Jason Martin

Safety Profile of the 9-Valent HPV Vaccine: A Combined Analysis of 7 Phase III Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVES: The overall safety profile of the 9-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV) vaccine was evaluated across 7 Phase III studies, conducted in males and females (nonpregnant at entry), 9 to 26 years of age. METHODS: Vaccination was administered as a 3-dose regimen at day 1, and months 2 and 6. More than 15 000 subjects received ≥1 dose of 9vHPV vaccine. In 2 of the studies, >7000 control subjects received ≥1 dose of quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine. Serious and nonserious adverse events (AEs) and new medical conditions were recorded throughout the study. Subjects testing positive for pregnancy at day 1 were not vaccinated; those who became pregnant after day 1 were discontinued from further vaccination until resolution of the pregnancy. Pregnancies detected after study start (n = 2950) were followed to outcome. RESULTS: The most common AEs (≥5%) experienced by 9vHPV vaccine recipients were injection-site AEs (pain, swelling, erythema) and vaccine-related systemic AEs (headache, pyrexia). Injection-site AEs were more common in 9vHPV vaccine than qHPV vaccine recipients; most were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Discontinuations and vaccine-related serious AEs were rare (0.1% and <0.1%, respectively). Seven deaths were reported; none were considered vaccine related. The proportions of pregnancies with adverse outcome were within ranges reported in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: The 9vHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated in subjects aged 9 to 26 years with an AE profile similar to that of the qHPV vaccine; injection-site AEs were more common with 9vHPV vaccine. Its additional coverage and safety profile support widespread 9vHPV vaccination.

Safety and immunogenicity of a hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate-hepatitis B vaccine at 2, 3, 4, and 12-14 months of age.

Combination vaccines improve parental and provider satisfaction and schedule compliance by decreasing the number of injections. In a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, we compared four formulations of a liquid, hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate-hepatitis B virus (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HBV) vaccine in 708 infants immunized at 2, 3, 4, and 12-14 months of age. The formulations contained identical DTaP and IPV components, differing in the contents of Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) conjugate component (tetanus-toxoid [PRP-T, 12microg] or Neisseria meningitidis outer-membrane-protein-complex [PRP-OMPC, 3microg or 6microg]), and in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg, 10microg or 15microg). A minimum acceptable postdose 3 antibody response rate was defined by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeding a prespecified target. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar among groups, with a trend for increased solicited injection-site reactions (pain, redness, swelling) with increasing PRP-OMPC and HBsAg concentration. Serious AEs reported by eight subjects were not considered to be vaccine related. All PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified acceptability criteria for postdose 3 immunogenicity for all antigens: PRP, HBsAg, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus and polio. Apart from the Hib response, the postdose 3 responses obtained with the PRP-T formulation met the acceptability criterion for each antigen. Postdose 4 responses were acceptable for all antigens in all formulations. All vaccine formulations were well tolerated. The three PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified immunogenicity criteria, and the one with the lowest PRP-OMPC concentration was selected for further optimization of immunogenicity.

Safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of a liquid hexavalent diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis–inactivated poliovirus–Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate–hepatitis B vaccine at 2, 4, 6 and 12–14 months of age☆☆☆

The current recommended infant vaccination schedules require many injections at multiple sites, which increase stress for infants and parents and may create challenges to vaccination compliance. Therefore, combination vaccines, which reduce the number of injections at each medical visit, can be an essential method to improve compliance. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational, liquid, hexavalent, pediatric vaccine at 2, 4, 6, and 12-14 months of age. In this multicenter, open-label controlled study, 756 infants were randomized in approximately equal numbers to receive 0.5mL intramuscular dose of diptheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-Haemophilus influenzae type b+hepatitis B vaccine, or 1 of 3 double-blind investigational formulations. All formulations included a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) concentration of 10μg/0.5mL. The three hexavalent vaccine formulations used in this study contained either Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) conjugate component (tetanus toxoid [PRP-T, 12μg] or Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein complex [PRP-OPMC, 3μg or 6μg]): a minimum acceptable postdose 3 antibody response rate for each antigen was defined by the lower limit of a 95% confidence interval exceeding a prespecified target. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar among groups, with a trend for increased solicited vaccine-related injection-site reactions (pain, erythema, swelling) with increasing PRP-OMPC dose. No serious vaccine-related AEs were reported in the investigational groups. Both PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified acceptability criteria for all antigens: PRP, HBsAg, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus and poliovirus. The PRP-T formulation met the acceptability criterion for antibody responses to all antigens other than PRP at postdose 3. Postdose 4 responses were adequate for all antigens in all formulations. All vaccine formulations were well-tolerated. Both PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified immunogenicity criteria of PRP-OMPC evaluation.

Safety and immunogenicity of a modified process hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults ≥ 50 years

Background: Generating protective immune responses in older adults (particularly ≥65 years) remains challenging for vaccines in general. This study examined the immune response engendered in older adults by RECOMBIVAX HB™ manufactured using a modified adjuvant (modified-process hepatitis B vaccine; mpHBV), RECOMBIVAX-HB™, and ENGERIX-B™. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study enrolled healthy, seronegative subjects (N=538) to receive mpHBV (10 µg hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]), RECOMBIVAX-HB™ (10 µg HBsAg), or ENGERIX-B™ (20 µg HBsAg) at Day 1, Month 1, and Month 6. Prespecified analysis of subpopulations 50-64 years and ≥65 years was conducted. Serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was measured Predose 1 and 1 month Postdose 3. Results: For subjects ≥50 years, seroprotection rates (SPR, anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL) were 75.7% (95% CI: 68.0,82.2) for mpHBV, 68.0% (95% CI: 59.8,75.5) for RECOMBIVAX HB™, and 84.0% (95% CI: 77.0,89.6) for ENGERIX-B™. For subjects 50-64 years, SPRs were 82.1% (95% CI: 73.8,88.7) for mpHBV, 77.4% (95% CI: 68.7,84.7) for RECOMBIVAX-HB™, and 88.5% (95% CI: 81.1,93.7) for ENGERIX-B™. For subjects ≥65 years, SPRs were 57.5% (95% CI: 40.9,73.0) for mpHBV, 34.4% (95% CI: 18.6,53.2) for RECOMBIVAX-HB™, and 67.7% (95% CI: 48.6,83.3) for ENGERIX-B™. There were 6 non-vaccine related serious adverse events reported. Conclusions: The majority of subjects ≥50 years old achieved seroprotection. The sub-population ≥65 years had lower vaccination responses than the 50-64 years sub-population. For subjects ≥65 years, mpHBV and ENGERIX-B™ groups achieved higher seroprotection rates than the RECOMBIVAX-HB group. The safety profile of mpHBV was consistent with the other groups.

Safety and immunogenicity of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy elderly subjects

Rotavirus may be an important causative agent of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in the elderly, a population that is particularly vulnerable due to waning immunity. It is estimated that rotavirus may account for 2–5% of adult gastroenteritis hospitalizations in the United States. This is the first study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the live pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) in an elderly population. In this study, healthy, independently living adults aged 65–80 years were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive three 2-mL oral doses of RV5 or placebo administered 28–42 days apart. All subjects were followed for safety for 42 days post any vaccination and up to 180 days after the final vaccination for clinical adverse events. Immunogenicity of RV5 was measured by serum anti-rotavirus IgA enzyme immunoassay and serum neutralizing antibody responses to human rotavirus serotypes prior to and after each dose. Results of this study demonstrated that RV5 was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy elderly adults, where 9% of placebo and 27% of RV5 recipients experienced a vaccine-related adverse event of mild or moderate intensity. Immune responses (serum anti-rotavirus immunoglobulin A [IgA] and serum neutralizing antibodies against human rotavirus serotypes in the vaccine) were augmented in this population after a single dose of RV5, despite the factors of older age and preexisting antibodies to the virus. Therefore, if vaccination in the elderly is needed, further evaluation of RV5 as a candidate vaccine in this age group may be warranted.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine manufactured by a modified process in renal pre-dialysis and dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND Patients with renal insufficiency are hyporesponsive to vaccination, including to hepatitis B vaccines. A manufacturing process modification for a hepatitis B vaccine (mpHBV) was studied in renal pre-dialysis and dialysis patients. METHODS This randomized, open-label, multicenter, estimation study enrolled previously unvaccinated, HBV-seronegative adult dialysis and pre-dialysis patients (N=276, median age 72.0 years). At 0, 1, 6, and 8 months, group 1 received a 1 mL intramuscular dose of mpHBV (containing 40 μg HBsAg) as a single injection, while group 2 received a 1 mL intramuscular dose of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine as two injections (each containing 20 μg HBsAg; 40 μg HBsAg total). Serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was measured predose 1, and 1 month postdose 3 and 4. Anti-HBs geometric mean concentration (GMC) and seroprotection rate (SPR, % of subjects with anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL) were estimated at months 7 and 9. RESULTS For group 1, month 7 SPR was 48.5% (49/101, 95% CI: 38.4%, 58.7%); with an additional dose, month 9 SPR increased to 66.7% (66/99, 95% CI: 56.5%, 75.8%). For group 2, month 7 SPR was 57.7% (64/111, 95% CI: 47.9%, 67.0%); with an additional dose, month 9 SPR increased to 69.2% (72/104, 95% CI: 59.4%, 77.9%). group 1 GMCs at months 7 and 9 were 27.5 mIU/mL (95% CI: 15.7, 48.0) and 61.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 34.2, 111.5), respectively. group 2 GMCs at months 7 and 9 were 48.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 28.7, 82.7) and 115.8 mIU/mL (95% CI: 65.2, 205.5), respectively. There were 22 serious adverse events; none were considered related to study vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Both formulations were immunogenic in this population but required more vaccinations to reach seroprotective levels than comparable regimens in healthy individuals, as expected. The relatively reduced SPRs seen in this population support the need for routine screening and re-dosing in this population.

