Jane Colona
University of Miami
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jane Colona.
Transplantation | 1998
David Roth; Jane Colona; George W. Burke; Gaetano Ciancio; Violet Esquenazi; Joshua Miller
Background Studies using tacrolimus and corticosteroids or the combination of cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids have been shown to reduce the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes in cadaveric kidney recipients compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. The current study is a retrospective analysis of our experience with tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Methods. In a retrospective analysis, 72 patients who received primary therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids (triple therapy) were compared with a control group of 98 kidney recipients who received tacrolimus and corticosteroids (double therapy). Results. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the triple therapy group (8.2%) compared with the double therapy group (21%; P=0.003). One-year patient and graft survival did not differ between groups. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 18% and 21% in the triple and double therapy groups, respectively. Leukopenia and gastrointestinal side effects were the most common cause for discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil. Conclusions. The combination of tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids is more effective at preventing early acute rejection than tacrolimus and corticosteroids alone. The use of mycophenolate mofetil was associated with a higher incidence of leukopenia and diarrhea, often leading to discontinuation of the drug.
Transplant International | 2010
Takafumi Machimoto; Giselle Guerra; George W. Burke; Frederick Jay Fricker; Jane Colona; Phillip Ruiz; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Juan C. Scornik
The objective of the present study was to determine if there are changes on complement (C) activation and concentration of HLA antibodies (Abs) in patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The patients evaluated were given IVIG as treatment of Ab‐mediated rejection or desensitization. The patients’ sera obtained before and after IVIG administration were tested for their effects on the deposition of both IgG (HLA Abs) and C3b (C activation) as measured by flow cytometry on T cells. IVIG consistently inhibited C activation when measured shortly after IVIG infusion but returned to the initial levels at 2–4 weeks, when total serum IgG also returned to pre‐infusion levels. C inhibition was more pronounced with higher IVIG doses and the degree of inhibition was inversely proportional to the HLA Ab concentrations. IVIG did not block the binding of HLA Abs immediately after administration, although levels were slightly but consistently lower after several monthly IVIG infusions. The data show that C inhibition by IVIG is short‐lived and that IVIG induces only a mild reduction of HLA Abs, seen not immediately but after months of treatment. These results may explain the inconsistent results of IVIG to achieve desensitization.
Transplant International | 2010
Takafumi Machimoto; Giselle Guerra; George W. Burke; Frederick Jay Fricker; Jane Colona; Phillip Ruiz; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Juan C. Scornik
The objective of the present study was to determine if there are changes on complement (C) activation and concentration of HLA antibodies (Abs) in patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The patients evaluated were given IVIG as treatment of Ab‐mediated rejection or desensitization. The patients’ sera obtained before and after IVIG administration were tested for their effects on the deposition of both IgG (HLA Abs) and C3b (C activation) as measured by flow cytometry on T cells. IVIG consistently inhibited C activation when measured shortly after IVIG infusion but returned to the initial levels at 2–4 weeks, when total serum IgG also returned to pre‐infusion levels. C inhibition was more pronounced with higher IVIG doses and the degree of inhibition was inversely proportional to the HLA Ab concentrations. IVIG did not block the binding of HLA Abs immediately after administration, although levels were slightly but consistently lower after several monthly IVIG infusions. The data show that C inhibition by IVIG is short‐lived and that IVIG induces only a mild reduction of HLA Abs, seen not immediately but after months of treatment. These results may explain the inconsistent results of IVIG to achieve desensitization.
Transplant International | 2010
Takafumi Machimoto; Giselle Guerra; George W. Burke; Frederick Jay Fricker; Jane Colona; Phillip Ruiz; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Juan C. Scornik
The objective of the present study was to determine if there are changes on complement (C) activation and concentration of HLA antibodies (Abs) in patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The patients evaluated were given IVIG as treatment of Ab‐mediated rejection or desensitization. The patients’ sera obtained before and after IVIG administration were tested for their effects on the deposition of both IgG (HLA Abs) and C3b (C activation) as measured by flow cytometry on T cells. IVIG consistently inhibited C activation when measured shortly after IVIG infusion but returned to the initial levels at 2–4 weeks, when total serum IgG also returned to pre‐infusion levels. C inhibition was more pronounced with higher IVIG doses and the degree of inhibition was inversely proportional to the HLA Ab concentrations. IVIG did not block the binding of HLA Abs immediately after administration, although levels were slightly but consistently lower after several monthly IVIG infusions. The data show that C inhibition by IVIG is short‐lived and that IVIG induces only a mild reduction of HLA Abs, seen not immediately but after months of treatment. These results may explain the inconsistent results of IVIG to achieve desensitization.
The Journal of Urology | 1999
David Roth; Jane Colona; George W. Burke; Gaetano Ciancio; Violet Esquenazi; Joshua Miller
BACKGROUND Studies using tacrolimus and corticosteroids or the combination of cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids have been shown to reduce the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes in cadaveric kidney recipients compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. The current study is a retrospective analysis of our experience with tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. METHODS In a retrospective analysis, 72 patients who received primary therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids (triple therapy) were compared with a control group of 98 kidney recipients who received tacrolimus and corticosteroids (double therapy). RESULTS There was a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the triple therapy group (8.2%) compared with the double therapy group (21%; P=0.003). One-year patient and graft survival did not differ between groups. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 18% and 21% in the triple and double therapy groups, respectively. Leukopenia and gastrointestinal side effects were the most common cause for discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSIONS The combination of tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids is more effective at preventing early acute rejection than tacrolimus and corticosteroids alone. The use of mycophenolate mofetil was associated with a higher incidence of leukopenia and diarrhea, often leading to discontinuation of the drug.
Human Immunology | 2009
Takafumi Machimoto; Giselle Guerra; Jane Colona; Phillip Ruiz; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Juan C. Scornik
Transplantation | 1999
David Roth; F. Kuehnel; M. Angelis; Jane Colona; G W. Burke; Gaetano Ciancio; Violet Esquenazi; Joshua Miller
Transplantation | 1999
David Roth; K. Zucker; Robert Cirocco; Rajender Reddy; Jane Colona; G W. Burke; Gaetano Ciancio; Violet Esquenazi; Joshua Miller
Transplantation | 1998
David Roth; Jane Colona; George W. Burke; Gaetano Ciancio; K. Zucker; Violet Esquenazi; Joshua Miller
Transplantation | 1998
David Roth; Robert Cirocco; K. Zucker; Jane Colona; G W. Burke; Gaetano Ciancio; Violet Esquenazi; Joshua Miller