Janet Hardy

A study to investigate the prevalence, severity and correlates of fatigue among patients with cancer in comparison with a control group of volunteers without cancer

BACKGROUND Determining the prevalence of fatigue among cancer patients is complicated by the high prevalence of fatigue symptoms in the general population. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, severity and correlates of fatigue among both cancer patients and control subjects without cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 227 cancer patients and 98 control subjects were recruited to the study. They completed a number of questionnaires about fatigue, quality of life and psychological symptoms. The majority of subjects also underwent assessment of voluntary muscle function and nutritional status. Severe fatigue in the patients was defined as a score on the Fatigue Severity Scale in excess of the 95th percentile of the control group. RESULTS The prevalence of severe fatigue was 15% among patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer, 16% among patients with recently diagnosed prostate cancer, 50% among patients with inoperable non small cell lung cancer and 78% among patients receiving specialist inpatient palliative care. In the patients a combination of dyspnoea, psychological distress, pain, and a measure of overall disease burden accounted for 56% of the variance in fatigue scores. CONCLUSIONS Severe fatigue is a common problem among cancer patients, particularly those with advanced disease. Fatigue is significantly associated with the severity of psychological symptoms (anxiety and depression) and with the severity of pain and dyspnoea.

Fatigue in patients with cancer

This paper reviews current knowledge regarding cancer-related fatigue assessment, prevalence, mechanisms and management. Most quality of life questionnaires contain at least some items pertaining to fatigue and a number of more specific self-assessment tools have now also been developed. As a results, there is a growing body of literature which documents the extent and severity of fatigue in cancer populations. Unfortunately most of these studies are uncontrolled and do not, therefore, provide an accurate estimate of the prevalence or severity of cancer fatigue relative to that found in the general population. Data from controlled studies are limited and the results are conflicting. Cross-sectional studies suggest that fatigue is the result of a combination of physical and psychological causes. Although no one treatment is proven to alleviate cancer-related fatigue a number of strategies show therapeutic promise.

Fatigue in advanced cancer: a prospective controlled cross-sectional study.

SummaryUncontrolled studies have reported that fatigue is a common symptom among patients with advanced cancer. It is also a frequent complaint among the general population. Simply asking cancer patients whether or not they feel fatigued does not distinguish between the ‘background’ level of this symptom in the community and any ‘excess’ arising as a result of illness. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of fatigue among palliative care inpatients in comparison with a control group of age and sex-matched volunteers without cancer. In addition, the correlates of fatigue were investigated. The prevalence of ‘severe subjective fatigue’ (defined as fatigue greater than that experienced by 95% of the control group) was found to be 75%. Patients were malnourished, had diminished muscle function and were suffering from a number of physical and mental symptoms. The severity of fatigue was unrelated to age, sex, diagnosis, presence or site of metastases, anaemia, dose of opioid or steroid, any of the haematological or biochemical indices (except urea), nutritional status, voluntary muscle function, or mood. A multivariate analysis found that fatigue severity was significantly associated with pain and dypnoea scores in the patients, and with the symptoms of anxiety and depression in the controls. The authors conclude that subjective fatigue is both prevalent and severe among patients with advanced cancer. The causes of this symptom remain obscure. Further work is required in order to determine if the associations reported between fatigue and pain and between fatigue and dyspnoea are causal or coincidental.

A pilot trial to evaluate the acute toxicity and feasibility of tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer

Epidemiological and experimental evidence indicates that oestrogens are involved in the carcinogenic promotion of human breast cancer. We have undertaken a pilot trial of tamoxifen, an anti-oestrogen, compared to placebo given to 200 women at a high risk of developing breast cancer. The results of this trial show that acute toxicity is low and that accrual and compliance are satisfactory. Furthermore, biochemical monitoring of lipids and clotting factors indicate that tamoxifen may reduce the risk of cardiovascular deaths. At this stage no untoward long-term risks have been identified, and it is therefore proposed that a large multicentre trial should be started.

Symptom relief with MVP (mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The role of chemotherapy in the palliation of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We have carried out a chemotherapy study emphasising symptom relief, a topic not normally discussed in previous similar studies. A total of 120 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a moderate-dose palliative chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitomycin C 8 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (alternate courses), vinblastine 6 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 50 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (MVP), repeating every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. Thirty-eight of 118 assessable patients (32%) achieved an objective response. Patients with locally advanced disease (stage IIIB) had a significantly better response rate (52%) than those with metastatic disease (25%) (P < 0.01). In 76 out of 110 (69%) patients, with tumour-related symptoms including 24 out of 31 patients (78%) with locally advanced disease, symptoms completely disappeared or substantially improved. In only 15 patients (14%) did symptoms progress during treatment. Symptomatic improvement was achieved after one course of chemotherapy in 61% and after two courses in 96% of responding patients. The schedule was well tolerated. Only 19% developed WHO grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, and only 3% developed significant alopecia. Other toxicities were minimal. MVP is a pragmatic inexpensive chemotherapy regimen that offers useful symptom palliation in patients with advanced NSCLC and merits a 1-2 course therapeutic trial in such patients. The schedule should also be assessed as primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy before radical radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC in a randomised trial.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial of 6% Miltefosine Solution, a Topical Chemotherapy in Cutaneous Metastases From Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To compare 6% miltefosine solution (Miltex; Asta Medica, Frankfurt, Germany), a new topical cytostatic drug, with placebo as palliative treatment for cutaneous metastases from breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III study, a total of 52 patients with inoperable progressive skin lesions from histologically or cytologically confirmed breast cancer, not manageable by radiotherapy or systemic treatment, with superficial or flat skin lesions (estimated depth of invasion < or = 1 cm) were randomized to receive either 6% miltefosine solution or placebo. The solution was applied at the dose of 2 drops/10 cm(2), once daily during the first week and twice daily thereafter until treatment failure. RESULTS Treatment groups were well balanced for patient characteristics at study entry except for a small difference in age. Time to treatment failure (TTF), the primary parameter of this study, showed miltefosine solution to be significantly superior to placebo (P = .007); the median TTF in the miltefosine solution group was nearly three times longer than that in the placebo group (56 days v 21 days). The rate of response based on intention to treat patients was 33.3% for miltefosine solution compared with 3.7% for placebo (P = .006). Cutaneous reactions were seen mainly in the miltefosine group, with the type and frequency similar to those observed in previous studies. CONCLUSION 6% Miltefosine solution is confirmed as an effective palliative treatment option for cutaneous metastases from breast cancer. Skin reactions, when present, are well tolerated and only occasionally require cessation of treatment.

What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre

Like any other specialty, palliative care needs a scientific foundation on which to base its practice. Research in palliative care is particularly difficult because of the characteristics of the patient population under study (e.g. advanced disease, poor performance status and limited prognosis). The aim of this paper was to highlight the challenges of recruitment into clinical trials in palliative care. Information on all patients treated at a specialist cancer centre who were referred for consideration of entry into any one of 23 clinical trials in palliative care was collected prospectively over 4 years to determine factors that influence patients to accept or reject entry into a study. Of the 1206 patients referred, 558 (46%) met the entry criteria. Of these, 362 (30%) agreed to enter and 248 (21% of all those referred) completed the study. Thus, 65% of all eligible patients were entered into trials but only 44% of these completed the study. The relatively high percentage of patients entered probably reflects the site (a cancer centre with a high research profile) and is not typical of other palliative care centres or hospices. The most common reasons given for unwillingness to participate were a wish to defer to a later date, a deterioration in condition, distance from home to hospital, a lack of interest, transfer to another unit, inability to give consent and family objection. In order to maximise patient accrual into trials in palliative care, studies should be designed to suit the patient population under study (e.g. be of short duration with realistic entry criteria) and not necessarily mirror the trial methodology of therapeutic trials in oncology.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Toxicity of Subcutaneous Ketamine in the Management of Cancer Pain

PURPOSE The anesthetic ketamine is widely used for pain related to cancer, but the evidence to support its use in this setting is weak. This study aimed to determine whether ketamine is more effective than placebo when used in conjunction with opioids and standard adjuvant therapy in the management of chronic uncontrolled cancer pain. Ketamine would be considered of net benefit if it provided clinically relevant improvement in pain with limited breakthrough analgesia and acceptable toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multisite, dose-escalation, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial, ketamine or placebo was delivered subcutaneously over 3 to 5 days. RESULTS In all, 185 participants were included in the primary analysis. There was no significant difference between the proportion of positive outcomes (0.04; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.18; P = .55) in the placebo and intervention arms (response rates, 27% [25 of 92] and 31% [29 of 93]). Pain type (nociceptive v neuropathic) was not a predictor of response. There was almost twice the incidence of adverse events worse than baseline in the ketamine group after day 1 (incidence rate ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.46 to 2.61; P < .001) and throughout the study. Those receiving ketamine were more likely to experience a more severe grade of adverse event per day (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.18; P = .039). The number of patients needed to treat for one additional patient to have a positive outcome from ketamine was 25 (95% CI, six to ∞). The number needed to harm, because of toxicity-related withdrawal, was six (95% CI, four to 13). CONCLUSION Ketamine does not have net clinical benefit when used as an adjunct to opioids and standard coanalgesics in cancer pain.

Fatigue in Patients with Cancers of the Breast or Prostate Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy

To determine the prevalence, severity, and correlates of fatigue among patients with cancers of the prostate or breast receiving high dose radiotherapy with curative intent, a prospective, questionnaire-based study evaluated a convenience sample of 62 patients who were about to start a course of radiotherapy. Patients were assessed immediately prior to treatment, and again within a week of finishing. Fatigue was assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Bidimensional Fatigue Scale (BFS). Quality of life was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQc30). Psychological distress was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Personality Traits were assessed using the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI). Fatigue severity increased significantly on 3 out of the 5 assessment instruments used. Radiotherapy was associated with a decline in global quality of life, role, cognitive and social functioning, and an increase in nausea/vomiting, pain, insomnia, diarrhea, and financial difficulty. At baseline, 39% of the variation in fatigue scores among the patients could be explained by a combination of measures of their global quality of life and physical functioning. A combination of fatigue and anxiety scores at baseline was able to predict 54% of the variation in fatigue scores at the completion of radiotherapy. These data indicate that fatigue is a significant problem for patients receiving radical radiotherapy, although its severity is relatively modest.

A prospective survey of the use of dexamethasone on a palliative care unit

One hundred and six consecutive patients started on glucocorticosteroids (steroids) according to a defined prescription policy were surveyed each week to document the indications for use, any beneficial effect, any toxicity incurred and the reason for stopping. All patients had advanced malignant disease and survived for a median of 40.5 days (range 1–398+ days) from the start of steroid treatment. Fifty-seven per cent of patients completed three or more assessments. The most common specific indications for starting steroids were spinal cord compression, cerebral metastases, lymphangitis carcinomatosa and intestinal obstruction. The most common non-specific indications were anorexia, nausea, low mood, pain and vomiting. The median duration of steroid use was 21.5 days (range 1–89 days). The most common reason for the discontinuation of steroids was death or deteriorating condition. Symptom scores improved at some stage for the majority of patients started on steroids for anorexia, nausea, pain, low mood, vomiting and weakness but not in patients complaining of dyspnoea or poor mobility. The most common side-effects that were most probably attributable to steroid therapy were oral candidosis and proximal myopathy. The benefits of steroids when used according to defined guidelines were thought to outweigh toxicity.