Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jarol B. Manheim is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jarol B. Manheim.


American Political Science Review | 1983

Changing National Images: International Public Relations and Media Agenda Setting

Jarol B. Manheim; Robert B. Albritton

Research within the agenda-setting framework has generally ignored the potential influence of purposive efforts by external actors (those outside the political system) to manipulate media coverage related to their interests. The present study uses interrupted time-series analysis to examine one such set of manipulative efforts, those undertaken by professional public relations consultants to influence the images of foreign nations as portrayed in the United States press. Data represent New York Times coverage of six nations that signed public relations contracts with American firms during the period from 1974 to 1978, and one nation that expressly rejected such a contract. The analysis identifies consistent patterns of improvement along two primary dimensions of national image, visibility and valence, which are associated in time with the public relations contracts.


Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly | 1983

News of Rhodesia: The Impact of a Public Relations Campaign.

Robert B. Albritton; Jarol B. Manheim

b Analysts of public policy-making have identified two distinct levels of agendasetting that influence, or are influenced by, the news media. The first, termed the formal agenda, refers to that set of issues and options that are actually under consideration by policy-makers. Most of these arise from a variety of internal (governmental) mechanisms which are seldom directly and heavily influenced by news coverage per se. The items on this agenda are relatively explicit, often narrowly defined and generally well-documented by non-media sources. They become the objects of legislative or administrative action which is in turn reported in the press and may thus enter upon the second, or public, agenda. This latter set of concerns tends to be more ambiguously stated, more broadly defined and less well-documented than the former, and the public agenda itself usually assumes its greatest importance not in the actual making of policy, but a t the front end of the decision-making process (through the articulation and organization of political demands) and at the tail end (in the generation of publicacceptance of policies once adopted). Here the media play a


Archive | 2018

Empirical political analysis : quantitative and qualitative research methods

Craig Leonard Brians; Lars Willnat; Jarol B. Manheim; Richard C. Rich

PART I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 1. Research as a Process PART II. PREPARING TO DO RESEARCH Chapter 2. Explaining the Political World: Building Theories and Hypotheses Chapter 3. Developing Your Literature Review: What Others Say About Your Topic Chapter 4. Designing Your Research and Choosing Your Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Chapter 5. From Abstract to Concrete: Operationalization and Measurement Chapter 6. Experimental Research Methods Chapter 7. Who, What, Where, When: The Problem of Sampling PART III. QUANTITATIVE METHODS Chapter 8. Survey Research Chapter 9. Combining Multiple Measures: Using Scaling Techniques Chapter 10. Content Analysis Chapter 11. Studying Groups with Aggregate Data Chapter 12. Comparative Research PART IV. ANALYZING QUANTITATIVE DATA Chapter 13. Social Network Analysis: Finding Structure in a Complex World Chapter 14. Data Coding Chapter 15. Describing the Data Chapter 16. Statistics I: Summarizing Distributions on One Variable Chapter 17. Statistics II: Examining Relationships between Two Variables Chapter 18. Statistics III: Examining Relationships among Several Variables PART V. QUALITATIVE METHODS Chapter 19. Direct Observation Chapter 20. Focus Group Methodologies Chapter 21. Elite and Specialized Interviewing PART VI. CONCLUSION Chapter 22. Writing (and Reading) the Research Report Chapter 23. Summary Appendix A. Statistical Tables Appendix B. Ethical Standard in Empirical Research


Archive | 2011

Strategy in information and influence campaigns : how policy advocates, social movements, insurgent groups, corporations, governments and others get what they want

Jarol B. Manheim

1. Points of Origin 2. Information and Influence Campaigns 3. Strategy and Tactics in Campaign Communication I: Winning the Argument 4. Strategy and Tactics in Campaign Communication II: Shaping the Decision 5. Networks and Netwaves: Organizing for Influence 6. Riding the Waves: Strategy and Tactics in Network Activation 7. Feeling the Pressure: The Dimensionality of Targets 8. Guarding the Castle: Deterring, Deflecting, Minimizing or Defeating Information and Influence Campaigns 9. Information, and Influence Appendix A. Need to Know: Strategic Intelligence and Research in the Campaign Appendix B. The IIC Knowledge Base: A Selective Bibliographic Inventory Appendix C. A Bibliography for IIC Strategy (Including Sources Cited)


British Journal of Political Science | 1987

Insurgent Violence Versus Image Management: The Struggle For National Images in Southern Africa

Jarol B. Manheim; Robert B. Albritton

The authors examine the countervailing effects of two forces on external news coverage of Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and South Africa during the 1970s. The first is purposeful government efforts at news management and information control undertaken by each of the two regimes. The second is the civil unrest which was present in the region during that period. They conclude that these effects and the policy consequences that flow from them are functions of the pre-existing image environment of each country in the foreign (US) press and of the character of its domestic unrest.


Political Communication | 1986

Public relations in the public eye: Two case studies of the failure of public information campaigns

Jarol B. Manheim; Robert B. Albritton

Abstract The authors examine two instances in which public relations efforts undertaken in behalf of foreign governments became the subject of public attention or controversy, finding in each case that the news image of the client government worsened. Comparing their results with other research that has identified more positive public relations outcomes, they conclude that public awareness of the manipulative efforts distinguished these cases and contributed to the observed effects.


Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science | 1979

International Relations and Politics James MacGregor Burns. Leadership. Pp. xii, 530. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.

Jarol B. Manheim

What we might term &dquo;the book reviewer’s hypothesis&dquo; holds that the greater the degree of hyperbole used in touting a book, the more suspicious one must be of its real quality. Here we have a book that is described as &dquo;a pioneering exploration of the frontiers of scholarship,&dquo; and the &dquo;culmination ... [and] synthesis&dquo; of the distinguished career of a Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award winning author, and which is endorsed in the


Archive | 1994

15.00

Jarol B. Manheim


Archive | 1981

Strategic public diplomacy and American foreign policy : the evolution of influence

Jarol B. Manheim; Richard C. Rich


Archive | 2000

Empirical Political Analysis: Research Methods in Political Science

Jarol B. Manheim

Collaboration


Dive into the Jarol B. Manheim's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge