Javier Luis Carrasco Rus

Clasificación secuencial tecno-tipológica de las fíbulas de codo de la Península Ibérica

espanolSe analizan y clasifican las fibulas de codo peninsulares segun la composicion de sus aleaciones metalicas, con el fin de determinar su tipologia tecnica, los posibles talleres existentes, las zonas de influencia y su origen y desarrollo cronologico. La presencia de un importante numero de ellas procedente de la provincia de Granada, caracterizadas por un escaso contenido de estano y una presencia considerable de arsenico, sugiere una mayor antiguedad para las fibulas granadinas. EnglishTechnical-typological sequential classification of the elbow fibuine froin te ibedan Peninsula. An analysis and statistical classification is attempted on the elbow’ type fibulae ofthe Iberian Peninsula, in order tofind out their technical typology, the existence of local workshops, the areasof influence of each type. and the chronological origin and development. The greatnumber of these artefacts that have beenfound in the Granada province. together with special technical characteristics (low content in tin, high in arsenic) suggests an carlier dating for the Granada fibulae.

¿Fíbulas peninsulares de codo «sículas» o de tipo «Monachil»? Novedades y revisión

We study a wide range of elbow fibulae, traditionally referred to as «siculas» in our Monachil nomenclature. This study will fulfill our knowledge of these problematic and paradigmatic devices in the Late Bronze in the Iberian Peninsula. The different typologies and chronologies are deeply analyzed, as well as their regional distribution, focusing on their native or foreign origin. Our aim is to build a chrono-cultural framework incorporating these fibulae. With the current information available, we cannot conclude that these Iberian fibulae have a Sicilian origin.

Paleoetnología de la Andalucía Oriental (etnogeografía)

espanolSe analizan las fuentes antiguas sobre las etnias prerromanas de esta region andaluza, partiendo de los datos mas antiugos, desde Avieno (siglo VI a.C.) y otros autores de distintas epocas (Hecateo de Mileto, Esteban de Bizancio, Teopompo de Quios, Eforo, Apiano, Estrabon, Plinio, Mela, Ptolomeo, etc...). Tambien se analizan los grupos etnicos identificados, con su situacion, limites y ciudades correspondientes, senalando sus diferencias y su hitoriografia y apuntando ciertos caracteres culturales que apoyan un polimorfismo antiguo en la parte oriental andaluza. Una segunda parte, tras el acercamiento tradicional al problema, plantea la posible inexistencia de diversidad etnica en ese mundo prerromano, pues, la prehistoria de la region evidencia que loos habitantes de Andalucia Oriental son basicamente los mismos desde el neolitico, lo que desmonta las tesis invasionistas y la falcia del polimorfismo prerromano. Se argumenta arqueologicamente que el mundo prerromano andaluz ofrece mas elementos comunes de lo que se suponia. EnglishThe classical sources on the pre-Roman tribes of this Andalusian region are analysed, starting from the oldest data, from Avieno (6th century B. C.) and other authors from various eras (Hecateus of Miletus, Stephen of Byzacium, Theopompus of Chios, Ephorus, Apianus, Strabo, Pliny, Mela, Ptolemy, etc.). The ethnic groups identified, their situation, limits and corresponding cities are also analysed, observing iheir differences and their historiography and nothing certain cultural characteristics that support polymorphism in eastern Andalusia in ancient times. A second part, after the traditional approach to the problem, considers the possibility dial diere was no ethnic diversity in this pre-Roman world, since the Prehistory of the region indicates that the inhabitants of Eastern Andalusia remained basically the same from the Neolithic onwards, which contradicts the invasionist thesis and the fallacy of pre-Roman polymorphism. It is argued that the pre-Roman Andalusian world has more elements in common than previously demonstrated.