Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Janet Royalty is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Janet Royalty.


American Journal of Public Health | 2010

Timeliness of Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Initiation of Treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996–2005

Lisa C. Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B. Benard

OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of program policy changes, we examined service delivery benchmarks for breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). METHODS We analyzed NBCCEDP data for women with abnormal mammogram or clinical breast examination (n=382 416) from which 23 701 cancers were diagnosed. We examined time to diagnosis and treatment for 2 time periods: 1996 to 2000 and 2001 to 2005. We compared median time for diagnostic, treatment initiation, and total intervals with the Kruskal-Wallis test. We calculated adjusted proportions (predicted marginals) with logistic regression to examine diagnosis and treatment within program benchmarks (<or=60 days) and time from screening to treatment (<or=120 days). RESULTS Median diagnostic intervals decreased by 2 days (25 vs 23; P<.001). Median treatment initiation intervals increased by 2 days (12 vs 14; P<.001). Total intervals decreased by 3 days (43 vs 40; P<.001). Women meeting the 60-day benchmark for diagnosis improved the most for women with normal mammograms and abnormal clinical breast examinations from 77% to 82%. CONCLUSIONS Women screened by the NBCCEDP received diagnostic follow-up and initiated treatment within preestablished program guidelines.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2011

Estimated effects of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on breast cancer mortality.

Thomas J. Hoerger; Donatus U. Ekwueme; Jacqueline W. Miller; Vladislav Uzunangelov; Ingrid J. Hall; Joel E. Segel; Janet Royalty; James G. Gardner; Judith Lee Smith; Chunyu Li

BACKGROUND The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides breast cancer screening to medically underserved, low-income women aged 40-64 years. No study has evaluated NBCCEDPs effect on breast cancer mortality. PURPOSE This study estimates life-years saved by NBCCEDP breast cancer screening compared with screening in the absence of NBCCEDP and with no screening. METHODS A breast cancer simulation model based on existing Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network models was constructed. The screening module from these models was modified to reflect screening frequency for NBCCEDP participants. Screening data for uninsured women represented what would have happened without the program. Separate simulations were performed for women who received NBCCEDP (Program) screening, women who potentially received screening without the program (No Program), and women who received no screening (No Screening). The impact of NBCCEDP was estimated as the difference in life-years between the Program and No Program, and the Program and No Screening scenarios. The analysis was performed in 2008-2009. RESULTS Among 1.8 million women who were screened between 1991 and 2006, the Program saved 100,800 life-years compared with No Program and 369,000 life-years compared with No Screening. Per woman screened, the Program saved 0.056 life-years (95% CI=0.031, 0.081) compared with No Program and 0.206 life-years (95% CI=0.177, 0.234) compared with No Screening. Per woman with invasive breast cancer and screen-detected invasive cancer, the Program saved 0.41 and 0.71 life-years, respectively, compared with No Program. CONCLUSIONS These estimates suggest that NBCCEDP breast cancer screening has reduced mortality among medically uninsured and underinsured low-income women.


Journal of Womens Health | 2012

Timeliness of Cervical Cancer Diagnosis and Initiation of Treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program

Vicki B. Benard; William Howe; Janet Royalty; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Lisa C. Richardson

OBJECTIVES To examine time intervals from cervical cancer screening to diagnosis and treatment initiation among low-income and uninsured women in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) during two consecutive time periods. METHODS We analyzed NBCCEDP data for women with abnormal Pap tests (n=100,167), from which 1,417 invasive cervical cancers were diagnosed. We examined two time intervals for this study: diagnostic interval (time from abnormal Pap test to the date of definitive diagnosis) and treatment initiation interval (time from definitive diagnosis to treatment initiation) for two time periods: 1996-2002 and 2003-2009. We compared median time intervals for diagnostic and treatment initiation using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Adjusted proportions (predicted marginals) were calculated using logistic regression to examine diagnosis and treatment within program benchmarks (≤60 days). RESULTS Median diagnostic intervals decreased overall by 6 days (54 vs. 48 days, p<0.001). This decrease in the median diagnostic interval was noted for all variables examined. The median treatment initiation intervals remained stable over the two time periods. CONCLUSIONS Women screened by the NBCCEDP receive diagnostic follow-up and initiate treatment within preestablished program guidelines.


Cancer | 2013

Clinical outcomes from the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program

Laura C. Seeff; Janet Royalty; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Jennifer E. Boehm; Diane M. Dwyer; William Howe; Djenaba A. Joseph; Dorothy S. Lane; Melinda Laughlin; Melissa Leypoldt; Steven C. Marroulis; Cynthia A. Mattingly; Marion R. Nadel; Ellen Phillips‐Angeles; Tanner Rockwell; A. Blythe Ryerson; Florence K. Tangka

Colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer‐related deaths among US men and women. Screening rates have been slow to increase, and disparities in screening remain.


Journal of Urban Health-bulletin of The New York Academy of Medicine | 2001

Incidence of HIV Among Injection Drug Users Entering Drug Treatment Programs in Four US Cities

Christopher S. Murrill; D. Rebecca Prevots; Martha S. Miller; Laurie Linley; Janet Royalty; Marta Gwinn

We estimated seroincidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and prevalence of risk behaviors among injection drug users (IDUs) who accepted voluntary HIV testing on entry to drug treatment. Record-based incidence studies were conducted in 12 drug treatment programs in New York City (n = 890); Newark, New Jersey (n = 521); Seattle, Washington (n = 1,256); and Los Angeles, California (n = 733). Records of confidential HIV tests were abstracted for information on demographics, drug use, and HIV test results. More detailed data on risk behaviors were obtained by a standardized questionnaire. Although overall incidence rates were relatively low in this population (<1/100 person-years), there was a high prevalence of risk behaviors. Needle sharing was reported by more than one-third of the participants in each of the cities. HIV seroincidence rates were up to three-fold higher among younger ID Us. We found that HIV continued to be transmitted among ID Us who had received both drug treatment and HIV counseling and testing. HIV/AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) prevention education should continue to be an important component of drug treatment.


Cancer | 2013

Outpatient colonoscopy complications in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: a prospective analysis.

Georgina Castro; M. Fuad Azrak; Laura C. Seeff; Janet Royalty

To the authorss knowledge, there are few published prospective cohort studies of colonoscopy complications in patients at average risk for colorectal cancer who received colorectal cancer screening from a community‐based program. In this article, the authors report the rate of colonoscopy complications in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP), which provided colorectal cancer screening to a medically underserved population aged 50 years to 64 years for screening, diagnostic follow‐up after positive stool blood tests, and surveillance purposes.


Cancer Causes & Control | 2015

Cervical cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1997–2012

Florence K. Tangka; David H. Howard; Janet Royalty; Lucinda P. Dalzell; Jacqueline W. Miller; Brett O’Hara; Susan A. Sabatino; Kristy Joseph; Kristy Kenney; Gery P. Guy; Ingrid J. Hall

Objective The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides breast and cervical cancer screens to low-income, uninsured, and underinsured women. We describe the number and proportion of women eligible for cervical cancer screening services and the proportion of eligible women screened over the period 1997–2012.


Cancer | 2013

Costs of planning and implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program

Sujha Subramanian; Florence K. Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Maggie Cole Beebe; Amy DeGroff; Janet Royalty; Laura C. Seeff

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initiated the Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP) to explore the feasibility of establishing a large‐scale colorectal cancer screening program for underserved populations in the United States. The authors of the current report provide a detailed description of the total program costs (clinical and nonclinical) incurred during both the start‐up and service delivery (screening) phases of the 4‐year program.


Cancer | 2014

Using data to effectively manage a national screening program

Brandie Yancy; Janet Royalty; Steve Marroulis; Cindy Mattingly; Vicki B. Benard; Amy DeGroff

The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is implemented through cooperative agreements with state health departments, US territories, and tribal health organizations (grantees). Grantees typically contract with clinicians and other providers to deliver breast and cervical cancer screening and diagnostic services. As required by the CDC, grantees report biannually a subset of patient and clinical level program data known as the Minimum Data Elements. Rigorous processes are in place to ensure the completeness and quality of program data collection. In this article, the authors describe the NBCCEDP data‐collection processes and data management system and discusses how data are used for 1) program monitoring and improvement, 2) evaluation and research, and 3) policy development and analysis. They also provide 2 examples of how grantees use data to improve their performance. Cancer 2014;120(16 suppl):2575‐83.


Cancer | 2013

Clinical Costs of Colorectal Cancer Screening in 5 Federally Funded Demonstration Programs

Florence K. Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Maggie Cole Beebe; Sonja Hoover; Janet Royalty; Laura C. Seeff

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated the Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP) to explore the feasibility of establishing a large‐scale colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program for underserved populations in the United States. The authors of this report assessed the clinical costs incurred at each of the 5 participating sites during the demonstration period.

Collaboration


Dive into the Janet Royalty's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Florence K. Tangka

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacqueline W. Miller

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy DeGroff

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vicki B. Benard

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donatus U. Ekwueme

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura C. Seeff

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingrid J. Hall

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James G. Gardner

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Blythe Ryerson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge