Jana J. Watson-Capps

Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: Evidence for sexual coercion, male-male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behaviour

Aggressive behaviour is rarely observed, but may have a large impact on the social structure, relationships and interactions in animal societies. Long-term behavioural study of Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay, Australia, suggests that males are more aggressive than females, and use sexual coercion during the breeding season, but age and sex-specific patterns of aggression have not been well documented. We analyzed tooth rake marks, an indirect measure of received conspecific aggression, to determine such patterns by age, sex, and adult female reproductive state. Photographs of 224 Shark Bay bottlenose dolphins were examined for tooth rakes and each rake was categorized as new (broken skin), obvious (white rake lines that are clearly visible) or faint (faint evidence of rakes). Rake lines were also coded by each body section visible in the photograph. Cycling females (those that became pregnant within 6 mos. of the photograph date) were significantly more likely to have new tooth rakes than non-cycling females (pregnant or with a dependent calf 2 years apart) suggests that the marks are not cumulative. Overall, 83% of the population has tooth rake marks, suggesting that agonistic interactions occur for most individuals at least every two years. Analysis of gonistic interactions for 55 adult focal females (observed for 1960 h) and their 88 calves (observed for 1876 h) show that female aggression is extremely rare (occurring every 490 h), but females receive aggression more often (every 61 h), and 84% of received aggression was from juvenile and adult males. Focal adult females were never observed acting aggressively towards juveniles or adults of either sex, suggesting that female bottlenose dolphins are highly tolerant. Of the four observed instances of adult female aggression, all were directed at their dependent offspring. Male calves are significantly more aggressive than female calves, and calves had higher rates of agonistic interactions than their mothers (every 18 h), even though calves had fewer tooth rakes than all other age classes. The patterns of tooth rake presence and prevalence likely result from sexual coercion of adult females by adult males and intra-sexual male competition.

Why Do Dolphins Carry Sponges

Tool use is rare in wild animals, but of widespread interest because of its relationship to animal cognition, social learning and culture. Despite such attention, quantifying the costs and benefits of tool use has been difficult, largely because if tool use occurs, all population members typically exhibit the behavior. In Shark Bay, Australia, only a subset of the bottlenose dolphin population uses marine sponges as tools, providing an opportunity to assess both proximate and ultimate costs and benefits and document patterns of transmission. We compared sponge-carrying (sponger) females to non-sponge-carrying (non-sponger) females and show that spongers were more solitary, spent more time in deep water channel habitats, dived for longer durations, and devoted more time to foraging than non-spongers; and, even with these potential proximate costs, calving success of sponger females was not significantly different from non-spongers. We also show a clear female-bias in the ontogeny of sponging. With a solitary lifestyle, specialization, and high foraging demands, spongers used tools more than any non-human animal. We suggest that the ecological, social, and developmental mechanisms involved likely (1) help explain the high intrapopulation variation in female behaviour, (2) indicate tradeoffs (e.g., time allocation) between ecological and social factors and, (3) constrain the spread of this innovation to primarily vertical transmission.

A new level of complexity in the male alliance networks of Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)

Male bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay, Western Australia form two levels of alliances; two to three males cooperate to herd individual females and teams of greater than three males compete with other groups for females. Previous observation suggested two alliance tactics: small four to six member teams of relatives that formed stable pairs or trios and unrelated males in a large 14-member second-order alliance that had labile trio formation. Here, we present evidence for a third level of alliance formation, a continuum of second-order alliance sizes and no relationship between first-order alliance stability and second-order alliance size. These findings challenge the ‘two alliance tactics’ hypothesis and add to the evidence that Shark Bay male bottlenose dolphins engage in alliance formation that likely places considerable demands on their social cognition.

Engineering precision biomaterials for personalized medicine

A unit operations approach for designing precision biomaterial-based medical devices may lead to more effective personalized therapies. As the demand for precision medicine continues to rise, the “one-size-fits-all” approach to designing medical devices and therapies is becoming increasingly outdated. Biomaterials have considerable potential for transforming precision medicine, but individual patient complexity often necessitates integrating multiple functions into a single device to successfully tailor personalized therapies. Here, we introduce an engineering strategy based on unit operations to provide a unified vocabulary and contextual framework to aid the design of biomaterial-based devices and accelerate their translation.

Male alliance behaviour and mating access varies with habitat in a dolphin social network

Within-species variation in social structure has attracted interest recently because of the potential to explore phenotypic plasticity and, specifically, how demographic and ecological variation influence social structure. Populations of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) vary in male alliance formation, from no alliances to simple pairs to, in Shark Bay, Western Australia, the most complex nested alliances known outside of humans. Examination of ecological contributions to this variation is complicated by differences among populations in other potentially explanatory traits, such as phylogenetic distance, as well as female reproductive schedules, sexual size dimorphism, and body size. Here, we report our discovery of systematic spatial variation in alliance structure, seasonal movements and access to mates within a single continuous social network in the Shark Bay population. Participation in male trios (versus pairs), the sizes of seasonal range shifts and consortship rates all decrease from north to south along the 50 km length of the study area. The southern habitat, characterised by shallow banks and channels, may be marginal relative to the open northern habitat. The discovery of variation in alliance behaviour along a spatial axis within a single population is unprecedented and demonstrates that alliance complexity has an ecological component.