Janet Dunbabin
University of Newcastle
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Janet Dunbabin.
BMC Research Notes | 2014
Steven James; Robyn Gallagher; Janet Dunbabin; Lin Perry
BackgroundVascular complications curtail life expectancy and quality of life in type 1 diabetes and development at younger ages is particularly detrimental. To date no review has summarised the prevalence or factors predicting their development in young adults.MethodsA quantitative epidemiological systematic review was conducted to identify the prevalence and predictive factors for development of retinopathy, nephropathy and hypertension in young adults (sample age mean [plus 1SD] 18–30 years) with type 1 diabetes, using processes adapted from established review methods set out by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL, Science Direct (Elsevier), Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant articles published between 1993 and June 2014. From this eleven papers were retrieved, appraised and results summarised by three reviewers using established methods.ResultsSome form of retinopathy occurred in up to almost half of participants; more severe forms affected up to one in ten. One in six was reported with microalbuminuria; one in 14 had macroalbuminuria. Hypertension occurred in almost one in two participants. Applying out-dated high thresholds this decreased to approximately one in ten participants. Glycaemic control was a consistent predictor of vascular disease in this age group.ConclusionPrevalence rates of retinopathy, nephropathy and hypertension in young adults with type 1 diabetes emphasise the importance of regular complication screening for early detection and treatment. The predictive effect of glycaemic control reinforces its importance for prevention of vascular complications.
Pain Medicine | 2013
Simon Holliday; Parker Magin; Janet Dunbabin; Christopher Oldmeadow; Julie-Marie Henry; Nicholas Lintzeris; John Attia; Susan Goode; Adrian Dunlop
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate the quality of opioid analgesia prescribing in chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) by general practitioners (GPs, family physicians). DESIGN An anonymous, cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. SETTING The setting was five Australian divisions of general practice (geographically based associations of GPs). METHODS A questionnaire was mailed to all division members. Outcome measures were adherence to individual recommendations of locally derived CNMP practice guidelines. RESULTS We received 404 responses (response rate 23.3%). In the previous fortnight, GPs prescribed long-term continuous opioids for CNMP for a median of 4 and a mean of 7.1 (±8.7) patients with CNMP. Guideline concordance (GLC) was poor, with no GP always compliant with all guideline items, and only 31% GPs usually employing most items. GLC was highest for the avoidance of high dosages or fast-acting formulations. It was lowest for strategies minimizing individual and public health harms, such as the initiation of opioids on a time-limited trial basis, use of contracts, and the preclusion or management of aberrant behaviors. GLC was positively associated with relevant training or qualifications, registration with the Australian Prescription Drug Monitoring Programme, being an opioid substitution therapy prescriber, and female gender. CONCLUSIONS In this study, long-term opioids were frequently initiated for CNMP without a quality use-of-medicine approach. Potential sequelae are inadequate treatment of pain and escalating opioid-related harms. These data suggest a need for improved resourcing and training in opioid management across pain and addictions.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2016
Parker Magin; Laura Juratowitch; Janet Dunbabin; Patrick McElduff; Susan Goode; Amanda Tapley; Dimity Pond
In view of proposed screening for presymptomatic Alzheimers disease (AD) with advanced imaging, and blood and cerebral spinal fluid analysis, we aimed to establish levels, and associations, of acceptance of AD testing modalities by general practice patients.
BMC Endocrine Disorders | 2014
Steven James; Lin Perry; Robyn Gallagher; Julia Lowe; Janet Dunbabin; Patrick McElduff; Shamasunder Acharya; Katharine Steinbeck
BackgroundFew studies have examined young adults with type 1 diabetes use of health services and the development of vascular complications. As part of the Youth Outreach for Diabetes (YOuR-Diabetes) project, this study identified health service usage, the prevalence and factors predictive of development of vascular complications (hypertension, retinopathy and nephropathy) in a cohort of young adults (aged 16–30 years) with type 1 diabetes in Hunter New England and the Lower Mid-North Coast area of New South Wales, Australia.MethodsA cross-sectional retrospective documentation survey was undertaken of case notes of young adults with type 1 diabetes accessing Hunter New England Local Health District public health services in 2010 and 2011, identified through ambulatory care clinic records, hospital attendances and other clinical records. Details of service usage, complications screening and evidence of vascular complications were extracted. Independent predictors were modelled using linear and logistic regression analyses.ResultsA cohort of 707 patients were reviewed; mean (SD) age was 23.0 (3.7) years, with mean diabetes duration of 10.2 (5.8, range 0.2 - 28.3) years; 42.4% lived/ 23.1% accessed services in non-metropolitan areas.Routine preventative service usage was low and unplanned contacts high; both deteriorated with increasing age. Low levels of complications screening were found. Where documented, hypertension, particularly, was common, affecting 48.4% across the study period. Diabetes duration was a strong predictor of vascular complications along with glycaemic control; hypertension was linked with renal dysfunction.ConclusionFindings indicate a need to better understand young people’s drivers and achievements when accessing services, and how services can be reconfigured or delivered differently to better meet their needs and achieve better outcomes. Regular screening is required using current best practice guidelines as this affords the greatest chance for early complication detection, treatment initiation and secondary prevention.
The Medical Journal of Australia | 2010
Lin Perry; Katharine Steinbeck; Janet Dunbabin; Julia Lowe
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 2012
Lin Perry; Julia Lowe; Katherine S. Steinbeck; Janet Dunbabin
Drug and Alcohol Review | 2013
Simon Holliday; Parker Magin; Christopher Oldmeadow; John Attia; Janet Dunbabin; Julie-Marie Henry; Nicholas Lintzeris; Susan Goode; Adrian Dunlop
The Medical Journal of Australia | 2012
Simon Holliday; Parker Magin; Janet Dunbabin; Ben Ewald; Julie-Marie Henry; Susan Goode; Fran Baker; Adrian Dunlop
British Journal of General Practice | 2015
Parker Magin; Janet Dunbabin; Susan Goode; Jose M. Valderas; Christopher Levi; Mario D'Souza; Melanie Marshall; Daniel Barker; Daniel Lasserson
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | 2017
Lin Perry; Steven James; Robyn Gallagher; Janet Dunbabin; Katharine Steinbeck; Julia Lowe