Jayendra K. Patel

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials Of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Schizophrenia Trial: clinical comparison of subgroups with and without the metabolic syndrome.

UNLABELLED The metabolic syndrome (MS) is highly prevalent among patients with schizophrenia (current estimates 35-40%), yet no data exist on the correlation of this diagnosis with illness severity, neurocognitive or quality of life measures in this population. METHODS Using baseline data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Schizophrenia Trial, assignment of MS status was performed using an updated definition derived from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria. Those with and without MS were compared on the basis of primary and secondary variables of interest from baseline data encompassing psychiatric, neurocognitive and quality of life measures. RESULTS Of 1460 subjects enrolled at baseline, MS status could be reliably assigned for 1231 subjects, with a prevalence of 35.8% using the NCEP derived criteria. After adjustment for age, gender, race, ethnicity and site variance, those with MS rated themselves significantly lower on physical health by SF-12 (p < .001), and scored higher on somatic preoccupation (PANSS item G1) (p = .03). There were no significant differences between the two cohorts on measures of symptom severity, depression, quality of life, neurocognition, or self-rated mental health. Neither years of antipsychotic exposure nor alcohol usage were significant predictors of MS status when adjusted for age, gender, race, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS The metabolic syndrome is highly prevalent in this large cohort of schizophrenia patients and is strongly associated with a poor self-rating of physical health and increased somatic preoccupation. These results underscore the need for mental health practitioners to take an active role in the health monitoring of patients with schizophrenia to minimize the impact of medical comorbidity on long-term mortality and on daily functioning. Outcomes data from CATIE will provide important information on the metabolic and clinical impact of antipsychotic treatment for those subjects with MS and other medical comorbidities.

Predictors of antipsychotic medication adherence in patients recovering from a first psychotic episode.

BACKGROUND Many patients recovering from a first psychotic episode will discontinue medication against medical advice, even before a 1-year treatment course is completed. Factors associated with treatment adherence in patients with chronic schizophrenia include beliefs about severity of illness and need for treatment, treatment with typical versus atypical antipsychotic and medication side effects. METHOD In this 2-year prospective study of 254 patients recovering from a first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder we examined the relationship between antipsychotic medication non-adherence and patient beliefs about: need for treatment, antipsychotic medication benefits, and negative aspects of antipsychotic medication treatment. We also examined the relationship between medication non-adherence and treatment with either haloperidol or olanzapine, and objective measures of symptom response and side effects. RESULTS The likelihood of becoming medication non-adherent for 1 week or longer was greater in subjects whose belief in need for treatment was less (HR=1.75, 95% CI 1.16, 2.65, p=0.0077) or who believed medications were of low benefit (HR=2.88, 95 CI 1.79-4.65, p<0.0001). Subjects randomized to haloperidol were more likely to become medication non-adherent for >or=1 week than subjects randomized to olanzapine (HR-1.51, 95% CI 1.01, 2.27, p=0.045). CONCLUSION Beliefs about need for treatment and the benefits of antipsychotic medication may be intervention targets to improve likelihood of long-term medication adherence in patients recovering from a first episode of schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or schizophreniform disorder.

A Placebo-Controlled Add-On Trial of the Ampakine, CX516, for Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia

AMPA-receptor-positive modulators (Ampakines) facilitate learning and memory in animal models and in preliminary trials in human subjects. CX516 is the first Ampakine to be studied for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Stable schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine (n=52), olanzapine (n=40), or risperidone (n=13) were randomly assigned to add-on treatment with CX516 900 mg three times daily or placebo for 4 weeks. Subjects were assessed with a cognitive battery at baseline, week 4, and at 4-week follow-up. Clinical scales and safety monitoring were also performed. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in a composite cognitive score at week 4 for the intent-to-treat sample. Additional analyses examined change in symptom rating scores and examined drug effects on patients treated with clozapine separately from patients treated with either olanzapine or risperidone. A total of 105 patients were randomized and 95 (90%) completed the 4-week trial. Patients treated with CX516 did not differ from placebo in change from baseline on the composite cognitive score, or on any cognitive test at weeks 4 or 8. The between groups effect size at week 4 for the cognitive composite score was −0.19 for clozapine-treated patients and 0.24 for patients treated with olanzapine or risperidone. The placebo group improved more on the PANSS total score than the CX516 group; no other clinical rating differed between treatment groups. CX516 was associated with fatigue, insomnia and epigastric discomfort compared to placebo, but was generally well tolerated. CX516 was not effective for cognition or for symptoms of schizophrenia when added to clozapine, olanzapine, or risperidone.

Metabolic profiles of second-generation antipsychotics in early psychosis: Findings from the CAFE study

OBJECTIVE To further define the metabolic profiles of second-generation antipsychotics during the treatment of young patients with early psychosis, with a view to better inform prescribing clinicians. METHOD Weight, body mass index (BMI), glucose, and serum lipids were measured in the 52-week Comparison of Atypicals for First Episode (CAFE) study, in which olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone were evaluated, and whose primary outcomes have been reported elsewhere. These metabolic data were analyzed using a mixed random coefficients model for continuous longitudinal measures and a logistic regression model for categorical responses. RESULTS Of the 400 patients recruited, 31% were overweight and 18% were obese at baseline, and 17 (4.3%) patients met criteria for metabolic syndrome. After 12 and 52 weeks of treatment, weight gain >or=7% from baseline was reported in 29.2% and 50.0% of quetiapine-treated patients, 59.8% and 80.0% of olanzapine-treated patients, and 32.5% and 57.6% of risperidone-treated patients, respectively. Weight gain after 12 and 52 weeks of treatment was estimated as [Least Squares Mean (SE)] 15.6 (+/-1.1) and 24.2 (+/-1.9) lb for olanzapine, 8.6 (+/-1.1) and 14.0 (+/-1.9) lb with risperidone and 7.9 (+/-1.1) and 12.1 (+/-1.8) lb for quetiapine respectively. In women, greater weight gain occurred during risperidone treatment compared with quetiapine treatment. By week 52, increases in BMI >or=1 unit occurred with significantly higher frequency in olanzapine-treated patients compared with quetiapine- or risperidone-treated patients. By 52 weeks, treatment-emergent metabolic syndrome was reported in 51 individuals (13.4% of the total population), of whom 22 were receiving olanzapine, 18 quetiapine, and 11 risperidone. Risperidone was associated with the smallest elevations in triglyceride and total cholesterol levels. CONCLUSION Weight gain and metabolic syndrome occur commonly even in young patients receiving antipsychotic treatment for early psychosis. Targeted interventions are therefore warranted from the onset of antipsychotic therapy.

Effectiveness of Switching From Antipsychotic Polypharmacy to Monotherapy

OBJECTIVE This randomized trial addressed the risks and benefits of staying on antipsychotic polypharmacy or switching to monotherapy. METHOD Adult outpatients with schizophrenia taking two antipsychotics (127 participants across 19 sites) were randomly assigned to stay on polypharmacy or switch to monotherapy by discontinuing one antipsychotic. The trial lasted 6 months, with a 6-month naturalistic follow-up. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses examined time to discontinuation of assigned antipsychotic treatment, and random regression models examined additional outcomes over time. RESULTS Patients assigned to switch to monotherapy had shorter times to all-cause treatment discontinuation than those assigned to stay on polypharmacy. By month 6, 86% (N=48) of those assigned to stay on polypharmacy were still taking both medications, whereas 69% (N=40) of those assigned to switch to monotherapy were still taking the same medication. Most monotherapy discontinuations entailed returning to the original polypharmacy. The two groups did not differ with respect to psychiatric symptoms or hospitalizations. On average, the monotherapy group lost weight, whereas the polypharmacy group gained weight. CONCLUSIONS Discontinuing one of two antipsychotics was followed by treatment discontinuation more often and more quickly than when both antipsychotics were continued. However, two-thirds of participants successfully switched, the groups did not differ with respect to symptom control, and switching to monotherapy resulted in weight loss. These results support the reasonableness of prescribing guidelines encouraging trials of antipsychotic monotherapy for individuals receiving antipsychotic polypharmacy, with the caveat that patients should be free to return to polypharmacy if an adequate trial on antipsychotic monotherapy proves unsatisfactory.

Metformin for Weight Loss and Metabolic Control in Overweight Outpatients With Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether metformin promotes weight loss in overweight outpatients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD In a double-blind study, 148 clinically stable, overweight (body mass index [BMI] ≥27) outpatients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to receive 16 weeks of metformin or placebo. Metformin was titrated up to 1,000 mg twice daily, as tolerated. All patients continued to receive their prestudy medications, and all received weekly diet and exercise counseling. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight from baseline to week 16. RESULTS Fifty-eight (77.3%) patients who received metformin and 58 (81.7%) who received placebo completed 16 weeks of treatment. Mean change in body weight was -3.0 kg (95% CI=-4.0 to -2.0) for the metformin group and -1.0 kg (95% CI=-2.0 to 0.0) for the placebo group, with a between-group difference of -2.0 kg (95% CI=-3.4 to -0.6). Metformin also demonstrated a significant between-group advantage for BMI (-0.7; 95% CI=-1.1 to -0.2), triglyceride level (-20.2 mg/dL; 95% CI=-39.2 to -1.3), and hemoglobin A1c level (-0.07%; 95% CI=-0.14 to -0.004). Metformin-associated side effects were mostly gastrointestinal and generally transient, and they rarely led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Metformin was modestly effective in reducing weight and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease in clinically stable, overweight outpatients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder over 16 weeks. A significant time-by-treatment interaction suggests that benefits of metformin may continue to accrue with longer treatment. Metformin may have an important role in diminishing the adverse consequences of obesity and metabolic impairments in patients with schizophrenia.

Antidepressant augmentation using the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist memantine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE Intravenous N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists have shown promising results in rapidly ameliorating depression symptoms, but placebo-controlled trials of oral NMDA antagonists as monotherapy have not observed efficacy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the NMDA antagonist memantine as an augmentation treatment for patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder. METHOD Adult outpatients with major depressive disorder and partial response or nonresponse to their current antidepressant (as indicated by a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of ≥ 16 at baseline) were randomized (from July 2006-December 2011) to add memantine (flexible dose 5-20 mg/d, with all memantine group participants reaching the dose of 20 mg/d) (n = 15) or placebo (n = 16) to their existing treatment for 8 weeks. The primary outcome, change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS), was evaluated with repeated-measures mixed effects models using last-observation-carried-forward methods. Secondary outcomes included other depression and anxiety rating scales, suicidal and delusional ideation, and other adverse effects. RESULTS 84% of participants completed the trial, including 93% of participants receiving memantine. Participants receiving memantine did not show a statistically or clinically significant change in MADRS scores compared to placebo, either over the entire study (β = 0.133, favoring placebo, P = .74) or at study completion (week 8 mean [SD] MADRS score change = -7.13 [6.61] [memantine]; -7.25 [11.14] [placebo]; P = .97). A minimal to small effect size (comparing change to baseline variability) favoring placebo was observed (Cohen d = 0.19). Similarly, no substantial effect sizes favoring memantine nor statistically significant between-group differences were observed on secondary efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This trial did not detect significant statistical or effect size differences between memantine and placebo augmentation among nonresponders or poor responders to conventional antidepressants. While the small number of participants is a limitation, this study suggests memantine lacks substantial efficacy as an augmentation treatment for major depressive disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00344682.

Serotonin Gene Polymorphisms and Bipolar I Disorder: Focus on the Serotonin Transporter

The pathogenesis of bipolar disorder may involve, at least in part, aberrations in serotonergic neurotransmission. Hence, serotonergic genes are attractive targets for association studies of bipolar disorder. We have reviewed the literature in this field. It is difficult to synthesize results as only one polymorphism per gene was typically investigated in relatively small samples. Nevertheless, suggestive associations are available for the 5HT2A receptor and the serotonin transporter genes. With the availability of extensive polymorphism data and high throughput genotyping techniques, comprehensive evaluation of these genes using adequately powered samples is warranted. We also report on our investigations of the serotonin transporter, SLC6A4 (17q11.1‐q12). An insertion/deletion polymorphism (5HTTLPR) in the promoter region of this gene has been investigated intensively. However, the results have been inconsistent. We reasoned that other polymorphism/s may contribute to the associations and the inconsistencies may be due to variations in linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns between samples. Therefore, we conducted LD analyses, as well as association and linkage using 12 polymorphisms, including 5HTTLPR. We evaluated two samples. The first sample consisted of 135 US Caucasian nuclear families having a proband with bipolar I disorder (BDI, DSM IV criteria) and available parents. For case‐control analyses, the patients from these families were compared with cord blood samples from local Caucasian live births (n = 182). Our second, independent sample was recruited through the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP‐BD, 545 cases, 548 controls). No significant associations were detected at the individual polymorphism or haplotype level using the case‐control or family‐based analyses. Our analyses do not support association between SLC6A4 and BDI families. Further studies using sub‐groups of BDI are worthwhile.

Quality of life during treatment with haloperidol or olanzapine in the year following a first psychotic episode

OBJECTIVES Schizophrenia causes significant impairments of quality of life. As treatment approaches have advanced, more attention has been given to re-integrating patients into their psychosocial environments, rather than simply monitoring psychotic symptoms. The development of the second-generation antipsychotics raised hope that these medications would provide better quality of life improvement than conventional antipsychotics. This improvement is particularly relevant early in the course of schizophrenia. METHODS To address these considerations, improvements in measures of general health and social function (determined using the SF-36) were assessed in 195 patients with first-episode schizophrenia for up to one year following randomization to either olanzapine or haloperidol in a double blind clinical trial. We hypothesized that olanzapine would demonstrate better improvement on these measures than haloperidol. In order to test this hypothesis, we used a repeated measure model with SF-36 scores as the outcome, and treatment group, time, time2, time-by-treatment group interaction, and time2-by-treatment group interaction as fixed effects. RESULTS Both treatments demonstrated similar changes on the SF-36. Independent of treatment, patients demonstrated significant improvements in most of the SF-36 subscales, which approached normative scores by the end of one year of treatment. Forty-six of 100 olanzapine-treated patients and 37 of 95 haloperidol-treated patients completed the one year of this study (p<.4). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest an important initial treatment goal for patients with new onset schizophrenic disorders, namely that they can expect to recover significant quality of life and social function at least initially in treatment.

Olanzapine: A New Antipsychotic Agent with Efficacy in the Management of Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy data, and adverse effects of olanzapine as a treatment for schizophrenia and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of this atypical antipsychotic agent compared with currently marketed agents. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE computer literature search was conducted to retrieve all English-language studies and review articles involving olanzapine published as of October 1, 1996. The manufacturer of the drug, Eli Lilly and Company, provided the clinical investigators brochure and abstracts of unpublished Phase III clinical trials. STUDY SELECTION: Animal studies evaluating the pharmacology of olanzapine were evaluated, as were all open-label and double-blind studies involving the evaluation of olanzapine for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. DATA EXTRACTION: All available clinical studies were reviewed and the interpretation of data for each study was influenced by the size of the study sample, the nature of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data analysis techniques used. DATA SYNTHESIS: Olanzapine is a thienobenzodiazepine analog with an in vitro receptor affinity profile similar to that of clozapine. Olanzapine exhibits linear kinetics over the dosage range studied and is extensively metabolized in humans. Clinical evaluations to date have shown olanzapine to be at least as efficacious as typical antipsychotic agents in the treatment of the acute phase of schizophrenia. The drug was well tolerated, with significantly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than haloperidol. Current data suggest that olanzapine may be more effective than haloperidol for the treatment of negative symptoms; moreover, preliminary data suggest that fewer relapses occur over the course of treatment in patients treated with olanzapine compared with those taking haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: The exact place of olanzapine in the therapy of psychotic patients remains unclear, as more data are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this agent, its impact on negative symptoms, and its potential use in patients resistant to the standard agents. Despite limitations in the current database, olanzapine is a promising treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.