Jan Oldenburg
University of Oslo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jan Oldenburg.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2003
Jan Oldenburg; G. Cecilie Alfsen; Hans H. Lien; Nina Aass; Håkon Wæhre; Sophie D. Fosså
PURPOSE To determine preoperative parameters that predict the histology of specimens obtained by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell cancer (NSGCT) whose residual mass was </= 20 mm in diameter after modern cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-seven patients with metastatic NSGCT underwent RPLND after having received cisplatin- or carboplatin-based induction chemotherapy. In all patients, the largest diameter of the residual mass on the transaxial plane was </= 20 mm, as assessed by abdominal computed tomography (CT) immediately before RPLND. RESULTS Complete fibrosis or necrosis was found in 58 patients (67%), teratoma was found in 23 patients (26%), and vital malignant germ cell tumor was found in six patients (7%), including one patient with rhabdomyosarcoma in the RPLND specimen. In five of the six latter patients, the residual lesion was </= 10 mm at pre-RPLND CT. No pre- or postchemotherapy clinical or radiologic parameter was identified that significantly predicted the histology of the residual mass. CONCLUSION One third of retroperitoneal postchemotherapy lesions </= 20 mm contained residual vital tumor tissue, despite modern chemotherapy regimens. Therefore, postchemotherapy RPLND remains necessary in patients with minimal-size residual lesions to facilitate easy and safe follow-up and initiate additional therapy as early as possible, thus avoiding recurrences.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2010
Lois B. Travis; Clair J. Beard; James M. Allan; Alv A. Dahl; Darren R. Feldman; Jan Oldenburg; Gedske Daugaard; Jennifer L. Kelly; M. Eileen Dolan; Robyn Hannigan; Louis S. Constine; Kevin C. Oeffinger; Paul Okunieff; G. T. Armstrong; David Wiljer; Robert C. Miller; Jourik A. Gietema; Flora E. van Leeuwen; Jacqueline P. Williams; Craig R. Nichols; Lawrence H. Einhorn; Sophie D. Fosså
Testicular cancer represents the most curable solid tumor, with a 10-year survival rate of more than 95%. Given the young average age at diagnosis, it is estimated that effective treatment approaches, in particular, platinum-based chemotherapy, have resulted in an average gain of several decades of life. This success, however, is offset by the emergence of considerable long-term morbidity, including second malignant neoplasms, cardiovascular disease, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, hypogonadism, decreased fertility, and psychosocial problems. Data on underlying genetic or molecular factors that might identify those patients at highest risk for late sequelae are sparse. Genome-wide association studies and other translational molecular approaches now provide opportunities to identify testicular cancer survivors at greatest risk for therapy-related complications to develop evidence-based long-term follow-up guidelines and interventional strategies. We review research priorities identified during an international workshop devoted to testicular cancer survivors. Recommendations include 1) institution of lifelong follow-up of testicular cancer survivors within a large cohort setting to ascertain risks of emerging toxicities and the evolution of known late sequelae, 2) development of comprehensive risk prediction models that include treatment factors and genetic modifiers of late sequelae, 3) elucidation of the effect(s) of decades-long exposure to low serum levels of platinum, 4) assessment of the overall burden of medical and psychosocial morbidity, and 5) the eventual formulation of evidence-based long-term follow-up guidelines and interventions. Just as testicular cancer once served as the paradigm of a curable malignancy, comprehensive follow-up studies of testicular cancer survivors can pioneer new methodologies in survivorship research for all adult-onset cancer.
Annals of Oncology | 2013
Joerg Beyer; Peter Albers; Renske Altena; Jorge Aparicio; Carsten Bokemeyer; Jonas Busch; Richard Cathomas; Eva Cavallin-Ståhl; Noel W. Clarke; J Claßen; G. Cohn-Cedermark; Alv A. Dahl; Gedske Daugaard; U. De Giorgi; M. De Santis; M. de Wit; R. de Wit; Klaus Peter Dieckmann; Martin Fenner; Karim Fizazi; Aude Flechon; Sophie D. Fosså; J R Germá Lluch; Jourik A. Gietema; Silke Gillessen; A Giwercman; J. T. Hartmann; Axel Heidenreich; Marcus Hentrich; Friedemann Honecker
In November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377–1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478–496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497–513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, ∼50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007
Jan Oldenburg; Sigrid Marie Kraggerud; Milada Cvancarova; Ragnhild A. Lothe; Sophie D. Fosså
PURPOSE Cisplatin, a cornerstone of combination chemotherapy in the treatment of testicular cancer, induces hearing impairment with considerable interindividual variations. These differences might be a result of functional polymorphisms in cisplatin-detoxifying enzymes like glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified 173 cisplatin-treated testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) who had participated in a long-term survey that included audiometric testing and lymphocyte sampling. The hearing decibel thresholds at 4,000 Hz were categorized into leveled scales by normative decibel percentiles. Known functional polymorphisms (positive or negative) in GSTT1 and GSTM1 and codon 105 A/G (Ile/Val) in GSTP1 were analyzed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction, followed by restriction enzyme cutting, and separated by gel electrophoresis. RESULTS The risk of having an inferior audiometric result was more than four times higher in TCSs with 105Ile/105Ile-GSTP1 or 105Val/105Ile-GSTP1 compared with 105Val/105Val-GSTP1 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.21; 95% CI, 1.99 to 8.88; P < .001 when modeled by ordinal logistic regression [OLR]). GSTM1 positivity was detrimental for hearing ability. Two combined genotypes were associated with hearing ability. The presence of pattern 1 (GSTT1 positive, GSTM1 positive, and 105Ile/105Ile-GSTP1) was associated with hearing impairment (OR = 2.76; 95% CI, 1.35 to 5.64; P = .005, OLR). TCSs with pattern 2 (GSTT1 positive, GSTM1 positive, and 105Val/105Val-GSTP1) had better hearing ability than TCSs without this pattern (OR = 5.35; 95% CI, 2.25 to 12.76; P < .001, OLR). CONCLUSION The presence of both alleles of 105Val-GSTP1 offered protection against cisplatin-induced hearing impairment. Two genotype patterns with good and poor protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were identified.
European Urology | 2015
Peter Albers; Walter Albrecht; Ferran Algaba; Carsten Bokemeyer; G. Cohn-Cedermark; Karim Fizazi; A. Horwich; Maria Pilar Laguna; Nicola Nicolai; Jan Oldenburg
CONTEXT This is an update of the previous European Association of Urology testis cancer guidelines published in 2011, which included major changes in the diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumours. OBJECTIVE To summarise latest developments in the treatment of this rare disease. Recommendations have been agreed within a multidisciplinary working group consisting of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A semi-structured literature search up to February 2015 was performed to update the recommendations. In addition, this document was subjected to double-blind peer review before publication. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS This publication focuses on the most important changes in treatment recommendations for clinical stage I disease and the updated recommendations for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Most changes in the recommendations will lead to an overall reduction in treatment burden for patients with germ cell tumours. In advanced stages, treatment intensification is clearly defined to further improve overall survival rates. PATIENT SUMMARY This is an update of a previously published version of the European Association of Urology guidelines for testis cancer, and includes new recommendations for clinical stage I disease and revision of the follow-up recommendations. Patients should be fully informed of all the treatment options available to them.
Annals of Oncology | 2013
Jan Oldenburg; Sophie D. Fosså; Janine Nuver; Axel Heidenreich; H.-J. Schmoll; Carsten Bokemeyer; A. Horwich; Joerg Beyer; V. Kataja
J. Oldenburg1, S. D. Fosså1, J. Nuver2, A. Heidenreich3, H-J Schmoll4, C. Bokemeyer5, A. Horwich6, J. Beyer7 & V. Kataja8, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group* Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen; Department of Oncology/Haematology/Haemostaseology, University Hospital Halle, Halle; Department of Oncology, Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Academic Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton Hospital, UK; Department of Haematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany; Cancer Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland;
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012
Hege Sagstuen Haugnes; George J. Bosl; Hink Boer; Jourik A. Gietema; Marianne Brydøy; Jan Oldenburg; Alv A. Dahl; Roy M. Bremnes; Sophie D. Fosså
Germ cell testicular cancer (TC) represents a malignancy with high cure rates. Since the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the late 1970s, the 5-year survival rate has increased considerably, and it is currently above 95%. Because TC is usually diagnosed before the age of 40 years, these men can expect to live for another 40 to 50 years after being successfully treated. This success, however, is hampered by an increased risk of long-term and late effects of treatment. Secondary malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular disease represent the most common potentially life-threatening late effects, typically occurring more than 10 years after treatment. Other long-term effects include pulmonary toxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, decreased fertility, hypogonadism, and psychosocial problems. The incidence and time to onset of these various adverse effects vary according to treatment type and intensity. There is still little knowledge about underlying mechanisms and genetic susceptibility of the various adverse effects. Apart from treatment burden, it is not yet possible to identify patients who are at high risk for certain late effects after TC treatment. In this clinical review, we present the current status regarding different somatic and psychosocial long-term late effects after treatment for TC, based on Medline searches and our own research. Moreover, we postulate recommendations for general medical evaluations that should begin after treatment is completed and continue during follow-up.
Psycho-oncology | 2009
Tone Skaali; Sophie D. Fosså; Roy M. Bremnes; Olav Dahl; Carl Fredrik Haaland; Erik Rønneberg Hauge; Olbjør n Klepp; Jan Oldenburg; Erik Wist; Alv A. Dahl
Objective: To explore fear of recurrence (FoR) in long‐term testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) since FoR hardly has been examined in TCSs.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006
Jan Oldenburg; Jarad Martin; Sophie D. Fosså
Late relapses of malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs) are rare and occur, by definition, 2 years or later after successful treatment. They represent a major challenge of todays treatment of MGCTs. Because of the rarity and heterogeneity of late relapses, many aspects of their main characteristics remain obscure. We present relevant literature on relapsing MGCTs to highlight the following issues: incidence, impact of initial treatment on the subsequent risk of late relapse, treatment, and survival. In a pooled analysis, the incidence is 1.4% and 3.2% in seminoma and nonseminoma patients, respectively. The predominant site of relapse is the retroperitoneal space in both histologic types. The initial treatment appears to be important for the risk and localization of late relapses. The treatment of late relapses should be based on a representative presalvage biopsy and includes radical surgery and salvage chemotherapy in most cases. Five-year cancer-specific survival is above 50% in the recent large series and reaches 100% in case of single-site teratoma. Diagnosis and treatment of late-relapsing MGCT patients is challenging and should be performed in experienced centers only. Referral of late-relapsing patients to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables increasing understanding of tumor biology and the clinical course of these patients.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2009
Marianne Brydøy; Jan Oldenburg; Olbjørn Klepp; Roy M. Bremnes; Erik Wist; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Erik Rønneberg Hauge; Olav Dahl; Sophie D. Fosså
Background Sensory neuropathy (paresthesias), tinnitus, hearing impairment, and Raynaud phenomena are side effects of cisplatin-based chemotherapy used to treat testicular cancer patients. We assessed the long-term occurrence of these side effects among testicular cancer survivors according to the treatment they received. Methods A total of 1814 men who were treated for unilateral testicular cancer in Norway during 1980–1994 were invited to participate in a national multicenter follow-up survey conducted during 1998–2002. The men were allocated to six groups according to the treatment they had received. Self-reported symptoms were assessed by a mailed questionnaire that included the Scale for Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity. A total of 1409 participants who responded to the questionnaire and/or underwent audiometry were assessable in this study. Respondents to the questionnaire (n = 1402) scored the relevant symptoms according to how troubled they were by each (not at all, a little, quite a bit, or very much). Hearing impairment was objectively assessed by audiometry at 4000 Hz in 755 men (seven of whom did not respond to the questionnaire). Group comparisons of symptom assessments were performed with χ2 or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Associations between relevant factors and self-reported symptoms or hearing impairment measured by audiometry were assessed using proportional odds ordinal logistic regression models and linear regression models, respectively. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The median follow-up for the 1409 assessable men was 10.7 years (range = 4–21 years). All chemotherapy groups had statistically significantly higher odds for increasing severity of all assessed symptoms and inferior audiometric results compared with men who did not receive chemotherapy. Among chemotherapy-treated men, 39% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 35% to 43%) reported Raynaud-like phenomena (defined as white or cold hands or fingers [or feet or toes] on cold exposure), 29% (95% CI = 25% to 33%) reported paresthesias in the hands or feet, 21% (95% CI = 18% to 25%) reported hearing impairment, and 22% (95% CI = 19% to 26%) reported tinnitus as major symptoms troubling them quite a bit or very much. Hearing impairment (odds ratio [OR] = 5.3, 95% CI = 3.0 to 9.2) and tinnitus (OR = 7.1, 95% CI = 4.1 to 12.4) were particularly common in the dose-intensive chemotherapy group compared with the no chemotherapy group. Men who were treated with radiotherapy had higher odds of self-reported paresthesias in feet compared with those not treated with radiotherapy (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.01 to 2.1, P = .04). Conclusion Long-term survivors of testicular cancer who were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy were more often troubled by dose-dependent neurological side effects and Raynaud-like phenomena compared with those who were not treated with chemotherapy.
Collaboration
Dive into the Jan Oldenburg's collaboration.
Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences
View shared research outputs