Jarosław Szwalski

Construction of a tissue microarray with two millimeters cores of endometrioid endometrial cancer: factors affecting the quality of the recipient block

The tissue microarray (TMA) method currently is not used to render a primary diagnosis of cancer, but its scientific value has been proved in studies of various cancer types. TMA technology still is not used often for uterine tumors, however. We investigated the repeatability of histological diagnosis of endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) using conventional histology and TMA using 2 mm cores. We examined EEC tissues from 171 patients. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue donor blocks from EEC specimens were selected and examined histologically. Duplicate 2 mm tissue cores were inserted into a TMA recipient block. EEC tissues were examined as hematoxylin-eosin stained sections from the TMAs. EEC tissue was identified in the TMAs in 158 cases (92.4%) and not found in 13 cases (7.6%). On the TMA slides, both EEC positive cores were identified in 129 cases (75.4%), but only one core in 29 cases (17.0%). Among 342 biopsies of the donor blocks (each case in duplicate), EEC was found in 287 cases (83.9%) using the TMA: 124/146 (84.9%) with superficial infiltration, 153/178 (86.0%) with deep myometrial infiltration, and 10/18 (55.6%) without myometrial infiltration. We concluded that two 2 mm tissue cores from a biopsy of a donor block inserted into a TMA recipient block were sufficient to diagnose EEC in more than 90% of cases. EEC was identified in the TMAs with similar frequency with respect to superficial and deep myometrial infiltration. Cases without myometrial infiltration were identified less often.

Membrane expression of trail receptors DcR1 and DcR2 in the normal endometrium, endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid endometrial cancer

Abstract We aimed to evaluate the membrane expression of DcR1 and DcR2 in the normal endometrium (NE), endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). The study comprised 101 patients: 20 NE, 14 EAH and 67 EEC. Membrane expression of DcR1 and DcR2 was examined and presented as total score (TS). The membrane expression of both DcR1 and DcR2 was more common in EEC than in NE (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). A strong correlation was found between type of endometrial tissue (NE/EAH/EEC) and the TS of DcR1 (p = 0.001) and DcR2 (p < 0.001). In EEC, the TS of DcR1 and DcR2 was not related to grading and survival. The TS of DcR1 negatively correlated with staging (p = 0.018), but DcR2 did not. The membrane expression of decoy receptors for TRAIL DcR1 and DcR2 is greater in NE than EEC. In EEC patients, membrane expression of DcR1 and DcR2 are not independent predictors of survival.

Glandular cancer of the cervix or endometrial cancer – difficulties in diagnostics

Maria Szubert1, Paulina Kwiatkowska-Wypych1, Martyna Sikora1, Jarosław Szwalski2, Jacek Suzin1, Katarzyna Kowalczyk-Amico1 Received: 30.09.2014 Accepted: 22.10.2014 Published: 28.11.2014

Membrane expression of the death ligand trail receptors DR4 and DR5 in the normal endometrium, endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid endometrial cancer

To assess membrane expression of DR4 and DR5 in the normal endometrium (NE), endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC), the study examined 101 patients: 20 NE, 14 EAH and 67 EEC. The expression of DR4 and DR5 was examined and presented as the total score (TS). DR4 expression was seen in 18 NE, 11 EAH and 10 EEC. DR5 expression was seen in 20 NE, 13 EAH and 21 EEC. A strong correlation between type of endometrial tissue and TS of both receptors was identified. In EEC TS of DR4 and DR5 was not related to grading, staging or survival. Malignant transformation in the endometrium is related to reduction of membrane DR4 and DR5 expression. The level of membrane staining of the receptors in EEC is not dependent on grading and staging, and is not sufficient to predict survival in EEC patients.