Jaromír Roubec

Phase III Study of Erlotinib in Combination With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial

PURPOSE Erlotinib is a potent inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, with single-agent antitumor activity. Preclinically, erlotinib enhanced the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy. This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received erlotinib (150 mg/d) or placebo, combined with up to six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to disease progression (TTP), response rate (RR), duration of response, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS A total of 1,172 patients were enrolled. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were well balanced. There were no differences in OS (hazard ratio, 1.06; median, 43 v 44.1 weeks for erlotinib and placebo groups, respectively), TTP, RR, or QoL between treatment arms. In a small group of patients who had never smoked, OS and progression-free survival were increased in the erlotinib group; no other subgroups were found more likely to benefit. Erlotinib with chemotherapy was generally well tolerated; incidence of adverse events was similar between arms, except for an increase in rash and diarrhea with erlotinib (generally mild). CONCLUSION Erlotinib with concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine showed no survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC.

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Vandetanib Plus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor kinase activity. The activity of vandetanib plus docetaxel was assessed in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This two-part study comprised an open-label run-in phase and a double-blind randomized phase. Eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective of the randomized phase was to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving vandetanib (100 or 300 mg/d) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 21 days) versus placebo plus docetaxel. The study was designed to have more than 75% power to detect 50% prolongation at a one-sided significance level of P < .20. Secondary objectives included objective response rate, overall survival, safety and tolerability. RESULTS In the randomized phase (n = 127), median PFS was 18.7 weeks for vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel (n = 42; hazard ratio v docetaxel = 0.64; one-sided P = .037); 17.0 weeks for vandetanib 300 mg plus docetaxel (n = 44; hazard ratio v docetaxel = 0.83; one-sided P = .231); and 12 weeks for docetaxel (n = 41). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival among the three treatment arms. Common adverse events included diarrhea, rash, and asymptomatic prolongation of corrected QT (QTC) interval. CONCLUSION The primary objective was achieved, with vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel demonstrating a significant prolongation of PFS compared with docetaxel in relation to the prespecified significance level. On the basis of these encouraging data, phase III evaluation of vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel in second-line NSCLC has been initiated.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of YM155, a Small-Molecule Suppressor of Survivin, in Patients With Advanced, Refractory, Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the antitumor activity and safety of YM155, a novel, small-molecule suppressor of survivin, as single-agent therapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC who had experienced treatment failure during one or two prior chemotherapy regimens (at least one of which was platinum based) received YM155 as a continuous intravenous infusion (4.8 mg/m(2)/d) over 168 hours followed by observation for 14 days in 21-day treatment cycles. The primary end point was objective tumor response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of stable disease (SD), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and pharmacokinetic profiles, and pharmacodynamic evaluations. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients received YM155. Two patients achieved a confirmed partial response, with an ORR of 5.4% (95% CI, 0.7% to 18.2%). An additional 14 patients (37.8%) achieved SD resulting in a disease control rate of 43.2% (95% CI, 27.1% to 60.5%). Median duration of PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8 months). Median duration of OS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4 to 12.2 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 35.1%. Treatment with YM155 was well tolerated with the majority of treatment discontinuations not treatment related. CONCLUSION YM155 exhibited modest single-agent activity in patients with refractory, advanced NSCLC. A favorable safety/tolerability profile was reported. Further evaluation of YM155 in combination with chemotherapy and other targeted agents may be warranted.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE This randomized, multicenter, phase III trial was conducted to compare the tolerability of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) in chemonaive patients with stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Secondary objectives were to evaluate response, duration of response, time to progressive disease (TTPD), and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were required to have stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, no previous chemotherapy, Karnofsky performance status of at least 70, bidimensionally measurable disease, and age 18-75 years. Randomized patients in both arms were given gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, followed on day 1 by cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (GP) or carboplatin AUC=5 (GC). Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS Enrolled patients in both arms, 87 in GP and 89 in GC, were well balanced for demographics and disease characteristics. Dose intensity was 93.8 and 92.7% for gemcitabine in GP/GC arms, respectively; 97.7% for cisplatin and 99.9% for carboplatin. Patients with at least one grade 3/4 toxicity excluding nausea, vomiting or alopecia, were 44% in GP arm and 54% in GC arm. The only significantly different toxicities were, nausea and vomiting in GP and thrombocytopenia in GC group. The overall response rates, median TTPD, response duration and survival were, 41/29%, 5.87/4.75 months, 7.48/5.15 months, and 8.75/7.97 months for GP and GC arms, respectively. CONCLUSION GP and GC are effective and feasible regimens for advanced NSCLC, and are comparable in efficacy and toxicity. GC may offer acceptable option to patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who are unable to receive cisplatin.

