ralph Maroun; Laurent Azoulay