Janusz Kochman

Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this document is to make the output of the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IWG-IVOCT) Standardization and Validation available to medical and scientific communities, through a peer-reviewed publication, in the interest of improving the diagnosis and treatment of patients with atherosclerosis, including coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) is a catheter-based modality that acquires images at a resolution of ~10 μm, enabling visualization of blood vessel wall microstructure in vivo at an unprecedented level of detail. IVOCT devices are now commercially available worldwide, there is an active user base, and the interest in using this technology is growing. Incorporation of IVOCT in research and daily clinical practice can be facilitated by the development of uniform terminology and consensus-based standards on use of the technology, interpretation of the images, and reporting of IVOCT results. METHODS The IWG-IVOCT, comprising more than 260 academic and industry members from Asia, Europe, and the United States, formed in 2008 and convened on the topic of IVOCT standardization through a series of 9 national and international meetings. RESULTS Knowledge and recommendations from this group on key areas within the IVOCT field were assembled to generate this consensus document, authored by the Writing Committee, composed of academicians who have participated in meetings and/or writing of the text. CONCLUSIONS This document may be broadly used as a standard reference regarding the current state of the IVOCT imaging modality, intended for researchers and clinicians who use IVOCT and analyze IVOCT data.

Rationale and design of the randomized, double-blind trial testing INtraveNous and Oral administration of elinogrel, a selective and reversible P2Y12-receptor inhibitor, versus clopidogrel to eVAluate Tolerability and Efficacy in nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Interventions patients (INNOVATE-PCI)

Despite current dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, adverse clinical events continue to occur during and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The failure of clopidogrel to provide optimal protection may be related to delayed onset of action, interpatient variability in its effect, and an insufficient level of platelet inhibition. Furthermore, the irreversible binding of clopidogrel to the P2Y(12) receptor for the life span of the platelet is associated with increased bleeding risk especially during urgent or emergency surgery. Novel antiplatelet agents are required to improve management of patients undergoing PCI. Elinogrel is a potent, direct-acting (ie, non-prodrug), selective, competitive, and reversible P2Y(12) inhibitor available in both intravenous and oral formulations. The INNOVATE-PCI study is a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, clopidogrel-controlled trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of this novel antiplatelet agent in patients undergoing nonurgent PCI.

A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 2 trial to evaluate a novel selective and reversible intravenous and oral P2Y 12 inhibitor elinogrel versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention: The INNOVATE-PCI trial

Background— We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of elinogrel, a competitive, reversible intravenous and oral P2Y12 inhibitor that does not require metabolic activation, in patients undergoing nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results— In a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging phase 2b trial, 652 patients received either 300 or 600 mg of clopidogrel pre-percutaneous coronary intervention followed by 75 mg daily or 80 or 120 mg of IV elinogrel followed by 50, 100, or 150 mg oral elinogrel twice daily. Numerous exploratory safety and efficacy end points were assessed and, as such, had no prespecified primary end point, and the study was not powered to conclusively evaluate its objectives. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction combined bleeding was increased with elinogrel (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 3.57), related largely to increased bleeding requiring medical attention (elinogrel 47/408 [11.5%] versus clopidogrel 13/208 [6.3%]) and occurring primarily at the percutaneous coronary intervention access site. Efficacy end points and postprocedure cardiac enzyme were similar, but there was a nonsignificant higher frequency of periprocedural myocardial infarctions in the elinogrel arms (OR, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 3.48). There was an increased incidence of dyspnea (elinogrel 50/408 [12.3%] versus clopidogrel 8/208 [3.8%]) and transaminase elevation (alanine transferase/aspartate transferase >3× the upper limit of normal; elinogrel 18/408 [4.4%] versus clopidogrel 2/208 [1.0%]) in the elinogrel arms, but there were no cases of heart block, bradycardia, hypotension, or liver failure. Conclusions— In patients undergoing nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention and in comparison with clopidogrel, intravenous and oral elinogrel therapy did not significantly increase thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major or minor bleeding, although bleeding requiring medical attention was more common. The significance of these findings will need to be more definitively determined in future Phase 3 studies. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00751231.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: A patient level multi-center analysis

OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV). BACKGROUND BiAV remains a relative contraindication to TAVI resulting in exclusion from TAVI trials and thus limiting data on the clinical performance of transcatheter valves in these patients. METHODOLOGY We conducted an international patient level multicenter analysis on outcomes in patients with BiAV undergoing TAVI. The primary outcome of the study was the combined early safety endpoint--a composite of 30 day mortality, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary artery obstruction, major vascular complication and valve related dysfunction. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint as well as post-TAVI paravalvular leak (PVL), rehospitalization, new pacemaker insertion and device success rates at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS A total of 108 patients with BiAV were identified in 21 centers in Canada, Spain, Italy, Poland and Singapore who underwent TAVI between January 2005 and March 2014. The composite primary outcome occurred in one quarter of patients (26.9%)--mainly driven by re-intervention for valve malposition (9.3%). The 30-day and 1 year mortality rates were 8.3% and 16.9% respectively with AR ≥ 3+ occurring in 9.6% of patients. Device success was achieved in 85.2% of cases with pacemaker insertion in 19.4%. While PVL was not associated with an increased risk of 30 day or 1 year mortality--Type I BiAV anatomy with left and right cusp fusion had significantly better outcomes than other valve variants. CONCLUSION In selected patients with BiAV and severe aortic stenosis, TAVI appears both safe and feasible with acceptable clinical outcomes. Clinical studies of TAVI in this patient population are warranted.

Baseline platelet size is increased in patients with acute coronary syndromes developing early stent thrombosis and predicts future residual platelet reactivity. A case-control study

INTRODUCTION Pre-procedural predictors of early stent thrombosis (ST) and future response to platelet inhibitors are in demand. We sought to evaluate the impact of baseline platelet indices on the occurrence of early ST and future residual platelet reactivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Hundred and eight patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in whom stents were implanted were included: 36 consecutive ST cases and 72 matched controls. Platelet indices assessed with flow cytometry before stent implantation were retrieved from the departments data base. Residual platelet reactivity specific to aspirin (aspirin reaction units-ARU) and clopidogrel (P2Y12 reaction units-PRU) was assessed prospectively with VerifyNow under dual antiplatelet treatment. RESULTS Platelet size reported as mean platelet volume (MPV) or proportion of large platelets (LPLT) was significantly higher in ST cases compared with controls (10.4, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 10.1-10.8 vs. 9.7, CI, 9.5-9.9, P=0.0004 and 35.8, CI, 34.2-37.3 vs. 33.3, CI, 32.2-34.3, P=0.007, respectively). Dual aspirin and clopidogrel poor-responsiveness was diagnosed significantly more often in ST cases than in controls (19.6% vs. 1.4%, P=0.004), whereas no difference was observed for single aspirin or clopidogrel poor-responsiveness. A strong correlation was found between MPV and both, ARU (r=0.66, P<0.0001) and PRU (r=0.55, P<0.0001). Similarly, higher LPLT was associated with higher ARU (r=0.47, P<0.0001) and PRU (r=0.38, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Baseline platelet size is increased in patients with ACS developing early ST and correlates with future residual platelet reactivity under aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. Dual but not isolated aspirin or clopidogrel poor-responsiveness appears to be associated with early ST.

Optical coherence tomography evaluation of intermediate-term healing of different stent types: systemic review and meta-analysis

Aims The intermediate-term incidence of strut malapposition (SM) and uncovered struts (US), and the degree of neointimal thickness (NIT) according to stent type have not been characterized. Methods and results All studies of >50 patients in which optical coherence tomography was performed between 6 and 12 months after stent implantation were included. The incidences of SM and US were the co-primary end points, while NIT was the secondary end point. A total of 458 citations were initially appraised at the abstract level, and 11 full-text studies (280 652 analysed struts, 921 patients) were assessed. The 6–12 months incidences of SM and US were 5.0 and 7.8%, respectively, and the mean NIT was 206 &mgr;m. Biolimus-eluting stents (BES) and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) had the highest SM rates (2.7 and 3.8%, respectively), while everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and fast-release zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) had the lowest SM rates (0.9 and 0.1%, respectively). BES and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) had the highest US rates (7.7 and 8.8%, respectively), while bare metal stents (BMS) and ZES had the lowest US rates (0.3 and 0.3%, respectively). BMS had the greatest NIT (340 &mgr;m), while SES, EES, and BES had the least NIT. Conclusion Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have better intermediate-term strut apposition and coverage than first-generation DES, BVS, and BMS. EES demonstrate the overall best combination of healing with suppression of neointimal hyperplasia at 6–12 months. Further studies with clinical correlation are warranted to determine the implications of these findings.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effects of Elinogrel Results of the Platelet Function Substudy From the Intravenous and Oral Administration of Elinogrel to Evaluate Tolerability and Efficacy in Nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients (INNOVATE-PCI) Trial

Background— Elinogrel is the only selective, competitive and reversible platelet P2Y12 inhibitor available in both intravenous (IV) and oral formulations. Methods and Results— This substudy of the Intravenous and Oral Administration of Elinogrel to Evaluate Tolerability and Efficacy in Nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention patients (INNOVATE-PCI) trial evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of two dosing regimens of IV followed by oral elinogrel (120 mg IV plus 100 mg oral twice daily; 120 mg IV plus 150 mg oral twice daily) versus standard clopidogrel therapy (300–600 mg oral loading dose plus 75 mg oral maintenance dose) in 56 patients undergoing nonurgent PCI. At time of randomization, 71.4% (40/56) of patients were using maintenance clopidogrel therapy. In the acute phase, an IV bolus of elinogrel achieved more rapid and potent antiplatelet effects compared with clopidogrel, which were sustained during the transition from the IV to the oral formulation in the first 24 hours of the peri-PCI period. During chronic therapy, elinogrel achieved similar levels of platelet reactivity compared with clopidogrel before the next oral dose and, although platelet reactivity was lower with elinogrel up to 6 hours after daily oral maintenance dosing, these differences were not statistically significant. These pharmacodynamic effects matched the pharmacokinetic profile of elinogrel. There were no differences in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects between the two elinogrel dosing regimens. Conclusions— Compared with clopidogrel, the combination of IV and oral elinogrel achieves more rapid and enhanced antiplatelet effects that were sustained through the transition to oral elinogrel in the peri-PCI period, but these were not significant during chronic dosing in this pilot investigation. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00751231.

Between-centre reproducibility of volumetric intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency-based analyses in mild-to-moderate coronary atherosclerosis : An international multicentre study

Aims: To assess for the first time in a multicentre design the between-centre reproducibility of volumetric virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) measurements with a semi-automated, computer-assisted contour detection system in mild-to-moderately diseased coronary segments. Methods and results: Analysts of four European IVUS centres performed independent IVUS analyses (in total 7,188 cross-sectional analyses) and obtained volumetric data to evaluate the reproducibility of volumetric VH-IVUS measurements in 36 coronary segments (length 20.0±0.4 mm) from patients with stable angina. Geometric and compositional VH-IVUS measurements were highly correlated for the different comparisons. Overall intraclass correlation for vessel, lumen, plaque volume and plaque burden were 0.98, 0.92 0.95, and 0.86, respectively; for fibrous, fibro-lipidic, necrotic core and calcified volumes overall intraclass correlations were 0.95, 0.93, 0.99, and 1.00, respectively. There were significant but small differences for vessel, lumen, fibrous and calcified volumes, and there was no significant difference for plaque volume. Of the plaque components necrotic core and calcified volume showed on average the highest reproducibility. Conclusions: These findings underline the necessity to centrally analyse IVUS data obtained in multicentre studies addressing mild-to-moderately diseased coronary arteries. In addition, pooling VH-IVUS data from different studies, analysed at different centres, may be problematical.

Transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis in a female patient with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis

A successful implantation of transcatheter aortic valve was performed in a highrisk 85-year-old female with severe symptomatic stenosis of a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) [ Panel A ] and tight lesions in left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex artery (LCx). Until recently, BAV remained a contraindication to transcatheter aortic valve replacement …

Incidence, Predictors and Impact of Severe Periprocedural Bleeding According to VARC-2 Criteria on 1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

There are differences in reporting bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), which is a consequence of the lack of consensus for their definition. Furthermore, the amount of data on the impact of peri-procedural bleeding on the mid-term prognosis is still limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, predictors, and impact of life-threatening and major bleedings as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) in patients after TAVI over the mid-term prognosis.Consecutive patients who underwent TAVI from March 2010 to December 2013 were included. All data were classified according to the VARC-2 criteria. We assessed the incidence and the predictors of serious bleeding events (SBE), defined as life-threatening/disabling (LT/D) or major bleeding, and analyzed their impact on 30-day and 1-year clinical outcome.A total of 129 patients were included (79.1 ± 8.3 years; mean EuroSCORE = 17.8 ± 12.7). The SBE occurred in 25 patients (19.4%), of which 9 (7.0%) had LT/D and 16 (12.4%) had major bleeding. Trans-subclavian (TS) access (OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.13-14.29, P = 0.01) and diabetes (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.08-7.93, P = 0.03) were identified as independent predictors of SBE. Patients with SBE had higher 30-day mortality (20.0% versus 4.0% P = 0.02) and 1-year mortality (40.0% versus 11.1%, P < 0.002). SBE independently predicted 1-year, all-cause mortality (HR 5.88, 95% CI 1.7319,94, P = 0.005).SBE are frequent after TAVI and are associated with decreased short and mid-term survival. Diabetes and TS access are independent risk factors for SBE.