Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jamin J. Day is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jamin J. Day.


Clinical Psychology Review | 2014

The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support

Matthew R. Sanders; James N. Kirby; Cassandra L. Tellegen; Jamin J. Day

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of the multilevel Triple P-Positive Parenting Program system on a broad range of child, parent and family outcomes. Multiple search strategies identified 116 eligible studies conducted over a 33-year period, with 101 studies comprising 16,099 families analyzed quantitatively. Moderator analyses were conducted using structural equation modeling. Risk of bias within and across studies was assessed. Significant short-term effects were found for: childrens social, emotional and behavioral outcomes (d=0.473); parenting practices (d=0.578); parenting satisfaction and efficacy (d=0.519); parental adjustment (d=0.340); parental relationship (d=0.225) and child observational data (d=0.501). Significant effects were found for all outcomes at long-term including parent observational data (d=0.249). Moderator analyses found that study approach, study power, Triple P level, and severity of initial child problems produced significant effects in multiple moderator models when controlling for other significant moderators. Several putative moderators did not have significant effects after controlling for other significant moderators. The positive results for each level of the Triple P system provide empirical support for a blending of universal and targeted parenting interventions to promote child, parent and family wellbeing.


Journal of Medical Internet Research | 2018

Attitudes Toward e-Mental Health Services in a Community Sample of Adults: Online Survey

Sonja March; Jamin J. Day; Gabrielle Ritchie; Arlen Rowe; Jeffrey Gough; Tanya Hall; Chin Yan Jackie Yuen; Caroline L. Donovan; Michael J. Ireland

Background Despite evidence that e-mental health services are effective, consumer preferences still appear to be in favor of face-to-face services. However, the theory of planned behavior (TPB) suggests that cognitive intentions are more proximal to behavior and thus may have a more direct influence on service use. Investigating individual characteristics that influence both preferences and intentions to use e-mental health services is important for better understanding factors that might impede or facilitate the use of these services. Objective This study explores predictors of preferences and intentions to access e-mental health services relative to face-to-face services. Five domains were investigated (demographics, technology factors, personality, psychopathology, and beliefs), identified from previous studies and informed by the Internet interventions model. We expected that more participants would report intentions to use e-mental health services relative to reported preferences for this type of support and that these 5 domains would be significantly associated with both intentions and preferences toward online services. Methods A mixed sample of 308 community members and university students was recruited through social media and the host institution in Australia. Ages ranged between 17 and 68 years, and 82.5% (254/308) were female. Respondents completed an online survey. Chi-square analysis and t tests were used to explore group differences, and logistic regression models were employed to explore factors predicting preferences and intentions. Results Most respondents (85.7%, 264/308) preferred face-to-face services over e-mental health services. Relative to preferences, a larger proportion of respondents (39.6%, 122/308) endorsed intentions to use e-mental health services if experiencing mental health difficulties in the future. In terms of the 5 predictor domains, 95% CIs of odds ratios (OR) derived from bootstrapped standard errors suggested that prior experience with online services significantly predicted intentions to use self-help (95% CI 2.08-16.24) and therapist-assisted (95% CI 1.71-11.90) online services in future. Being older predicted increased intentions to use therapist-assisted online services in future (95% CI 1.01-1.06), as did more confidence using computers and the Internet (95% CI 1.06-2.69). Technology confidence was also found to predict greater preference for online services versus face-to-face options (95% CI 1.24-4.82), whereas higher doctor-related locus of control, or LOC (95% CI 0.76-0.95), and extraversion (95% CI 0.88-1.00) were predictive of lower likelihood of preferring online services relative to face-to-face services. Conclusions Despite generally low reported preferences toward e-mental health services, intentions to access these services are higher, raising the question of how to best encourage translation of intentions into behavior (ie, actual use of programs). Strategies designed to ease people into new Internet-based mental health programs (to enhance confidence and familiarity) may be important for increasing the likelihood that they will return to such programs later.


Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 2018

Can the Perceived Barriers to Psychological Treatment Scale be used to investigate treatment barriers among females with disordered and non-disordered eating behaviours?

Natasha T. Innes; Bonnie A. Clough; Jamin J. Day; Leanne Michelle Casey

There is a lack of psychometrically sound instruments to assess treatment barriers among individuals with disordered eating behaviours. This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Perceived Barriers to Psychological Treatment scale (PBPT; Mohr et al., 2010) among a sample of individuals with disordered eating behaviours. Participants were 708 females aged 14 years and older who completed an online survey. The sample was randomly divided in two for the conduct of exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses. EFA suggested a seven-factor structure retaining 24 of the original 27 items (variance explained = 60%, α = 0.91). Factors were stigma, participation restrictions, negative evaluation of treatment, lack of motivation, emotional concerns, access restrictions, and time constraints. To assess clinical sensitivity, we conducted a secondary EFA utilising only clinical cases from this sample, which supported the solution but suggested retaining 25 of the original 27 items (variance explained = 58%, α = 0.89). The 25-item, seven-factor solution was further supported by CFA with an independent sample. Construct validity was also supported. The study suggests that the instrument will provide clinicians and researchers with a valid and reliable method of assessing treatment barriers in disordered eating samples.


Jmir mhealth and uhealth | 2018

The Interactive Child Distress Screener: Development and Preliminary Feasibility Testing

Sonja March; Jamin J. Day; Kirsty Zieschank; Michael J. Ireland

Background Early identification of child emotional and behavioral concerns is essential for the prevention of mental health problems; however, few suitable child-reported screening measures are available. Digital tools offer an exciting opportunity for obtaining clinical information from the child’s perspective. Objective The aim of this study was to describe the initial development and pilot testing of the Interactive Child Distress Screener (ICDS). The ICDS is a Web-based screening instrument for the early identification of emotional and behavioral problems in children aged between 5 and 12 years. Methods This paper utilized a mixed-methods approach to (1) develop and refine item content using an expert review process (study 1) and (2) develop and refine prototype animations and an app interface using codesign with child users (study 2). Study 1 involved an iterative process that comprised the following four steps: (1) the initial development of target constructs, (2) preliminary content validation (face validity, item importance, and suitability for animation) from an expert panel of researchers and psychologists (N=9), (3) item refinement, and (4) a follow-up validation with the same expert panel. Study 2 also comprised four steps, which are as follows: (1) the development of prototype animations, (2) the development of the app interface and a response format, (3) child interviews to determine feasibility and obtain feedback, and (4) refinement of animations and interface. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 18 children aged between 4 and 12 years who tested 3 prototype animated items. Children were asked to describe the target behavior, how well the animations captured the intended behavior, and provide suggestions for improvement. Their ability to understand the wording of instructions was also assessed, as well as the general acceptability of character and sound design. Results In study 1, a revised list of 15 constructs was generated from the first and second round of expert feedback. These were rated highly in terms of importance (mean 6.32, SD 0.42) and perceived compatibility of items (mean 6.41, SD 0.45) on a 7-point scale. In study 2, overall feedback regarding the character design and sounds was positive. Children’s ability to understand intended behaviors varied according to target items, and feedback highlighted key objectives for improvements such as adding contextual cues or improving character detail. These design changes were incorporated through an iterative process, with examples presented. Conclusions The ICDS has potential to obtain clinical information from the child’s perspective that may otherwise be overlooked. If effective, the ICDS will provide a quick, engaging, and easy-to-use screener that can be utilized in routine care settings. This project highlights the importance of involving an expert review and user codesign in the development of digital assessment tools for children.


Behavior Therapy | 2018

Do Parents Benefit From Help When Completing a Self-Guided Parenting Program Online? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Triple P Online With and Without Telephone Support

Jamin J. Day; Matthew R. Sanders

In response to recent increases in the dissemination of Web-based parenting supports, an important consideration is whether the core benefits of self-directed participation in online parenting interventions are counterbalanced by issues such as high dropout and noncompletion rates commonly reported within the Internet intervention literature. This study outlines a randomized controlled trial of Triple P Online, a Web-based variant of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program, delivered with varied levels of support scaffolding. Participants were 183 parents of children between 1 and 8 years of age with concerns about their childs behavior and at least one area of disadvantage or family difficulty. Participants were randomized to self-directed Triple P Online, telephone-supported Triple P Online, or a wait-list control. Primary outcomes measured at baseline, postintervention, and 5-month follow-up were negative parenting styles and child behavior problems. Secondary outcomes included parent confidence, anger, and adjustment; relationship quality; program engagement; and parent satisfaction. Self-directed participants showed short-term treatment effects, including reductions in overall negative parenting and frequency of child behavior problems, while practitioner support led to greater improvements in negative parenting and intensity of difficult child behaviors. Participants in the supported condition were also more likely to complete modules and reported greater program satisfaction. At follow-up, 50% of outcomes for the self-directed condition were significantly better than the control, while 94% of outcomes were significantly better than the control in the practitioner-supported condition. Although self-directed online approaches to parenting intervention are promising, this research highlights how minimal support can improve effective engagement and enhance outcomes for families.


Couple and Family Psychology | 2017

Mediators of parenting change within a web-based parenting program: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of Triple P Online.

Jamin J. Day; Matthew R. Sanders

Many parents now use the Internet as a preferred method of accessing parenting information and support. Evidence-based behavioral parenting programs are well-suited to online delivery and have demonstrated efficacy through numerous randomized controlled trials, with parenting outcomes enhanced relative to self-directed treatment through professional support. However, more work is needed to better understand how we can maximize treatment effects and ensure users are provided with a minimally sufficient level of support. Developing a clearer understanding of the pathways of change is an important step toward this goal. In this study, we used path analysis to examine whether measurable and modifiable factors such as a parent’s initial level of distress can predict response to online treatment both with and without professional support, and explored its impact on the putative mediating pathway of self-efficacy as a key mechanism of reductions in negative parenting. Finally, we examined the hypothesis that professional consultations were primarily responsible for improving outcomes through increasing program engagement, likely due to added accountability and its impact on motivation. Hypotheses were partially supported, showing that self-efficacy was associated with the treatment → negative parenting pathway when parents were provided with professional support, whereas in the absence of support, this pathway was disrupted for parents experiencing high levels of distress before treatment. Additionally, a plausible model was developed showing that telephone consultations influenced program engagement, but had additional effects on negative parenting not explained by the online modules alone. Clinical implications for the online delivery of parenting programs are discussed.


Personality and Individual Differences | 2017

The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: Factorial, convergent, and criterion validity analyses of the full and short versions

Michael J. Ireland; Bonnie A. Clough; Jamin J. Day


Journal of Gambling Studies | 2017

Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Leanne Michelle Casey; Tian P. S. Oei; Namrata Raylu; Katherine Horrigan; Jamin J. Day; Michael J. Ireland; Bonnie A. Clough


Clinical Psychology Review | 2014

Erratum to “The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support” [CPR (2014) 337–357]

Matthew R. Sanders; James N. Kirby; Cassandra L. Tellegen; Jamin J. Day


Archive | 2016

Telephone-supported versus self-directed delivery of an online parenting program: Outcomes, mediators and moderators of change

Jamin J. Day

Collaboration


Dive into the Jamin J. Day's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Ireland

University of Southern Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James N. Kirby

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kate Sofronoff

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sonja March

University of Southern Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arlen Rowe

University of Southern Queensland

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge