Jay D. Pal

Low Operative Mortality With Implantation of a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device and Impact of Concurrent Cardiac Procedures

Background— The objective of this study was to determine the impact of concurrent cardiac procedures (CCP) on patient outcomes after HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device implantation. Methods and Results— Two hundred eighty-one patients underwent implantation of a HMII as a bridge to transplantation from March 2005 to March 2007. One hundred seventy patients had an HMII implanted only, and 81 patients underwent concurrent cardiac procedures in conjunction with HMII implantation (HMII+CCP). Of these, 47 patients had concurrent valvular procedures, 15 patients had simultaneous closure of patent foramen ovale, and 19 patients had other various cardiac procedures. Patients requiring right ventricular assist device support or noncardiac procedures were excluded. Preoperative characteristics were similar for patients with and without concurrent cardiac procedures. Overall 30-day mortality was 5.8% for the HMII group and 11.3% for the HMII+CCP group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that simultaneous patent foramen ovale closure was not associated with an increased 30-day mortality rate, but concurrent valvular procedures increased the risk to 8.5%. Patients who underwent an aortic valve procedure had a 30-day mortality rate of 25%, higher than for isolated concurrent mitral (0%) or tricuspid repair (3.3%). Survival at 180 days was 87% for HMII alone and 80% for HMII+CCP. The hazard ratio for concurrent cardiac procedures adjusted for baseline parameters was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.10, P=0.026). Conclusions— There is a low 5.8% operative mortality rate for patients requiring uncomplicated HMII implantation, with no apparent increased risk for concurrent patent foramen ovale closure or mitral or tricuspid repair. However, concurrent aortic valve and other cardiac procedures are associated with significantly decreased perioperative and long-term survival.

Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Device Bridging on Posttransplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND Bridge to heart transplantation with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) can be a promising therapy for patients who are not effectively stabilized with conservative measures. However, referral for LVAD therapy may be limited secondary to reports of poor outcomes when mechanical circulatory support is required before transplantation. METHODS A retrospective review was undertaken to evaluate outcomes in United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status 1 heart transplant recipients who were bridged to transplant with an implantable LVAD or with intravenous inotropes only from 1994 to 2007. Preoperative characteristics, posttransplant survival, and postoperative complications were compared between 86 patients with an implantable LVAD and 173 patients bridged with intravenous inotropes only. RESULTS The patients had similar baseline characteristics and pretransplant hemodynamics. Hemodynamics in the LVAD group, as measured by cardiac index, pulmonary vascular resistance, central venous pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, significantly improved during mechanical support. Short-term and long-term posttransplant survival and the incidence of posttransplant infectious complications and rejection episodes during the first year was similar. The incidence of posttransplant renal dysfunction was higher in patients bridged with inotropes. CONCLUSIONS Patients bridged to transplant with a LVAD represent a subset of UNOS status 1 patients who deteriorated on intravenous inotropic therapy. Bridging to heart transplantation with an implantable LVAD provides comparable outcomes to similar status 1 patients who were stabilized on inotropic infusions only. In contrast with International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation data, no increase in posttransplant morbidity or mortality occurred in LVAD-bridged patients.

A different view of lactate in trauma patients: protecting the injured brain.

BACKGROUND The relationship between lactate and head injury is controversial. We sought to determine the relationship between initial serum lactate, severity of head injury, and outcome. We hypothesized that lactate is elevated in head injured patients, and that initial serum lactate increases as the severity of head injury increases. Furthermore, lactate may be neuroprotective and improve neurologic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified normotensive adult patients over a 6-y period at our university-based urban trauma center with isolated blunt head injury. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to examine the relationship between lactate and Glasgow coma scale (GCS). The correlation of admission lactate with survival and neurologic function was also examined. RESULTS There were 555 patients who met study criteria. While controlling for injury severity score and age, increased lactate was associated with more severe head injury (P<0.0001). The admission lactate was 2.2+/-0.07, 3.7+/-0.7, and 4.7+/-0.8 mmol/L in patients with mild, moderate, and severe head injury respectively (P<0.01). Patients with moderate or severe head injury and an admission lactate>5 were more likely to have a normal mental status on discharge (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In normotensive isolated head injured patients, there was an increase in serum lactate as head injuries became more severe. Since lactate is a readily available fuel source of the injured brain, this may be a mechanism by which brain function is preserved in trauma patients. Elevations in lactate due to anaerobic metabolism in trauma patients may have beneficial effects by protecting the brain during injury.

Atrial septal defect repair by inversion of a juxtaposed left atrial appendage.

A 7-year-old child was noted to have dextrojuxtaposition of the left atrial appendage at the time of surgical atrial septal defect repair. Given the favourable anatomic location and size of the atrial appendage, it was inverted and used to close the atrial defect. This is the first report of atrial septal defect repair using a juxtaposed atrial appendage. The cardiac anatomy and theoretical benefits of this repair are discussed.