Janice M. Johnston
University of Hong Kong
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Janice M. Johnston.
Medical Education | 2003
Janice M. Johnston; Gabriel M. Leung; Keith Tin; Lai-Ming Ho
Objectives Most evidence‐based practice (EBP) educational assessment tools evaluated to date have focused on specific knowledge components or technical skills. Other important potential barriers to the adoption of EBP, such as attitudinal, perceptual and behavioural factors, have yet to be studied, especially in the undergraduate setting. Therefore, we developed and validated a knowledge, attitude and behaviour questionnaire designed to evaluate EBP teaching and learning in an undergraduate medical curriculum.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2002
Gabriel M. Leung; Lai-Ming Ho; Moon‐Fai Chan; Janice M. Johnston; Fung Kam Wong
Low response rates, especially among physicians, are a common problem in mailed survey research. We conducted a randomized trial to examine the effects of cash and lottery incentives on response rates. A total of 4,850 subjects were randomized to one of three interventions accompanying a mailed survey-no incentive (n = 1,700), cash payment [three levels of Hong Kong dollars (HKD)
Medical Education | 2004
Janice M. Johnston; Gabriel M. Leung; Keith Tin; Lai-Ming Ho; Wendy Wing Tak Lam
10,
Medical Care | 2003
Gabriel M. Leung; Susana Castan-Cameo; Sarah M. McGhee; Irene O. L. Wong; Janice M. Johnston
20, and
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity | 2013
Ester Cerin; Ka Yiu Lee; Anthony Barnett; Cindy Sit; Man-chin Cheung; Wai Man Chan; Janice M. Johnston
40; N = 50 in each subgroup], or entry into a lottery (three levels of HKD
Medical Education | 2004
Wendy Wing Tak Lam; Roger A. Fielding; Janice M. Johnston; Keith Tin; Gabriel M. Leung
1,000,
Public Health Nutrition | 2014
Ester Cerin; Cindy P.H. Sit; Anthony Barnett; Janice M. Johnston; Man-chin Cheung; Wai-man Chan
2,000, and
BMC Public Health | 2012
Kelvin Kf Lam; Janice M. Johnston
4,000; N = 1,000 in each subgroup) on receipt of the completed questionnaire. The response rates were higher among those offered incentives than those without (19.8% vs. 16.8%, P =.012). Cash was the more effective incentive compared to lottery (27.3% vs. 19.4%, P =.017). Response also increased substantially between the first and second mailings (14.2% vs. 18.8%, P >.001). In addition, those with specialist qualifications were more willing to participate in mailed surveys. We found no significant differences in response outcomes among the various incentive arms. Cash reward at the
BMJ Open | 2015
Anthony Barnett; Ester Cerin; Claudia S-K Ching; Janice M. Johnston; Ruby S. Y. Lee
20 level was the most cost-effective intervention, in terms of cost per responder. Further systematic examination of the effects of different incentive strategies in epidemiologic studies should be encouraged.
Thorax | 2008
Peng Wu; Benjamin J. Cowling; Cm Schooling; Irene Wong; Janice M. Johnston; Chi-Chiu Leung; Cheuk Ming Tam; Gabriel M. Leung
Introduction Handheld computers (PDAs) uploaded with clinical decision support software (CDSS) have the potential to facilitate the adoption of evidence‐based medicine (EBM) at the point‐of‐care among undergraduate medical students. Further evaluation of the usefulness and acceptability of these tools is required.