Jantien van der Heyden
Maastricht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jantien van der Heyden.
Acta Paediatrica | 2014
Sabine Bakhuizen; Timo R. de Haan; Margreet Teune; Aleid G. van Wassenaer-Leemhuis; Jantien van der Heyden; David van der Ham; Ben Willem J. Mol
Infants suffering from neonatal sepsis face an increased risk of early death and long‐term neurodevelopmental delay. This paper analyses and summarises the existing data on short‐term and long‐term outcomes of neonatal sepsis, based on 12 studies published between January 2000 and 1 April 2012 and covering 3669 neonates with sepsis.
American Journal of Perinatology | 2010
Jantien van der Heyden; Stijn van Teeffelen; Anne C.G Coolen; Feico Halbertsma; Robert Aardenburg; Helena J.M.M Mertens; Ben Willem J. Mol
Neonatal infection is the main complication of prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM). We studied the accuracy of measuring C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocytes in maternal serum to predict neonatal infection. We performed a retrospective cohort study in two hospitals in the Netherlands between 2003 and 2006. We included consecutive women hospitalized for PROM. In both hospitals, CRP and leukocytes were measured routinely in maternal serum every 2 days until delivery. End points considered were clinical neonatal infection and proven neonatal sepsis. The accuracy of CRP and leukocytes was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. We included 299 women with PROM, 12 of whom had a twin pregnancy. Gestational age at inclusion varied between 26 weeks and 0 days and 41 weeks and 5 days with a median of 37 weeks and 3 days. In 47 women (16%), the neonate developed a clinical infection. The areas under the ROC curve of CRP and leukocytes in the prediction of clinical neonatal infection were 0.61 and 0.62, respectively. Of the 47 infected neonates, six neonates (2%) had a proven neonatal sepsis. In the mothers of these septic neonates, maternal CRP did not rise above 50 mg/L and leukocyte values varied between 9.8 and 25.8 x 10 (9)/L. In women with PROM, CRP and leukocytes should not be measured routinely.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2015
Jantien van der Heyden; Christine Willekes; Anneloes L. van Baar; Aleid G. van Wassenaer-Leemhuis; Eva Pajkrt; Martijn A. Oudijk; Martina Porath; Hans Duvekot; Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp; Mariette Groenewout; Mallory Woiski; Bas Nij Bijvank; Caroline J. Bax; Janneke van 't Hooft; Marko Sikkema; Bettina M.C. Akerboom; T. Mulder; Jan G. Nijhuis; Ben W.J. Mol; David van der Ham
OBJECTIVE We recently reported that induction of labour does not improve short term neonatal outcome in women with late preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) as compared to expectant management (PPROMEXIL trial). In this study the neurodevelopmental and behavioural outcome of the children from this trial at 2 years of age was studied. STUDY DESIGN We studied outcome of offspring of women randomised in the PPROMEXIL study. These women had >24h of ruptured membranes and were between 34 and 37 weeks of pregnancy when they were randomised to induction of labour (IoL) or expectant management (EM). Two years after delivery, the parents received the ages and stages questionnaire (ASQ), the child behaviour checklist (CBCL) and a general questionnaire. RESULTS Follow-up data were obtained from 234 children (121 after IoL, 113 after EM, response rate 59% (44% of the original 532 randomised women)). In the IoL group 16 children (14%) had an abnormal score in ≥1 domains of the ASQ, versus 27 (26%) in the EM group (difference in percentage -11.4 (95% CI -21.9 to -0.98; p=0.033)). For the CBCL, an abnormal score was found in 13% (n=15) in the IoL group and in 15% (n=16) in the EM group (difference in percentage -2.13 (95% CI -11.2 to 6.94; p=0.645)). CONCLUSION Although a policy of induction of labour in women with late PPROM does not improve short term neonatal outcome, it might be associated with a decrease in neurodevelopmental difficulties at the age of two years as compared to expectant management. Expectant management did not lead to a difference in behavioural problems.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012
David van der Ham; Jantien van der Heyden; Brent C. Opmeer; Antonius L.M. Mulder; Rob Moonen; J. (Hans) J. van Beek; Maureen Franssen; Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp; J. M. Sikkema; Christianne J.M. de Groot; Martina Porath; Anneke Kwee; Mallory Woiski; Johannes J. Duvekot; Bettina M.C. Akerboom; Aren J. van Loon; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Christine Willekes; Ben Willem J. Mol; Jan G. Nijhuis
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2013
Jantien van der Heyden; David van der Ham; Sander M. J. van Kuijk; Kim Notten; Timothy Janssen; Jan G. Nijhuis; Christine Willekes; Martina Porath; Joris A. M. van der Post; Feico Halbertsma; Ben Willem J. Mol; Eva Pajkrt
American Journal of Perinatology Reports | 2013
Jantien van der Heyden; Sander M. J. van Kuijk; David van der Ham; Kim Notten; Timothy Janssen; Jan G. Nijhuis; Christine Willekes; Martina Porath; Joris A. M. van der Post; Feico Halbertsma; Eva Pajkrt; Ben Willem J. Mol
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2014
Jantien van der Heyden; Christine Willekes; M.A. Oudijk; Martina Porath; Hans Duvekot; Kitty Bloemenkamp; Maureen Franssen; Mallory Woiski; Bas Bij Nijvank; Marko Sikkema; Twan Mulder; Jan G. Nijhuis; Ben Willem J. Mol; David van der Ham
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey | 2013
David van der Ham; Jantien van der Heyden; Brent C. Opmeer; Antonius L.M. Mulder; Rob Moonen; Hans van Beek; Maureen Franssen; Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp; J. Marko Sikkema; Christianne J.M. de Groot; Martina Porath; Anneke Kwee; Mallory Woiski; Hans Duvekot; Bettina M.C. Akerboom; Aren J. van Loon; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Christine Willekes; Ben Willem J. Mol; Jan G. Nijhuis
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012
David van der Ham; Jantien van der Heyden; Brent C. Opmeer; Antonius L.M. Mulder; Rob Moonen; J. (Hans) J. van Beek; Maureen Franssen; Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp; J. M. Sikkema; Christianne J.M. de Groot; Martina Porath; Anneke Kwee; Mallory Woiski; Johannes J. Duvekot; Bettina M.C. Akerboom; Aren J. van Loon; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Christine Willekes; Jan G. Nijhuis
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012
Jantien van der Heyden; Stijn van Teeffelen; David van der Ham; Jelle Schaaf; Anita Ravelli; Christine Willekes; Jan G. Nijhuis; Ben Willem J. Mol