Jason R. Wickstrum

Francisella tularensis Induces Extensive Caspase-3 Activation and Apoptotic Cell Death in the Tissues of Infected Mice

ABSTRACT Although Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis is known to cause extensive tissue necrosis, the pathogenesis of tissue injury has not been elucidated. To characterize cell death in tularemia, C57BL/6 mice were challenged by the intranasal route with type A F. tularensis, and the pathological changes in infected tissues were characterized over the next 4 days. At 3 days postinfection, well-organized inflammatory infiltrates developed in the spleen and liver following the spread of infection from the lungs. By the next day, extensive cell death, characterized by the presence of pyknotic cells containing double-strand DNA breaks, was apparent throughout these inflammatory foci. Cell death was not mediated by activated caspase-1, as has been reported for cells infected with other Francisella subspecies. Mouse macrophages and dendritic cells that had been stimulated with type A F. tularensis did not release interleukin-18 in vitro, a response that requires the activation of procaspase-1. Dying cells within type A F. tularensis-infected tissues expressed activated caspase-3 but very little activated caspase-1. When caspase-1-deficient mice were challenged with type A F. tularensis, pathological changes, including extensive cell death, were similar to those seen in infected wild-type mice. In contrast, type A F. tularensis-infected caspase-3-deficient mice showed much less death among their F4/80+ spleen cells than did infected wild-type mice, and they retained the ability to express tumor necrosis factor alpha and inducible NO synthase. These findings suggest that type A F. tularensis induces caspase-3-dependent macrophage apoptosis, resulting in the loss of potentially important innate immune responses to the pathogen.

Conditional Gene Expression in Chlamydia trachomatis Using the Tet System

Chlamydia trachomatis is maintained through a complex bi-phasic developmental cycle that incorporates numerous processes that are poorly understood. This is reflective of the previous paucity of genetic tools available. The recent advent of a method for transforming Chlamydia has enabled the development of essential molecular tools to better study these medically important bacteria. Critical for the study of Chlamydia biology and pathogenesis, is a system for tightly controlled inducible gene expression. To accomplish this, a new shuttle vector was generated with gene expression controlled by the Tetracycline repressor and anhydryotetracycline. Evaluation of GFP expression by this system demonstrated tightly controlled gene regulation with rapid protein expression upon induction and restoration of transcription repression following inducer removal. Additionally, induction of expression could be detected relatively early during the developmental cycle and concomitant with conversion into the metabolically active form of Chlamydia. Uniform and strong GFP induction was observed during middle stages of the developmental cycle. Interestingly, variable induced GFP expression by individual organisms within shared inclusions during later stages of development suggesting metabolic diversity is affecting induction and/or expression. These observations support the strong potential of this molecular tool to enable numerous experimental analyses for a better understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of Chlamydia.

Amino Acid Contacts between Sigma 70 Domain 4 and the Transcription Activators RhaS and RhaR

The RhaS and RhaR proteins are transcription activators that respond to the availability of L-rhamnose and activate transcription of the operons in the Escherichia coli L-rhamnose catabolic regulon. RhaR activates transcription of rhaSR, and RhaS activates transcription of the operon that encodes the L-rhamnose catabolic enzymes, rhaBAD, as well as the operon that encodes the L-rhamnose transport protein, rhaT. RhaS is 30% identical to RhaR at the amino acid level, and both are members of the AraC/XylS family of transcription activators. The RhaS and RhaR binding sites overlap the -35 hexamers of the promoters they regulate, suggesting they may contact the sigma70 subunit of RNA polymerase as part of their mechanisms of transcription activation. In support of this hypothesis, our lab previously identified an interaction between RhaS residue D241 and sigma70 residue R599. In the present study, we first identified two positively charged amino acids in sigma70, K593 and R599, and three negatively charged amino acids in RhaR, D276, E284, and D285, that were important for RhaR-mediated transcription activation of the rhaSR operon. Using a genetic loss-of-contact approach we have obtained evidence for a specific contact between RhaR D276 and sigma70 R599. Finally, previous results from our lab separately showed that RhaS D250A and sigma70 K593A were defective at the rhaBAD promoter. Our genetic loss-of-contact analysis of these residues indicates that they identify a second site of contact between RhaS and sigma70.

