Jan C. Diephuis

Intraoperative High-Dose Dexamethasone for Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Prophylactic corticosteroids are often administered during cardiac surgery to attenuate the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass and surgical trauma; however, evidence that routine corticosteroid use can prevent major adverse events is lacking. OBJECTIVE To quantify the effect of intraoperative high-dose dexamethasone on the incidence of major adverse events in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 4494 patients aged 18 years or older undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at 8 cardiac surgical centers in The Netherlands enrolled between April 13, 2006, and November 23, 2011. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single intraoperative dose of 1 mg/kg dexamethasone (n = 2239) or placebo (n = 2255). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, or respiratory failure, within 30 days of randomization. RESULTS Of the 4494 patients who underwent randomization, 4482 (99.7%) could be evaluated for the primary outcome. A total of 157 patients (7.0%) in the dexamethasone group and 191 patients (8.5%) in the placebo group reached the primary study end point (relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.01; absolute risk reduction, -1.5%; 95% CI, -3.0% to 0.1%; P = .07). Dexamethasone was associated with reductions in postoperative infection, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, and lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays. In contrast, dexamethasone was associated with higher postoperative glucose levels. CONCLUSION In our trial of adults undergoing cardiac surgery, the use of intraoperative dexamethasone did not reduce the 30-day incidence of major adverse events compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00293592.

Randomized Comparison Between Stenting and Off-Pump Bypass Surgery in Patients Referred for Angioplasty

Background—Stenting improves cardiac outcome in comparison with balloon angioplasty. Compared with conventional surgery, off-pump bypass surgery on the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass may reduce morbidity, hospital stay, and costs. The purpose, therefore, was to compare cardiac outcome, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness 1 year after stenting and after off-pump surgery. Methods and Results—Patients referred for angioplasty (n=280) were randomly assigned to stenting (n=138) or off-pump bypass surgery. At 1 year, survival free from stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization was 85.5% after stenting and 91.5% after off-pump surgery (relative risk, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.02). Freedom from angina was 78.3% after stenting and 87.0% after off-pump surgery (P =0.06). Quality-adjusted lifetime was 0.82 year after stenting and 0.79 year after off-pump surgery (P =0.09). Hospital stay after the initial procedure was 1.43 and 5.77 days, respectively (P <0.01). Stenting reduced overall costs by

Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial

2933 (26.2%) per patient (

The Octopus Study: Rationale and Design of Two Randomized Trials on Medical Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Bypass Surgery on the Beating Heart

8276 versus

Role of Coronary Collaterals in Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery

11 209; P <0.01). Stenting was more cost-effective in 95% of the bootstrap estimates. Conclusions—At 1 year, stenting was more cost-effective than off-pump surgery while maintaining comparable cardiac outcome and quality of life. Stenting rather than off-pump surgery, therefore, can be recommended as a first-choice revascularization strategy in selected patients.

Intraoperative High-Dose Dexamethasone and Severe AKI after Cardiac Surgery

Background:The addition of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) to general anesthesia (GA) during cardiac surgery may have a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes. TEA in cardiac surgery, however, is controversial because the insertion of an epidural catheter in patients requiring full heparinization for cardiopulmonary bypass may lead to an epidural hematoma. The clinical effects of fast-track GA plus TEA were compared with those of with fast-track GA alone. Methods:A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 654 elective cardiac surgical patients who were randomly assigned to combined GA and TEA versus GA alone. Follow-up was at 30 days and 1 yr after surgery. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival free from myocardial infarction, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and stroke. Results:Thirty-day survival free from myocardial infarction, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and stroke was 85.2% in the TEA group and 89.7% in the GA group (P = 0.23). At 1 yr follow-up, survival free from myocardial infarction, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and stroke was 84.6% in the TEA group and 87.2% in the GA group (P = 0.42). Postoperative pain scores were low in both groups. Conclusions:This study was unable to demonstrate a clinically relevant benefit of TEA on the frequency of major complications after elective cardiac surgery, compared with fast-track cardiac anesthesia without epidural anesthesia. Given the potentially devastating complications of an epidural hematoma after insertion of an epidural catheter, it is questionable whether this procedure should be applied routinely in cardiac surgical patients who require full heparinization.

Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation

The Octopus Study consists of two multicenter randomized clinical trials in which coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart (off-pump CABG) using the Utrecht Octopus Method is compared to intracoronary stent implantation and conventional CABG. The primary endpoint in the comparison of off-pump CABG versus stent implantation (OctoStent Trial) is medical effectiveness (i.e., absence of reintervention and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 1 year after treatment). The primary endpoint in the comparison of off-pump CABG versus conventional CABG (OctoPump Trial) is cerebral safety (i.e., absence of cognitive deficits and cerebrovascular events at 3 months after treatment). Secondary endpoints in both trials include presence and severity of angina, quality of life, exercise capacity, and cost-effectiveness. A total of 560 patients will be enrolled. A random sample of 210 patients will undergo repeat angiography at 1 year to assess angiographic restenosis rate and graft patency. Including 1-year follow-up, the study will last for 3 years. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:595-609

Cerebral Oxygen Extraction and Autoregulation during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia in Humans

Background—Collaterals limit infarct size, preserve viability, and reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. In patients with stable coronary disease, collaterals are associated with less angina and ischemia during angioplasty and fewer ischemic events during follow-up. The role of collaterals has not been studied in patients undergoing off-pump or on-pump bypass surgery. Methods and Results—The population consisted of the 281 patients randomized to off-pump or on-pump CABG in the Octopus Study. Collaterals were defined on the baseline angiogram with the Rentrop score and were present in 49% and 51% of the patients in the off-pump and on-pump group, respectively. Perioperative myocardial infarction was defined by a creatine kinase-MB to CK ratio >10% and occurred in 18.2% in the off-pump group and 32.5% in the on-pump group. The unadjusted OR of perioperative myocardial infarction in the presence of collaterals was 0.31 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.84) in the off-pump group and 1.06 (95% CI 0.29 to 3.85) in the on-pump group After adjustment for age, gender, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, multivessel disease, ventricular dysfunction, incomplete revascularization, and ischemic time, the OR was 0.34 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.84) in the off-pump group and 1.28 (95% CI 0.30 to 5.40) in the on-pump group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival at 1 year were 87% in patients with and 69% in those without collaterals after off-pump CABG. These estimates were 66% and 63%, respectively, after on-pump CABG. Conclusions—Collaterals protect against perioperative myocardial infarction during off-pump surgery but not during on-pump surgery and are associated with a better 1-year event-free survival.

Beating heart versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass: the octopus experience: a randomized comparison of 281 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Administration of prophylactic glucocorticoids has been suggested as a strategy to reduce postoperative AKI and other adverse events after cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. In this post hoc analysis of a large placebo-controlled randomized trial of dexamethasone in 4465 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery, we examined severe AKI, defined as use of RRT, as a primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were doubling of serum creatinine level or AKI-RRT, as well as AKI-RRT or in-hospital mortality (RRT/death). The primary outcome occurred in ten patients (0.4%) in the dexamethasone group and in 23 patients (1.0%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.96). In stratified analyses, the strongest signal for potential benefit of dexamethasone was in patients with an eGFR<15 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). In conclusion, compared with placebo, intraoperative dexamethasone appeared to reduce the incidence of severe AKI after cardiac surgery in those with advanced CKD.

Intraoperative High-Dose Dexamethasone in Cardiac Surgery and the Risk of Rethoracotomy

BACKGROUND Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery. Inflammation is believed to play a pivotal role in the etiology of postoperative AF. There is a suggestion from small studies that perioperative treatment with corticosteroids may reduce postoperative AF. The DExamethasone for Cardiac Surgery (DECS) study was a large randomized trial showing no protective effect of dexamethasone on major adverse events. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dexamethasone treatment on the occurrence of AF after cardiac surgery. METHODS The DECS study compared intra-operative dexamethasone (1mg/kg) or placebo treatment in 4494 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. AF was defined by the occurrence of any reported AF within 30days after surgery. We also performed an in-depth analysis of a subset of 1565 patients on new-onset AF. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS The incidence of any AF in the main study of 4494 patients was 33.1% in the dexamethasone and 35.2% in the placebo group (RR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.87-1.02, p=0.14). In the substudy of 1565 patients, the incidence of new-onset AF was 33.0% vs. 35.5% (RR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07, p=0.31), respectively. There was no protective effect of dexamethasone across clinically important patient subgroups. CONCLUSION Intraoperative administration of dexamethasone had no protective effect on the occurrence of any or new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Therefore, the use of dexamethasone for the reduction of postoperative AF should not be recommended.