Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jane E. Roberts is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jane E. Roberts.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2006

Autistic behavior in children with fragile X syndrome: Prevalence, stability, and the impact of FMRP

Deborah D. Hatton; John Sideris; Martie L. Skinner; Jean Mankowski; Donald B. Bailey; Jane E. Roberts; Penny Mirrett

We examined autistic behavior in a cross‐sectional sample of 179 children with fragile X syndrome (FXS) and a longitudinal subset of 116 children using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) to (a) determine a prevalence of autistic behavior in FXS, (b) examine the stability of autistic ratings over time, and (c) assess the association between the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and autistic behavior. Approximately 21% of the sample of 129 children (25.9% of boys) scored at or above the cutoff for autism. CARS scores increased slowly, yet significantly, over time, and low levels of FMRP were associated with higher mean levels of autistic behavior as measured by the CARS.


Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | 1998

Autistic behavior in young boys with fragile X syndrome

Donald B. Bailey; Gary B. Mesibov; Deborah D. Hatton; Renee D. Clark; Jane E. Roberts; Lisa Mayhew

A sample of 57 boys with fragile X syndrome (fraX) between the ages of 24 and 133 months was rated using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) to assess the extent to which autism and autistic features were evident in a young population. Fourteen subjects (approximately 25% of the sample) scored above the cutoff for autism, suggesting a relatively high incidence of autistic behavior. All but 2 of these 14 were in the mildly or moderately autistic range, however, and only a few items received severe ratings, suggesting that severe autism is relatively rare in fraX, at least during the early years. The CARS resulted in a continuum of autistic ratings in the fraX population, but no particular items on the CARS contributed disproportionately to autism ratings. A visual comparison of ratings on an autistic, non-fraX sample revealed similar profiles of ratings, suggesting that differentiating fraX and autism on the basis of CARS ratings is not likely. Within the fraX group, chronological age and socioeconomic status did not correlate with CARS ratings, but severity of delay was strongly related, such that more severely delayed children scored higher (more autistic) on the CARS.


American Journal of Medical Genetics | 2009

Mood and anxiety disorders in females with the FMR1 premutation

Jane E. Roberts; Donald B. Bailey; Jean Mankowski; Amy L. Ford; John Sideris; Leigh Anne Weisenfeld; T. Morgan Heath; Robert N. Golden

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a model for studying the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to psychiatric disorders in mothers of children with disabilities. Here, we examine the frequency and predictors of mood and anxiety disorders in mothers with the FMR1 premutation. Ninety‐three females with the FMR1 premutation were in the study and were compared to 2,159 women from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R) dataset. Mood and anxiety disorders were assessed using the SCID‐I. Our data reflect elevated lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD), lifetime panic disorder without agoraphobia and current agoraphobia without panic disorder in the FMR1 premutation sample. Also, we found a low frequency of lifetime social phobia, specific phobia, and post‐traumatic stress disorders and current specific phobia in the FMR1 premutation sample. The profile of MDD in the FMR1 premutation sample was not episodic or comorbid with an anxiety disorder, as in the NCS‐R dataset. Never having been married and smaller CGG repeat length were associated with increased likelihood of MDD while increased children with FXS in the family and greater child problem behaviors were associated with increased likelihood of an anxiety disorder in the FMR 1 premutation group. Major depression in females with the FMR1 premutation may not be characterized as an episodically chronic recurrent disorder as it is in community samples and may have a genetic basis given the relationship with CGG repeat length and lack of association with all child and most demographic factors.


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 2000

Family experiences and factors associated with the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome.

Donald B. Bailey; Debra Skinner; Deborah D. Hatton; Jane E. Roberts

&NA; The authors interviewed 41 mothers of young boys with fragile X syndrome to determine the process by which they learned their child had fragile X syndrome. The average family had concerns about the childs development at 9 months of age. Developmental delay was determined at an average age of 24 months, and fragile X syndrome was diagnosed at a mean age of 35 months. Considerable variability was found in age of first concern, determination of delay, and diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. Three child variables (severity of delay, autistic behavior, temperament style) and four family variables (mothers age, mothers education, sibling status, social support) did not account for this variability, although birth year did (children born more recently were somewhat more likely to be identified earlier). Families often encountered physicians who initially discounted concerns or said that it was too early to determine whether a problem did indeed exist. Given current knowledge and practice, improving the early identification (under 3 years of age) of children with fragile X syndrome is likely to remain difficult if based solely on behavioral and clinical observations.


Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics | 2008

Developmental trajectories and correlates of sensory processing in young boys with fragile X syndrome.

Grace T. Baranek; Jane E. Roberts; Fabian J. David; John Sideris; Penny Mirrett; Deborah D. Hatton; Donald B. Bailey

Background and Purpose: No longitudinal study on sensory processing in children with fragile X syndrome (FXS) exists. This study examined developmental trajectories and correlates of sensory processing from infancy through preschool years in 13 boys with FXS. Method: Participants were assessed using observational and parent-report measures 2–6 times between 9 and 54 months of age. Results: Over time, an increasing proportion of boys displayed sensory processing that differed significantly from test norms. Observational measures were more sensitive than parent-reports early in infancy. Age and developmental quotient significantly predicted levels of hyporesponsiveness; there was a trend for hyperresponsiveness to increase with age. Baseline physiological and biological measures were not predictive. Conclusions: Sensory processing problems are observable early and grow increasingly problematic from infancy through the preschool ages. Early identification and intervention may attenuate long-term difficulties for children with FXS.


American Journal on Mental Retardation | 2003

Adaptive Behavior in Children With Fragile X Syndrome

Deborah D. Hatton; Anne C. Wheeler; Martie L. Skinner; Donald B. Bailey; Kelly Sullivan; Jane E. Roberts; Penny Mirrett; Renee D. Clark

Adaptive behavior over time in 70 children with fragile X syndrome, ages 1 to 12 years, was examined using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. With a mean of 4.4 assessments per child, adaptive behavior skills increased steadily and gradually over time. Children with less autistic behavior and higher percentages of FMPR expression showed better performance on all areas of adaptive behavior. Children without autistic behavior displayed higher scores and rates of growth on the Daily Living Skills domain, with the lowest scores in Socialization. Comparison to Brief IQs indicate that children with fragile X syndrome display nonverbal IQs superior to their adaptive behavior when they are below age 10 but that these skills seem to converge as they get older.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2005

Mapping nonverbal IQ in young boys with fragile X syndrome

Martie L. Skinner; Stephen R. Hooper; Deborah D. Hatton; Jane E. Roberts; Penny Mirrett; Jennifer M. Schaaf; Kelly Sullivan; Anne C. Wheeler; Donald B. Bailey

This study examines the developmental changes in nonverbal intellectual functioning evident in males with fragile X syndrome (FXS) measured by the Leiter International Performance Scales‐Revised (Leiter‐R). The Leiter‐R provides both IQ scores and associated growth scores which permit the examination of both age‐based IQ scores and overall intellectual growth. Participants were 45 males with full mutation FXS and ranged in age from 4.0 to 13.8 years. Each child was assessed annually using the Leiter‐R as part of a larger longitudinal battery for an average of 3.5 assessments per child and a range of 2–6 assessments, representing a total of 156 assessment occasions. Longitudinal analyzes of Leiter scores consisted primarily of hierarchical linear modeling, with the impact of chronological age, maternal education, fragile X mental retardation 1 protein (FMRP), autistic behaviors also being assessed. Findings revealed a significant linear decline in nonverbal IQ scores, with no effects of maternal education, autistic behaviors, or FMRP on mean level or rate of change in IQ scores over time. The decline slowed significantly around 8 years of age, but scores continued to decline into the 12th year of age. In contrast, a significant linear increase was observed in Leiter‐R growth scores, which was negatively influenced by autistic behaviors. The rate of increase did not change over time, and neither mean level nor rate of increase was influenced by maternal education or FMRP levels. These findings suggest that declines in IQ are the result of steady, but suboptimal intellectual growth, rather than a true deterioration in overall intellectual functioning.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2008

Child and genetic variables associated with maternal adaptation to fragile X syndrome: a multidimensional analysis.

Donald B. Bailey; John Sideris; Jane E. Roberts; Deborah D. Hatton

One hundred eight carrier mothers (95 premutation, 13 full mutation) of children with the full mutation fragile X syndrome completed seven scales to assess maternal stress, depressive symptoms, anger, anxiety, quality of life, hope, and optimism. A wide range of responses was found on each measure, with most mothers scoring in the non‐clinical range on any individual measure. However, nearly half of the mothers scored in the clinically significant range on at least one measure and 25% on two or more measures. High stress and low quality of life were the most common domains of concern. Mothers with the full mutation generally did not differ from mothers with the premutation. CGG repeat length was not associated with responses on any of the measures completed by mothers with the premutation. Severity of the childs delay was not associated with any of the outcome measures, but child behavior problems accounted for significant variance in stress, depressive symptoms, anxiety, anger, and quality of life. Maternal adaptation appears to be a multidimensional phenomenon experienced in unique ways by each mother. Most mothers experienced positive adaptation, but a subset appear to be more vulnerable, especially those with children who have significant behavior problems. Future research needs to identify family, child, and support factors associated with maternal vulnerability and how adaptation changes over time in response to these factors.


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 2004

Developmental screening and detection of developmental delays in infants and toddlers with fragile X syndrome.

Penny Mirrett; Donald B. Bailey; Jane E. Roberts; Deborah D. Hatton

Three developmental screening tests (the Denver-II, Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test, and Early Language Milestone Scale-2) were administered to 18 infants and toddlers (13 boys and 5 girls) with confirmed diagnoses of fragile X syndrome as part of a comprehensive developmental assessment at 9, 12, and 18 months of age. The Denver-II identified delays for 10 of 11 boys at 9 months of age and the Denver-II and the Early Language Milestone Scale-2 identified delays in 100% of the boys at 12 and 18 months. The Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test identified delays in 75% of the children at 12 and 18 months. When compared with more comprehensive developmental tests (Mullen Scales of Early Learning and Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale-2), the screening tests concurred at least 76% of the time at the 12- and 18-month assessments. These results indicate that developmental delays could be detected in most children with fragile X syndrome through routine developmental screening by the age of 9 to 12 months.


Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders | 2009

Autistic behavior in boys with fragile X syndrome: social approach and HPA-axis dysfunction

Jane E. Roberts; Megan Clarke; Kaitlyn Alcorn; John C. Carter; Anna C. J. Long; Walter E. Kaufmann

The primary goal of this study was to examine environmental and neuroendocrine factors that convey increased risk for elevated autistic behavior in boys with Fragile X syndrome (FXS). This study involves three related analyses: (1) examination of multiple dimensions of social approach behaviors and how they vary over time, (2) investigation of mean levels and modulation of salivary cortisol levels in response to social interaction, and (3) examination of the relationship of social approach and autistic behaviors to salivary cortisol. Poor social approach and elevated baseline and regulation cortisol are discernible traits that distinguish boys with FXS and ASD from boys with FXS only and from typically developing boys. In addition, blunted cortisol change is associated with increased severity of autistic behaviors only within the FXS and ASD group. Boys with FXS and ASD have distinct behavioral and neuroendocrine profiles that differentiate them from those with FXS alone and typically developing boys.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jane E. Roberts's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bridgette L. Tonnsen

University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessica Klusek

University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Penny Mirrett

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grace T. Baranek

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Sideris

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lindsay M. McCary

University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge