Janice F. Wiesman

High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients with AL Amyloidosis: An 8-Year Study

Context AL amyloidosis responds poorly to oral chemotherapy and rarely leads to elimination of plasma cell dyscrasia. Amyloid cardiomyopathy is a particularly fatal complication of the disease. Contribution Analysis of consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis from 6 separate trials over 8 years shows that high-dose intravenous melphalan therapy combined with autologous stem-cell transplantation greatly improves duration of survival and ameliorates organ dysfunction. Implications Intravenous melphalan therapy combined with stem-cell transplantation represents a clinically significant improvement in treating AL amyloidosis and shows promise in reversing amyloid cardiomyopathy. The Editors The most common form of systemic amyloidosis in the United States is AL (or primary) amyloidosis. In this disease, amyloid fibrils are derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains that are produced by an underlying clonal plasma cell dyscrasia. Although the burden of plasma cells is generally low, accumulation of amyloid deposits in vital organs leads to progressive disability and death. The median survival of untreated patients after diagnosis is 12 months and less than 5 months for those with cardiomyopathy (1-5). AL amyloidosis is reported to occur in 5 to 12 persons per million per year in the United States; however, death records and autopsy results suggest that the incidence may be higher (6, 7). Treatment with oral melphalan results in a modest increase in median survival but rarely eliminates the plasma cell dyscrasia and is not effective for rapidly progressive disease (8-10). Alternative chemotherapy regimens have not improved survival further (11-15). Promising treatment outcomes observed with high-dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma (16-19) provided a rationale for testing the hypothesis that this treatment would improve survival for patients with AL amyloidosis. Favorable responses to high-dose melphalan and stem-cell transplantation in patients with AL amyloidosis have been reported in case reports and in small series; however, treatment-related mortality was high in multicenter trials (20-28). Our initial experience with treatment in AL amyloidosis indicated that selected patients can tolerate treatment and that hematologic responses and reversal of amyloid-related organ dysfunction can be achieved (29-32). Since 1994, we have evaluated 701 patients with AL amyloidosis, 312 of whom initiated high-dose melphalan treatment and stem-cell transplantation. This longitudinal study examines survival, hematologic response, and improvement of amyloid-related organ disease in patients who were treated with high-dose melphalan and stem-cell transplantation. We contrast these data with features and survival of a simultaneous cohort of patients who were not eligible for treatment. Methods Patients Between July 1994 and June 2002, 701 consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis were evaluated and clinical data were collected with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Boston University Medical Center. All patients had biopsy-proven amyloid disease and a documented plasma cell dyscrasia, which was diagnosed by the presence of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow or a monoclonal gammopathy detected by immunofixation electrophoresis of serum or urine proteins (Figure 1). To exclude another type of systemic amyloidosis and a monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, all patients with findings compatible with familial or secondary (AA) amyloidosis were tested by DNA analysis for gene mutations in transthyretin, apolipoprotein A1, fibrinogen, and lysozyme known to be associated with amyloidosis and by immunohistochemistry of the biopsy tissue for AA amyloid fibril deposits (33). Patients with multiple myeloma (bone marrow plasmacytosis 30% or lytic bone lesions) were excluded. In patients older than 70 years of age with cardiomyopathy only, a diagnosis of senile cardiac amyloidosis (caused by wild-type transthyretin) was excluded by immunohistochemical examination of a tissue biopsy specimen using antiserum to transthyretin. All patients were evaluated for degree of organ involvement by physical examination, standardized blood tests, electrocardiography, echocardiography, chest radiography, pulmonary function tests, and a 24-hour urine collection. All patients were evaluated by a hematologist and cardiologist and, when appropriate, by nephrology, pulmonology, gastroenterology, and neurology specialists. Figure 1. Algorithm for patient selection and treatment with high-dose melphalan and stem-cell transplantation. High-Dose Melphalan and Stem-Cell Transplantation Eligibility and Protocols Patients were enrolled in several sequential institutional review boardapproved protocols during the 8-year study period. Eligibility criteria for all protocols required biopsy-proven amyloid disease; evidence of a plasma cell dyscrasia; at least 1 major organ affected by amyloid disease; and minimum measures of cardiac, pulmonary, and performance status (Figure 1). Functional measures included cardiac ejection fraction 0.4 or greater, absence of symptomatic pleural effusions, absence of heart failure or arrhythmia resistant to medical management, oxygen saturation of 95% or greater on room air, lung diffusing capacity of 50% or more of predicted, supine systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater, and Southwest Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less unless limited by neuropathy (on a scale of 0 to 4, reflecting percentage of the day [0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100%] spent in bed or in a chair). Minor variations in eligibility requirements for age, renal function, amount of previous chemotherapy, and time from diagnosis while on some protocols are noted in the following discussion; the number of patients affected is also given. The first protocol (July 1994 to December 1995) enrolled 13 patients 60 years of age or younger with serum creatinine values of 176.8 mol/L (2.0 mg/dL) or less; these patients were treated with melphalan, 200 mg/m2 (29). Subsequent protocols had no restriction for impaired renal function. A second protocol (April 1995 to October 1996) enrolled 28 patients 70 years of age or younger and used a lower dose of melphalan, 100 mg/m2 (31). Two protocols (January 1996 to June 1998) evaluated the use of CD34+-selected stem cells in 16 patients (34). The fifth protocol (October 1996 to September 2000) randomly assigned 100 previously untreated patients to treatment with high-dose melphalan and stem-cell transplantation immediately or after 2 cycles of oral melphalan and prednisone. There was no age limit for this protocol; however, melphalan, 140 mg/m2, was given to patients who were older than 65 years of age or had a cardiac ejection fraction between 0.40 and 0.44. The sixth protocol (November 2000 to the present) has enrolled 29 patients 65 years of age or younger. On this protocol, enough stem cells are collected initially to give a second cycle of chemotherapy within the first year if a complete response has not been achieved after an initial course of melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m2. Other patients who met eligibility criteria (August 1996 to the present) but were excluded from an active protocol because of previous treatment or time from diagnosis were treated by using the established dosing guidelines. Patients who did not meet eligibility for treatment with high-dose melphalan and stem-cell transplantation were grouped according to reasons for ineligibility and were analyzed for survival. Organ system involvement was defined by physical examination; postural blood pressure determinations; standardized serologic laboratory measurements of kidney, liver, and endocrine function; coagulation studies, including factor X levels; electrocardiography; echocardiography; chest radiography; pulmonary function tests with walking oximetry; and a 24-hour urine collection for protein excretion. Cardiac involvement was defined by septal or posterior wall thickening of 13 mm or greater on echocardiography or a clinical syndrome of congestive heart failure or cardiac arrhythmia in the absence of preexisting cardiac disease. Renal involvement was diagnosed by proteinuria of 500 mg/24 h or greater or an elevated serum creatinine concentration in the absence of other causes of renal disease. Gastrointestinal involvement was diagnosed by involuntary loss of 10% of body weight, unexplained diarrhea, hepatomegaly of 4 cm or more below the right costal margin on physical examination, or alkaline phosphatase level 2 or more times the upper limit of normal values. Peripheral neuropathy was diagnosed by symptoms and physical examination or nerve conduction studies, and autonomic neuropathy was defined by orthostatic hypotensiona decrease in systolic blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or greater with upright posture in euvolemic patients. Soft tissue involvement was diagnosed by clinical evidence of macroglossia, soft tissue or subcutaneous deposits, amyloid arthropathy, lymphadenopathy, or nail dystrophy. Coagulation factor X level was considered deficient if it was 50% or less of normal. Stem-Cell Collection and High-Dose Chemotherapy Peripheral blood stem cells were collected by leukapheresis after mobilization using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. A minimum yield of 2.0 106 CD34+cells/kg of body weight was required to support high-dose chemotherapy. The patients age and cardiac status and the number of stem cells collected determined the melphalan dose (Figure 1). A dose of 200 mg/m2 was administered to patients who were 65 years of age or younger and who had a cardiac ejection fraction of 0.45 or greater and a stem-cell collection of at least 2.5 106 CD34+cells/kg. A dose of 140 mg/m2 was administered to patients who were older than 65 years of age, who had a cardiac ejection fraction of 0.4 to 0.44, or who had a stem-cell collection of 2.0 to 2.5 106 CD34+cells/k

Repurposing diflunisal for familial amyloid polyneuropathy: A randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE Familial amyloid polyneuropathy, a lethal genetic disease caused by aggregation of variant transthyretin, induces progressive peripheral nerve deficits and disability. Diflunisal, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, stabilizes transthyretin tetramers and prevents amyloid fibril formation in vitro. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of diflunisal on polyneuropathy progression in patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS International randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted among 130 patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy exhibiting clinically detectable peripheral or autonomic neuropathy at amyloid centers in Sweden (Umeå), Italy (Pavia), Japan (Matsumoto and Kumamoto), England (London), and the United States (Boston, Massachusetts; New York, New York; and Rochester, Minnesota) from 2006 through 2012. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly assigned to receive diflunisal, 250 mg (n=64), or placebo (n=66) twice daily for 2 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point, the difference in polyneuropathy progression between treatments, was measured by the Neuropathy Impairment Score plus 7 nerve tests (NIS+7) which ranges from 0 (no neurological deficits) to 270 points (no detectable peripheral nerve function). Secondary outcomes included a quality-of-life questionnaire (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]) and modified body mass index. Because of attrition, we used likelihood-based modeling and multiple imputation analysis of baseline to 2-year data. RESULTS By multiple imputation, the NIS+7 score increased by 25.0 (95% CI, 18.4-31.6) points in the placebo group and by 8.7 (95% CI, 3.3-14.1) points in the diflunisal group, a difference of 16.3 points (95% CI, 8.1-24.5 points; P < .001). Mean SF-36 physical scores decreased by 4.9 (95% CI, -7.6 to -2.2) points in the placebo group and increased by 1.5 (95% CI, -0.8 to 3.7) points in the diflunisal group (P < .001). Mean SF-36 mental scores declined by 1.1 (95% CI, -4.3 to 2.0) points in the placebo group while increasing by 3.7 (95% CI, 1.0-6.4) points in the diflunisal group (P = .02). By responder analysis, 29.7% of the diflunisal group and 9.4% of the placebo group exhibited neurological stability at 2 years (<2-point increase in NIS+7 score; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy, the use of diflunisal compared with placebo for 2 years reduced the rate of progression of neurological impairment and preserved quality of life. Although longer-term follow-up studies are needed, these findings suggest benefit of this treatment for familial amyloid polyneuropathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00294671.

Assessing mNIS+7Ionis and International Neurologists' Proficiency in an FAP Trial.

Polyneuropathy signs (Neuropathy Impairment Score, NIS), neurophysiologic tests (m+7Ionis), disability, and health scores were assessed in baseline evaluations of 100 patients entered into an oligonucleotide familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) trial.

Assessing mNIS+7Ionis and international neurologists' proficiency in a familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy trial

Polyneuropathy signs (Neuropathy Impairment Score, NIS), neurophysiologic tests (m+7Ionis), disability, and health scores were assessed in baseline evaluations of 100 patients entered into an oligonucleotide familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) trial.

High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation for AL amyloidosis: recent trends in treatment-related mortality and 1-year survival at a single institution

Treatment with high-dose melphalan chemotherapy supported by hematopoietic rescue with autologous stem cells produces high rates of hematologic responses and improvement in survival and organ function for patients with AL amyloidosis. Ongoing clinical trials explore pre-transplant induction regimens, post-transplant consolidation or maintenance approaches, and compare transplant to non-transplant regimens. To put these studies into context, we reviewed our recent experience with transplant for AL amyloidosis in the Amyloid Treatment and Research Program at Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine. Over the past 10 years, there was a steady reduction in rates of treatment-related mortality and improvement in 1-year survival, now approximately 5% and 90%, respectively, based upon an intention-to-treat analysis. Median overall survival of patients treated with this approach at our center exceeds 7.5 years. Introduction: Treatment of AL amyloidosis patients with high-dose intravenous melphalan chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support (HDM/SCT) produces a high rate of hematologic complete responses and improvement in organ function. Nephrotic syndrome can resolve [1], myocardial wall thickness can decline (MeierEwert et al., this volume), and quality of life improves [2]. Good outcomes are dependent upon the safe application of the therapy. Our first large patient series, published in 2004, reported a 100 day treatment-related mortality (TRM) of 14% [3]. Since then, we have refined patient selection and transplantation techniques and seen a concomitant decline in the rate of serious complications. Methods: Data on patients evaluated and treated in the Amyloid Treatment and Research Program at Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center were collected under protocols approved by the Boston University Medical Campus IRB after informed consent was signed. Data on patients enrolled into protocols using HDM/SCT from January 2000–December 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. Survival of all patients was determined through the end of December 2010, providing at least 1 year of follow-up on 100% of patients. Kaplan-Meier survival and confidence intervals for median overall and event-free survival were determined. Results and discussion: In the 10-year-period from January 2000 through December 2009, 323 patients began treatment on institutional or cooperative group protocols using HDM/SCT. The age range of enrolled patients was 28–80 years (median 57). The overall TRM was 8.4%, and the 1-year survival (1 YS) was 86.1% by intention-to-treat analysis. In the more recent 5-year-period from January 2005 through December 2009, 158 patients were treated; the age range was 28–77 years (median 57), the TRM was 5.1%, and the 1YS was 89.2%. Annual trends are plotted in Figure 1. The overall survival and progression free survival of all 323 patients are plotted in Figure 2. We attribute these improvements to two factors: firstly, rigorous selection of appropriate patients; and secondly, experienced multidisciplinary management during the peri-transplant period. Appropriate patient selection requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary clinical evaluation. The key evaluation components are summarized below. Chronological age is not a critical factor [4]. Patients who are potential candidates for HDM/SCT are assessed by sub-specialists highly familiar with the clinical manifestations of amyloidosis and with the complications of HDM/SCT. Cardiopulmonary function: Many studies have demonstrated that outcomes for patients with AL amyloidosis are driven by cardiac disease, defined by clinical parameters, echocardiographic parameters, and biomarkers for cardiac function. We use all of these to judge cardiac risk, including careful review of symptoms, physical examination for signs of heart Figure 1. Trends in TRM (lower line) and 1YS (upper line) each year in the 10-year-period from 2000 through the end of 2009, for a total of 323 patients. 127

