Jason R. Norcross

The preferred walk to run transition speed in actual lunar gravity

Quantifying the preferred transition speed (PTS) from walking to running has provided insight into the underlying mechanics of locomotion. The dynamic similarity hypothesis suggests that the PTS should occur at the same Froude number across gravitational environments. In normal Earth gravity, the PTS occurs at a Froude number of 0.5 in adult humans, but previous reports found the PTS occurred at Froude numbers greater than 0.5 in simulated lunar gravity. Our purpose was to (1) determine the Froude number at the PTS in actual lunar gravity during parabolic flight and (2) compare it with the Froude number at the PTS in simulated lunar gravity during overhead suspension. We observed that Froude numbers at the PTS in actual lunar gravity (1.39±0.45) and simulated lunar gravity (1.11±0.26) were much greater than 0.5. Froude numbers at the PTS above 1.0 suggest that the use of the inverted pendulum model may not necessarily be valid in actual lunar gravity and that earlier findings in simulated reduced gravity are more accurate than previously thought.

CO2 Washout Testing of the REI and EM-ACES Space Suits

When a space suit is used during ground testing, adequate carbon dioxide (CO2) washout must be provided for the suited subject. Symptoms of acute CO2 exposure depend on partial pressure of CO2 (ppCO2), metabolic rate of the subject, and other factors. This test was done to characterize inspired oronasal ppCO2 in the Rear Entry I-Suit (REI) and the Enhanced Mobility Advanced Crew Escape Suit (EM-ACES) for a range of workloads and flow rates for which ground testing is nominally performed. Three subjects were tested in each suit. In all but one case, each subject performed the test twice. Suit pressure was maintained at 4.3 psid. Subjects wore the suit while resting, performing arm ergometry, and walking on a treadmill to generate metabolic workloads of about 500 to 3000 BTU/hr. Supply airflow was varied between 6, 5, and 4 actual cubic feet per minute (ACFM) at each workload. Subjects wore an oronasal mask with an open port in front of the mouth and were allowed to breathe freely. Oronasal ppCO2 was monitored in real time by gas analyzers with sampling tubes connected to the mask. Metabolic rate was calculated from the total CO2 production measured by an additional gas analyzer at the suit air outlet. Real-time metabolic rate was used to adjust the arm ergometer or treadmill workload to meet target metabolic rates. In both suits, inspired CO2 was affected mainly by the metabolic rate of the subject: increased metabolic rate significantly (P < 0.05) increased inspired ppCO2. Decreased air flow caused small increases in inspired ppCO2. The effect of flow was more evident at metabolic rates ≥ 2000 BTU/hr. CO2 washout values of the EM-ACES were slightly but not significantly better than those of the REI suit. Regression equations were developed for each suit to predict the mean inspired ppCO2 as a function of metabolic rate and suit flow rate. This paper provides detailed descriptions of the test hardware, methodology, and results as well as implications for future ground testing in the REI-suit and EM-ACES.

Hypobaric Decompression Sickness Treatment Model.

INTRODUCTION The Hypobaric Decompression Sickness (DCS) Treatment Model links a decrease in computed bubble volume from increased pressure (ΔP), increased oxygen (O2) partial pressure, and passage of time during treatment to the probability of symptom resolution [P(SR)]. The decrease in offending volume is realized in two stages: 1) during compression via Boyles law; and 2) during subsequent dissolution of the gas phase via the oxygen window. METHODS We established an empirical model for the P(SR) while accounting for multiple symptoms within subjects. The data consisted of 154 cases of hypobaric DCS symptoms with ancillary information from tests on 56 men and 18 women. RESULTS Our best estimated model is P(SR)=1/(1+exp(-(ln(ΔP)-1.510+0.795×AMB-0.00308×Ts)/0.478)), where ΔP is pressure difference (psid); AMB=1 if ambulation took place during part of the altitude exposure, otherwise AMB=0; and Ts is the elapsed time in minutes from the start of altitude exposure to recognition of a DCS symptom. DISCUSSION Values of ΔP as inputs to the model would be calculated from the Tissue Bubble Dynamics Model based on the effective treatment pressure: ΔP=P2-P1|=P1×V1/V2-P1, where V1 is the computed volume of a bubble at low pressure P1 and V2 is computed volume after a change to a higher pressure P2. If 100% ground-level oxygen was breathed in place of air, then V2 continues to decrease through time at P2 at a faster rate.

An Ergonomic Evaluation of the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) Spacesuit Hard Upper Torso (HUT) Size Effect on Mobility, Strength, and Metabolic Performance

Introduction: The objective of this project was to develop a comprehensive methodology to assess the suit fit and performance differences between a nominally sized extravehicular mobility unit (EMU) spacesuit and a nominal +1 (plus) sized EMU. Method: This study considered a multitude of evaluation metrics including 3D clearances and pressure point mapping to quantify potential issues associated with using off-nominal suit sizes. Results: There were minimal differences with using a plus suit size. Discussion: Analysis of the results indicates that future suit size evaluations should consider this ergonomic approach to understand and mitigate potential suit fit and performance issues.

Characterization of variability sources associated with measuring inspired CO 2 in spacesuits

NASA seeks a validated, standardized methodology for measuring the inspired carbon dioxide gas (CO2) in spacesuits to verify that ventilation designs maintain safe levels of CO2 during suited operations. To date, several studies have been performed to assess the CO2 washout capability of different spacesuits using a variety of in-suit sampling techniques and devices, while different approaches are used to test breathing masks for applications such as firefighting and diving. This study reviews existing methodologies for measuring CO2 washout and then describes a series of systematic evaluations conducted to characterize sources of variability associated with spacesuit CO2 washout measurement equipment and methods so that calculations of inspired CO2 may be appropriately adjusted or interpreted to account for the known measurement errors. To systematically isolate and identify the contributions of variability associated with each component of measurement equipment and methods, a technique was developed using 4% CO2 calibration gas and 1% CO2 calibration gas to simulate perfect washout with respiratory traces of exactly known expired CO2 levels. Using this technique, sample line length, line inner diameter, effect of fittings, and placement of flow controllers such as rotameters were tested sequentially to quantify their effects on the resulting simulated respiratory trace. The results of this testing indicate that unsuited, ambient sampling for CO2 should be performed with small diameter, short length tubing, at high flow rates with minimal flow interrupters (e.g., fittings, valves) in order to minimize errors associated with loss of data integrity. Of the conditions tested, data integrity was best maintained when sampling at 1000 mL/min, using a practical sample tube of 3.0 m (10 ft) length and 1.6 mm (0.063 in) inner diameter, with no flow interrupters between the CO2 source and the CO2 sensor. In the near-term, the results of this study will inform a follow-up study, the objectives of which are to define a validated, standardized methodology for measuring inspired CO2 in pressurized spacesuits, and to characterize intra-subject and inter-subject variability during human-in-the-loop (HITL) testing of CO2 washout in the extravehicular mobility unit (EMU) spacesuit.

Hemoglobin O2 Saturation with Mild Hypoxia and Microgravity

INTRODUCTION Microgravity (μG) exposure and even early recovery from μG in combination with mild hypoxia may increase the alveolar-arterial oxygen (O2) partial pressure gradient. METHODS Four male astronauts on STS-69 (1995) and four on STS-72 (1996) were exposed on Earth to an acute sequential hypoxic challenge by breathing for 4 min 18.0%, 14.9%, 13.5%, 12.9%, and 12.2% oxygen-balance nitrogen. The 18.0% O2 mixture at sea level resulted in an inspired O2 partial pressure (PIo2) of 127 mmHg. The equivalent PIO2 was also achieved by breathing 26.5% O2 at 527 mmHg that occurred for several days in μG on the Space Shuttle. A Novametrix CO2SMO Model 7100 recorded hemoglobin (Hb) oxygen saturation through finger pulse oximetry (Spo2, %). There were 12 in-flight measurements collected. Measurements were also taken the day of (R+0) and 2 d after (R+2) return to Earth. Linear mixed effects models assessed changes in Spo2 during and after exposure to μG. RESULTS Astronaut Spo2 levels at baseline, R+0, and R+2 were not significantly different from in flight, about 97% given a PIo2 of 127 mmHg. There was also no difference in astronaut Spo2 levels between baseline and R+0 or R+2 over the hypoxic challenge. CONCLUSIONS The multitude of physiological changes associated with μG and during recovery from μG did not affect astronaut Spo2 under hypoxic challenge.Conkin J, Wessel JH III, Norcross JR, Bekdash OS, Abercromby AFJ, Koslovsky MD, Gernhardt ML. Hemoglobin oxygen saturation with mild hypoxia and microgravity. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(6):527-534.

Integrated Suit Test 1 - A Study to Evaluate Effects of Suit Weight, Pressure, and Kinematics on Human Performance during Lunar Ambulation

In an effort to design the next generation Lunar suit, NASA has initiated a series of tests aimed at understanding the human physiological and biomechanical affects of space suits under a variety of conditions. The first of these tests was the EVA Walkback Test (ICES 2007-01-3133). NASA-JSC assembled a multi-disciplinary team to conduct the second test of the series, titled Integrated Suit Test 1 (IST-1), from March 6 through July 24, 2007. Similar to the Walkback Test, this study was performed with the Mark III (MKIII) EVA Technology Demonstrator suit, a treadmill, and the Partial Gravity Simulator in the Space Vehicle Mock-Up Facility at Johnson Space Center. The data collected for IST-1 included metabolic rates, ground reaction forces, biomechanics, and subjective workload and controllability feedback on both suited and unsuited (shirt-sleeve) astronaut subjects. For IST-1 the center of gravity was controlled to a nearly perfect position while the weight, pressure and biomechanics (waist locked vs. unlocked) were varied individually to evaluate the effects of each on the ability to perform level (0 degree incline) ambulation in simulated Lunar gravity. The detailed test methodology and preliminary key findings of IST-1 are summarized in this report.

Ground Reaction Forces and Gait Parameters during Motorized and Non-Motorized Treadmill Walking and Runing on the International Space Station Treadmill

Both motorized (T-M) and non-motorized (T-NM) treadmill locomotion are used on the International Space Station (ISS) as countermeasures to the deleterious effects of prolonged weightlessness. However, the ground reaction forces (GRF) and gait parameters of these exercise modes have not been examined.