Jaume Francisco-Pascual

A risk score to predict the absence of left ventricular reverse remodeling: Implications for the timing of ICD implantation in primary prevention

BACKGROUND A prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) is only indicated when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reassessment remains ≤35% after 3-6 months on optimal pharmacological therapy. However, LVEF may not improve during this period and the patient may be exposed to an unnecessary risk of sudden cardiac death. This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of the absence of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) after pharmacological treatment optimization in patients with HFrEF to design a risk score of absence of LVRR. METHODS Consecutive outpatients with LVEF ≤35% were included in this observational prospective study. Up-titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradine was performed in our Heart Failure (HF) Unit. The absence of LVRR was defined as the persistence of an LVEF ≤35% at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS One hundred and twenty patients were included. At the 6-month follow-up, 64%, 76%, 72%, and 7% of patients were at 100% of the target dose of ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, MRAs, and ivabradine, respectively. LVRR was observed in 48% of the patients. Ischemic cardiomyopathy, prolonged HF duration, and larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter index (LVEDDI) were independent predictors of the absence of LVRR. The risk score based on these predictors showed a c-statistic value of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacological treatment optimization is associated with LVRR in approximately half of cases, reducing potential ICD indications in parallel. However, ischemic cardiomyopathy, prolonged HF duration, and larger LVEDDI predict the absence of LVRR and favor ICD implantation without delay. The risk score based on the former predictors may help the clinician with the timing of ICD implantation.

Diagnostic Yield and Economic Assessment of a Diagnostic Protocol With Systematic Use of an External Loop Recorder for Patients With Palpitations

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of a diagnostic protocol based on the systematic use of latest-generation external loop recorders (ELRs) compared with the classic diagnostic strategy for patients with recurrent unexplained palpitations. METHODS Two cohorts of consecutive patients referred for diagnosis of unexplained palpitations to the outpatient clinic of the arrhythmia unit were compared: a prospective cohort after the implementation of a new diagnostic protocol based on the systematic use of ELRs, and another, retrospective, cohort before the implementation of the protocol. The cost of diagnosis was calculated based on the number of complementary examinations, visits to outpatient clinics, or emergency department visits required to reach a diagnosis, and its costs according the prices published for the local health system. RESULTS One hundred and forty-nine patients were included (91 in the ELR group, 58 in the control group). The diagnostic yield was higher in the ELR group (79 [86.8%] definitive diagnoses in the ELR group vs 12 [20.7%] in the control group, P < .001). The cost per diagnosis was €375.13 in the ELR group and €5184.75 in the control group (P < .001). The cost-effectiveness study revealed that the systematic use of ELR resulted in a cost reduction of €11.30 for each percentage point of increase in diagnosis yield. CONCLUSIONS In patients with recurrent unexplained palpitations, evaluation by means of a study protocol that considers the systematic use of a latest-generation ELR increases diagnostic yield while reducing the cost per diagnosis.

Predictors of Acute Failure Ablation of Intra‐atrial Re‐entrant Tachycardia in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Cardiac Disease, Atypical Flutter, and Previous Atrial Fibrillation

Background Intra‐atrial re‐entrant tachycardia (IART) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) increases morbidity and mortality. Radiofrequency catheter ablation has evolved as the first‐line treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the acute success and to identify predictors of failed IART radiofrequency catheter ablation in CHD. Methods and Results The observational study included all consecutive patients with CHD who underwent a first ablation procedure for IART at a single center from January 2009 to December 2015 (94 patients, 39.4% female, age: 36.55±14.9 years). In the first procedure, 114 IART were ablated (acute success: 74.6%; 1.21±0.41 IART per patient) with an acute success of 74.5%. Cavotricuspid isthmus–related IART was the only arrhythmia in 51%; non–cavotricuspid isthmus–related IART was the only mechanism in 27.7% and 21.3% of the patients had both types of IART. Predictors of acute radiofrequency catheter ablation failure were as follows: nonrelated cavotricuspid isthmus IART (odds ratio 7.3; confidence interval [CI], 1.9–17.9; P=0.04), previous atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 6.1; CI, 1.3–18.4; P=0.02), transposition of great arteries (odds ratio, 4.9; CI, 1.4–17.2; P=0.01) and systemic ventricle dilation (odds ratio 4.8; CI, 1.1–21.7; P=0.04) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83±0.056 (CI, 0.74–0.93, P=0.001). After a mean follow‐up longer than 3.5 years, 78.3% of the patients were in sinus rhythm (33.1% of the patients required more than 1 radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure). Conclusions Although ablation in CHD is a challenging procedure, acute success of 75% can be achieved in moderate–highly complex CHD patients in a referral center. Predictors of failed ablation are IART different from cavotricuspid isthmus, previous atrial fibrillation, and markers of complex CHD (transposition of great arteries, systemic ventricle dilation).

Yield of atrial fibrillation detection with Textile Wearable Holter from the acute phase of stroke: Pilot study of Crypto-AF registry

BACKGROUND We describe the feasibility of monitoring with a Textile Wearable Holter (TWH) in patients included in Crypto AF registry. METHODS We monitored cryptogenic stroke patients from stroke onset (<3days) continuously during 28days. We employed a TWH composed by a garment and a recorder. We compared two garments (Lead and Vest) to assess rate of undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation (AF) detection, monitoring compliance, comfortability (1 to 5 points), skin lesions, and time analyzed. We describe the timing of AF detection in three periods (0-3, 4-15 and 16-28days). RESULTS The rate of undiagnosed AF detection with TWH was 21.9% (32 out of 146 patients who completed the monitoring). Global time compliance was 90% of the time expected (583/644h). The level of comfortability was 4 points (IQR 3-5). We detected reversible skin lesions in 5.47% (8/146). The comfortability was similar but time compliance (in hours) was longer in Vest group 591 (IQR [521-639]) vs. Lead 566 (IQR [397-620]) (p=0.025). Also, time analyzed was more prolonged in Vest group 497 (IQR [419-557]) vs. Lead (336h (IQR [140-520]) (p=0.001)). The incidence of AF increases from 5.6% (at 3days) to 17.5% (at 15th day) and up to 20.9% (at 28th day). The percentage of AF episodes detected only in each period was 12.5% (0-3days); 21.7% (4-15days) and 19% (16-28days). CONCLUSIONS 28days Holter monitoring from the acute phase of the stroke was feasible with TWH. Following our protocol, only five patients were needed to screen to detected one case of AF.

Mechanisms of Intra-Atrial Re-Entrant Tachycardias in Congenital Heart Disease: Types and Predictors

Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia (IART) is a severe complication in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-related IART is the most frequent mechanism. However, due to fibrosis and surgical scars, non-CTI-related IART is frequent. The main objective of this study was to describe the types of IART, circuit locations, and to analyze predictors of CTI versus non-CTI-related IART. This is an observational study that includes all consecutive patients with CHD who underwent a first IART ablation in a single referral tertiary hospital from January 2009 to December 2015 (94 patients; 39.4% women; age: 36.55 ± 14.9 years, 40.4% with highly complex cardiac disease). During the study, 114 IARTs were ablated (1.21 ± 0.41 IARTs per patient). CTI-related IART was the only arrhythmia in 51% (n = 48) of patients; non-CTI-related IART was the only mechanism in 27.7% (n = 26), and 21.3% of patients (n = 20) presented the two types of IART. Severe dilation of the systemic ventricle, absence of severe dilation of the venous atrium, highly complex cardiac defects, and nontypical electrocardiography (ECG) were related to non-CTI-related IART in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, nontypical ECG (odds ratio 3.64; 1.01 to 4.9; p = 0.049) and grade III CHD complexity (odds ratio 9.43; 1.44 to 11.7; p = 0.001) were predictors of non-CTI-related IART. In conclusion, in our population with a high proportion of complex CHD, CTI-related IART was the most frequent mechanism, although non-CTI-related IART was present in 49% (alone or with concomitant CTI-related IART). High-grade CHD complexity and nontypical ECG were strongly related to non-CTI IART.

Response to ECG, December 2016

The electrocardiogram showed sinus P waves at a heart rate of about 75 bpm, with a normal PR interval, 1:1 conduction, and QRS morphology indicative of incomplete right bundle branch block. In addition, pacing spikes of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (Figure 1, asterisks) were seen at a heart rate of about 30 bpm (normally the back-up pacing heart rate used in ICD programming for patients not requiring cardiac pacing), compatible with a ventricular sensing failure. These spikes provoked a heterogeneous action potential morphology that had no effect on the atrial and ventricular cycles, indicating capture of an extracardiac structure. Chest radiography (Figure 2) showed dislodgement of the lead toward the pectoral region due to apparent rotation of the device on its sagittal axis, which would produce capture of the chest muscles (correct answer, no. 1). None of the other options would explain the electrocardiographic findings: in the antitachycardia therapy (option 2), rapid ventricular pacing would be observed; battery depletion (option 3) would not cause any electrocardiographic changes in this situation because the patient had normal sinus rhythm and did not require pacing; lead fracture (option 4) is usually accompanied by noise in the ventricular canal, which would trigger inappropriate discharges due to oversensing.

Life-threatening and life-saving inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks

An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead dislodgement into the right atrium is a dangerous situation, particularly in patients in atrial fibrillation because atrial fibrillation can be sensed as ventricular fibrillation and true ventricular fibrillation induced with an inappropriate shock. In the presence of shocks, ICD interrogation should be performed as soon as possible.

Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction Caused by Tamponade

A transthoracic echocardiogram of a 72-year-old woman who was admitted to the hospital complaining of dyspnea at rest and peripheral edema showed severe pericardial effusion with right chamber and left atrial collapse, as well as left ventricular hypertrophy with systolic anterior movement of the septal mitral leaflet and systolic gradient through the left ventricular outflow tract (peak gradient of 70 mm Hg; online-only Data Supplement Movie I and Figure 1). A grade 3/6 systolic murmur was heard. The ECG showed sinus rhythm and respiratory phasic changes in QRS amplitude (Figure 2). The patient was referred to the …