Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Javed A. Aslam is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Javed A. Aslam.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2001

Models for metasearch

Javed A. Aslam; Mark H. Montague

Given the ranked lists of documents returned by multiple search engines in response to a given query, the problem ofmetasearchis to combine these lists in a way which optimizes the performance of the combination. This paper makes three contributions to the problem of metasearch: (1) We describe and investigate a metasearch model based on an optimal democratic voting procedure, the Borda Count; (2) we describe and investigate a metasearch model based on Bayesian inference; and (3) we describe and investigate a model for obtaining upper bounds on the performance of metasearch algorithms. Our experimental results show that metasearch algorithms based on the Borda and Bayesian models usually outperform the best input system and are competitive with, and often outperform, existing metasearch strategies. Finally, our initial upper bounds demonstrate that there is much to learn about the limits of the performance of metasearch.


acm/ieee international conference on mobile computing and networking | 2001

Online power-aware routing in wireless Ad-hoc networks

Qun Li; Javed A. Aslam; Daniela Rus

This paper discusses online power-aware routing in large wireless ad-hoc networks for applications where the message sequence is not known. We seek to optimize the lifetime of the network. We show that online power-aware routing does not have a constant competitive ratio to the off-line optimal algorithm. We develop an approximation algorithm called max-min zPmin that has a good empirical competitive ratio. To ensure scalability, we introduce a second online algorithm for power-aware routing. This hierarchical algorithm is called zone-based routing. Our experiments show that its performance is quite good.


international conference on embedded networked sensor systems | 2003

Tracking a moving object with a binary sensor network

Javed A. Aslam; Zack J. Butler; Florin Constantin; Valentino Crespi; George Cybenko; Daniela Rus

In this paper we examine the role of very simple and noisy sensors for the tracking problem. We propose a binary sensor model, where each sensors value is converted reliably to one bit of information only: whether the object is moving toward the sensor or away from the sensor. We show that a network of binary sensors has geometric properties that can be used to develop a solution for tracking with binary sensors and present resulting algorithms and simulation experiments. We develop a particle filtering style algorithm for target tracking using such minimalist sensors. We present an analysis of fundamental tracking limitation under this sensor model, and show how this limitation can be overcome through the use of a single bit of proximity information at each sensor node. Our extensive simulations show low error that decreases with sensor density.


conference on information and knowledge management | 2002

Condorcet fusion for improved retrieval

Mark H. Montague; Javed A. Aslam

We present a new algorithm for improving retrieval results by combining document ranking functions: Condorcet-fuse. Beginning with one of the two major classes of voting procedures from Social Choice Theory, the Condorcet procedure, we apply a graph-theoretic analysis that yields a sorting-based algorithm that is elegant, efficient, and effective. The algorithm performs very well on TREC data, often outperforming existing metasearch algorithms whether or not relevance scores and training data is available. Condorcet-fuse significantly outperforms Borda-fuse, the analogous representative from the other major class of voting algorithms.


conference on information and knowledge management | 2006

Estimating average precision with incomplete and imperfect judgments

Emine Yilmaz; Javed A. Aslam

We consider the problem of evaluating retrieval systems using incomplete judgment information. Buckley and Voorhees recently demonstrated that retrieval systems can be efficiently and effectively evaluated using incomplete judgments via the bpref measure [6]. When relevance judgments are complete, the value of bpref is an approximation to the value of average precision using complete judgments. However, when relevance judgments are incomplete, the value of bpref deviates from this value, though it continues to rank systems in a manner similar to average precision evaluated with a complete judgment set. In this work, we propose three evaluation measures that (1) are approximations to average precision even when the relevance judgments are incomplete and (2) are more robust to incomplete or imperfect relevance judgments than bpref. The proposed estimates of average precision are simple and accurate, and we demonstrate the utility of these estimates using TREC data.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2006

A statistical method for system evaluation using incomplete judgments

Javed A. Aslam; Virgiliu Pavlu; Emine Yilmaz

We consider the problem of large-scale retrieval evaluation, and we propose a statistical method for evaluating retrieval systems using incomplete judgments. Unlike existing techniques that (1) rely on effectively complete, and thus prohibitively expensive, relevance judgment sets, (2) produce biased estimates of standard performance measures, or (3) produce estimates of non-standard measures thought to be correlated with these standard measures, our proposed statistical technique produces unbiased estimates of the standard measures themselves.Our proposed technique is based on random sampling. While our estimates are unbiased by statistical design, their variance is dependent on the sampling distribution employed; as such, we derive a sampling distribution likely to yield low variance estimates. We test our proposed technique using benchmark TREC data, demonstrating that a sampling pool derived from a set of runs can be used to efficiently and effectively evaluate those runs. We further show that these sampling pools generalize well to unseen runs. Our experiments indicate that highly accurate estimates of standard performance measures can be obtained using a number of relevance judgments as small as 4% of the typical TREC-style judgment pool.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2008

A new rank correlation coefficient for information retrieval

Emine Yilmaz; Javed A. Aslam; Stephen E. Robertson

In the field of information retrieval, one is often faced with the problem of computing the correlation between two ranked lists. The most commonly used statistic that quantifies this correlation is Kendalls Τ. Often times, in the information retrieval community, discrepancies among those items having high rankings are more important than those among items having low rankings. The Kendalls Τ statistic, however, does not make such distinctions and equally penalizes errors both at high and low rankings. In this paper, we propose a new rank correlation coefficient, AP correlation (Τap), that is based on average precision and has a probabilistic interpretation. We show that the proposed statistic gives more weight to the errors at high rankings and has nice mathematical properties which make it easy to interpret. We further validate the applicability of the statistic using experimental data.


conference on information and knowledge management | 2001

Relevance score normalization for metasearch

Mark H. Montague; Javed A. Aslam

Given the ranked lists of documents returned by multiple search engines in response to a given query, the problem of metasearch is to combine these lists in a way which optimizes the performance of the combination. This problem can be naturally decomposed into three subproblems: (1) normalizing the relevance scores given by the input systems, (2) estimating relevance scores for unretrieved documents, and (3) combining the newly-acquired scores for each document into one, improved score.Research on the problem of metasearch has historically concentrated on algorithms for combining (normalized) scores. In this paper, we show that the techniques used for normalizing relevance scores and estimating the relevance scores of unretrieved documents can have a significant effect on the overall performance of metasearch. We propose two new normalization/estimation techniques and demonstrate empirically that the performance of well known metasearch algorithms can be significantly improved through their use.


Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing | 2003

Three power-aware routing algorithms for sensor networks

Javed A. Aslam; Qun Li; Daniela Rus

Summary This paper discusses online power-aware routing in large wireless ad hoc networks (especially sensor networks) for applications in which the message sequence is not known. We seek to optimize the lifetime of the network. We show that online power-aware routing does not have a constant competitive ratio to the off-line optimal algorithm. We develop an approximation algorithm called max –min zPmin that has a good empirical competitive ratio. To ensure scalability, we introduce a second online algorithm for power-aware routing. This hierarchical algorithm is called zone-based routing. Our experiments show that its performance is quite good. Finally, we describe a distributed version of this algorithm that does not depend on any centralization. Copyright  2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2008

Evaluation over thousands of queries

Ben Carterette; Virgiliu Pavlu; Evangelos Kanoulas; Javed A. Aslam; James Allan

Information retrieval evaluation has typically been performed over several dozen queries, each judged to near-completeness. There has been a great deal of recent work on evaluation over much smaller judgment sets: how to select the best set of documents to judge and how to estimate evaluation measures when few judgments are available. In light of this, it should be possible to evaluate over many more queries without much more total judging effort. The Million Query Track at TREC 2007 used two document selection algorithms to acquire relevance judgments for more than 1,800 queries. We present results of the track, along with deeper analysis: investigating tradeoffs between the number of queries and number of judgments shows that, up to a point, evaluation over more queries with fewer judgments is more cost-effective and as reliable as fewer queries with more judgments. Total assessor effort can be reduced by 95% with no appreciable increase in evaluation errors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Javed A. Aslam's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniela Rus

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emine Yilmaz

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Virgil Pavlu

Northeastern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge