Janet Stowe

Evaluation of Aids and Equipment for Bathing: Survey II

A survey was carried out between 1974 and 1976 (Thomely, Chamberlain and Wright, 1977) at the Rheumatism and Rehabilitation Research Unit in Leeds, studying aids and equipment for bathing and toileting which had been prescribed and ordered when the patient had been assessed in an occupational therapy department. It revealed that two thirds of the aids were received weeks or months after the patient had returned home.

Acquisition and Use of Communication Aids by Those Buying Aids Directly from the Supplier

Assessment of the patient for a communication aid can be a complicated procedure, particularly in the case of those with multiple handicap. A wide range of professionals may need to be involved in the assessment. It was known that a number of people acquired communication aids directly from the manufacturers. A study was set up to investigate why this happened, what advice was available to such patients and the result of their action. Manufacturers of six of the most frequently used electronic aids supplied names of private buyers who were contacted by postal questionnaire over a 9-month period. Of the 34 respondents, 12 used no other form of communication other than their aid. Reasons for acquiring an aid included speech loss (9) and writing problems (6). There were 16 sources of information about their communication aid and 25 had tried their aid prior to acquisition. Nine taught themselves how to use their aid. Few (4) were used in large groups, but 25 used their aids at home and 9 at school. Although satisfaction with the aids was expressed, it is probable that patients had other uninvestigated but related difficulties, and that the aids they procured were not necessarily the most appropriate for them. It was evident that some had not had access to full assessment and after purchase had no known professional route for obtaining further help. These needs should be addressed.

Book Review: ‘Cabbage Syndrome.’ the Social Construction of Dependence‘CABBAGE SYNDROME.’ THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF DEPENDENCE. BarnesC.Falmer Press1990. 232pp. £10.95. ISBN 1 85 000 758 6.

motor disorders. London: Croom Helm, 1986. Cotton E, Parnwell M. Conductive education with special reference to severe athetoids in a non-residential centre. J Ment Subnormality 1968; 14(1): 50-56. Cotton E. Improvement in motor-function with the use of conductive education. Dev Med Child Neuro11974; 16(5): 637-43. Cotton E, Kinsman R. Conductive education for adult hemiplegia. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1983. Cotton E. The basic motor pattern. London: Spastic Society, 1986. Dunk: A. Conductive education for motor disorders (letter). Arch Dis Child 1988; 63(6): 680-81. Gent A, Giles G. Conductive education and motor learning. In: Fussey I, Giles G, eds. Rehabilitation of the severely brain injured adult. London: Croom Helm, 1987. Haberfellner H. Therapeutic possibilities for the handicapped child. Padiatr Pado11988; 23(2): 149-60. Heal, Laird W, et aI. Evaluating an integrated approach to the manugement of cerebral palsy. Four Volumes. Washington, DC: Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, 1972. Heal, Laird W. Evaluation of an integrated approach to the management of cerebral palsy. National Association for Retarded Children, Arlington, Virginia. Except Child 1974; 40(6): 452-53. Smith A. The Bristol adaptation of the Hungarian method of conductive education for the cerebral palsied child. Prog Phys Ther 1970; 1(3): 254-57. Sutton A. Conductive education in the Midlands, Summer 1982: progress and problems in the importation of an educational method. Educ Stud 1984; 10: 121-30. Sutton A. Conductive education: a challenge to integration. Educ Child Psychol1986; 3(2): 5-12. Sutton A. Including pupils with disabilities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.