Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Janne Kärki is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Janne Kärki.


Waste Management | 2014

Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 1: SRF produced from commercial and industrial waste.

Muhammad Nasrullah; Pasi Vainikka; Janne Hannula; Markku Hurme; Janne Kärki

This paper presents the mass, energy and material balances of a solid recovered fuel (SRF) production process. The SRF is produced from commercial and industrial waste (C&IW) through mechanical treatment (MT). In this work various streams of material produced in SRF production process are analyzed for their proximate and ultimate analysis. Based on this analysis and composition of process streams their mass, energy and material balances are established for SRF production process. Here mass balance describes the overall mass flow of input waste material in the various output streams, whereas material balance describes the mass flow of components of input waste stream (such as paper and cardboard, wood, plastic (soft), plastic (hard), textile and rubber) in the various output streams of SRF production process. A commercial scale experimental campaign was conducted on an MT waste sorting plant to produce SRF from C&IW. All the process streams (input and output) produced in this MT plant were sampled and treated according to the CEN standard methods for SRF: EN 15442 and EN 15443. The results from the mass balance of SRF production process showed that of the total input C&IW material to MT waste sorting plant, 62% was recovered in the form of SRF, 4% as ferrous metal, 1% as non-ferrous metal and 21% was sorted out as reject material, 11.6% as fine fraction, and 0.4% as heavy fraction. The energy flow balance in various process streams of this SRF production process showed that of the total input energy content of C&IW to MT plant, 75% energy was recovered in the form of SRF, 20% belonged to the reject material stream and rest 5% belonged with the streams of fine fraction and heavy fraction. In the material balances, mass fractions of plastic (soft), plastic (hard), paper and cardboard and wood recovered in the SRF stream were 88%, 70%, 72% and 60% respectively of their input masses to MT plant. A high mass fraction of plastic (PVC), rubber material and non-combustibles (such as stone/rock and glass particles), was found in the reject material stream.


Waste Management & Research | 2015

Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 3: Solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid waste

Muhammad Nasrullah; Pasi Vainikka; Janne Hannula; Markku Hurme; Janne Kärki

This is the third and final part of the three-part article written to describe the mass, energy and material balances of the solid recovered fuel production process produced from various types of waste streams through mechanical treatment. This article focused the production of solid recovered fuel from municipal solid waste. The stream of municipal solid waste used here as an input waste material to produce solid recovered fuel is energy waste collected from households of municipality. This article presents the mass, energy and material balances of the solid recovered fuel production process. These balances are based on the proximate as well as the ultimate analysis and the composition determination of various streams of material produced in a solid recovered fuel production plant. All the process streams are sampled and treated according to CEN standard methods for solid recovered fuel. The results of the mass balance of the solid recovered fuel production process showed that 72% of the input waste material was recovered in the form of solid recovered fuel; 2.6% as ferrous metal, 0.4% as non-ferrous metal, 11% was sorted as rejects material, 12% as fine faction and 2% as heavy fraction. The energy balance of the solid recovered fuel production process showed that 86% of the total input energy content of input waste material was recovered in the form of solid recovered fuel. The remaining percentage (14%) of the input energy was split into the streams of reject material, fine fraction and heavy fraction. The material balances of this process showed that mass fraction of paper and cardboard, plastic (soft) and wood recovered in the solid recovered fuel stream was 88%, 85% and 90%, respectively, of their input mass. A high mass fraction of rubber material, plastic (PVC-plastic) and inert (stone/rock and glass particles) was found in the reject material stream.


Waste Management | 2014

Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 2: SRF produced from construction and demolition waste.

Muhammad Nasrullah; Pasi Vainikka; Janne Hannula; Markku Hurme; Janne Kärki

In this work, the fraction of construction and demolition waste (C&D waste) complicated and economically not feasible to sort out for recycling purposes is used to produce solid recovered fuel (SRF) through mechanical treatment (MT). The paper presents the mass, energy and material balances of this SRF production process. All the process streams (input and output) produced in MT waste sorting plant to produce SRF from C&D waste are sampled and treated according to CEN standard methods for SRF. Proximate and ultimate analysis of these streams is performed and their composition is determined. Based on this analysis and composition of process streams their mass, energy and material balances are established for SRF production process. By mass balance means the overall mass flow of input waste material stream in the various output streams and material balances mean the mass flow of components of input waste material stream (such as paper and cardboard, wood, plastic (soft), plastic (hard), textile and rubber) in the various output streams of SRF production process. The results from mass balance of SRF production process showed that of the total input C&D waste material to MT waste sorting plant, 44% was recovered in the form of SRF, 5% as ferrous metal, 1% as non-ferrous metal, and 28% was sorted out as fine fraction, 18% as reject material and 4% as heavy fraction. The energy balance of this SRF production process showed that of the total input energy content of C&D waste material to MT waste sorting plant, 74% was recovered in the form of SRF, 16% belonged to the reject material and rest 10% belonged to the streams of fine fraction and heavy fraction. From the material balances of this process, mass fractions of plastic (soft), paper and cardboard, wood and plastic (hard) recovered in the SRF stream were 84%, 82%, 72% and 68% respectively of their input masses to MT plant. A high mass fraction of plastic (PVC) and rubber material was found in the reject material stream. Streams of heavy fraction and fine fraction mainly contained non-combustible material (such as stone/rock, sand particles and gypsum material).


International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2013

Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill – Part I: Technical concept analysis

Antti Arasto; Eemeli Tsupari; Janne Kärki; Erkki Pisilä; Lotta Sorsamäki


International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2013

Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill – Part II: Economic feasibility

Eemeli Tsupari; Janne Kärki; Antti Arasto; Erkki Pisilä


Energy Procedia | 2014

Bio-CCS: Feasibility comparison of large scale carbon-negative solutions☆

Antti Arasto; Kristin Onarheim; Eemeli Tsupari; Janne Kärki


Journal of energy storage | 2016

Economic feasibility of power-to-gas integrated with biomass fired CHP plant

Eemeli Tsupari; Janne Kärki; Esa Vakkilainen


International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2014

Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill—Part I: Technical concept analysis

Antti Arasto; Eemeli Tsupari; Janne Kärki; Jarmo Lilja; Miika Sihvonen


Energy Procedia | 2011

Prospects for application of CCS in Finland

Sebastian Teir; Eemeli Tsupari; Antti Arasto; Tiina Koljonen; Janne Kärki; Antti Lehtilä; Lauri Kujanpää; Soile Aatos; Matti Nieminen


Energy Procedia | 2014

Feasibility of significant CO2 emission reductions in thermal power plants–comparison of biomass and CCS☆

Antti Arasto; Eemeli Tsupari; Janne Kärki; Risto Sormunen; Timo Korpinen; Sari Hujanen

Collaboration


Dive into the Janne Kärki's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eemeli Tsupari

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antti Arasto

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Muhammad Nasrullah

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pasi Vainikka

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sebastian Teir

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kristin Onarheim

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matti Tähtinen

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sampo Kouri

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Toni Pikkarainen

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge