Janine Paynter
University of Auckland
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Janine Paynter.
BMJ Open | 2016
Helen Petousis-Harris; Tony Walls; Donna Watson; Janine Paynter; Patricia Graham; Nikki Turner
Objectives Actively recruit and intensively follow pregnant women receiving a dose of acellular pertussis vaccine for 4 weeks after vaccination. Design and settings A prospective observational study conducted in 2 New Zealand regions. Participants Women in their 28th–38th week of pregnancy, recruited from primary care and antenatal clinics at the time of Tdap administration. Telephone interviews were conducted at 48 h and 4 weeks postvaccination. Main outcomes measures Outcomes were injection site reactions, systemic symptoms and serious adverse events (SAEs). Where available, data have been classified and reported according to Brighton Collaboration definitions. Results 793 women participated with 27.9% receiving trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine concomitantly. 79% of participants reported mild or moderate pain and 2.6% severe pain. Any swelling was reported by 7.6%, induration by 12.0% (collected from 1 site only, n=326), and erythema by 5.8% of participants. Fever was reported by 17 (2.1%) participants, 14 of these occurred within 24 h. Headache, dizziness, nausea, myalgia or arthralgia was reported by <4% of participants, respectively, and fatigue by 8.4%. During the study period, there were 115 adverse events in 113 participants, most of which were minor. At the end of the reporting period, 31 events were classified as serious (eg, obstetric bleeding, hypertension, infection, tachycardia, preterm labour, exacerbation of pre-existing condition and pre-eclampsia). All had variable onset time from vaccination. There were two perinatal deaths. Clinician assessment of all SAEs found none likely to be vaccine related. Conclusions Vaccination with Tdap in pregnant women was well tolerated with no SAE likely to be caused by the vaccine. Trial registration number ACTRN12613001045707.
Tobacco Control | 2016
Janine Paynter; Marewa Glover; Chris Bullen; Deepika Sonia
Background Reduction of the availability of tobacco has been proposed as a means of reducing and denormalising tobacco use. Some retailers have stopped selling tobacco. Therefore, we investigated how willing New Zealand convenience store owners were to stop selling tobacco or sell nicotine replacement therapy. Promotion of their stores was offered as an incentive to stop selling tobacco. Methods We asked convenience store owners in the Auckland metropolitan region of New Zealand to choose one of three actions. The first was to stop selling tobacco for a short period of time; the second was to restrict the hours that they sold tobacco; the third was to display and sell nicotine replacement therapy. All participating retailers completed a short interview about selling tobacco. We also surveyed customers about nicotine replacement and cessation. Results One-third of eligible retailers agreed to participate. Most who participated (93%) were unwilling to stop or restrict tobacco sales and 2 (7%) had already stopped selling tobacco. Tobacco was perceived as a key product for their businesses. Very few customers who purchased cigarettes noticed nicotine replacement therapy or obtained it from convenience stores. Conclusions Substantially reducing the availability of tobacco in communities is likely to require legislative approaches, underpinned by sustained community pressure and support for convenience store owners who are willing to change their business model.
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2018
Matthew J. Glasgow; Jane E. Harding; Richard Edlin; Jane M. Alsweiler; J. Geoffery Chase; Deborah L. Harris; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A. Wouldes; Judith M. Ansell; Anne Jaquiery; Kelly Jones; Sapphire Martin; Christina McQuoid; Jenny Rogers; Heather Stewart; Anna Catherine Tottman; Kate Williamson; Ellen Campbell; Coila Bevan; Tineke J Crawford; Kelly Fredell; Kate Sommers; Claire Hahnhaussen; Safayet Hossin; Karen Frost; Grace McKnight; Janine Paynter; Jess Wilson; R P Young; Anna Gsell
Objective To evaluate the costs of using dextrose gel as a primary treatment for neonatal hypoglycemia in the first 48 hours after birth compared with standard care. Study design We used a decision tree to model overall costs, including those specific to hypoglycemia monitoring and treatment and those related to the infants length of stay in the postnatal ward or neonatal intensive care unit, comparing the use of dextrose gel for treatment of neonatal hypoglycemia with placebo, using data from the Sugar Babies randomized trial. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of dextrose gel cost, neonatal intensive care cost, cesarean delivery rate, and costs of glucose monitoring. Results In the primary analysis, treating neonatal hypoglycemia using dextrose gel had an overall cost of NZ
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics | 2018
Nadia A. Charania; Janine Paynter; Arier C. Lee; Donna Watson; Nikki Turner
6863.81 and standard care (placebo) cost NZ
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2018
Helen Petousis-Harris; Anna S. Howe; Janine Paynter; Nikki Turner; Jennifer B. Griffin
8178.25; a saving of NZ
Clinical Rheumatology | 2016
Helen Petousis-Harris; Janine Paynter
1314.44 per infant treated. Sensitivity analyses showed that dextrose gel remained cost saving with wide variations in dextrose gel costs, neonatal intensive care unit costs, cesarean delivery rates, and costs of monitoring. Conclusions Use of buccal dextrose gel reduces hospital costs for management of neonatal hypoglycemia. Because it is also noninvasive, well tolerated, safe, and associated with improved breastfeeding, buccal dextrose gel should be routinely used for initial treatment of neonatal hypoglycemia. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12608000623392.
The Lancet | 2017
Helen Petousis-Harris; Janine Paynter; Jane Morgan; Peter Saxton; Barbara McArdle; Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Steven Black
ABSTRACT Migrants may experience immunisation inequities compared with the host population related to barriers with accessing immunisations in their home countries, while migrating and/or post-arrival. This retrospective cohort study explored vaccination rates among migrant and non-migrant children in New Zealand (NZ). Linked de-identified data from various government sources from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2015 were analysed using Statistic NZ’s Integrated Data Infrastructure. Vaccination rates were compared between three cohorts of children aged up to 5 years: foreign-born children who migrated to NZ; children born in NZ of migrant mothers; and a comparator group of children born in NZ to non-migrant mothers. Less than half of foreign-born children (46%) had a record in the NZ National Immunisation Register compared with 95% and 96% among migrant and non-migrant NZ-born children, respectively. Foreign-born migrant children had lower age-appropriate reported vaccination rates by vaccine of interest, ethnicity and visa category compared with NZ-born children. Migrant children from Pacific ethnicities had lower reported coverage than other ethnicities. High rates of not age-appropriately vaccinated were noted among foreign-born children on refugee, Pacific and humanitarian visa schemes. This study highlights possible shortfalls around immunisation data, particularly about recording vaccinations given overseas for foreign-born children, and potential challenges around engagement with immunisation services for migrant children. However, results highlight the successful engagement of quota refugee children as part of NZ’s refugee orientation programme. It is important to monitor vaccination coverage by migrant and refugee background to inform improvements to policy and practice for wider population health benefits.
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2016
Deborah L. Harris; Jane M. Alsweiler; Judith M. Ansell; G. Gamble; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia Ann Wouldes; Tzu-Ying Yu; Je Harding; Judith Ansell; Coila Bevan; Jessica Brosnanhan; Ellen Campbell; Tineke J Crawford; Kelly Fredell; Karen Frost; Greg Gamble; Anna Gsell; Claire Hahnhaussen; Safayet Hossin; Yannan Jiang; Kelly Jones; Sapphire Martin; Christopher J.D. McKinlay; Grace McKnight; Christina McQuoid; Janine Paynter; Jenny Rogers; Kate Sommers; Heather Stewart; Anna Timmings
BACKGROUND Hospitalization rates for infectious diseases in New Zealand (NZ) children have increased since 1989. The highest burden is among Māori and Pacific children, and the most socioeconomically deprived. New Zealand introduced pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)7 in June 2008, PCV10 in 2011, and PCV13 in 2014. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of NZ children aged <6 years between 2006 and 2015 was performed using administrative databases. Demographics and hospitalizations were linked to evaluate the impact of the PCV vaccination program on cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), all-cause pneumonia (ACP), and otitis media (OM), defined by ICD-10-AM codes, and to explore the effect by ethnicity and deprivation. RESULTS Between 2006 and 2015, there were 640 children hospitalized with IPD, 26589 for ACP, and 44545 for OM. IPD hospitalizations declined by 73% between 2005 and 2015 for children <6 years of age, whereas ACP and OM declined by 8% and 25%, respectively. The highest rates for all diseases were among Māori and Pacific children and those from high deprivation. However, the declines were highest among Māori and Pacific children and those from socioeconomically deprived areas. IPD hospitalizations declined by 79% and 67% for Māori and Pacific children, respectively, between 2006 and 2015. ACP declined by 12% in Māori and 21% in Pacific children. OM declined by 51% in Māori children. CONCLUSION In contrast to the increasing trend of hospitalization rates for infectious disease in New Zealand, the use of PCV appears associated with reductions in ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in hospitalization for IPD, ACP, and OM.
The New Zealand Medical Journal | 2008
Marewa Glover; Janine Paynter; Chris Bullen; Kristensen K
1. I would like to respond to comments in Dr MartinezLevin’s letter published on 14 November on proposed HPV vaccination syndrome. Case series are not recognised as a ‘first line of evidence’ when describing adverse effects of treatments. They help us know when further research on safety and effects are needed. Only studies which include an unexposed comparator group will allow an assessment of cause and effect in the case of a potential problem. Many such safety studies have already been done for the HPV vaccine. 2. Biased selection of case reports (i.e. only looking at cases of a condition occurring after a vaccination and excluding cases of the same condition in unvaccinated individuals) do nothing to raise ‘red flags’ about HPV vaccine safety when there are studies with over 1 million individuals comparing outcomes in vaccinated AND unvaccinated. Studies that have assessed neurological events following HPV vaccine include a register-based cohort study from Denmark and Sweden with 997,585 girls aged 10–17 of whom 296,828 had received a total of 696,420 doses of Gardasil [1]. That leaves over 700,000 unvaccinated girls, and there was no difference in neurological outcomes. 3. The concerns about aluminium raised by Dr MartinezLevin have already been raised in the past and thoroughly investigated. Dr Martinez-Levin’s literature, seems a bit behind the times and does not discuss the large body of evidence on the safety of aluminium adjuvants including a major review by the French High Council for Public Health. This 2013 review was in response to the claims from a single research group that a histological entity (Macrophagic Myofasciitis) was associated with diffuse muscle pain and fatigue. The review concludes that the scientific data available do not allow the safety of vaccines containing aluminium to be called into question [2].
The New Zealand Medical Journal | 2007
Grace Wong; Marewa Glover; Nosa; Becky Freeman; Janine Paynter; Robert Scragg