Janne M. Veerbeek

What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Physical therapy (PT) is one of the key disciplines in interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update of the evidence for stroke rehabilitation interventions in the domain of PT. Methods and Findings Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding PT in stroke rehabilitation were retrieved through a systematic search. Outcomes were classified according to the ICF. RCTs with a low risk of bias were quantitatively analyzed. Differences between phases poststroke were explored in subgroup analyses. A best evidence synthesis was performed for neurological treatment approaches. The search yielded 467 RCTs (N = 25373; median PEDro score 6 [IQR 5–7]), identifying 53 interventions. No adverse events were reported. Strong evidence was found for significant positive effects of 13 interventions related to gait, 11 interventions related to arm-hand activities, 1 intervention for ADL, and 3 interventions for physical fitness. Summary Effect Sizes (SESs) ranged from 0.17 (95%CI 0.03–0.70; I2 = 0%) for therapeutic positioning of the paretic arm to 2.47 (95%CI 0.84–4.11; I2 = 77%) for training of sitting balance. There is strong evidence that a higher dose of practice is better, with SESs ranging from 0.21 (95%CI 0.02–0.39; I2 = 6%) for motor function of the paretic arm to 0.61 (95%CI 0.41–0.82; I2 = 41%) for muscle strength of the paretic leg. Subgroup analyses yielded significant differences with respect to timing poststroke for 10 interventions. Neurological treatment approaches to training of body functions and activities showed equal or unfavorable effects when compared to other training interventions. Main limitations of the present review are not using individual patient data for meta-analyses and absence of correction for multiple testing. Conclusions There is strong evidence for PT interventions favoring intensive high repetitive task-oriented and task-specific training in all phases poststroke. Effects are mostly restricted to the actually trained functions and activities. Suggestions for prioritizing PT stroke research are given.

Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) was developed to overcome upper limb impairments after stroke and is the most investigated intervention for the rehabilitation of patients. Original CIMT includes constraining of the non-paretic arm and task-oriented training. Modified versions also apply constraining of the non-paretic arm, but not as intensive as original CIMT. Behavioural strategies are mostly absent for both modified and original CIMT. With forced use therapy, only constraining of the non-paretic arm is applied. The original and modified types of CIMT have beneficial effects on motor function, arm-hand activities, and self-reported arm-hand functioning in daily life, immediately after treatment and at long-term follow-up, whereas there is no evidence for the efficacy of constraint alone (as used in forced use therapy). The type of CIMT, timing, or intensity of practice do not seem to affect patient outcomes. Although the underlying mechanisms that drive modified and original CIMT are still poorly understood, findings from kinematic studies suggest that improvements are mainly based on adaptations through learning to optimise the use of intact end-effectors in patients with some voluntary motor control of wrist and finger extensors after stroke.

Is Accurate Prediction of Gait in Nonambulatory Stroke Patients Possible Within 72 Hours Poststroke? The EPOS Study

Background. Early prognosis, adequate goal setting, and referral are important for stroke management. Objective. To investigate if independent gait 6 months poststroke can be accurately predicted within the first 72 hours poststroke, based on simple clinical bedside tests. Reassessment on days 5 and 9 was used to check whether accuracy changed over time. Methods. In 154 first-ever ischemic stroke patients unable to walk independently, 19 demographic and clinical variables were assessed within 72 hours and again on days 5 and 9 poststroke. Multivariable logistic modeling was applied to identify early prognostic factors for regaining independent gait, defined as ≥4 points on the Functional Ambulation Categories. Results. Multivariable modeling showed that patients with an independent sitting balance (Trunk Control Test–sitting; 30 seconds) and strength of the hemiparetic leg (Motricity Index leg; eg, visible contraction for all 3 items, or movement against resistance but weaker for 1 item) on day 2 poststroke had a 98% probability of achieving independent gait at 6 months. Absence of these features in the first 72 hours was associated with a probability of 27%, declining to 10% by day 9. Conclusions. Accurate prediction of independent gait performance can be made soon after stroke, using 2 simple bedside tests: “sitting balance” and “strength of the hemiparetic leg.” This knowledge is useful for making early clinical decisions regarding treatment goals and discharge planning at hospital stroke units.

