Jason J. Fichtner
George Mason University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jason J. Fichtner.
Archive | 2013
Jason J. Fichtner; Jacob M. Feldman
Lawmakers have long used the tax code for purposes far beyond simply collecting revenue to fund the federal government. Through the insertion of specialized tax provisions, the tax code is used to achieve policy and political aims as well. But these special provisions come at a price: economic growth is foregone, higher accounting costs are incurred, more lobbyists are hired to protect tax advantages, and revenue is lost as a result of collection inefficiencies. We estimate that hidden costs of tax compliance range from
Archive | 2000
Jason J. Fichtner
215 billion to
The Journal of Retirement | 2016
Jason J. Fichtner; Jason S. Seligman
987 billion annually, and that part of the
Archive | 2014
Jason J. Fichtner; Jacob M. Feldman
452 billion revenue gap in 2012 unreported taxes was the result of tax code complexity. We provide policy recommendations based on lessons from the Russia flat tax reforms and the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
Archive | 2011
Jason J. Fichtner; Jacob M. Feldman
The analysis of tax data is a time intensive and complicated process. Much time and effort are spent collecting income and tax data, compiling data sets and running statistical analyses. However, it appears that relatively little time and effort are spent actually understanding the data and how best to present results to the public of analyses of using tax data. This is evident in the overuse of averages and the simplistic classification of taxpayers into income ranges and quintiles by tax distribution tables that are often highly publicized. This study shows that the link between income and tax liability is much more tenuous that that often presumed and that a variety of other factors can greatly affect tax liability. Specifically, this report finds that, among other things: - Over 22 percent of all 1995 tax returns claimed zero tax liability - For calendar year 2000, the JCT estimates that 48.7 million out of 140.2 million taxpayers overall will have zero or negative federal income tax liability. - In four out of the five income groups examined, a majority of taxpayers had tax liabilities that were either 25 percent greater than the average or 25 percent less than the average tax liability for each income group. - In comparing federal income tax liabilities, distribution tables often misclassify and group millions of taxpayers into quintiles in which they have little tax liability in common. - Approximately 2.2 million taxpayers in the third quintile pay more in federal income taxes than 5.4 million taxpayers classified in the fourth quintile. - Over 3 million taxpayers in the fourth quintile pay more in federal income taxes than 4.1 million taxpayers classified in the fifth quintile.
Archive | 2005
Jason J. Fichtner
Many Social Security reform proposals have emphasized the role of savings over insurance, focusing on security in retirement. In contrast, disability in prime working age is harder to save for and thus is arguably better considered an insurable event. However, unlike determination processes for many other catastrophes, disability determination often appears inherently relative and somewhat subjective. For these reasons, most social insurance reform proposals have advocated treating the reform of disability insurance separately, subsequent to any reform of the retirement system. This article focuses on disability insurance but makes the case for considering reforms made in tandem—that is, both developing disability program reforms that accommodate plausible retirement program reforms while properly aligning incentives to support work and savings and providing a financially secure, vital safety net for disabled Americans.
Social Science Research Network | 2004
Jason J. Fichtner
The
Archive | 2003
Jason J. Fichtner
69 billion mortgage interest deduction (MID) is often viewed as an element of the tax code that promotes middle-class prosperity. However, 64 percent of the benefits, as measured by effective tax reduction, goes to households earning more than
Archive | 2002
Jason J. Fichtner
100,000 per year. The large variation in nominal benefits is one of the reasons why many economists state that the MID is regressive. High-income earners average a tax benefit nearly nine times greater than a tax filer earning
Archive | 2000
Jason J. Fichtner
50,000-