Jan Riemer

Disulfide Formation in the ER and Mitochondria: Two Solutions to a Common Process

Two Ways to Redox Regulation Eukaryotic cells control the redox environment within their cytoplasm to be generally reducing. However, the endoplasmic reticulum provides an oxidizing environment for secretory and membrane proteins. In addition, a subcompartment of mitochondria—the powerhouses of the cell—also generates an oxidizing environment for constituent and itinerant proteins. Riemer et al. (p. 1284) review the current understanding of both eukaryotic redox machineries and highlight their implications for the biogenesis and regulation of protein function, focusing on the impact of these systems on health and disease. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was long considered to be the only compartment of the eukaryotic cell in which protein folding is accompanied by enzyme-catalyzed disulfide bond formation. However, it has recently become evident that cells harbor a second oxidizing compartment, the mitochondrial intermembrane space, where disulfide formation facilitates protein translocation from the cytosol. Moreover, protein oxidation has been implicated in many mitochondria-associated processes central for human health such as apoptosis, aging, and regulation of the respiratory chain. Whereas the machineries of ER and mitochondria both form disulfides between cysteine residues, they do not share evolutionary origins and exhibit distinct mechanistic properties. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of these oxidation systems and discuss their functional similarities and differences.

Multiple glutathione disulfide removal pathways mediate cytosolic redox homeostasis

Glutathione is central to cellular redox chemistry. The majority of glutathione redox research has been based on the chemical analysis of whole-cell extracts, which unavoidably destroy subcellular compartment-specific information. Compartment-specific real-time measurements based on genetically encoded fluorescent probes now suggest that the cytosolic glutathione redox potential is about 100 mV more reducing than previously thought. Using these probes in yeast, we show that even during severe oxidative stress, the cytosolic glutathione disulfide (GSSG) concentration is much more tightly regulated than expected and provides a mechanistic explanation for the discrepancy with conventional measurements. GSSG that is not immediately reduced in the cytosol is rapidly transported into the vacuole by the ABC-C transporter Ycf1. The amount of whole-cell GSSG is entirely dependent on Ycf1 and uninformative about the cytosolic glutathione pool. Applying these insights, we identify Trx2 and Grx2 as efficient backup systems to glutathione reductase for cytosolic GSSG reduction.

The multidrug resistance protein 1 (Mrp1), but not Mrp5, mediates export of glutathione and glutathione disulfide from brain astrocytes.

Astrocytes play an important role in the glutathione (GSH) metabolism of the brain. To test for an involvement of multidrug resistance protein (Mrp) 1 and 5 in the release of GSH and glutathione disulfide (GSSG) from astrocytes, we used astrocyte cultures from wild‐type, Mrp1‐deficient [Mrp1(–/–)] and Mrp5‐deficient [Mrp5(–/–)] mice. During incubation of wild‐type or Mrp5(–/–) astrocytes, GSH accumulated in the medium at a rate of about 3 nmol/(h.mg), whereas the export of GSH from Mrp1(–/–) astrocytes was only one‐third of that. In addition, Mrp1(–/–) astrocytes had a 50% higher specific GSH content than wild‐type or Mrp5(–/–) cells. The presence of 50 μm of the Mrp inhibitor MK571 inhibited the rate of GSH release from wild‐type and Mrp5(–/–) astrocytes by 60%, but stimulated at the low concentration of 1 μm GSH release by 40%. In contrast, both concentrations of MK571 did not affect GSH export from Mrp1(–/–) astrocytes. Moreover, in contrast to wild‐type and Mrp5(–/–) cells, GSSG export during H2O2 stress was not observed for Mrp1(–/–) astrocytes. These data demonstrate that in astrocytes Mrp1 mediates 60% of the GSH export, that Mrp1 is exclusively responsible for GSSG export and that Mrp5 does not contribute to these transport processes.

A novel disulphide switch mechanism in Ero1α balances ER oxidation in human cells

Oxidative maturation of secretory and membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is powered by Ero1 oxidases. To prevent cellular hyperoxidation, Ero1 activity can be regulated by intramolecular disulphide switches. Here, we determine the redox‐driven shutdown mechanism of Ero1α, the housekeeping Ero1 enzyme in human cells. We show that functional silencing of Ero1α in cells arises from the formation of a disulphide bond—identified by mass spectrometry—between the active‐site Cys94 (connected to Cys99 in the active enzyme) and Cys131. Competition between substrate thiols and Cys131 creates a feedback loop where activation of Ero1α is linked to the availability of its substrate, reduced protein disulphide isomerase (PDI). Overexpression of Ero1α‐Cys131Ala or the isoform Ero1β, which does not have an equivalent disulphide switch, leads to augmented ER oxidation. These data reveal a novel regulatory feedback system where PDI emerges as a central regulator of ER redox homoeostasis.

Mitochondrial Disulfide Bond Formation Is Driven by Intersubunit Electron Transfer in Erv1 and Proofread by Glutathione

The disulfide relay system in the intermembrane space of mitochondria is of crucial importance for mitochondrial biogenesis. Major players in this pathway are the oxidoreductase Mia40 that oxidizes substrates and the sulfhydryl oxidase Erv1 that reoxidizes Mia40. To analyze in detail the mechanism of this oxidative pathway and the interplay of its components, we reconstituted the complete process in vitro using purified cytochrome c, Erv1, Mia40, and Cox19. Here, we demonstrate that Erv1 dimerizes noncovalently and that the subunits of this homodimer cooperate in intersubunit electron exchange. Moreover, we show that Mia40 promotes complete oxidation of the substrate Cox19. The efficient formation of disulfide bonds is hampered by the formation of long-lived, partially oxidized intermediates. The generation of these side products is efficiently counteracted by reduced glutathione. Thus, our findings suggest a role for a glutathione-dependent proofreading during oxidative protein folding by the mitochondrial disulfide relay.

Systematic Analysis of the Twin Cx9C Protein Family

The Mia40-Erv1 disulfide relay system is of high importance for mitochondrial biogenesis. Most so far identified substrates of this machinery contain either two cysteine-x(3)-cysteine (twin Cx(3)C) or two cysteine-x(9)-cysteine (twin Cx(9)C) motifs. While the first group is composed of well-characterized components of the mitochondrial import machinery, the molecular function of twin Cx(9)C proteins still remains unclear. To systematically characterize this protein family, we performed a database search to identify the full complement of Cx(9)C proteins in yeast. Thereby, we identified 14 potential family members, which, with one exception, are conserved among plants, fungi, and animals. Among these, three represent novel proteins, which we named Cmc2 to 4 (for Cx(9)C motif-containing protein) and which we demonstrated to be dependent for import on the Mia40-Erv1 disulfide relay. By testing deletion mutants of all 14 proteins for function of the respiratory chain, we found a critical function of most of these proteins for the assembly or stability of respiratory chain complexes. Our data suggest that already early during the evolution of eukaryotic cells, a multitude of twin Cx(9)C proteins developed, which exhibit largely nonredundant roles critical for the biogenesis of enzymes of the respiratory chain in mitochondria.

Turning a disulfide isomerase into an oxidase: DsbC mutants that imitate DsbA

There are two distinct pathways for disulfide formation in prokaryotes. The DsbA‐DsbB pathway introduces disulfide bonds de novo, while the DsbC‐DsbD pathway functions to isomerize disulfides. One of the key questions in disulfide biology is how the isomerase pathway is kept separate from the oxidase pathway in vivo. Cross‐talk between these two systems would be mutually destructive To force communication between these two systems we have selected dsbC mutants that complement a dsbA null mutation. In these mutants, DsbC is present as a monomer as compared with dimeric wild‐type DsbC. Based on these findings we rationally designed DsbC mutants in the dimerization domain. All of these mutants are able to rescue the dsbA null phenotype. Rescue depends on the presence of DsbB, the native re‐oxidant of DsbA, both in vivo and in vitro. Our results suggest that dimerization acts to protect DsbCs active sites from DsbB‐mediated oxidation. These results explain how oxidative and reductive pathways can co‐exist in the periplasm of Escherichia coli.

Glutathione redox potential in the mitochondrial intermembrane space is linked to the cytosol and impacts the Mia40 redox state

Glutathione is an important mediator and regulator of cellular redox processes. Detailed knowledge of local glutathione redox potential (EGSH) dynamics is critical to understand the network of redox processes and their influence on cellular function. Using dynamic oxidant recovery assays together with EGSH‐specific fluorescent reporters, we investigate the glutathione pools of the cytosol, mitochondrial matrix and intermembrane space (IMS). We demonstrate that the glutathione pools of IMS and cytosol are dynamically interconnected via porins. In contrast, no appreciable communication was observed between the glutathione pools of the IMS and matrix. By modulating redox pathways in the cytosol and IMS, we find that the cytosolic glutathione reductase system is the major determinant of EGSH in the IMS, thus explaining a steady‐state EGSH in the IMS which is similar to the cytosol. Moreover, we show that the local EGSH contributes to the partially reduced redox state of the IMS oxidoreductase Mia40 in vivo. Taken together, we provide a comprehensive mechanistic picture of the IMS redox milieu and define the redox influences on Mia40 in living cells.

Disulphide production by Ero1α–PDI relay is rapid and effectively regulated

The molecular networks that control endoplasmic reticulum (ER) redox conditions in mammalian cells are incompletely understood. Here, we show that after reductive challenge the ER steady‐state disulphide content is restored on a time scale of seconds. Both the oxidase Ero1α and the oxidoreductase protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) strongly contribute to the rapid recovery kinetics, but experiments in ERO1‐deficient cells indicate the existence of parallel pathways for disulphide generation. We find PDI to be the main substrate of Ero1α, and mixed‐disulphide complexes of Ero1 primarily form with PDI, to a lesser extent with the PDI‐family members ERp57 and ERp72, but are not detectable with another homologue TMX3. We also show for the first time that the oxidation level of PDIs and glutathione is precisely regulated. Apparently, this is achieved neither through ER import of thiols nor by transport of disulphides to the Golgi apparatus. Instead, our data suggest that a dynamic equilibrium between Ero1‐ and glutathione disulphide‐mediated oxidation of PDIs constitutes an important element of ER redox homeostasis.

Mitochondrial Disulfide Relay: Redox-regulated Protein Import into the Intermembrane Space

99% of all mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol, from where they are imported into mitochondria. In contrast to matrix proteins, many proteins of the intermembrane space (IMS) lack presequences and are imported in an oxidation-driven reaction by the mitochondrial disulfide relay. Incoming polypeptides are recognized and oxidized by the IMS-located receptor Mia40. Reoxidation of Mia40 is facilitated by the sulfhydryl oxidase Erv1 and the respiratory chain. Although structurally unrelated, the mitochondrial disulfide relay functionally resembles the Dsb (disufide bond) system of the bacterial periplasm, the compartment from which the IMS was derived 2 billion years ago.