Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jan J. Heimans is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jan J. Heimans.


The Lancet | 2002

Effect of radiotherapy and other treatment-related factors on mid-term to long-term cognitive sequelae in low-grade gliomas : a comparative study

Martin Klein; Jan J. Heimans; Neil K. Aaronson; H.M. van der Ploeg; J Grit; Marco Müller; T.J. Postma; Jacob J Mooij; Rudolf H. Boerman; Guus Beute; Gj Ossenkoppele; van Gustaaf Imhoff; Aw Dekker; J. Jolles; Ben J. Slotman; H Struikmans; Mjb Taphoorn

BACKGROUND Because survival benefits of treatment with radiotherapy are questionable and such treatment can cause substantial damage to the brain over time, the optimum management strategy for low-grade gliomas remains controversial. We aimed to identify the specific effects of radiotherapy on objective and self-reported cognitive function, and on cognitive deterioration over time, in patients with low-grade gliomas treated with early radiotherapy. METHODS 195 patients with low-grade glioma (of whom 104 had received radiotherapy 1-22 years previously) were compared with 100 low-grade haematological patients and 195 healthy controls. Our analyses aimed to differentiate between the effects of the tumour (eg, disease duration, lateralisation) and treatment effects (neurosurgery, radiotherapy, antiepileptic drugs) on cognitive function and on relative risk of cognitive disability. FINDINGS Low-grade glioma patients had lower ability in all cognitive domains than did low-grade haematological patients, and did even less well by comparison with healthy controls. Use of radiotherapy was associated with poorer cognitive function; however, cognitive disability in the memory domain was found only in radiotherapy patients who received fraction doses exceeding 2 Gy. Antiepileptic drug use was strongly associated with disability in attentional and executive function. INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that the tumour itself has the most deleterious effect on cognitive function and that radiotherapy mainly results in additional long-term cognitive disability when high fraction doses are used. Additionally, the effects of other medical factors, especially antiepileptic drug use, on cognitive function in glioma patients deserve attention.


Lancet Neurology | 2009

Cognitive and radiological effects of radiotherapy in patients with low-grade glioma : long-term follow-up

Linda Douw; Martin Klein; Selene Saa Fagel; Josje van den Heuvel; Martin J. B. Taphoorn; Neil K. Aaronson; Tjeerd J. Postma; W. Peter Vandertop; Jacob J Mooij; Rudolf H. Boerman; G.N. Beute; J.D. Sluimer; Ben J. Slotman; Jaap C. Reijneveld; Jan J. Heimans

BACKGROUND Our previous study on cognitive functioning among 195 patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) a mean of 6 years after diagnosis suggested that the tumour itself, rather than the radiotherapy used to treat it, has the most deleterious effect on cognitive functioning; only high fraction dose radiotherapy (>2 Gy) resulted in significant added cognitive deterioration. The present study assesses the radiological and cognitive abnormalities in survivors of LGG at a mean of 12 years after first diagnosis. METHODS Patients who have had stable disease since the first assessment were invited for follow-up cognitive assessment (letter-digit substitution test, concept shifting test, Stroop colour-word test, visual verbal learning test, memory comparison test, and categoric word fluency). Compound scores in six cognitive domains (attention, executive functioning, verbal memory, working memory, psychomotor functioning, and information processing speed) were calculated to detect differences between patients who had radiotherapy and patients who did not have radiotherapy. White-matter hyperintensities and global cortical atrophy were rated on MRI scans. FINDINGS 65 patients completed neuropsychological follow-up at a mean of 12 years (range 6-28 years). 32 (49%) patients had received radiotherapy (three had fraction doses >2 Gy). The patients who had radiotherapy had more deficits that affected attentional functioning at the second follow-up, regardless of fraction dose, than those who did not have radiotherapy (-1.6 [SD 2.4] vs -0.1 [1.3], p=0.003; mean difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.5-2.4). The patients who had radiotherapy also did worse in measures of executive functioning (-2.0 [3.7] vs -0.5 [1.2], p=0.03; mean difference 1.5, 0.2-2.9) and information processing speed (-2.0 [3.7] vs -0.6 [1.5], p=0.05; mean difference 0.8, 0.009-1.6]) between the two assessments. Furthermore, attentional functioning deteriorated significantly between the first and second assessments in patients who had radiotherapy (p=0.25). In total, 17 (53%) patients who had radiotherapy developed cognitive disabilities deficits in at least five of 18 neuropsychological test parameters compared with four (27%) patients who were radiotherapy naive. White-matter hyperintensities and global cortical atrophy were associated with worse cognitive functioning in several domains. INTERPRETATION Long-term survivors of LGG who did not have radiotherapy had stable radiological and cognitive status. By contrast, patients with low-grade glioma who received radiotherapy showed a progressive decline in attentional functioning, even those who received fraction doses that are regarded as safe (</=2 Gy). These cognitive deficits are associated with radiological abnormalities. Our results suggest that the risk of long-term cognitive and radiological compromise that is associated with radiotherapy should be considered when treatment is planned. FUNDING Kaptein Fonds; Schering Plough.


Drugs | 2003

Neurotoxic complications of chemotherapy in patients with cancer: clinical signs and optimal management.

Carla C.P. Verstappen; Jan J. Heimans; Klaas Hoekman; T.J. Postma

Neurotoxic side effects of chemotherapy occur frequently and are often a reason to limit the dose of chemotherapy. Since bone marrow toxicity, as the major limiting factor in most chemotherapeutic regimens, can be overcome with growth factors or bone marrow transplantation, the use of higher doses of chemotherapy is possible, which increases the risk of neurotoxicity.Chemotherapy may cause both peripheral neurotoxicity, consisting mainly of a peripheral neuropathy, and central neurotoxicity, ranging from minor cognitive deficits to encephalopathy with dementia or even coma.In this article we describe the neurological adverse effects of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents.The vinca-alkaloids, cisplatin and the taxanes are amongst the most important drugs inducing peripheral neurotoxicity. These drugs are widely used for various malignancies such as ovarian and breast cancer, and haematological cancers. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy is clearly related to cumulative dose or dose-intensities. Patients who already have neuropathic symptoms due to diabetes mellitus, hereditary neuropathies or earlier treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy are thought to be more vulnerable for the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.Methotrexate, cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside) and ifosfamide are primarily known for their central neurotoxic side effects. Central neurotoxicity ranges from acute toxicity such as aseptic meningitis, to delayed toxicities comprising cognitive deficits, hemiparesis, aphasia and progressive dementia. Risk factors are high doses, frequent administration and radiotherapy preceding methotrexate chemotherapy, which appears to be more neurotoxic than methotrexate as single modality.Data on management and neuroprotective agents are discussed. Management mainly consists of cumulative dose-reduction or lower dose-intensities, especially in patients who are at higher risk to develop neurotoxic side effects. None of the neuroprotective agents described in this article can be recommended for standard use in daily practise at this moment, and further studies are needed to confirm some of the beneficial effects described.


Annals of Neurology | 2003

Epilepsy in low-grade gliomas: the impact on cognitive function and quality of life.

Martin Klein; Nadine H. J. Engelberts; Henk M. van der Ploeg; Dorothée Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité; Neil K. Aaronson; Martin J. B. Taphoorn; Hans Baaijen; W. Peter Vandertop; Martin J. Muller; Tjeerd J. Postma; Jan J. Heimans

Low‐grade gliomas frequently are associated with epilepsy. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of epilepsy and antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment on cognitive functioning and health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in these patients. One hundred fifty‐six patients without clinical or radiological signs of tumor recurrence for at least 1 year after histological diagnosis and with an epilepsy burden (based on seizure frequency and AED use) ranging from none to severe were compared with healthy controls. The association between epilepsy burden and cognition/HRQOL was also investigated. Eighty‐six percent of the patients had epilepsy and 50% of those using AEDs actually were seizure‐free. Compared with healthy controls, glioma patients had significant reductions in information processing speed, psychomotor function, attentional functioning, verbal and working memory, executive functioning, and HRQOL. The increase in epilepsy burden that was associated with significant reductions in all cognitive domains except for attentional and memory functioning could primarily be attributed to the use of AEDs, whereas the decline in HRQOL could be ascribed to the lack of complete seizure control. In conclusion, low‐grade glioma patients suffer from a number of neuropsychological and psychological problems that are aggravated by the severity of epilepsy and by the intensity of the treatment.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2001

Neurobehavioral Status and Health-Related Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma Patients

Martin Klein; Martin J. B. Taphoorn; Jan J. Heimans; Henk M. van der Ploeg; W. Peter Vandertop; Egbert F. Smit; Sieger Leenstra; Cees A. F. Tulleken; Willem Boogerd; J. Belderbos; Wilmy Cleijne; Neil K. Aaronson

PURPOSE To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cognitive functioning of high-grade glioma patients in the postneurosurgical period. PATIENTS AND METHODS The HRQOL, as assessed by the Short-Form Health Survey-36, tumor-specific symptoms, and objective and subjective neuropsychologic functioning, of 68 newly diagnosed glioma patients were compared with that of 50 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The association between tumor lateralization, extent of resection, and use of medication, and the HRQOL outcomes was also investigated. RESULTS The HRQOL of the two patient groups was similar but significantly lower than that of the healthy controls. Glioma patients reported significantly more neurologic symptoms and poorer objective and subjective neuropsychologic functioning than the NSCLC patients. Using healthy controls as the reference group, cognitive impairment assessed at the individual patient level was observed in all glioma patients and 52% of the NSCLC patients. Poor performance on timed tasks in the glioma group could be attributed, in large part, to visual and motor deficits. Tumor lateralization was found to affect neuropsychologic functioning in a predictable manner. The extent of resection was not related significantly to neuropsychologic functioning. Corticosteroid use was associated with better recognition memory, whereas antiepileptic drug use was correlated negatively with working memory capacity. CONCLUSION The general HRQOL of glioma patients is similar to that of patients with NSCLC. However, they suffer from a number of condition-specific neurologic and neuropsychologic problems that have a significant impact on their daily lives in the postsurgical period, before treatment with radiotherapy.


Neurology | 1998

Response rate and prognostic factors of recurrent oligodendroglioma treated with procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine chemotherapy

M. J. van den Bent; Johan M. Kros; Jan J. Heimans; L. C. Pronk; C.J. van Groeningen; H.G.J. Krouwer; M. J. B. Taphoorn; Bernard A. Zonnenberg; Cees C. Tijssen; A. Twijnstra; Cornelis J. A. Punt; Willem Boogerd

Objectives: To determine the response rate and factors correlated with response of oligodendroglial tumors to procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy. Design: Retrospective, observational multicenter study. Methods: Patients treated with PCV or intensified PCV chemotherapy for a recurrent oligodendroglial tumor after surgery and radiation therapy with measurable disease were retrospectively evaluated for response. A 50% reduction in cross-sectional enhancing tumor area was considered a partial response. Stabilized or responding patients received six cycles of PCV unless unacceptable toxicity occurred. Results: Fifty-two patients were included; median time to progression (MTP) for the entire group was 10 months. In 17% of patients a complete response (MTP, 25 months) was obtained, and in 46% a partial response (MTP, 12 months) was obtained. Median overall survival was 20 months. Although treatment was discontinued for toxicity in seven patients, it was generally well tolerated. The intensified PCV regimen was more toxic. Patients initially presenting with seizures and patients with tumor necrosis in histologic specimens had a better response rate in contrast to patients who had their first relapse within 1 year of first treatment (surgery and radiation therapy). Conclusions: Oligodendroglial tumors are chemosensitive, but most patients will have relapsed after 12 to 16 months. New studies must aim at improving initial treatment and second-line chemotherapy.


Annals of Oncology | 2013

The chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy outcome measures standardization study: from consensus to the first validity and reliability findings

Guido Cavaletti; David R. Cornblath; Ingemar S. J. Merkies; T. J. Postma; Emanuela Rossi; Barbara Frigeni; Paola Alberti; Jordi Bruna; Roser Velasco; Andreas A. Argyriou; H. P. Kalofonos; Dimitri Psimaras; Damien Ricard; Andrea Pace; Edvina Galiè; Chiara Briani; C. Dalla Torre; Catharina G. Faber; R. Lalisang; W. Boogerd; Dieta Brandsma; Susanne Koeppen; J. Hense; Dawn J. Storey; S. Kerrigan; Angelo Schenone; Sabrina Fabbri; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; A. Mazzeo; A. Toscano

BACKGROUND Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and dose-limiting complication of cancer treatment. Thus far, the impact of CIPN has not been studied in a systematic clinimetric manner. The objective of the study was to select outcome measures for CIPN evaluation and to establish their validity and reproducibility in a cross-sectional multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS After literature review and a consensus meeting among experts, face/content validity were obtained for the following selected scales: the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), the Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc), the modified Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group sensory sumscore (mISS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, and CIPN20 quality-of-life measures. A total of 281 patients with stable CIPN were examined. Validity (correlation) and reliability studies were carried out. RESULTS Good inter-/intra-observer scores were obtained for the TNSc, mISS, and NCI-CTC sensory/motor subscales. Test-retest values were also good for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CIPN20. Acceptable validity scores were obtained through the correlation among the measures. CONCLUSION Good validity and reliability scores were demonstrated for the set of selected impairment and quality-of-life outcome measures in CIPN. Future studies are planned to investigate the responsiveness aspects of these measures.BACKGROUND Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and dose-limiting complication of cancer treatment. Thus far, the impact of CIPN has not been studied in a systematic clinimetric manner. The objective of the study was to select outcome measures for CIPN evaluation and to establish their validity and reproducibility in a cross-sectional multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS After literature review and a consensus meeting among experts, face/content validity were obtained for the following selected scales: the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), the Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc), the modified Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group sensory sumscore (mISS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, and CIPN20 quality-of-life measures. A total of 281 patients with stable CIPN were examined. Validity (correlation) and reliability studies were carried out. RESULTS Good inter-/intra-observer scores were obtained for the TNSc, mISS, and NCI-CTC sensory/motor subscales. Test-retest values were also good for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CIPN20. Acceptable validity scores were obtained through the correlation among the measures. CONCLUSION Good validity and reliability scores were demonstrated for the set of selected impairment and quality-of-life outcome measures in CIPN. Future studies are planned to investigate the responsiveness aspects of these measures.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2000

Survival of human glioma cells treated with various combination of temozolomide and X-rays

Johannes van Rijn; Jan J. Heimans; Jaap van den Berg; Paul van der Valk; Ben J. Slotman

PURPOSE To investigate the effect of temozolomide, a 3-methyl derivative of mitozolomide in combination with X-rays in human glioma-derived cell lines. METHODS AND MATERIALS Glioma cell lines D384 and U251 were treated with temozolomide for various periods of time in combinations with X-rays. Temozolomide administration was repeated every 24 h for exposures up to 96 h. Cytotoxicity was determined with a clonogenic assay. RESULTS Incubation of D384 cells with temozolomide during 24 h prior to or following irradiation results in a moderate enhancement of the cytotoxicity. Prolonged treatment with temozolomide, i.e., 48-96 h before X-rays, causes a stronger potentiation. In contrast, no enhancement is observed in irradiated U251 cells in combination with 24-96 h temozolomide treatment. In addition to single-dose irradiation, we investigated the effect of temozolomide in D384 cells with concomitant fractionated irradiation. A 96-h exposure to temozolomide with simultaneous doses of 2 Gy X-rays at 24-h intervals, causes a significant further reduction in cell survival as compared to fractionated irradiation only. CONCLUSION Depending on the cell line, treatment of glioma cells with temozolomide and X-rays can have either an additional effect or potentiate cell killing.


Annals of Neurology | 2006

How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study

Fabrice Bartolomei; Ingeborg Bosma; Martin Klein; Johannes C. Baayen; Jaap C. Reijneveld; T.J. Postma; Jan J. Heimans; Bob W. van Dijk; Jan C. de Munck; Arent de Jongh; Keith S. Cover; Cornelis J. Stam

This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that brain tumors interfere with normal brain function by disrupting functional connectivity of brain networks.


Neurology | 2005

Dose-related vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy with unexpected off-therapy worsening

C. C.P. Verstappen; S. Koeppen; Jan J. Heimans; P. C. Huijgens; M. E. Scheulen; D. Strumberg; B. Kiburg; T. J. Postma

This study describes the natural course of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with lymphoma (n = 114) receiving vincristine in two different dose intensities. Neuropathic changes were observed in both dose intensity groups, but the higher dose intensity group reported significantly more symptoms during therapy, whereas neurologic signs were significantly more prominent after a cumulative dose of 12 mg vincristine. Furthermore, off-therapy worsening of symptoms (24%) and signs (30%) occurred unexpectedly.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jan J. Heimans's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jaap C. Reijneveld

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Klein

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tjeerd J. Postma

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin J. B. Taphoorn

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda Douw

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. J. B. Taphoorn

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil K. Aaronson

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cornelis J. Stam

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eefje M. Sizoo

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T.J. Postma

VU University Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge