Jan Lycke

Neurofilament light protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biological markers in MS

Objective: To determine if CNS-derived proteins present in the CSF of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients reflect different pathologic processes of MS and if these proteins could be useful as biologic markers of disease activity. Methods: Concentrations of the neurofilament light protein (NFL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100B, and the neuron-specific enolase protein (NSE) were determined in the CSF of 66 MS patients and 50 healthy control subjects with immunoassays. Results: The mean levels of the NFL were increased during all stages of MS compared with controls (p < 0.001), peaking almost 10 times higher during acute relapses. The highest levels of GFAP were found during the secondary progressive course (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation with neurologic deficits (Expanded Disability Status Scale score, r = 0.73, p < 0.001). No increase of S100B or NSE protein was found in the CSF of MS patients compared with control subjects. Conclusions: Increased level of NFL is a general feature of MS, indicating continuous axonal damage during the entire course of the disease with the most profound damage during acute relapses. GFAP may serve as a biomarker for disease progression, probably reflecting the increasing rate of astrogliosis.

Axonal damage in relapsing multiple sclerosis is markedly reduced by natalizumab

The impact of present disease‐modifying treatments (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) on nerve injury and reactive astrogliosis is still unclear. Therefore, we studied the effect of natalizumab treatment on the release of 2 brain‐specific tissue damage markers into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in MS patients.

Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a potential marker of activity in multiple sclerosis

The neurofilament protein is a major structural protein of neurons and a marker for axonal damage. The concentrations of the light subunit of the neurofilament triplet protein (NFL) in CSF were significantly increased in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis compared with healthy controls (p<0.001). Seventy eight per cent of patients with multiple sclerosis showed increased NFL concentrations. Significant correlations between the NFL concentration in CSF and clinical indices were discerned for disability, exacerbation rate, and time from the start of the previous exacerbation to the time of the lumbar puncture. The results suggest that axonal damage occurs during relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and that the damage contributes to disability and the appearance of clinical exacerbations. The concentration of NFL in CSF is a potential marker of disease activity in multiple sclerosis and might be useful in future clinical trials of multiple sclerosis.

Glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF of multiple sclerosis patients: relation to neurological deficit

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAp) was analysed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls. Patients with relapsing-remitting course (n = 13) were followed with quantitative neurological examinations and lumbar punctures during a 24-month period. The patient group was a subsample from a randomised, double-blind clinical trial of acyclovir on MS: 7 patients were treated with acyclovir and 6 were placebo controls. CSF was also collected from 5 age-matched healthy individuals with normal quantitative neurological examinations. The CSF assays disclosed increased concentrations of GFAp in MS patients compared to controls (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the GFAp levels correlated significantly with the deficit score (p < 0.01) but not with exacerbation frequency. When the group treated with acyclovir was compared with the placebo group, no significant change of CSF GFAp was observed. In the present study we show that GFAp is increased in CSF of patients with MS and that the levels correlate with the neurological dysfunction. Further work is needed to ascertain whether determinations of CSF GFAp can be used to monitor disease progression in MS or whether the assay may be useful to evaluate therapeutic intervention.

Simvastatin as add-on therapy to interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (SIMCOMBIN study): a placebo-controlled randomised phase 4 trial

BACKGROUND Treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with interferon beta is only partly effective. We aimed to establish whether add-on of simvastatin, a statin with anti-inflammatory properties, improves this efficacy. METHODS We enrolled treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group trial of simvastatin (80 mg daily) as add-on treatment to intramuscular interferon beta-1a (30 μg weekly). After starting treatment with interferon beta, patients were randomly assigned (in computer-generated blocks of four patients) to simvastatin 80 mg per day or placebo for 1-3 years. Patients and treating and evaluating physicians were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was annual rate of documented relapses; analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00492765. FINDINGS We randomly assigned 307 patients to interferon beta plus simvastatin (n=151) or plus placebo (n=156). Annual rate of documented relapses was 0·19 (95% CI 0·13 to 0·28) in the simvastatin group and 0·14 (95% CI 0·09 to 0·23) in the placebo group (absolute difference 0·059, 95% CI -0·21 to 0·09; p=0·35). Time to first documented relapse (20th percentile) was 18·1 months in patients on simvastatin and 21·5 months in those on placebo (hazard ratio 1·21, 95% CI 0·74 to 1·99; p=0·51). Mean number of new or enlarging T2 lesions was 2·96 in the simvastatin group and 2·52 in the placebo group (ratio of new lesions, 1·17, 95% CI 8·89 to 1·55; p=0·25). Eight (6%) patients on simvastatin and 17 (13%) on placebo had no disease activity (odds ratio 0·42, 95% CI 0·17 to 1·00; p=0·05). No unexpected adverse events were seen. Generally, adverse events were mild and there were no group differences in infections or musculoskeletal disorders, including myalgia (five [3%] patients on simvastatin and nine [6%] on placebo). Rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuria were not reported and there were no differences in serum creatine phosphokinase. INTERPRETATION We found no beneficial effect of simvastatin as add-on therapy to interferon beta-1a. Although unlikely, we can not exclude that combination of other statins with other disease-modifying drugs still could be beneficial. FUNDING Biogen Idec.

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for aggressive multiple sclerosis: the Swedish experience

Background Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a viable option for treatment of aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS). No randomised controlled trial has been performed, and thus, experiences from systematic and sustained follow-up of treated patients constitute important information about safety and efficacy. In this observational study, we describe the characteristics and outcome of the Swedish patients treated with HSCT for MS. Methods Neurologists from the major hospitals in Sweden filled out a follow-up form with prospectively collected data. Fifty-two patients were identified in total; 48 were included in the study and evaluated for safety and side effects; 41 patients had at least 1 year of follow-up and were further analysed for clinical and radiological outcome. In this cohort, 34 patients (83%) had relapsing-remitting MS, and mean follow-up time was 47 months. Results At 5 years, relapse-free survival was 87%; MRI event-free survival 85%; expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score progression-free survival 77%; and disease-free survival (no relapses, no new MRI lesions and no EDSS progression) 68%. Presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions prior to HSCT was associated with a favourable outcome (disease-free survival 79% vs 46%, p=0.028). There was no mortality. The most common long-term side effects were herpes zoster reactivation (15%) and thyroid disease (8.4%). Conclusions HSCT is a very effective treatment of inflammatory active MS and can be performed with a high degree of safety at experienced centres.

IL-6 and CCL2 levels in CSF are associated with the clinical course of MS : Implications for their possible immunopathogenic roles

Biological markers would provide valuable tools for tracking disease activity, immunopathological processes or therapeutic efficacy in MS. In this study we analysed a panel of Th(1)/Th(2) cytokines and the chemokine CCL2 in serum and CSF from MS patients and healthy controls. Increased levels of IL-6 (p<0.05) and decreased levels of CCL2 (p<0.001), with the lowest levels during acute relapses, was found in CSF from patients with relapsing-remitting MS. CSF levels of CCL2 correlated with indices for intrathecal IgG production and the CSF level of the neurofilament light protein, a marker for axonal damage, indicating a immunopathogenic role for CCL2.

Relapses in multiple sclerosis are associated with increased CD8+ T-cell mediated cytotoxicity in CSF

MS is thought to be mediated by CD4(+) T-helper cells. To investigate the importance of CD8(+) cytotoxic T-cells in MS we analyzed peripheral blood T-cells by DNA microarray, and plasma and CSF levels of granzymes from MS patients and controls. Cytotoxic gene expression was decreased in peripheral T-cells from RRMS patients whereas plasma levels of granzymes were unchanged. However, granzyme levels were elevated in the CSF of RRMS patients at relapse compared with controls and remission. Thus, CD8+ T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity is confined to the CSF/CNS compartment in RRMS patients and may be involved in the immunopathogenesis of clinical relapses.

Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs

Background: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). Objective: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first generation disease modifying drugs (DMDs), and a historical control cohort. Methods: We included a cohort of contemporary RRMS patients treated with DMDs, obtained from the Swedish National MS Registry (disease onset between 1995–2004, n = 730) and a historical population-based incidence cohort (onset 1950–64, n = 186). We retrospectively analyzed the difference in time to SP, termed the “period effect” within a 12-year survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: We found that the “period” affected the entire severity spectrum. After adjusting for onset features, which were weaker in the contemporary material, as well as the therapy initiation time, the DMD-treated patients still exhibited a longer time to SP than the controls (hazard ratios: men, 0.32; women, 0.53). Conclusion: Our results showed there was a longer time to SP in the contemporary subjects given DMD. Our analyses suggested that this effect was not solely driven by the inclusion of benign cases, and it was at least partly due to the long-term immunomodulating therapy given.

Monoclonal antibody therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: differentiating mechanisms and clinical outcomes:

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) target immune cells or other molecules involved in pathogenic pathways with extraordinary specificity. Natalizumab and alemtuzumab are the only two currently approved mAbs for the treatment of MS, having demonstrated significant reduction in clinical and magnetic resonance imaging disease activity and disability in clinical studies. Ocrelizumab and daclizumab are in the late stages of phase III trials, and several other mAbs are in the early stages of clinical evaluation. mAbs have distinct structural characteristics (e.g. chimeric, humanized, fully human) and unique targets (e.g. blocking interactions, induction of signal transduction by receptor binding, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity) conferring different mechanisms of action in MS. Because of these differences, mAbs for MS do not constitute a single treatment class; each must be considered individually when selecting appropriate therapy. Furthermore, in reviewing the data from clinical studies of mAbs, attention should be drawn to use of different comparators (e.g. placebo or interferon β-1a) and study designs. Each mAb treatment has a unique administration schedule. In the decision to select the appropriate treatment for each individual MS patient, careful review of the benefits relative to risks of mAbs is balanced against the risk of development of MS-associated disability.