Jayeon Kim

Trends of socioeconomic disparities in referral patterns for fertility preservation consultation

BACKGROUND While oncologists are aware that cancer treatments may impact fertility, referral rates for fertility preservation consultation (FPC) remain poor. The goal of this study was to identify predictors associated with FPC referral. METHODS This is a retrospective, cohort study of women aged 18-42 years diagnosed with a new breast, gynecologic, hematologic or gastrointestinal cancer at our institution between January 2008 and May 2010. Exclusion criteria included history of permanent sterilization, documentation of no desire for future children, stage IV disease, short interval (<4 days) between diagnosis and treatment and treatment that posed no threat to fertility. Demographic, socioeconomic and cancer variables were evaluated with respect to FPC. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of referral for FPC based on specified predictors. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-nine patients were eligible for FPC and of those, 41 received FPC (20.6%). Women with breast cancer were 10 times more likely to receive FPC compared with other cancer diagnoses [odds ratio (OR) 10.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-26.8]. The odds of FPC referral were approximately two times higher for Caucasian women (OR 2.4; 95% CI 0.9-6.2), three times higher for age <35 years (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.4-7.7) and four times higher in nulliparous women (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.9-11.3). There was no association between BMI, income, distance to our institution, being in a relationship and referral for FPC. CONCLUSIONS Overall referral rates for FPC are low, and there appear to be significant discrepancies in referral based on ethnicity, age, parity and cancer type. This highlights a need for further provider education and awareness across all oncologic disciplines.

Long-Term Safety of Letrozole and Gonadotropin Stimulation for Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE There has been increased attention to the issue of fertility preservation (FP). We aimed to investigate the long-term safety of FP via controlled ovarian stimulation with letrozole supplementation (COSTLES) prior to breast cancer treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study conducted between the years 2002 and 2014. A total of 337 women diagnosed with stage 3 or less invasive breast cancer were enrolled during a FP consultation before chemotherapy. Of those, 120 elected to undergo COSTLES for FP prior to chemotherapy (FP group). The remaining 217 patients did not undergo any FP procedure and served as the controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary end point was cancer recurrence defined as the detection of locoregional tumor (chest wall, regional nodal disease), distant metastases, or contralateral invasive breast cancer. RESULTS The baseline characteristics at enrollment were similar between the FP and control groups except for the less frequent lymph node involvement (P = .02) in the former. The mean follow-up after diagnosis was 5.0 years in the FP group and 6.9 years in the control group. In the FP group, the hazard ratio for recurrence after ovarian stimulation was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.28–2.13), and the survival was not compromised compared with controls (P = .61). Neither BRCA gene mutation status (P = .57) nor undergoing FP before or after breast surgery (P = .44) affected survival outcomes in the FP group. Likewise, none of the tumor characteristics including the estrogen receptor status affected the survival rates after the COSTLES. CONCLUSIONS COSTLES is unlikely to cause a substantially increased recurrence risk in breast cancer during the 5 years after diagnosis.

Building a successful fertility preservation program at a major cancer center.

Over 150,000 reproductive age individuals face fertility-threatening cancer treatments each year. Improved detection and treatment of cancer in reproductive-age patients have greatly increased the long-term survival and made it possible for these individuals to consider their long-term quality-of-life after cancer including having biologic offspring. Various methods of fertility preservation (FP) are now available for both males and females. In order to maximize FP options available to patients facing imminent gonadotoxic therapies, it is crucial that women have quick access to FP care and that providers expedite FP strategies. The overarching goal of a clinical FP program is to help patients and their physicians consider the impact of treatment on future fertility and facilitate FP efforts in what is often a limited time period before cancer treatment begins.

Fertility preservation in patients with haematological disorders: a retrospective cohort study

This study investigated the factors associated with utilization of fertility preservation and the differences in treatments and outcomes by prior chemotherapy exposure in patients with haematological diseases. This study included all 67 women with haematological diseases seen for fertility preservation consultation at two university hospitals between 2006 and 2011. Of the total, 49% had lymphoma, 33% had leukaemia, 7% had myelodysplastic syndrome and 4% had aplastic anaemia; 46% had prior chemotherapy; and 33% were planning for bone marrow transplantation, 33% pursued ovarian stimulation and 7% used ovarian tissue banking; and 48% of patients did not pursue fertility preservation treatment. All five cycle cancellations were in the post-chemotherapy group: three patients with leukaemia and two with lymphoma. Patients with prior chemotherapy had lower baseline antral follicle count (10 versus 22) and received more gonadotrophins to achieve similar peak oestradiol concentrations, with no difference in oocyte yield (10.5 versus 10) after adjustment for age. Embryo yield was similar between those who had prior chemotherapy and those who had not. Half of the patients with haematological diseases who present for fertility preservation have been exposed to chemotherapy. While ovarian reserve is likely impaired in this group, oocyte yield may be acceptable.

Abstract P5-15-02: Safety of letrozole-gonadotropin controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in women with breast cancer undergoing fertility preservation before or after tumor resection via embryo or oocyte cryopreservation: A prospective cohort study

Purpose: We have previously described the concurrent use of aromatase inhibitors to reduce estrogen exposure in women with breast cancer undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with gonadotropins for fertility preservation (FP) via oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. To purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of this letrozole-gonadotropin COS protocol on survival in women who underwent fertility preservation before or after breast surgery. Patients and Methods: A total of 364 women with stage ≤3 breast cancer, who pursued FP consultation or FP treatments at our institution were prospectively evaluated. Of those, 146 elected to undergo COS with letrozole and gonadotropins for FP (120 prior to chemotherapy and 26 after chemotherapy). The remaining 218 patients elected to not to undergo a fertility-preserving procedure and served as controls. Result(s): Demographic information and tumor characteristics at enrollment were similar between patients who pursued COS with letrozole and gonadotropins (COS group) and control groups. The median follow-up after diagnosis was 4.9 years in COS and 6.2 years in the control group. In the COS group, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence after IVF was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.28, 2.13) and the survival was not compromised compared with controls (P=0.61). In the COS group, survival was not different between patients with ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer (P=0.75) and between patients who underwent COS before and after tumor resection (P=0.56). The survival was also not different between patients who pursued COS before and after chemotherapy (P=0.57). Conclusion(s): Here we presented the largest prospective data with longest follow up on the safety of ovarian stimulation in women with breast cancer. COS with letrozole and gonadotropins for FP is unlikely to cause substantially increased recurrence risk in breast cancer, even in patients who have not yet undergone breast surgery. Larger studies are needed to confirm the findings from the subgroup analysis. Support: Supported by NIH RO1 HD053112. Citation Format: Kutluk Oktay, Jayeon Kim, Giuliano Bedoschi, Volkan Turan. Safety of letrozole-gonadotropin controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in women with breast cancer undergoing fertility preservation before or after tumor resection via embryo or oocyte cryopreservation: A prospective cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-02.

Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG)

Based on the current understanding of a preventive effect of bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancers, the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, and Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine support the following recommendations: • Women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease should be informed that bilateral salpingectomy reduces the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer, and they should be counseled regarding this procedure at the time of hysterectomy. • Although salpingectomy is generally considered as a safe procedure in terms of preserving ovarian reserve, there is a lack of evidences representing its long-term outcomes. Therefore, patients should be informed about the minimal potential of this procedure for decreasing ovarian reserve. • Prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy is favorable in terms of prevention of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer, although operation-related complications minimally increase with this procedure, compared to the complications associated with vaginal hysterectomy alone. Conversion to open or laparoscopic approach from vaginal approach to perform prophylactic salpingectomy is not recommended. • Women who desire permanent sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery could be counseled for prophylactic salpingectomy before surgery on an individual basis.

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after letrozole-gonadotropin stimulation: a case report

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) results from an exaggerated response to ovulation induction, characterized by a fluid shift from the intravascular space to third space compartments. The incidence of moderate OHSS is approximately 3–6% and severe OHSS occurs in 0.1–3% of treatment cycles [1, 2]. A number of causal mechanisms have been investigated, involving estradiol (E2), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). A strong association between E2 concentrations and risk for developing OHSS has been observed consistently [3]. A growing awareness and interest in treatments aimed at fertility preservation (FP) has led many women to pursue urgent oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. Those with estrogen-sensitive cancers often receive adjunctive treatment with letrozole, in efforts to limit exposure to elevated estrogen concentrations that typically result from exogenous gonadotropin stimulation; letrozole inhibits estrogen production by binding competitively to the cytochrome P450 component of the aromatase enzyme. Combination stimulation regimens yield results comparable to those achieved with standard gonadotropin stimulation protocols, but are associated with significantly lower E2 levels [4]. The risk of OHSS for women receiving adjunctive treatment with letrozole generally is considered low, because E2 levels are markedly lower than in cycles stimulated with gonadotropins alone. In fact, no cases of severe OHSS have been reported in a patient receiving combined treatment with letrozole and gonadotropins. Here, we report a case of severe OHSS arising in a woman with breast cancer after stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins, despite treatment with letrozole and having only moderately elevated E2 concentrations.