Predictive value of the NIHSS for ADL outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: Does timing of early assessment matter?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Early prediction of future functional abilities is important for stroke management. The objective of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of the 13-item National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), measured within 72 h after stroke, for the outcome in terms of activities of daily living (ADL) 6 months post stroke. The second aim was to examine if the timing of NIHSS assessment during the first days post stroke affects the accuracy of predicting ADL outcome 6 months post stroke. METHODS Baseline characteristics including neurological deficits were measured in 188 stroke patients, using the 13-item NIHSS, within 72 h and at 5 and 9 days after a first-ever ischemic hemispheric stroke. Outcome in terms of ADL dependency was measured with the Barthel Index (BI) at 6 months post stroke. The area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to determine the discriminative properties of the NIHSS at days 2, 5 and 9 for outcome of the BI. In addition, at optimal cut-off odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predicted values (NPV) for the different moments of NIHSS assessment post stroke were calculated. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-nine of the 188 patients were assessed at a mean of 2.2 (1.3), 5.4 (1.4) and 9.0 (1.8) days after stroke. Significant Spearman rank correlation coefficients were found between BI at 6 months and NIHSS scores on days 2 (r(s)=0.549, p<0.001), 5 (r(s)=0.592, p<0.001) and 9 (r(s)=0.567, p<0.001). The AUC ranged from 0.789 (95%CI, 0.715-0.864) for measurements on day 2 to 0.804 (95%CI, 0.733-0.874) and 0.808 (95%CI, 0.739-0.877) for days 5 and 9, respectively. Odds ratios ranged from 0.143 (95%CI, 0.069-0.295) for assessment on day 2 to a maximum of 0.148 (95%CI, 0.073-0.301) for day 5. The NPV gradually increased from 0.610 (95%CI, 0.536-0.672) for assessment on day 2 to 0.679 (95%CI, 0.578-0.765) for day 9, whereas PPV declined from 0.810 (95%CI, 0.747-0.875) for assessment on day 2 to 0.767 (95%CI, 0.712-0.814) for day 9. The overall accuracy of predictions increased from 71.7% for assessment on day 2 to 73.6% for day 9. CONCLUSIONS When measured within 9 days, the 13-item NIHSS is highly associated with final outcome in terms of BI at 6 months post stroke. The moment of assessment beyond 2 days post stroke does not significantly affect the accuracy of prediction of ADL dependency at 6 months. The NIHSS can therefore be used at acute hospital stroke units for early rehabilitation management during the first 9 days post stroke, as the accuracy of prediction remained about 72%, irrespective of the moment of assessment.

Effects of Exercise Therapy on Balance Capacity in Chronic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of exercise training on balance capacity in people in the chronic phase after stroke. Furthermore, we aimed to identify which training regimen was most effective. Methods— Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of exercise therapy on balance capacity in the chronic phase after stroke. Studies were included if they were of moderate or high methodological quality (PEDro score ≥4). Data were pooled if a specific outcome measure was reported in at least 3 randomized controlled trials. A sensitivity analysis and consequent subgroup analyses were performed for the different types of experimental training (balance and/or weight-shifting training, gait training, multisensory training, high-intensity aerobic exercise training, and other training programs). Results— Forty-three randomized controlled trials out of 369 unique hits were included. A meta-analysis could be conducted for the Berg Balance Scale (28 studies, n=985), Functional Reach Test (5 studies, n=153), Sensory Organization Test (4 studies, n=173), and mean postural sway velocity (3 studies, n=89). A significant overall difference in favor of the intervention group was found for the Berg Balance Scale (mean difference 2.22 points (+3.9%); 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–3.17; P<0.01; I2=52%), Functional Reach Test (mean difference=3.12 cm; 95% CI, 0.90–5.35; P<0.01; I2=74%), and Sensory Organization Test (mean difference=6.77 (+7%) points; 95% CI, 0.83–12.7; P=0.03; I2=0%). Subgroup analyses of the studies that included Berg Balance Scale outcomes demonstrated a significant improvement after balance and/or weight-shifting training of 3.75 points (+6.7%; 95% CI, 1.71–5.78; P<0.01; I2=52%) and after gait training of 2.26 points (+4.0%; 95% CI, 0.94–3.58; P<0.01; I2=21, whereas no significant effects were found for other training regimens. Conclusions— This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that balance capacities can be improved by well-targeted exercise therapy programs in the chronic phase after stroke. Specifically, balance and/or weight-shifting and gait training were identified as successful training regimens.

Is more physiotherapy better after stroke

‘More is better’ has been the mantra for physiotherapists working in stroke rehabilitation. Studies examining the neuroplasticity of the brain have shown that repetitive, meaningful practice is essential to drive positive plasticity, and meta-analyses of clinical trials provide evidence of benefit of increased therapy provision. However, a recent large clinical trial appears to contradict this evidence. The CIRCIT trial investigated two alternative models of physiotherapy service delivery for people after stroke. Despite participants in the circuit class therapy arm of the trial receiving an additional 22 h of physiotherapy time, their outcomes were not superior to usual care. This editorial interrogates and provides some possible explanations for these apparently contradictory findings.

