Jane Winter

BMI and all-cause mortality in older adults: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Whether the association between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause mortality for older adults is the same as for younger adults is unclear. OBJECTIVE The objective was to determine the association between BMI and all-cause mortality risk in adults ≥65 y of age. DESIGN A 2-stage random-effects meta-analysis was performed of studies published from 1990 to 2013 that reported the RRs of all-cause mortality for community-based adults aged ≥65 y. RESULTS Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies included 197,940 individuals with an average follow-up of 12 y. With the use of a BMI (in kg/m2) of 23.0-23.9 as the reference, there was a 12% greater risk of mortality for a BMI range of 21.0-21.9 and a 19% greater risk for a range of 20.0-20.9 [BMI of 21.0-21.9; HR (95% CI): 1.12 (1.10, 1.13); BMI of 20.0-20.9; HR (95% CI): 1.19 (1.17, 1.22)]. Mortality risk began to increase for BMI >33.0 [BMI of 33.0-33.9; HR (95% CI): 1.08 (1.00, 1.15)]. Self-reported anthropometric measurements, adjustment for intermediary factors, and exclusion of early deaths or preexisting disease did not markedly alter the associations, although there was a slight attenuation of the association in never-smokers. CONCLUSIONS For older populations, being overweight was not found to be associated with an increased risk of mortality; however, there was an increased risk for those at the lower end of the recommended BMI range for adults. Because the risk of mortality increased in older people with a BMI <23.0, it would seem appropriate to monitor weight status in this group to address any modifiable causes of weight loss promptly with due consideration of individual comorbidities.

Nutrition screening of older people in a community general practice, using the MNA-SF

Background: ObjectiveThe study aimed to determine the prevalence of malnutrition risk in a population of older people (aged 75 years and over) attending a community general practice and identify characteristics of those classified as malnourished or at risk of malnutrition.DesignCross-sectional study of nutritional risk screen conducted over a six month period.Participants and settingPatients attending a general practice clinic in Victoria, Australia, who attended for the “75 plus” health assessment check.MeasurementsThe Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA®-SF) was included as part of the health assessment. Information was collected on living situation, co-morbidities, independence with meal preparation and eating, number of medications. Height and weight was measured and MNA®-SF score recorded.ResultsTwo hundred and twenty five patients attending a general practice for a health assessment with a mean age of 81.3(4.3)(SD) years, 52% female and 34% living alone. Only one patient was categorised by the MNA®-SF as malnourished, with an additional 16% classified as at risk of malnutrition. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of the at-risk group was significantly lower than the well-nourished group (23.6 ± 0.8 (SEM) vs 27.4 ± 0.3; p=0.0001). However, 34% of the at-risk group had a BMI of 25 or more with only 13% in the underweight category.ConclusionIn this population of older adults attending their general practitioner for an annual health assessment, one in six were identified as being at nutritional risk which is an additional risk factor for a severe health issue. Importantly, one third of the at-risk group had a BMI in the overweight or obese category, highlighting that older people can be at nutritional risk although they may be overweight or obese.

The influence of age on the BMI and all-cause mortality association: A meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo assess BMI range with the lowest mortality for those aged <65 years and those >65 years, utilising cohort studies that spanned the entire adult age range.DesignA two-stage random effects meta-analysis of studies that reported mortality in cohorts both ≥65 years and <65 years.Setting / ParticipantsCommunity living adults aged ≥65 and <65 years.ResultsEight studies were included with a total of 370 416 subjects (306 340 aged <65 years; 64 076 ≥65 years). In the older age group, mortality risk increased at BMIs lower than 22 (BMI range 21.0-21.9: hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.05 (1.03, 1.07)), which was not seen in younger adults. In the younger group, mortality increased from BMI range 28.0-28.9 (HR (95% CI): 1.13 (1.00, 1.29)), but mortality did not tend to increase significantly in the older group at BMIs above 23.ConclusionThe recommended healthy weight range is appropriate for younger and middle aged adults but a higher BMI range should be recommended for older adults based on mortality.

Nutritional care of older patients: experiences of general practitioners and practice nurses

Older people living in the community face unique nutritional issues that put them at risk of undernutrition, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Primary healthcare staff such as general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) are well placed to identify nutritional problems early and intervene. The aim of this study was to understand the experiences and current practices in a sample of GPs and PNs with regards to nutritional care of elderly patients. An online survey of GPs and PNs working in regional Victoria was conducted. Among the 45 respondents, 89% reported encountering consultations with a nutritional component for older patients within the previous 3 months, and 94% of those took some action, most commonly referrals, dietary advice or prescribing supplements. Although the majority (63%) felt confident in providing appropriate nutritional recommendations for patients, 68% reported a desire for further professional development in the area. Given the frequency of nutritional issues presenting, further work is required to determine how well equipped primary healthcare staff are to provide nutritional advice to older patients.