Jana Sefcikova

Distinct Double- and Single-Stranded DNA Binding of E. coli Replicative DNA Polymerase III α Subunit

The α subunit of the replicative DNA polymerase III of Escherichia coli is the active polymerase of the 10-subunit bacterial replicase. The C-terminal region of the α subunit is predicted to contain an oligonucleotide binding (OB-fold) domain. In a series of optical tweezers experiments, the α subunit is shown to have an affinity for both double- and single-stranded DNA, in distinct subdomains of the protein. The portion of the protein that binds to double-stranded DNA stabilizes the DNA helix, because protein binding must be at least partially disrupted with increasing force to melt DNA. Upon relaxation, the DNA fails to fully reanneal, because bound protein interferes with the reformation of the double helix. In addition, the single-stranded DNA binding component appears to be passive, as the protein does not facilitate melting but instead binds to single-stranded regions already separated by force. From DNA stretching measurements we determine equilibrium association constants for the binding of α and several fragments to dsDNA and ssDNA. The results demonstrate that ssDNA binding is localized to the C-terminal region that contains the OB-fold domain, while a tandem helix-hairpin-helix (HhH)2 motif contributes significantly to dsDNA binding.

The genomic HDV ribozyme utilizes a previously unnoticed U-turn motif to accomplish fast site-specific catalysis

The genome of the human hepatitis delta virus (HDV) harbors a self-cleaving catalytic RNA motif, the genomic HDV ribozyme, whose crystal structure shows the dangling nucleotides 5′ of the cleavage site projecting away from the catalytic core. This 5′-sequence contains a clinically conserved U − 1 that we find to be essential for fast cleavage, as the order of activity follows U − 1 > C − 1 > A − 1 > G − 1, with a >25-fold activity loss from U − 1 to G − 1. Terbium(III) footprinting detects conformations for the P1.1 stem, the cleavage site wobble pair and the A-minor motif of the catalytic trefoil turn that depend on the identity of the N − 1 base. The most tightly folded catalytic core, resembling that of the reaction product, is found in the U − 1 wild-type precursor. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that a U − 1 forms the most robust kink around the scissile phosphate, exposing it to the catalytic C75 in a previously unnoticed U-turn motif found also, for example, in the hammerhead ribozyme and tRNAs. Strikingly, we find that the common structural U-turn motif serves distinct functions in the HDV and hammerhead ribozymes.

Crystal structure of a metal-dependent phosphoesterase (YP_910028.1) from Bifidobacterium adolescentis: Computational prediction and experimental validation of phosphoesterase activity.

The crystal structures of an unliganded and adenosine 5′‐monophosphate (AMP) bound, metal‐dependent phosphoesterase (YP_910028.1) from Bifidobacterium adolescentis are reported at 2.4 and 1.94 Å, respectively. Functional characterization of this enzyme was guided by computational analysis and then confirmed by experiment. The structure consists of a polymerase and histidinol phosphatase (PHP, Pfam: PF02811) domain with a second domain (residues 105‐178) inserted in the middle of the PHP sequence. The insert domain functions in binding AMP, but the precise function and substrate specificity of this domain are unknown. Initial bioinformatics analyses yielded multiple potential functional leads, with most of them suggesting DNA polymerase or DNA replication activity. Phylogenetic analysis indicated a potential DNA polymerase function that was somewhat supported by global structural comparisons identifying the closest structural match to the alpha subunit of DNA polymerase III. However, several other functional predictions, including phosphoesterase, could not be excluded. Theoretical microscopic anomalous titration curve shapes, a computational method for the prediction of active sites from protein 3D structures, identified potential reactive residues in YP_910028.1. Further analysis of the predicted active site and local comparison with its closest structure matches strongly suggested phosphoesterase activity, which was confirmed experimentally. Primer extension assays on both normal and mismatched DNA show neither extension nor degradation and provide evidence that YP_910028.1 has neither DNA polymerase activity nor DNA‐proofreading activity. These results suggest that many of the sequence neighbors previously annotated as having DNA polymerase activity may actually be misannotated. Proteins 2011.

Polymerase Switching in Response to DNA Damage

DNA polymerases are highly efficient and accurate macromolecular machines. They are capable of replicating DNA at up to 1,000 nucleotides per second while making less than one error in 100,000 additions. However, DNA is constantly subjected to damage from myriad sources. DNA damage disrupts normal cellular DNA replication by interfering with the accuracy and efficiency of replicative DNA polymerases. Specialized Y family DNA polymerases exist that can copy damaged DNA, although that ability often has a mutagenic cost. Therefore, Y family DNA polymerase activity is highly regulated in the cell. This chapter presents the functions of both replicative and Y family DNA polymerases and the cellular mechanisms of polymerase management. The focus is on Escherichia coli systems but also briefly discusses eukaryotic Y family polymerases. We first present DNA replication carried out by prokaryotic DNA polymerase III and describe its subunits and the coordination of leading and lagging strand replication. We then discuss DNA damage and specialized Y family DNA polymerases. Different models for the management of replicative and Y family DNA polymerases are presented. Finally, we briefly compare the eukaryotic systems with their prokaryotic counterparts.