Jason L. Harper

Goal-directed laparoscopic training leads to better laparoscopic skill acquisition

INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic skills training outside the operating room is becoming the standard for educating surgical residents. Because of the restrictions on the work week, it is imperative for this training to be efficient. We hypothesized that goal-directed laparoscopic training (GDLT) would result in better skill acquisition than laparoscopic training without goals (LT). METHODS Second-year general surgery residents participated in this study. Metrics were scores that incorporated time and errors. One group of residents (LT) went through a 10- week laparoscopic training course without goals; one group of residents (GDLT) was given goals to achieve during their course. Each group practiced for the same amount of time. The tasks were peg exercise, run the rope, pattern cutting, clip/cut vessel, extracorporeal knot tying, intracorporeal knot tying, and suturing device. Statistical analysis was performed via 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS There were 8 residents in the LT group and 7 residents in the GDLT. The GDLT group had statistically significant higher scores on 7 of the 8 tasks compared the LT group (P < .02 to P < .0001). The GDLT group performed better in the final task, suturing device, than the LT group, but this did not reach statistical significance (451 vs 414; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS GDLT should be used by surgeons instead of LT. Future studies need to examine whether GDLT translates into a better operative technique and outcomes.

Initial Trocar Placement and Abdominal Insufflation in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION Initial trocar placement and abdominal insufflation in laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be challenging for the novice. One technique is the use of an optical viewing trocar without prior abdominal insufflation. This investigation tests the hypothesis that this technique can be taught to novice surgeons with good results. METHODS Patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery were included. Novice surgeons (residents/fellows) with 0-50 initial trocar placements placed the initial trocar and insufflated the abdomen in the presence of an expert surgeon (>300 initial trocar placements in morbidly obese patients). Trocar placement time was defined as the time to place the trocar into the peritoneal cavity (including infiltration of local anesthesia and incision). Insufflation time was defined as the time to insufflate the abdomen to a pressure of 10 to 15 mm Hg (including time to place tubing on trocar). Novice times were compared with expert times. RESULTS There were 81 patients (56 by expert and 25 by novice) in this study. No bowel or vessel injury during initial trocar placement was noted. No correlation was seen between times and BMI or waist/hip circumference (P = NS). Mean expert trocar placement time was shorter than the mean novice time (25 +/- 9 versus 54 +/- 27 s; P < 0.0001); although there was no difference in mean insufflation time (expert versus novice: 16 +/- 5 versus 19 +/- 10; P = NS). The mean total time to place the initial trocar and insufflate the abdomen for the novices was 72 +/- 26 s. CONCLUSIONS Initial trocar placement can be taught safely to novices. The technique using an optical viewing trocar without prior abdominal insufflation is effective and efficient in morbidly obese patients.

Patient perception of medicare fee schedule of laparoscopic procedures.

Introduction. It seems that public perception is that physicians receive substantial payments for procedures. This investigation explores patient perception and opinion of Medicare reimbursements to surgeons related to laparoscopic surgery. Our hypothesis was that patients think the surgeon Medicare fee schedule is higher than actuality. Methods. Patients filled out an IRB exempted survey. The survey included a written description of laparoscopic gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an initial patient visit for 30 minutes. All participants were asked to give their thoughts of what Medicare currently reimburses for these procedures as well as what the payment should be. The survey also asked other questions about reimbursement related to Medicare. Results. There were 96 participants in the investigation with 43% of patients not filling in reimbursements for at least one procedure. Most patients (88%) looked at their bills from physicians and insurance companies carefully. For each procedure, the mean reimbursements were approximately 10 times higher than the patient perception of both the amount Medicare currently pays and the amount Medicare should pay compared to the actual fee. For the initial patient visit, the patients overestimated the payment by 158% and thought the Medicare should pay 199% of the actual fee. Most of the patients (98%) thought Medicare should pay more for more difficult cases and 85% thought Medicare should pay more if the patient visits the surgeon more times during the global period. While 32% of the patients feel Medicare pay physicians well, 91% thought that Medicare should increase fees. Conclusion. Most of our patients overestimated what Medicare currently pays for some laparoscopic procedures. Surgeons need to do a better job in educating patients and the general public about the Medicare fee schedule.