Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jane Maxim is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jane Maxim.


Disability & Society | 2005

Work after stroke: focusing on barriers and enablers

Sarah Lock; Lesley Jordan; Karen Bryan; Jane Maxim

Previous research on work after stroke has used quantitative methods and a medical model approach to identify factors that influence return to work. This study uses an inclusive, qualitative methodology (focus groups) to begin to explore stroke survivors’ own perspectives about what helps and hinders paid or voluntary work after stroke. The research was conducted in partnership with Different Strokes, a British organisation of stroke survivors. Five focus group discussions were held with 37 stroke survivors and 12 of their supporters. Data was analysed using an adapted Framework approach to identify themes within and across individuals and groups. Factors representing barriers to or enablers of work were identified in four key themes: rehabilitation process, employer agency, social structural and personal. The study found evidence of social oppression via infrastructure, institutional structures and practices, and some individuals’ attitudes. Alongside this, some supportive individuals, practices and strategies were identified.


International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders | 1998

THERAPY USING CONVERSATION ANALYSIS : HELPING COUPLES ADAPT TO APHASIA IN CONVERSATION

Ray Wilkinson; Karen Bryan; Sarah Lock; Kate Bayley; Jane Maxim; Carolyn Bruce; Anne Edmundson; Diana Moir

This study focuses on the assessment and treatment of the conversations of a couple where one partner has aphasia. The assessment and treatment, informed by conversation analysis, are described, and some implications for the relation between language and psychosocial issues discussed.


Research on Language and Social Interaction | 2010

Formulating Actions and Events With Limited Linguistic Resources: Enactment and Iconicity in Agrammatic Aphasic Talk

Ray Wilkinson; Suzanne Beeke; Jane Maxim

In this article a conversation analytic approach is used to investigate the form and use of enactment by speakers with agrammatic aphasia in talk-in-interaction. Enactment here refers to the employment by participants of direct reported speech and/or other behavior such as the use of gesture/body movement and/or prosody to iconically depict some aspects of reported scenes or events. The enactment of these speakers is notable in terms of the distinctive grammatical practices within which it is regularly produced (e.g., without any reporting verb such as say) and a reliance on kinesic enactment and simple lexical forms produced as seconds, i.e., reactions or second pair-part responses such as oh, no, and oh no. It is argued that enactment and other instances of iconicity within interaction as produced by these aphasic speakers are examples of interactional methods adopted by them in order to formulate actions and events in talk using the limited lexical and grammatical resources at their disposal, and some similarities to other types of language use such as child language and pidgins are noted.


Aphasiology | 2007

Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism

Suzanne Beeke; Ray Wilkinson; Jane Maxim

Background: Although research into agrammatism has done much to characterise the nature of the underlying disorder, most studies have analysed elicited, task‐based data. As a result, little is known about the grammar that people with agrammatism use in everyday talk with habitual conversational partners. There is evidence in the Conversation Analysis (CA) literature to suggest that conversational grammar may not mirror the grammar of elicited language samples. The data presented in this paper were collected as part of a larger study funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), entitled “An investigation of aphasic syntax‐for‐conversation” (ESRC R000222754, Wilkinson, Maxim, & Beeke, 2001). Aims: To explore the notion that conversation and task‐based data do not necessarily reveal the same grammatical phenomena, addressing the following questions: (1) What resources does a speaker with agrammatism make use of in order to construct a turn at talk? (2) Is the conversational grammar of a speaker with agrammatism organised in a systematic way? (3) What is the relationship between patterns of turn construction in conversation and the grammatical characteristics of output elicited by decontextualised language tests? Methods & Procedures: A videotaped conversation between an agrammatic speaker and his adult daughter is analysed using CA. Four recurring turn construction formats are described and illustrated with extracts. Background information on the client presents the results of picture‐naming and sentence production tests. Outcomes & Results: There is great variation between the grammar of conversation and test data. Test results reveal a severe problem with verb access and sentence construction, with ability declining sharply as the number of verb arguments increases. However, the speaker deploys interactional alternatives to standard grammatical structures, and it is possible for him to recount events without explicit articulation of verbs and argument structures, using a combination of talk and mime. Only a minority of his conversational utterances are concerned with recounting events—commenting, assessing, and reasoning are highly prevalent. Conclusions: Conversation and sentence‐level tests provide complementary but essentially different information about grammatical ability. This implies that assessment of conversational grammar should become a routine part of any investigation of agrammatism in order to gain a more complete picture of an individuals ability to impose structural order on their talk, and to explore implications for successful interaction with others. Currently, approaches to assessment and intervention over‐emphasise events. In conversation, other actions such as giving an opinion are just as prevalent. Findings suggest a mismatch between what appears problematic on testing and what is treated as problematic by the interactants in conversation, and that intervention might profitably seek to address grammatical difficulties that have a basis in interaction.


Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics | 2003

Exploring aphasic grammar 2: do language testing and conversation tell a similar story?

Suzanne Beeke; Ray Wilkinson; Jane Maxim

This paper investigates the grammatical difficulties of an English-speaking person with non-fluent aphasia using clinical assessments based on picture description and story telling. The same individuals conversation grammar, which was investigated in detail in a linked article is reviewed here, and the notion that interactional grammatical phenomena may not necessarily be visible in elicited language data is explored. Data analysis shows that the aphasic speakers grammar looks considerably different in the context of clinical assessment than it does in conversation. Analysis of elicited grammar reveals that the majority of utterances produced are subject-verb-object (SVO) type sentences, whereas prior analysis of conversation data indicated patterns of interactional grammatical phenomena that differ from such sentence types. It is suggested that language tests and conversation provide complementary but essentially different information about grammatical abilities. The clinical implications of this finding are discussed.


Journal of Neurolinguistics | 2011

Redesigning therapy for agrammatism: Initial findings from the ongoing evaluation of a conversation-based intervention study

Suzanne Beeke; Jane Maxim; Wendy Best; Firle Cooper

Abstract Therapy for agrammatism, once only targeted at surface grammar, has begun to demonstrate the benefits of rigorous theoretically motivated therapy aimed at underlying syntax. Whilst there is evidence that grammatical ability in the clinical setting can be improved by such therapies, it has proved hard to detect carryover to everyday conversation in the home. Recent research using a qualitative methodology called Conversation Analysis (CA) has shown that utterances produced by agrammatic speakers in peer conversation differ significantly from those elicited during assessment and therapy tasks. This is because tasks target decontextualized language, isolated from an interactional context of real-life talk about needs, opinions, and experiences. This paper explores the idea that, given this finding, it may be more appropriate, and effective, to provide therapy for agrammatism by targeting the grammar of conversation directly. It outlines a new therapeutic approach based on CA concepts, describes the early development of a valid quantitative measure of change in conversation and presents some qualitative data from one of the first dyads involved in an ongoing therapy study.


Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics | 2003

Exploring aphasic grammar. 1: A single case analysis of conversation.

Suzanne Beeke; Ray Wilkinson; Jane Maxim

This paper uses the methodology and analytical findings of conversation analysis to investigate the notion that aphasic grammar may be understood at least partly in the context of the demands of turns at talk in conversation. An investigation of the conversation of an English-speaking person with aphasia reveals two distinct grammatical phenomena, and it is suggested that their use may be interactionally motivated by the need to take a relatively unproblematic turn at talk despite the constraints of non-fluent aphasia. The grammatical patterns that are revealed by this analysis look considerably different from those elicited by standard methods of data sampling. The possibility that interactional grammatical phenomena are not visible in the language data elicited by clinical assessments is raised. This question is addressed via an in-depth comparison of the same speakers interactional and elicited grammar in a linked article. It is suggested that the tool of conversation analysis provides researchers with a new and fruitful approach to the study of grammatical abilities in aphasia.


Aphasiology | 2015

Conversation focused aphasia therapy: investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism.

Suzanne Beeke; Firle Beckley; Fiona Johnson; Claudia Heilemann; Susan Edwards; Jane Maxim; Wendy Best

Background: A recent review of interaction (or conversation)-focused therapy highlighted the potential of programmes targeting the person with aphasia (PWA) directly. However, it noted the key limitations of current work in this field to be a reliance on single case analyses and qualitative evidence of change, a situation that is not unusual when a complex behavioural intervention is in the early stages of development and evaluation. Aims: This article aims to evaluate an intervention that targeted a PWA and their conversation partner (CP), a dyad, as equals in a novel conversation therapy for agrammatic aphasia, using both quantitative and qualitative evidence of change. The intervention aimed to increase the insight of a dyad into facilitator and barrier conversation behaviours, to increase the understanding of the effect of agrammatism on communication, and to support each speaker to choose three strategies to work on in therapy to increase mutual understanding and enhance conversation. Methods & Procedures: Quantitative and qualitative methods are used to analyse multiple pre-therapy and follow up assessments of conversation for two dyads. Outcomes & Results: Results show that one person with severe and chronic agrammatic aphasia was able to select and practise strategies that led to qualitative and quantitative changes in his post-therapy conversations. The other PWA showed a numerical increase in one of his three strategies post therapy, but no significant quantitative change. Although both CPs significantly reduced barrier behaviours in their post-therapy conversations, neither showed a significant increase in the strategies they chose to work on. For one CP, there was qualitative evidence of the use of different turn types. Conclusions: Individually tailored input from a speech and language therapist can assist some people with chronic agrammatism to develop conversational strategies that enhance communication. Outcomes are influenced by the severity and extent of language deficits affecting, for example, single word writing. In terms of behaviour change for CPs, it appears that it may be easier to reduce barrier behaviours rather than to increase the use of facilitatory strategies. The results have implications for collaborative goal setting with clients undergoing conversation therapy.


International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders | 2013

Conversation therapy for agrammatism: exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia.

Firle Beckley; Wendy Best; Fiona Johnson; Susan Edwards; Jane Maxim; Suzanne Beeke

BACKGROUND & AIMS A recent systematic review of conversation training for communication partners of people with aphasia has shown that it is effective, and improves participation in conversation for people with chronic aphasia. Other research suggests that people with aphasia are better able to learn communication strategies in an environment which closely mirrors that of expected use, and that cognitive flexibility may be a better predictor of response to therapy than severity of language impairment. This study reports results for a single case, one of a case series evaluation of a programme of conversation training for agrammatism that directly involves a person with aphasia (PWA) as well as their communication partner. It explores how a PWA is able to engage with and learn from the therapy, and whether this leads to qualitative change in post-therapy conversation behaviours. METHODS & PROCEDURES A 55-year-old man with chronic agrammatism and his wife took part in eight weekly sessions of conversation therapy, adapted from Supporting Partners of People With Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation (SPPARC). Language and conversation were assessed before and after therapy, and the couples views on conversation and disability were elicited. Conversation analysis was used to analyse: (1) pre-therapy conversation patterns, (2) how the PWA engaged and learned during therapy and the forms of facilitation that aided this process, and (3) qualitative change in post-therapy conversation behaviour. OUTCOMES & RESULTS After therapy, the PWA showed increased insight and acceptance of the use of strategies such as writing and drawing in the face of conversational difficulty. However, use was prompted by his wife and was rarely spontaneous. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS This single case study suggests that conversation training based around an experiential learning process is able to engage a PWA directly in learning about the effects of aphasia on conversation. Key facilitators were self-study via video and experience of practising conversation whilst receiving online feedback from a speech and language therapist. However, increased insight did not automatically change conversation behaviour. Although he better understood the effects of his aphasia on conversations with his wife, learning stopped short of the ultimate goal of the conversation training programme; the spontaneous use of strategies worked on in therapy when faced with conversation breakdown. One explanation may be that limited cognitive flexibility lead to problems with switching from one strategy to another.


Aging & Mental Health | 2002

Working with older people with communication difficulties: An evaluation of care worker training

Karen Bryan; Lesley Axelrod; Jane Maxim; Linda Bell; Lesley Jordan

Studies suggest that a high proportion of older people in residential and nursing care have communication difficulties and there is some awareness of the need for staff training to allow effective communication to be achieved. This paper describes part of the evaluation of a one-day training package aimed at enabling care staff to communicate with older people who have a variety of communication difficulties. Care staff from four partner agencies completed questionnaires pre- and post-training, addressing contact with people with communication disorders, previous training on communication, knowledge about communication, attitudes towards communication problems and strategies to help communication with people who have communication difficulties. Positive gains were found in attitudes and self-perceptions of knowledge and competence, as well as in appropriate citations of strategies to enhance communication. The findings are discussed with reference to the need for enhanced communication skills in care workers engendered by current developments in care policy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jane Maxim's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suzanne Beeke

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ray Wilkinson

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen Bryan

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wendy Best

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fiona Johnson

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Firle Beckley

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Edmundson

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge