Jay K. Fisher
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jay K. Fisher.
Cell | 2013
Jay K. Fisher; Aude Bourniquel; Guillaume Witz; Beth M. Weiner; Mara Prentiss; Nancy Kleckner
Visualization of living E. coli nucleoids, defined by HupA-mCherry, reveals a discrete, dynamic helical ellipsoid. Three basic features emerge. (1) Nucleoid density coalesces into longitudinal bundles, giving a stiff, low-DNA-density ellipsoid. (2) This ellipsoid is radially confined within the cell cylinder. Radial confinement gives helical shape and directs global nucleoid dynamics, including sister segregation. (3) Longitudinal density waves flux back and forth along the nucleoid, with 5%-10% of density shifting within 5 s, enhancing internal nucleoid mobility. Furthermore, sisters separate end-to-end in sequential discontinuous pulses, each elongating the nucleoid by 5%-15%. Pulses occur at 20 min intervals, at defined cell-cycle times. This progression includes sequential installation and release of programmed tethers, implying cyclic accumulation and relief of intranucleoid mechanical stress. These effects could comprise a chromosome-based cell-cycle engine. Overall, the presented results suggest a general conceptual framework for bacterial nucleoid morphogenesis and dynamics.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011
Mohan C. Joshi; Aude Bourniquel; Jay K. Fisher; Brian T. Ho; David Magnan; Nancy Kleckner; David Bates
The basis for segregation of sister chromosomes in bacteria is not established. We show here that two discrete ~150-kb regions, both located early in the right replichore, exhibit prolonged juxtaposition of sister loci, for 20 and 30 min, respectively, after replication. Flanking regions, meanwhile, separate. Thus, the two identified regions comprise specialized late-splitting intersister connections or snaps. Sister snap loci separate simultaneously in both snap regions, concomitant with a major global nucleoid reorganization that results in emergence of a bilobed nucleoid morphology. Split snap loci move rapidly apart to a separation distance comparable with one-half the length of the nucleoid. Concomitantly, at already split positions, sister loci undergo further separation to a comparable distance. The overall consequence of these and other effects is that thus far replicated sister chromosomes become spatially separated (individualized) into the two nucleoid lobes, while the terminus region (and likely, all unreplicated portions of the chromosome) moves to midcell. These and other findings imply that segregation of Escherichia coli sister chromosomes is not a smooth continuous process but involves at least one and likely, two major global transition(s). The presented patterns further suggest that accumulation of internal intranucleoid forces and constraining of these forces by snaps play central roles in global chromosome dynamics. They are consistent with and supportive of our previous proposals that individualization of sisters in E. coli is driven primarily by internally generated pushing forces and is directly analogous to sister individualization at the prophase to prometaphase transition of the eukaryotic cell cycle.
Current Opinion in Microbiology | 2014
Nancy Kleckner; Jay K. Fisher; Mathieu Stouf; Martin A. White; David Bates; Guillaume Witz
Recent studies reveal that the bacterial nucleoid has a defined, self-adherent shape and an underlying longitudinal organization and comprises a viscoelastic matrix. Within this shape, mobility is enhanced by ATP-dependent processes and individual loci can undergo ballistic off-equilibrium movements. In Escherichia coli, two global dynamic nucleoid behaviors emerge pointing to nucleoid-wide accumulation and relief of internal stress. Sister segregation begins with local splitting of individual loci, which is delayed at origin, terminus and specialized interstitial snap regions. Globally, as studied in several systems, segregation is a multi-step process in which internal nucleoid state plays critical roles that involve both compaction and expansion. The origin and terminus regions undergo specialized programs partially driven by complex ATP burning mechanisms such as a ParAB Brownian ratchet and a septum-associated FtsK motor. These recent findings reveal strong, direct parallels among events in different systems and between bacterial nucleoids and mammalian chromosomes with respect to physical properties, internal organization and dynamic behaviors.
Frontiers in Microbiology | 2018
Nancy Kleckner; Katerina Chatzi; Martin A. White; Jay K. Fisher; Mathieu Stouf
Bacterial cells growing in steady state maintain a 1:1:1 relationship between an appropriate mass increase, a round of DNA replication plus sister chromosome segregation, and cell division. This is accomplished without the cell cycle engine found in eukaryotic cells. We propose here a formal logic, and an accompanying mechanism, for how such coordination could be provided in E. coli. Completion of chromosomal and divisome-related events would lead, interactively, to a “progression control complex” (PCC) which provides integrated physical coupling between sister terminus regions and the nascent septum. When a cell has both (i) achieved a sufficient mass increase, and (ii) the PCC has developed, a conformational change in the PCC occurs. This change results in “progression permission,” which triggers both onset of cell division and release of terminus regions. Release of the terminus region, in turn, directly enables a next round of replication initiation via physical changes transmitted through the nucleoid. Division and initiation are then implemented, each at its own rate and timing, according to conditions present. Importantly: (i) the limiting step for progression permission may be either completion of the growth requirement or the chromosome/divisome processes required for assembly of the PCC; and, (ii) the outcome of the proposed process is granting of permission to progress, not determination of the absolute or relative timings of downstream events. This basic logic, and the accompanying mechanism, can explain coordination of events in both slow and fast growth conditions; can accommodate diverse variations and perturbations of cellular events; and is compatible with existing mathematical descriptions of the E. coli cell cycle. Also, while our proposition is specifically designed to provide 1:1:1 coordination among basic events on a “per-cell cycle” basis, it is a small step to further envision permission progression is also the target of basic growth rate control. In such a case, the rate of mass accumulation (or its equivalent) would determine the length of the interval between successive permission events and, thus, successive cell divisions and successive replication initiations.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2014
Jay K. Fisher; Nancy Kleckner
Cellular biology takes place inside confining spaces. For example, bacteria grow in crevices, red blood cells squeeze through capillaries, and chromosomes replicate inside the nucleus. Frequently, the extent of this confinement varies. Bacteria grow longer and divide, red blood cells move through smaller and smaller passages as they travel to capillary beds, and replication doubles the amount of DNA inside the nucleus. This increase in confinement, either due to a decrease in the available space or an increase in the amount of material contained in a constant volume, has the potential to squeeze and stress objects in ways that may lead to changes in morphology, dynamics, and ultimately biological function. Here, we describe a device developed to probe the interplay between confinement and the mechanical properties of cells and cellular structures, and forces that arise due to changes in a structures state. In this system, the manipulation of a magnetic bead exerts a compressive force upon a target contained in the confining space of a microfluidic channel. This magnetic force microfluidic piston is constructed in such a way that we can measure (a) target compliance and changes in compliance as induced by changes in buffer, extract, or biochemical composition, (b) target expansion force generated by changes in the same parameters, and (c) the effects of compression stress on a targets structure and function. Beyond these issues, our system has general applicability to a variety of questions requiring the combination of mechanical forces, confinement, and optical imaging.
Biophysical Journal | 2011
Jay K. Fisher; Aude Bourniquel; Mara Prentiss; Nancy Kleckner
E. coli chromosome dynamics occurring throughout the cell cycle, as defined by fluorescence microscopy of living cells grown in a microfluidic device, have been analyzed in 3D at high resolution. Imaging of the nucleoid (HU-mCherry) reveals an asymmetric left-handed helicoidal ellipsoid. The shape can be seen to exert radial pushing forces at points of contact with the cell periphery, thereby defining complementary intracellular compartments. These compartments constrain the location of DNA replication and determine the paths taken by newly replicated DNA. As replication proceeds, two types of abrupt changes are obsserved: (i) rotation and modulation of the helix without change in basic shape; and (ii) longitudinal protrusion, first of one sister nucleoid towards the old cell pole and then of the other sister nucleoid towards the new cell pole. These two protrusion steps correspond to previously-described transitions involving release of specialized inter-sister “snaps”. We propose that loss of the inter-sister “snaps” and ensuing nucleoid movements, as well as other dynamic effects seen later in the cell cycle, are driven by accumulation and release of mechanical stress arising from the intra-nucleoid repulsive forces, likely arising via interactions between negatively supercoiled plectonemes. We further propose that nucleoid shape arises via repulsion under confinement. Overall these findings lead to a picture in which the E.coli nucleoid is a “bag of springs”, not a “bag of string”, and where intrinsic physical properties of the DNA dictate the behaviors and dispositions of other components via mechanically-driven effects.
Current Opinion in Microbiology | 2015
Nancy Kleckner; Jay K. Fisher; Mathieu Stouf; Martin A. White; David Bates; Guillaume Witz
Biophysical Journal | 2012
Jay K. Fisher
Biophysical Journal | 2012
Jay K. Fisher; Aude Bourniquel; Guillaume Witz; Mara Prentiss; Nancy Kleckner
Biophysical Journal | 2010
Jay K. Fisher; Romain Koszul; Mara Prentiss; Nancy Kleckner