Jay B. Wish

Anemia in renal disease: Diagnosis and management

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a widespread health problem in the world and anemia is a common complication. Anemia conveys significant risk for cardiovascular disease, faster progression of renal failure and decreased quality of life. Patients with CKD can have anemia for many reasons, including but not invariably their renal insufficiency. These patients require a thorough evaluation to identify and correct causes of anemia other than erythropoietin deficiency. The mainstay of treatment of anemia secondary to CKD has become erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The use of ESAs does carry risks and these agents need to be used judiciously. Iron deficiency often co-exists in this population and must be evaluated and treated. Correction of iron deficiency can improve anemia and reduce ESA requirements. Partial, but not complete, correction of anemia is associated with improved outcomes in patients with CKD.

Prevalence of Arteriovenous Fistulas in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: Correlation With Patient Factors That May Be Associated With Maturation Failure

BACKGROUND Lok et al previously reported a risk equation for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure. It is unclear whether this model or a more comprehensive model correlates with incident AVF use in the US hemodialysis population. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 195,756 adult patients initiating outpatient hemodialysis therapy in the United States between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, with 6 months or more prior nephrology care. PREDICTOR Patient characteristics (age, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, and race) populating the AVF maturation failure risk equation and other demographic and clinical variables from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medical Evidence Report (CMS 2728). OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS AVF use at first outpatient dialysis treatment as recorded on the CMS 2728. RESULTS Using the risk categories defined by Lok et al, AVF use varied from 19.0% (very high risk) to 25.6% (low risk). In a model using only these risk categories, logistic regression showed lower ORs for moderate-, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93); high-, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83); and very high-risk patients, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63-0.73) compared with low risk. In the expanded model, odds were lower for women, blacks, Hispanics, age older than 85 years, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, other cardiac disease, and underweight. Odds were higher for hypertension, overweight, obesity, 12 months or more nephrologist care, most insurance types, and each successive year after 2005. Despite associations, the C statistic for the expanded model was 0.64. LIMITATIONS This analysis is limited by lack of access creation history before dialysis therapy initiation and minimal external validation of CMS 2728 data. CONCLUSIONS Clinical risk factors identified by Lok and expanded in this analysis have limited ability to predict incident AVF use. Even patients judged at highest risk can have successful AVF construction and initiate dialysis therapy through a functioning AVF.

Use of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients With Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease: Overcoming the Pharmacological and Pharmacoeconomic Limitations of Existing Therapies

Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is characterized by a glomerular filtration rate of 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (reference range, 90-200 mL/min/1.73m2 for a 20-year-old, with a decrease of 4 mL/min per decade), affects approximately 8 million people in the United States. Anemia is common in patients with stage 3 CKD and, if not corrected, contributes to a poor quality of life. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), introduced almost 2 decades ago, have replaced transfusions as first-line therapy for anemia. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of ESAs in the primary care of patients with anemia of CKD and discusses pharmacological and pharmacoeconomic issues raised by recent data. Relevant studies in the English language were identified by searching the MEDLINE database (1987-2006). Two ESAs are currently available in the United States, epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. More frequent dosing with epoetin alfa is recommended by the labeled administration guidelines because it has a shorter half-life than darbepoetin alfa. Clinical experience also supports extended dosing intervals for both these ESAs. Use of ESAs in the management of anemia of CKD is associated with improved quality of life, increased survival, and decreased progression of renal failure. Some evidence suggests that ESAs have a cardioprotective effect. However, correction of anemia to hemoglobin levels greater than 12 g/dL (to convert to g/L, multiply by 10) appears to increase the risk of adverse cardiac outcomes and progression of kidney disease in some patients. The prescription of ESAs in the primary care setting requires an understanding of the accepted use of these agents, the associated pharmacoeconomic challenges, and the potential risks. This review considers the need to balance effective ESA dosing intervals against the potential risks of treatment.

Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Program in the Medicare ESRD Program: A New Era of Quality Improvement in ESRD

Improving the quality of health care is a central challenge for Americas health care system. The mission of the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program is to promote the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of ESRD patient care and program administration. The program provides an ideal opportunity to demonstrate the use of information to help clinicians analyze and improve the care they deliver to patients in an ambulatory setting. This is possible because the program has established regional surveillance systems, called ESRD Networks, that gather information on the occurrence and outcomes of treatment of Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD. The Health Care Financing Administration, which is responsible for the administration of the program, and the renal community have worked together since 1990 to identify ways of incorporating new methods of quality improvement into the program. These methods include statistical evaluation of the processes and outcomes of care in dialysis populations; communicating recommended practices with clinical guidelines and algorithms; regional peer review and feedback (ie, technical assistance and/or collaborations for quality improvement); interventions that focus on the provision of assistance for quality improvement efforts; continuing collection and active feedback of data to providers; and a commitment to continue to evaluate and revise quality improvement activities to reflect lessons learned and newly identified needs. These ideas have been included in the 1994-1997 scope of work for the ESRD Networks and is called the ESRD Health Care Quality Improvement Program (HCQIP). This article describes the background for the ESRD HCQIP and the programs elements.

Improving outcomes in CKD and ESRD patients: Carrying the torch from training to practice

Practicing nephrologists are spending more time caring for end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Despite this focus, and considerable advances in the understanding of those aspects of care that impact on clinical outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life for these patients has not improved substantially over the past decade. One of the possible explanations for this lack of progress is the structure of current nephrology training programs, where ESRD and CKD patient care is not emphasized. To address this issue, we developed a short preceptorship for second‐year nephrology fellows, including didactic lectures and workshops. Of 67 participating fellows, 50% were from programs offering 3 or fewer months of exposure to outpatient hemodialysis, and 25% reported no exposure to peritoneal dialysis. Of more concern, 25% reported no “official rounds” with an attending nephrologist on dialysis patients. If nephrologists are to take their appropriate place as leaders of the care delivery team, nephrology fellowships must be restructured with appropriate emphasis placed on the comprehensive care of ESRD and CKD patients.

Burden of illness for patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease and anemia in the United States: review of the literature

Objective: To assess the health-related quality of life (HRQL) and economic burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) related anemia in non-dialysis patients in the United States (US) via literature review. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PROQOLID, and Cochrane Library/Renal Group Resources were searched. Studies were appraised for patient populations, disease-specific versus generic HRQL assessments, and type and magnitude of health-related costs. Results: The treatment costs for CKD patients with anemia compared to those without anemia were significantly higher and were blunted but persistent after controlling for comorbidities and confounders. Intervention with erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) decreased anemia and avoided hospital admissions. Costs were higher when anemia was poorly controlled or untreated. HRQL burden was mainly due to physical limitations and difficulty in ability to perform activities of daily living. Significant positive correlations between increases in hemoglobin levels and HRQL measures were reported. Conclusions: Although evidence is limited, the economic and HRQL burden of non-dialysis CKD-related anemia is substantial. Under-treatment of anemia may contribute to higher resource consumption and higher costs; however, patient co-morbidities, use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents, and overall management introduce potential confounds. The contribution of anemia to humanistic disease burden is due to a constellation of factors, including physical activity and functional status.

Recovery of renal function among ESRD patients in the US medicare program.

Background Patients started on long term hemodialysis have typically had low rates of reported renal recovery with recent estimates ranging from 0.9–2.4% while higher rates of recovery have been reported in cohorts with higher percentages of patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis. Study Design Our analysis followed approximately 194,000 patients who were initiated on hemodialysis during a 2-year period (2008 & 2009) with CMS-2728 forms submitted to CMS by dialysis facilities, cross-referenced with patient record updates through the end of 2010, and tracked through December 2010 in the CMS SIMS registry. Results We report a sustained renal recovery (i.e no return to ESRD during the available follow up period) rate among Medicare ESRD patients of > 5% - much higher than previously reported. Recovery occurred primarily in the first 2 months post incident dialysis, and was more likely in cases with renal failure secondary to etiologies associated with acute kidney injury. Patients experiencing sustained recovery were markedly less likely than true long-term ESRD patients to have permanent vascular accesses in place at incident hemodialysis, while non-White patients, and patients with any prior nephrology care appeared to have significantly lower rates of renal recovery. We also found widespread geographic variation in the rates of renal recovery across the United States. Conclusions Renal recovery rates in the US Medicare ESRD program are higher than previously reported and appear to have significant geographic variation. Patients with diagnoses associated with acute kidney injury who are initiated on long-term hemodialysis have significantly higher rates of renal recovery than the general ESRD population and lower rates of permanent access placement.

Dialysis Delivery in Canada and the United States: A View From the Trenches

Although the general framework for health care delivery is vastly different in Canada and the United States, the framework for dialysis delivery is less divergent. However, the 2 systems have evolved very differently. Examined during the past 20 years, it is apparent that the dialysis system in the United States has undergone profound change, whereas the system in Canada is relatively stagnant. Most of the change in the United States has been positive, and this evolutionary change is expected to continue. In Canada, a system that historically has worked reasonably well is now showing severe signs of suboptimal performance that would be expected to get worse if no effort is made to improve it. This article, written from the perspective of 2 academic clinicians, tries to describe similarities and differences, identify strengths and weaknesses, and serve as a catalyst for discussions about improving both systems. Just as no dialysis treatment modality is perfect, the same can be said for dialysis delivery systems. Empirical methods to objectively evaluate the impact of change must be included in the design and implementation of new initiatives in the United States and Canada.

Special Article: Improving Outcomes in CKD and ESRD Patients: Carrying the Torch from Training to Practice

Practicing nephrologists are spending more time caring for end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Despite this focus, and considerable advances in the understanding of those aspects of care that impact on clinical outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life for these patients has not improved substantially over the past decade. One of the possible explanations for this lack of progress is the structure of current nephrology training programs, where ESRD and CKD patient care is not emphasized. To address this issue, we developed a short preceptorship for second‐year nephrology fellows, including didactic lectures and workshops. Of 67 participating fellows, 50% were from programs offering 3 or fewer months of exposure to outpatient hemodialysis, and 25% reported no exposure to peritoneal dialysis. Of more concern, 25% reported no “official rounds” with an attending nephrologist on dialysis patients. If nephrologists are to take their appropriate place as leaders of the care delivery team, nephrology fellowships must be restructured with appropriate emphasis placed on the comprehensive care of ESRD and CKD patients.

Healthcare Expenditure and Resource Utilization in Patients with Anaemia and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis

Background/Aims: We conducted a retrospective claims database analysis to examine the association of anaemia and anaemia management with healthcare expenditure and utilization in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before the onset of dialysis. Methods: Claims data on patients (aged ≥15 years) with CKD were collected from the Medstat Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare Databases between 2000 and 2005. Using these data, patients were evaluated for anaemia of CKD, anaemia treatment status and healthcare costs and use. Results: Of the 37,105 CKD patients, 9,807 (26%) had incident anaemia; 59% of these received at least one type of anaemia treatment, with 48% receiving an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. The total adjusted per patient per month healthcare expenditure for all CKD patients was USD 2,749. Patients with anaemia had significantly greater overall expenditure, which was 38% higher than those without anaemia. Total expenditure was 17% higher for untreated versus treated anaemic patients, largely due to higher inpatient expenditure in the untreated cohort. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the presence of anaemia is associated with greater medical expenditure in patients with CKD. However, we found that anaemia management may help to lower inpatient costs associated with anaemia in the CKD population.