Toll-like receptor 2 controls the gamma interferon response to Francisella tularensis by mouse liver lymphocytes

ABSTRACT The production of gamma interferon (IFN-γ) is a key step in the protective innate immune response to Francisella tularensis. Natural killer cells and T cells in the liver are important sources of this cytokine during primary F. tularensis infections, and interleukin-12 (IL-12) appears to be an essential coactivating cytokine for hepatic IFN-γ expression. The present study was undertaken to determine whether or not macrophages (Mφ) or dendritic cells (DC) provide coactivating signals for the liver IFN-γ response in vitro, whether IL-12 mediates these effects, and whether Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling is essential to induce this costimulatory activity. Both bone marrow-derived Mφ and DC significantly augmented the IFN-γ response of F. tularensis-challenged liver lymphocytes in vitro. While both cell types produced IL-12p40 in response to F. tularensis challenge, only DC secreted large quantities of IL-12p70. DC from both IL-12p35-deficient and TLR2-deficient mice failed to produce IL-12p70 and did not costimulate liver lymphocytes for IFN-γ production in response to viable F. tularensis organisms. Conversely, liver lymphocytes from TLR2-deficient mice cocultured with wild-type accessory cells produced IFN-γ at levels comparable to those for wild-type hepatic lymphocytes. These findings indicate that TLR2 controls hepatic lymphocyte IFN-γ responses to F. tularensis by regulating DC IL-12 production. While Mφ also coinduced hepatic IFN-γ production in response to F. tularensis, they did so in a fashion less dependent on TLR2.

Transcription Activation by the DNA-Binding Domain of the AraC Family Protein RhaS in the Absence of Its Effector-Binding Domain

The Escherichia coli L-rhamnose-responsive transcription activators RhaS and RhaR both consist of two domains, a C-terminal DNA-binding domain and an N-terminal dimerization domain. Both function as dimers and only activate transcription in the presence of L-rhamnose. Here, we examined the ability of the DNA-binding domains of RhaS (RhaS-CTD) and RhaR (RhaR-CTD) to bind to DNA and activate transcription. RhaS-CTD and RhaR-CTD were both shown by DNase I footprinting to be capable of binding specifically to the appropriate DNA sites. In vivo as well as in vitro transcription assays showed that RhaS-CTD could activate transcription to high levels, whereas RhaR-CTD was capable of only very low levels of transcription activation. As expected, RhaS-CTD did not require the presence of L-rhamnose to activate transcription. The upstream half-site at rhaBAD and the downstream half-site at rhaT were found to be the strongest of the known RhaS half-sites, and a new putative RhaS half-site with comparable strength to known sites was identified. Given that cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), the second activator required for full rhaBAD expression, cannot activate rhaBAD expression in a DeltarhaS strain, it was of interest to test whether CRP could activate transcription in combination with RhaS-CTD. We found that RhaS-CTD allowed significant activation by CRP, both in vivo and in vitro, although full-length RhaS allowed somewhat greater CRP activation. We conclude that RhaS-CTD contains all of the determinants necessary for transcription activation by RhaS.

Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein and RhaR Synergistically Activate Transcription from the l-Rhamnose-Responsive rhaSR Promoter in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli rhaSR operon encodes two AraC family transcription activator proteins, RhaS and RhaR, which regulate expression of the l-rhamnose catabolic regulon in response to l-rhamnose availability. RhaR positively regulates rhaSR in response to l-rhamnose, and RhaR activation can be enhanced by the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) protein. CRP is a well-studied global transcription regulator that binds to DNA as a dimer and activates transcription in the presence of cAMP. We investigated the mechanism of CRP activation at rhaSR both alone and in combination with RhaR in vivo and in vitro. Base pair substitutions at potential CRP binding sites in the rhaSR-rhaBAD intergenic region demonstrate that CRP site 3, centered at position -111.5 relative to the rhaSR transcription start site, is required for the majority of the CRP-dependent activation of rhaSR. DNase I footprinting confirms that CRP binds to site 3; CRP binding to the other potential CRP sites at rhaSR was not detected. We show that, at least in vitro, CRP is capable of both RhaR-dependent and RhaR-independent activation of rhaSR from a total of three transcription start sites. In vitro transcription assays indicate that the carboxy-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alpha-CTD) of RNA polymerase is at least partially dispensable for RhaR-dependent activation but that the alpha-CTD is required for CRP activation of rhaSR. Although CRP requires the presence of RhaR for efficient in vivo activation of rhaSR, DNase I footprinting assays indicated that cooperative binding between RhaR and CRP does not make a significant contribution to the mechanism of CRP activation at rhaSR. It therefore appears that CRP activates transcription from rhaSR as it would at simple class I promoters, albeit from a relatively distant position.

Coactivating Signals for the Hepatic Lymphocyte Gamma Interferon Response to Francisella tularensis

ABSTRACT The facultative intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis is capable of causing systemic infections in various hosts, including mice and humans. The liver is a major secondary site of F. tularensis infection, but hepatic immune responses to the pathogen remain poorly defined. Immune protection against the pathogen is thought to depend on the cytokine gamma interferon (IFN-γ), but the cellular basis for this response has not been characterized. Here we report that natural killer cells from the livers of naïve uninfected mice produced IFN-γ when challenged with live bacteria in vitro and that the responses were greatly increased by coactivation of the cells with either recombinant interleukin-12 (IL-12) or IL-18. Moreover, the two cytokines had strong synergistic effects on IFN-γ induction. Neutralizing antibodies to either IL-12 or IL-18 inhibited IFN-γ production in vitro, and mice deficient in the p35 subunit of IL-12 failed to show IFN-γ responses to bacterial challenge either in vitro or in vivo. Clinical isolates of highly virulent type A Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis organisms were comparable to the live attenuated vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica in their ability to induce IL-12 and IFN-γ expression. These findings demonstrate that cells capable of mounting IFN-γ responses to F. tularensis are resident within the livers of uninfected mice and depend on coactivation by IL-12 and IL-18 for optimum responses.