Is the proportional recovery rule applicable to the lower limb after a first-ever ischemic stroke?

Objective To investigate (a) the applicability of the proportional recovery rule of spontaneous neurobiological recovery to motor function of the paretic lower extremity (LE); and (b) the presence of fitters and non-fitters of this prognostic rule poststroke. When present, the clinical threshold for fitting nor non-fitting would be determined, as well as within-subject generalizability to the paretic upper extremity (UE). Methods Prospective cohort study in which the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-LE and FMA-UE were measured <72 hours and 6 months poststroke. Predicted maximum potential recovery was defined as [FMA-LEmax−FMA-LEinitial = 34 –FMA-LEinitial]. Hierarchical clustering in 202 first-ever ischemic stroke patients distinguished between fitting and not fitting the rule. Descriptive statistics determined whether fitters and non-fitters for LE were the same persons as for UE. Results 175 (87%) patients fitted the FMA-LE recovery rule. The observed average improvement of the fitters was ~64% of the predicted maximum potential recovery. In the non-fitter group, the maximum initial FMA-LE score was 13 points. Fifty-one out of 78 patients (~65%) who scored below the identified 14-point threshold at baseline fitted the FMA-LE rule. Non-fitters were more severely affected than fitters. All non-fitters of the FMA-LE rule did also not fit the proportional recovery rule for FMA-UE. Conclusions Proportional recovery seems to be consistent within subjects across LE and UE motor impairment at the hemiplegic side in first-ever ischemic hemispheric stroke subjects. Future studies should investigate prospectively distinguishing between fitters and not-fitters within the subgroup of patients who have initial low FMA-LE scores. Subsequently, patients could be stratified based on fitting or not fitting the recovery rule as this would impact rehabilitation management and trial design.

Selecting relevant and feasible measurement instruments for the revised Dutch clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients after stroke

Abstract Purpose: To select relevant and feasible instruments for the revision of the Dutch clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke. Methods: In this implementation study a comprehensive proposal for ICF categories and matching instruments was developed, based on reliability and validity. Relevant instruments were then selected in a consensus round by 11 knowledge brokers who were responsible for the implementation of the selected instruments. The feasibility of the selected instruments was tested by 36 physical therapists at different work settings within stroke services. Finally, instruments that were deemed relevant and feasible were included in the revised guideline. Results: A total of 28 instruments were recommended for inclusion in the revised guideline. Nineteen instruments were retained from the previous guideline. Ten new instruments were tested in clinical practice, seven of which were found feasible. Two more instruments were added after critical appraisal of the set of the measurement instruments. Conclusions: The revised guideline contains 28 relevant and feasible instrument selected and tested in clinical practice by physical therapists. Further education and implementation is needed to integrate instruments in clinical practice. Further research is proposed for developing and implementing a core set of measurement instruments to be used at fixed time points to establish data registries that allow for continuous improvement of rehabilitation for stroke patients. Implications for Rehabilitation The revised Dutch Stroke Physical Therapy Guideline recommends a total of 28 instruments, that are relevant and feasible for clinical practice of physical therapist in the different settings of stroke rehabilitation. The selection of instrument in daily practice should be part of the clinical reasoning process of PTs and be tailored to individual patients’ needs and the degree of priority of the affected ICF category. Suggested education strategies for further integration of instruments in of the daily practice of PTs in Stroke Rehabilitation are: ‘Training on the job’ and ‘peer assessment in clinical situations’.

Design of the ExCersion-VCI study : The effect of aerobic exercise on cerebral perfusion in patients with vascular cognitive impairment

There is evidence for a beneficial effect of aerobic exercise on cognition, but underlying mechanisms are unclear. In this study, we test the hypothesis that aerobic exercise increases cerebral blood flow (CBF) in patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). This study is a multicenter single‐blind randomized controlled trial among 80 patients with VCI. Most important inclusion criteria are a diagnosis of VCI with Mini‐Mental State Examination ≥22 and Clinical Dementia Rating ≤0.5. Participants are randomized into an aerobic exercise group or a control group. The aerobic exercise program aims to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and takes 14 weeks, with a frequency of three times a week. Participants are provided with a bicycle ergometer at home. The control group receives two information meetings. Primary outcome measure is change in CBF. We expect this study to provide insight into the potential mechanism by which aerobic exercise improves hemodynamic status.