Effects of Treatment with Crizotinib on Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma with ALK Translocation in the Czech Republic

BACKGROUND Patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) -positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may gain significant benefit from treatment with the first-generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib. This study investigated the effects of crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients via analyzing data submitted to the TULUNG registry by pneumo-oncology centers in the Czech Republic. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed the data of 60 NSCLC patients submitted to the TULUNG registry by pneumo-oncology centers who had ALK translocation confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and complete data records from 2011 to 2017. RESULTS The median age of patients was 58 years. A total of 53% of patients were men, 90% had adenocarcinomas, 61.7% were smokers or ex-smokers, and 65% had a performance status of 0. Upon initiation of crizotinib therapy, most patients were at stage IV (88.3%) and the remainder were at stage IIIA or IIIB. Crizotinib was the second-line therapy in 71.7% of patients. A total of 20% of patients suffered side effects, while 11.7% suffered grade 3 and 4 adverse effects. A total of, 6.7, 25, 21.7, and 25% of patients displayed a complete response, a partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, resp. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months. Overall survival (OS) was 27.9 months from the initiation of the first-line therapy and 12.6 from the initiation of crizotinib therapy. PFS and OS were longer among nonsmokers and ex-smokers than among smokers (PFS, 9.7 vs. 5.8 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.029; OS, 26.8 vs. 15.3 vs. 7.0 months, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION Targeted crizotinib therapy is well tolerated and has significant benefit in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Although international guidelines recommend that crizotinib is only used as a first-line therapy, it is used as a second-line and higher-line therapy in the Czech Republic. Clinical studies provide evidence that targeted therapy elicits better effects and less toxicity than routine chemotherapy. Key words: ALK translocation - crizotinib - targeted biological therapy - tyrosine kinase inhibitors This work was supported by AZV grant No. 17- 30748A. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 17. 1. 2018 Accepted: 20. 2. 2018.

Full Oral Vinorelbine (NVBO) on D1 and D8 With Carboplatin (CBDCA) as First Line Treatment in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Sudy in Nonrandomized Population

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the activity and feasibility of CBDCA together with NVBO as first line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC received NVBO 80 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 with CBDCA AUC5 on D1 every three weeks. In stage III, chemotherapy was followed by external radiotherapy. The outcomes include following: response, median overall survival (mOS) and median progression free survival (mPFS). The difference in response relative to baseline characteristics was determined using Pearson Chi-square test. Differences in OS and PFS relative to baseline characteristics were evaluated for significance using Log-rank test. RESULTS: 259 patients were treated: 209 men (80,7%) and 50 women (19,3%), median age 65 years. ECOG performance status at inclusion was PS 0 in 47 (18,2% patients, PS 1 in 185 (71,7%) and PS 2 in 26 (10,1%) patients. Most patients had stage IIIB 97 (37,5%) and stage IV NSCLC 130 (50,2%), only 32 (12,4%) were stage IIIA . Adenocarcinoma was confirmed in 52 patients (20,1%), squamous-cell carcinoma in 152 (58,7%), large-cell carcinoma in 8 (3,1%) and other in 47 (18,4%). Complete response was confirmed in 1 (0,4%) patient, partial response in 121 (46,7%), stable disease in 58 (22,4%), 79 (30,5%) patients progressed. The regimen was well tolerated. Median cycles was 4, the dosage of NVBO was without changes in 159 (61%) patients, the dosage of NVBO was reduced in 12 (4,7%) and escalated in 64 (24,8%). In 23 (8,9%) of patients was the dosage of NVBO reduced after escalation. Major toxicities (Grade 3-4) were neutropenia in 69 (26,9%), leucopenia in 51 (19,8%), anemia in 7 (2,7%), and thrombocytopenia in 6 (2,3%) patients. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 17 (6,6%) patients. Gastrointestinal toxicity grade 3-4 was observed in 47 (18,4%) patients. The estimated mOS was 13,8 moths. and the estimated mPFS was 9,4 months by median follow-up 8,5 months. The differences between groups of pts according to PS (0+1 vs. 2) were statistically significant (p < 0,001) better for patiens with PS 0+1. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of 259 non-selected patients with advanced NSCLC was the treatment with full NVBO and CBDCA in first line more convenient and well tolerated with evidence of high antitumour activity. This combination was active in all groups patients according histology.

Pemetrexed in the Second Line Chemotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. A Multicentre Prospective Analysis of Data From Clinical Practice

Non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most aggressive tumours with unsatisfactory prognosis and extremely high mortality. Pemetrexed became one of the standard chemotherapeutic options in advanced NSCLC. It is recommended both in the 1st line and in the 2nd line.