Jane Barrett

Rates and Outcomes of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population

Background: Information on the epidemiology of primary total hip replacement is limited, and we are not aware of any reports on the epidemiology of revision total hip replacement. The objective of this study was to characterize the rates and immediate postoperative outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in persons sixty-five years of age and older residing in the United States.Methods: We used Medicare claims submitted by hospitals, physicians, and outpatient facilities between July 1, 1995, and June 30, 1996, to identify individuals who had undergone elective primary total hip replacement for a reason other than a fracture (61,568 patients) or had had revision total hip replacement (13,483 patients). Annual incidence rates of primary and revision total hip replacement were calculated, and multivariate modeling was used to evaluate the association between patient characteristics and surgical rates. The rates of occurrence of five complications within ninety days postoperatively were also evaluated, and relationships between those outcomes and patient characteristics were assessed with use of multivariate models adjusted for hospital and surgeon volume.Results: The rates of primary total hip replacement were three to six times higher than the rates of revision total hip replacement. Women had higher rates than men, and whites had higher rates than blacks. The rates of primary and revision total hip replacement increased with age until the age of seventy-five to seventy-nine years and then declined. The rates of complications occurring within ninety days after primary total hip replacement were 1.0% for mortality, 0.9% for pulmonary embolus, 0.2% for wound infection, 4.6% for hospital readmission, and 3.1% for hip dislocation. The rates after revision total hip replacement were 2.6%, 0.8%, 0.95%, 10.0%, and 8.4%, respectively. Factors associated with an increased risk of an adverse outcome included increased age, gender (men were at higher risk than women), race (blacks were at higher risk than whites), a medical comorbidity, and a low income.Conclusions: Analysis of United States Medicare population data showed that the rates of total hip replacement increased with age up to the age of seventy-five to seventy-nine years and that blacks had a significantly lower rate of total hip replacement than whites. The overall rates of adverse outcomes were relatively low, but they were significantly higher after revision than after primary total hip replacement.Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population

Background: The mortality and complication rates of many surgical procedures are inversely related to hospital procedure volume. The objective of this study was to determine whether the volumes of primary and revision total hip replacements performed at hospitals and by surgeons are associated with rates of mortality and complications. Methods: We analyzed claims data of Medicare recipients who underwent elective primary total hip replacement (58,521 procedures) or revision total hip replacement (12,956 procedures) between July 1995 and June 1996. We assessed the relationship between surgeon and hospital procedure volume and mortality, dislocation, deep infection, and pulmonary embolus in the first ninety days postoperatively. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, arthritis diagnosis, comorbid conditions, and income. Analyses of hospital volume were adjusted for surgeon volume, and analyses of surgeon volume were adjusted for hospital volume. Results: Twelve percent of all primary total hip replacements and 49% of all revisions were performed in centers in which ten or fewer of these procedures were carried out in the Medicare population annually. In addition, 52% of the primary total hip replacements and 77% of the revisions were performed by surgeons who carried out ten or fewer of these procedures annually. Patients treated with primary total hip replacement in hospitals in which more than 100 of the procedures were performed per year had a lower risk of death than those treated with primary replacement in hospitals in which ten or fewer procedures were performed per year (mortality rate, 0.7% compared with 1.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.38, 0.89). Patients treated with primary total hip replacement by surgeons who performed more than fifty of those procedures in Medicare beneficiaries per year had a lower risk of dislocation than those who were treated by surgeons who performed five or fewer of the procedures per year (dislocation rate, 1.5% compared with 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.34, 0.69). Patients who had revision total hip replacement done by surgeons who performed more than ten such procedures per year had a lower rate of mortality than patients who were treated by surgeons who performed three or fewer of the procedures per year (mortality rate, 1.5% compared with 3.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.44, 0.96). Conclusions: Patients treated at hospitals and by surgeons with higher annual caseloads of primary and revision total hip replacement had lower rates of mortality and of selected complications. These analyses of Medicare claims are limited by a lack of key clinical information such as operative details and preoperative functional status.

Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement.

Background: The lengths of acute hospital stays following total hip replacement have diminished substantially in recent years. As a result, a greater proportion of complications occurs following discharge. Data on the incidence trends of major complications of total hip replacement would facilitate recognition and management of these adverse events.Methods: We used Medicare claims data on beneficiaries sixty-five years and older who had had elective, primary total hip replacement for a reason other than a fracture (58,521 patients) or had had revision total hip replacement (12,956 patients) between July 1, 1995, and June 30, 1996. We calculated incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep hip infection per 10,000 person-weeks for four time-periods following the admission for the surgery (during the index hospitalization, from discharge to four weeks postoperatively, from five to thirteen weeks postoperatively, and from fourteen to twenty-six weeks postoperatively). We then used life-table methods to estimate the cumulative incidence of each complication over the first six postoperative months.Results: Of the patients who had had a primary total hip replacement, 3.9% had a dislocation, 0.9% had a pulmonary embolism, and 0.2% had a deep infection in the first twenty-six postoperative weeks. In the revision total hip replacement cohort, the proportions with dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection were 14.4%, 0.8%, and 1.1%, respectively. The rates of these adverse outcomes were highest during the index hospitalization, diminished considerably in the period from discharge to four weeks postoperatively, and continued to drop in the periods from five to thirteen and fourteen to twenty-six weeks postoperatively.Conclusions: The incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection are highest immediately after total hip replacement, but they continue to be elevated throughout the first three postoperative months. With the lengths of hospital stays continuing to diminish, an increasing proportion of complications will occur in outpatients. These findings provide a basis for developing strategies to prevent these complications in the postdischarge management of patients who have had elective total hip replacement.Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and the Outcomes of Total Knee Replacement

BACKGROUND The annual volume of major cardiovascular and oncologic procedures performed in hospitals and by surgeons has been inversely associated with the rates of perioperative mortality and complications. The relationship between hospital and surgeon volume and perioperative outcomes following total knee replacement has received little study. METHODS We analyzed claims data for Medicare patients who had elective primary total knee replacement between January 1 and August 31, 2000. Hospital and surgeon volumes were defined as the number of primary and revision total knee replacements performed in the hospital or by the surgeon in Medicare recipients in 2000. We examined the associations between the annual volumes of total knee replacement performed in the hospitals and by the surgeons and the rates of mortality and complications (infection, pulmonary embolus, myocardial infarction, or pneumonia) in the first ninety days postoperatively. The analyses were adjusted for age, gender, comorbid conditions, Medicaid eligibility (a marker of low income), and arthritis diagnosis. Analyses of hospital volume were adjusted for surgeon volume and vice versa. RESULTS Twenty-five percent of the primary total knee replacements were done by surgeons who performed twelve of these procedures or fewer in the Medicare population annually, and 11% were done in hospitals with an annual volume of twenty-five of these procedures or fewer. Compared with the patients who had a primary total knee replacement in hospitals with an annual volume of twenty-five procedures or fewer, those managed in hospitals with an annual volume exceeding 200 procedures had a lower risk of pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.65; 99% confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.90) and any of the adverse outcomes examined (death, pneumonia, pulmonary embolus, acute myocardial infarction, or deep infection) (odds ratio, 0.74; 99% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.90). Similarly, patients who had a primary total knee replacement done by surgeons who performed more than fifty such procedures in Medicare recipients annually had a lower risk of pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.72; 99% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.95) and any adverse outcome (odds ratio, 0.81; 99% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.98) compared with patients of surgeons with an annual volume of twelve procedures or fewer. CONCLUSIONS Patients managed at hospitals and by surgeons with greater volumes of total knee replacement have lower risks of perioperative adverse events following primary total knee replacement. Patients and clinicians should incorporate these findings into discussions about selecting a surgeon and a hospital for total knee replacement. These data should also be integrated into the policy debate about the advantages and drawbacks of regionalizing total joint replacement to high-volume centers.

Epidemiology of Total Knee Replacement in the United States Medicare Population

BACKGROUND There are limited population-based data on the utilization and outcomes of total knee replacement. The aim of the present study was to describe the rates of primary and revision total knee replacement and selected outcomes in persons older than sixty-five years of age in the United States. METHODS Using Medicare claims, we computed annual incidence rates of unilateral elective primary and revision total knee replacement among United States Medicare beneficiaries in the year 2000. Poisson regression was used to assess the relationships between demographic characteristics and the incidence rates of primary and revision knee replacement. Proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationships between the ninety-day rates of complications and demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS The rate of primary knee replacement was lower in blacks than in whites and in those qualifying for Medicaid supplementation than in those with higher incomes. The complications observed during the ninety days following primary knee replacement included mortality (0.7%), readmission (0.9%), pulmonary embolus (0.8%), wound infection (0.4%), pneumonia (1.4%), and myocardial infarction (0.8%). The complications observed during the ninety days following revision knee replacement were mortality (1.1%), readmission (4.7%), pulmonary embolus (0.5%), wound infection (1.8%), pneumonia (1.4%), and myocardial infarction (1.0%). Blacks had higher rates of mortality, readmission, and wound infection after primary knee replacement than whites did. Patients who qualified for Medicaid supplementation had higher complication rates, particularly after primary knee replacement. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the rates of postoperative complications during the ninety days following total knee replacement are low. In the United States, blacks and individuals with low income undergo total knee replacement less frequently and generally have higher rates of adverse outcomes following primary knee replacement.

Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age

&NA; Current knowledge regarding the basic epidemiology of fractures is largely limited to a few fracture sites, notably those of the hip and distal forearm. To clarify the patterns of incidence of limb fractures in the elderly, we used data from a 5% sample of the U.S. Medicare population over age 65 years during the years 1986‐1990. We identified incident fractures of the proximal humerus, other parts of the humerus, proximal radius/ulna, shaft of the radius/ulna, distal radius/ulna, pelvis, hip, other parts of the femur, patella, ankle, and other parts of the tibia/fibula from diagnoses and procedures coded on claims for inpatient services, outpatient facility use, and physician services. We used Poisson regression to investigate the relation between demographic factors and fracture risk at these sites. Fractures at the hip were the most common, accounting for 38% of the fractures identified. The proximal humerus, distal radius/ulna, and ankle also were common fracture sites. A pattern of rapidly rising rates with age was seen for fractures of the pelvis, hip, and other parts of the femur among women. Fractures distal to the elbow or knee, however, had, at most, modest increases in incidence with age over 65 years. For each of the fractures studied, women had higher rates than men of the same race, and whites generally had higher rates than blacks of the same gender. Gender‐related differences in risk were larger among whites than among blacks, and racial differences in risk were more marked among women than among men. (Epidemiology 1996;7:612‐618)

Treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fractures: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVES This study was undertaken to examine the patterns of treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fracture. METHODS A 5% national sample of Medicare claims was used to identify patients who sustained hip fractures between 1986 and 1989. In comparing treatment patterns across regions, direct standardization was used to derive age- and race-adjusted percentages. Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to examine short- and long-term survival. RESULTS In the United States, 64% of femoral neck fractures were treated with arthroplasty; 90% of pertrochanteric fractures were treated with internal fixation. Higher short- and long-term mortality was associated with being male, being older, residing in a nursing home prior to fracture, having a higher comorbidity score, and having a pertrochanteric fracture. Blacks and Whites had similar 90-day postfracture mortality, but Blacks had a higher mortality later on. For femoral neck fracture, internal fixation has a modestly lower short-term mortality associated with it than arthroplasty has. CONCLUSION Variation in the treatment of hip fracture was modest, The increased delayed mortality after hip fracture among Blacks requires further study.

Racial differences in fracture risk

Blacks appear to have a lower risk of fractures than whites, but there has been little research regarding racial differences in the risk of fractures at sites other than the hip. We used Medicare claims to investigate the risks of fractures of the hip, distal forearm, proximal humerus, and ankle among American whites and blacks over 65 years old. Each of these fractures occurred more frequently in women than in men and (except for ankle fracture) displayed an increase in risk with age. Blacks had a lower risk than whites, although these differences were smaller for fractures of the ankle and were less pronounced among men. The most likely explanation for this is a constitutional or metabolic factor prevalent in blacks that particularly influences the risk of osteoporotic fractures in women.

Hip fracture incidence and mortality in New England.

We used Medicare data to conduct a population-based study of osteoporotic hip fracture incidence and outcomes among New England residents. To reduce bias and improve data reliability, we combined data from multiple files; we found that 6% of cases would have been missed had we relied on hospital claims alone. Hip fracture incidence (per 1,000 person-years) increased for white females from 2.2 for ages 65-69 to 31.8 for ages 90-94 and for white males from 0.9 for ages 65-69 to 20.8 for ages 90-94. Incidence among blacks was lower in all age/sex groups. The female/male relative risk was greater among whites than among blacks. Case fatality following hip fracture was 12.5% at 90 days and 23.7% at 1 year and was higher among males, older patients, and those who had documented comorbidity or who were residents of nursing homes.

The epidemiology of peripheral fractures.

Although much is known about hip fracture epidemiology, there are relatively little data regarding fractures at other peripheral sites. Epidemiological differences between fractures are important, since they imply that an understanding of the consequences and clinical expression of osteoporosis requires the study of many different fracture types. Recent data regarding the basic epidemiology of limb fractures among the elderly in industrialized countries have made some patterns clear. Fractures outside the hip are relatively common events, and before age 70 to 75, ankle and distal forearm fractures occur more commonly than fractures of the hip. Among the elderly, fractures at the most proximal and most distal ends of the limbs have the highest incidence. Thus, in the upper extremity, fractures of the proximal humerus and distal forearm are the most common, while in the lower extremity, those at the hip and ankle predominate. Outside the axial skeleton, females have higher rates for most fracture types, and at most fracture sites whites have higher rates than blacks. In each limb, the most proximal fractures tend to have the most pronounced age-related increases in risk.