Safety and immunogenicity of a modified process hepatitis B vaccine in healthy neonates

BACKGROUND A manufacturing process using a modified adjuvant was developed to optimize the consistency and immunogenicity for recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (control: RECOMBIVAX-HB™). This modified process hepatitis B vaccine (mpHBV), which was previously shown to have an acceptable safety and immunogenicity profile in young adults, has now been studied in newborn infants. METHODS Healthy 1-10-day-old neonates (N=566) received 3 intramuscular doses (5μg hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] per dose) of either mpHBV or control at Day 1, and Months 1 and 6. Serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was assayed at Month 7 (1 month Postdose 3). Anti-HBs geometric mean titers (GMTs) and seroprotection rates (SPRs) (% of subjects with an anti-HBs titer ≥10mIU/mL) were compared at Month 7. After each dose, injection-site adverse experiences (AEs) and axillary temperatures were recorded for 5 days; systemic AEs were recorded for Days 1-14. RESULTS Month 7 SPR was 97.9% for the mpHBV group and 98.9% for the control. The GMT was 843.7mIU/mL for the mpHBV group and 670.1mIU/mL for the control. The GMT ratio (mpHBV/control) was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.69), meeting the prespecified non-inferiority criteria. The percentages of subjects reporting any AE, injection-site AEs, or systemic AEs were similar across the 2 vaccination groups. There were no serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS The safety profile of mpHBV was comparable to that of the control vaccine. The geometric mean antibody titer for mpHBV was higher than control vaccine in this infant population, but the difference did not meet the predefined statistical criterion for superiority.

A randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial to assess the anamnestic immune response 4 to 8 years after a primary hepatitis B vaccination series.

This open-label, randomized study challenged 4- to 8-year-old children from Spain (N = 1478) with a single dose of hepatitis B vaccine to estimate anamnestic responses. At the time of preimmunization, 15.9% to 51.2% of subjects had antibody values ≥10 mIU/mL. One month postimmunization, 91.6% to 97.3% of subjects had antibody titers ≥10 mIU/mL. There were no serious, vaccine-related, adverse experiences, and no discontinuations as a result of adverse experience.

Immunogenicity and safety of zoster vaccine live administered with quadrivalent influenza virus vaccine

OBJECTIVES Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ZOSTAVAX™ (ZV) administered concomitantly with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in adults≥50years of age (NCT02519855). METHODS Overall, 440 participants were randomized into the Concomitant Group (CG) and 442 into the Sequential Group (SG). The CG received ZV and IIV4 at separate injection sites on Day 1 and matching placebo at Week 4. The SG received placebo and IIV4 (2015-2016 influenza season) at separate injection sites on Day 1 and ZV at Week 4. IMMUNOGENICITY ENDPOINTS Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody geometric mean titer (GMT) and geometric mean fold-rise (GMFR) from baseline to 4weeks postvaccination, measured by glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and adjusted for age and prevaccination titer. Influenza strain-specific GMT at baseline and 4weeks postvaccination was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. SAFETY ENDPOINTS Injection-site and systemic adverse experiences (AEs) within 28days following any vaccination and serious AEs throughout the study. RESULTS The adjusted VZV antibody GMT ratio (CG/SG) was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.80, 0.95), meeting the prespecified noninferiority criterion. The VZV antibody GMFR in the CG was 1.9 (95%CI: 1.76, 2.05), meeting the acceptability criterion. Influenza antibody GMT ratios for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata and B/Victoria were 1.02 (95%CI: 0.88, 1.18), 1.10 (95%CI: 0.94, 1.29), 1.00 (95%CI: 0.88, 1.14), and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.87, 1.13), respectively. The frequency of vaccine-related injection-site and systemic AEs was comparable between groups. No vaccine-related serious AE was observed. CONCLUSION The concomitant administration of ZV and IIV4 to adults≥50years of age induced VZV-specific and influenza-specific antibody responses that were comparable to those following administration of either vaccine alone, and was generally well tolerated.

Persistence of Varicella-Zoster Virus Cell-Mediated Immunity After the Administration of a Second Dose of Live Herpes Zoster Vaccine

Protection against zoster conferred by zoster vaccine live (ZVL; Zostavax) wanes over time. We compared varicella-zoster virus cell-mediated immunity (VZV-CMI) of adults ≥70 years who received a second dose of ZVL ≥10 years after the initial dose with de novo-immunized age-matched controls. Before and during the first year after vaccination, VZV-CMI was significantly higher in reimmunized compared with de novo vaccinees. At 3 years, VZV-CMI differences between groups decreased and only memory responses remained marginally higher in reimmunized participants. In conclusion, the increase in VZV-CMI generated by reimmunization with ZVL is at least equally persistent compared with de novo immunization.