Diaphragm paralysis in primary systemic amyloidosis.

A patient with primary (AL) systemic amyloidosis developed mononeuropathy multiplex complicated by diaphragmatic failure. High dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation did not ameliorate neuropathy or diaphragm dysfunction. Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation lowered arterial carbon dioxide levels and improved daytime dyspnea. This is the first case associating AL amyloid-induced neuropathy with diaphragm dysfunction.

Saphenous mononeuropathy after popliteal vein aneurysm repair.

Introduction:Saphenous mononeuropathy has been a well recognized consequence of lower extremity surgery. However, this complication has not been previously described with popliteal vein aneurysm repair. Case Presentation:We report the case of a 42-year-old woman with a saphenous mononeuropathy after popliteal vein aneurysm repair. Her saphenous neuropathy was confirmed by nerve conduction studies. Her case gives us an opportunity to review saphenous mononeuropathy and its many different etiologies. We also review the role of electrodiagnostic studies in the diagnosis of saphenous mononeuropathy. Conclusions:Though this particular iatrogenic injury has not previously been described, both neurologists and surgeons should be aware of this complication following popliteal vein aneurysm resection with saphenous vein interposition.

Clinical Reasoning: A 51-year-old woman with syncopal episodes and multiple cranial neuropathies

### Case presentation. A 51-year-old right-handed woman was admitted to the hospital because of two syncopal episodes. Both events had similar features with sudden onset of loss of consciousness. There were no preceding symptoms. They lasted only few seconds and were not accompanied by any abnormal movements, incontinence, or tongue biting. There was no confusion following the events. A feeling of vertigo, which gradually dissipated over the following 2 days, was the only residual symptom following both episodes. The patient also had a history of hypertension. She was on no medications. She consumed alcohol occasionally but denied tobacco or drug abuse. Her family history was positive only for heart disease in her mother. ### Question for consideration: 1. What is the differential diagnosis of syncope in this case? GO TO SECTION 2 Syncope is a sudden and brief loss of consciousness, associated with a loss of postural tone, with spontaneous recovery. It results from transiently decreased or interrupted cerebral blood flow. Frequently, the etiology remains unknown. Among diagnosed cases, neurocardiogenic syncope (including vasovagal attack, situational syncope, and carotid sinus syncope) is the most frequent cause. It stems from reflex-mediated changes in the vascular tone or heart rate. Other causes include cardiac (organic heart disease or arrhythmia) or neurologic diseases (concussion or seizure), orthostatic hypotension, medications, or psychiatric disorders.1,2 In this patient, based on the history, both reflex-mediated and primary cardiac causes were contemplated. On admission, the patient reported 3 years of right hearing defect without tinnitus or ear pain. She denied dysphagia or hoarseness of her voice. She was otherwise asymptomatic. On neurologic examination, cranial nerves I–VII were intact. There were multiple lower cranial neuropathies (VIII–XII) on the right side. There was sig-nificant right ear hearing loss. The tuning fork tests were equivocal: the Weber test lateralized to the affected ear (suggesting a conductive hearing loss in …