The AraC/XylS family activator RhaS negatively autoregulates rhaSR expression by preventing cyclic AMP receptor protein activation.

The Escherichia coli RhaR protein activates expression of the rhaSR operon in the presence of its effector, L-rhamnose. The resulting RhaS protein (plus L-rhamnose) activates expression of the L-rhamnose catabolic and transport operons, rhaBAD and rhaT, respectively. Here, we further investigated our previous finding that rhaS deletion resulted in a threefold increase in rhaSR promoter activity, suggesting RhaS negative autoregulation of rhaSR. We found that RhaS autoregulation required the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) binding site at rhaSR and that RhaS was able to bind to the RhaR binding site at rhaSR. In contrast to the expected repression, we found that in the absence of both RhaR and the CRP binding site at the rhaSR promoter, RhaS activated expression to a level comparable with RhaR activation of the same promoter. However, when the promoter included the RhaR and CRP binding sites, the level of activation by RhaS and CRP was much lower than that by RhaR and CRP, suggesting that CRP could not fully coactivate with RhaS. Taken together, our results indicate that RhaS negative autoregulation involves RhaS competition with RhaR for binding to the RhaR binding site at rhaSR. Although RhaS and RhaR activate rhaSR transcription to similar levels, CRP cannot effectively coactivate with RhaS. Therefore, once RhaS reaches a relatively high protein concentration, presumably sufficient to saturate the RhaS-activated promoters, there will be a decrease in rhaSR transcription. We propose a model in which differential DNA bending by RhaS and RhaR may be the basis for the difference in CRP coactivation.

Chlamydia trachomatis protein CT009 is a structural and functional homolog to the key morphogenesis component RodZ and interacts with division septal plane localized MreB

Cell division in Chlamydiae is poorly understood as apparent homologs to most conserved bacterial cell division proteins are lacking and presence of elongation (rod shape) associated proteins indicate non‐canonical mechanisms may be employed. The rod‐shape determining protein MreB has been proposed as playing a unique role in chlamydial cell division. In other organisms, MreB is part of an elongation complex that requires RodZ for proper function. A recent study reported that the protein encoded by ORF CT009 interacts with MreB despite low sequence similarity to RodZ. The studies herein expand on those observations through protein structure, mutagenesis and cellular localization analyses. Structural analysis indicated that CT009 shares high level of structural similarity to RodZ, revealing the conserved orientation of two residues critical for MreB interaction. Substitutions eliminated MreB protein interaction and partial complementation provided by CT009 in RodZ deficient Escherichia coli. Cellular localization analysis of CT009 showed uniform membrane staining in Chlamydia. This was in contrast to the localization of MreB, which was restricted to predicted septal planes. MreB localization to septal planes provides direct experimental observation for the role of MreB in cell division and supports the hypothesis that it serves as a functional replacement for FtsZ in Chlamydia.

Differences in the Mechanism of the Allosteric L-Rhamnose Responses of the AraC/XylS Family Transcription Activators RhaS and RhaR

Proteins in the largest subset of AraC/XylS family transcription activators, including RhaS and RhaR, have C‐terminal domains (CTDs) that mediate DNA‐binding and transcription activation, and N‐terminal domains (NTDs) that mediate dimerization and effector binding. The mechanism of the allosteric effector response in this family has been identified only for AraC. Here, we investigated the mechanism by which RhaS and RhaR respond to their effector, l‐rhamnose. Unlike AraC, N‐terminal truncations suggested that RhaS and RhaR do not use an N‐terminal arm to inhibit activity in the absence of effector. We used random mutagenesis to isolate RhaS and RhaR variants with enhanced activation in the absence of l‐rhamnose. NTD substitutions largely clustered around the predicted l‐rhamnose‐binding pockets, suggesting that they mimic the structural outcome of effector binding to the wild‐type proteins. RhaS‐CTD substitutions clustered in the first HTH motif, and suggested that l‐rhamnose induces improved DNA binding. In contrast, RhaR‐CTD substitutions clustered at a single residue in the second HTH motif, at a position consistent with improved RNAP contacts. We propose separate allosteric mechanisms for the two proteins: Without l‐rhamnose, RhaS does not effectively bind DNA while RhaR does not effectively contact RNAP. Upon l‐rhamnose binding, both proteins undergo structural changes that enable transcription activation.