Jayne Bailey

Does the brain noradrenaline network mediate the effects of the CO2 challenge

The inhalation of carbon dioxide (CO2) is commonly used in patients and volunteers as a means of producing anxiety or panic. It is generally believed that patients with panic disorder are more vulnerable to the effects of CO2 than patients with other anxiety disorders or healthy volunteers and there is speculation and debate as to the mechanism for this apparent sensitivity. Recent work from our group has shown that a single inhalation of 35% CO2 activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis, increases blood pressure (BP) and increases subjective fear responses in healthy volunteers. Correlation analyses reveal a relationship between the changes in BP and the cortisol increase. These findings led us to postulate that a common mechanism may mediate these and the subjective responses to inhalation of CO2. We propose that the noradrenergic system, particularly the locus coeruleus (LC), but including the A1 and A2 cell groups, may be a key mediator of these responses. This article examines the evidence and discusses the results of studies from our laboratory in relation to a neuroanatomical model centring on the LC.

Inhalation of 35% CO2 results in activation of the HPA axis in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is a major stress responsive system in humans. Although there are numerous ways of testing responsiveness of the HPA in experimental animals, this is much more difficult in man. Hypercapnea is a very stressful stimulus for humans and has been used as an anxiogenic probe in psychiatric patients. We have now investigated whether the simple challenge of a single 35% inhalation of CO(2) activates the neuroendocrine system as evidenced by changes in HPA activity, as well as cardiovascular and subjective responses, in healthy volunteers. METHODS Fourteen healthy male volunteers were recruited. They underwent single vital capacity inhalation of room air and 35% CO(2), in a single blind fashion. Neuroendocrine, cardiovascular and subjective fear measures were taken at regular intervals. RESULTS CO(2) inhalation produced significant activation of the HPA axis in all subjects, as measured with plasma cortisol. Heart rate was decreased and systolic blood pressure was significantly increased shortly after the inhalation of CO(2). The subjects reported short-lived symptoms of fear with the experimental gas. CONCLUSIONS Single vital capacity inhalation of 35% CO(2) activated the HPA axis in healthy volunteers. It also had a significant cardiovascular and psychological (anxiogenic) effect, as expected from previous published studies. The test is potentially useful in studying the responsivity of the HPA axis in health and disease.

A validation of the 7.5% CO2 model of GAD using paroxetine and lorazepam in healthy volunteers

The inhalation of 7.5% carbon dioxide (CO2) in healthy subjects produces an increase in blood pressure and heart rate, and increased feelings of anxiety, fear and tension (Bailey et al. 2005). As this state is similar to that of general anxiety rather than panic, we further validated this by examining the effects of anxiolytic medication. Two separate studies in healthy volunteers are described; study one is a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a single dose of 2mg lorazepam and study two describes the effects of 21 days of treatment with paroxetine. Gas challenges were air and 7.5% CO2 inhaled for 20 minutes, delivered on day 0 (before treatment) and day 21 (after treatment) in the paroxetine study. Subjective effects were measured using visual analogue scales and questionnaires. When compared with placebo, lorazepam 2mg significantly reduced peak CO2-induced subjective fear, feelings of wanting to leave, tension and worry. In the paroxetine study, when compared with day 0, day 21 showed a significantly attenuated peak CO2-induced nervousness and a trend for reduced ratings of anxiety, fear, feel like leaving, tense and worried. In these studies we have shown that this CO2 model of anxiety is sensitive to lorazepam and to a lesser extent paroxetine. This gives support to its utility as an experimental model of general anxiety disorder in healthy volunteers.

The 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron reduces gastrointestinal side effects induced by a specific serotonin re-uptake inhibitor in man

The selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are increasingly being used to treat depression and anxiety disorders. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are the main side effects, probably resulting from the stimulation of central or peripheral 5-HT receptors. The present double-blind, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to see if the GI side effects of fluvoxamine could be attenuated by the co-administration of the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron. The results demonstrate that, in volunteers, a single 100 mg oral dose of fluvoxamine can produce GI symptoms. Co-administration of ondansetron significantly reduced peak nausea and GI side effects, compared with placebo.

Preliminary evidence of anxiolytic effects of the CRF(1) receptor antagonist R317573 in the 7.5% CO(2) proof-of-concept experimental model of human anxiety

We have validated the use of prolonged inhalation of 7.5% carbon dioxide (CO2) as a human model of anxiety and have shown that drugs from two prototypical classes of anxiolytics, benzodiazepines and a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, attenuate CO2-induced symptoms (Bailey et al., 2007a). Preclinical evidence suggests that drugs acting at the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system may be useful for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and other stress-related disorders (Valdez, 2006), hence we have now examined the effects of a CRF1 receptor antagonist in the 7.5% CO2 model. In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, study in 32 healthy participants we examined the effects of 7 days of treatment with the CRF1 receptor antagonist, R317573, at a dose that shows a favourable safety profile and is comparable with those effective in preclinical models (40 mg). On day 8, eight of the placebo-treated group received lorazepam (LZP) 2 mg as a positive control. All participants underwent 20 min inhalation of 7.5% CO2-enriched air. Subjective reports of peak gas effects were assessed using visual analogue scales and questionnaires. The mean age of participants was 26 years, and 13 were male. The peak effects of CO2 were expressed as a difference from baseline scores obtained while breathing air alone. Compared with placebo (PLAC), both drug groups showed a decrease in all subjective symptoms, total score on the panic symptom inventory (CRF 11 [2.6], PLAC 16.4 [3.1], LZP 2.9 [3.0]) and a generalized anxiety disorder symptom scale (CRF 2.2 [1.5], PLAC 8.2 [2.2], LZP 1.1 [1.5]). We have shown that a drug that acts to inhibit the CRF1 receptor shows efficacy in the 7.5% CO2 model of anxiety in healthy participants.

A comparison of the effects of a subtype selective and non-selective benzodiazepine receptor agonist in two CO2 models of experimental human anxiety

Abstract Studies in human volunteers that can demonstrate proof of concept are attractive in that possible mechanisms and potential new drug treatments can be examined. We have been developing models of anxiety disorders using the inhalation of 7.5% CO2 for 20 min to model generalised anxiety disorder, as well as using the previously reported 35% CO2 as a model for panic anxiety. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study in 12 healthy volunteer subjects, we compared a full agonist at the benzodiazepine receptor that binds to four α-subtypes of the receptor (α-1,-2,-3,-5) (alprazolam 1 mg), with zolpidem (5 mg), an agonist selective for the α-1 subtype of the gamma amino butyric acid-receptor subtype A (GABA-A) receptor, which is a widely used hypnotic drug. Compared with placebo, both drugs significantly attenuated peak CO2-induced changes in subjective feelings after the inhalation of 7.5% CO2 for 20 min. However, there were fewer significant differences after a single vital capacity inhalation of 35% CO2, where zolpidem was less efficacious than alprazolam at reducing CO2-induced symptoms. In conclusion, our results show that zolpidem shows some anxiolytic efficacy in the 7.5% CO2 model, similar to alprazolam, and this is the first report of such an effect of zolpidem in a model of anxiety. These and other studies of benzodiazepines in clinical and volunteer studies suggest a definite role of the GABA-A receptor in CO2-induced anxiety, and it would be of interest to examine other GABA-A receptor subtype selective drugs, which are now in early phase clinical studies and are showing selective efficacy in pharmacodynamic studies.

Imagery of craving in opiate addicts undergoing detoxification

Craving is a significant factor in opiate addiction that is associated with drug-dependence and in relapse to drug use after treatment. In order to better understand the psychological and physiological mechanisms of craving for opiates, we have developed an imagery-based procedure using personal verbal descriptions of craving in abstinent opiate addicts. Thirteen opiate addicts in detoxification were required to imagine and describe their craving experiences while autonomic measures of heart rate and arterial pressure were taken. Subjects displayed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure and heart rate while describing drug craving compared with neutral descriptions. Furthermore, an increase in systolic blood pressure during imagery of craving descriptions compared with neutral descriptions was observed. These results provide preliminary evidence that imagery is powerful in eliciting craving for opiates, as indicated by subjective ratings and autonomic measures. The implications of the results of this paper for the cue-exposure paradigm and contemporary models of addiction are being discussed.

Effects of the common cold on subjective alertness, reaction time and eye movements

The present study examined whether volunteers with common colds showed impairments in objective and subjective indicators of alertness. All the volunteers (N = 81) were tested when healthy to provide baseline data for mood, simple and choice reaction time tasks, and an anti-saccadic eye movement task. When subjects developed a cold (N = 17) they returned to the laboratory and repeated the procedure. Volunteers (N = 64) who remained healthy over a 10-week period were recalled as controls. The results showed that those with colds felt significantly less alert and had significantly slower simple and choice reaction times and eye movements. This extends earlier research and shows that electrophysiological measures may also be of use in assessing the behavioral changes induced by upper respiratory tract illnesses.

Effects of 5 weeks of administration of fluoxetine and dothiepin in normal volunteers on sleep, daytime sedation, psychomotor performance and mood

This was a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized crossover study of long-term (5 weeks) administration of fluoxetine (20 mg/day) and dothiepin (75 mg/day for 1 week followed by 150 mg/day for 4 weeks) in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects were studied on day 10 and day 36 of treatment, with tests of nocturnal sleep, driving performance, continuous electroencephalogram (EEG), sleep during scheduled naps, computerized visual attention tasks, saccadic eye movement measurement and visual analogue ratings of mood. Both drugs had a marked suppressive effect on nocturnal rapid eye movement (REM) sleep; these effects were less at 36 days than at 10 days, and fluoxetine decreased and dothiepin increased REM in daytime naps. Sleep fragmentation after fluoxetine is similar to that reported in the literature. We found no sleep-promoting effects of dothiepin, in contrast to our previous single-dose study, and no subjective sleep effects of either drug. Subjects were less sleepy after both antidepressants than placebo at 5 weeks measured by sleep latencies and EEG. Saccadic eye movement measures were significantly faster after 5 weeks of fluoxetine than after 5 weeks of placebo. Reaction times to a peripheral stimulus during computerized tracking task were shorter after 10 days of dothiepin compared with placebo. Driving performance, visual attention and mood ratings showed no treatment effects. Subjective health reports during each 5 weeks of treatment were similar in number for the two drugs but showed a different profile of side-effects.

The use of sleep measures to compare a new 5HT1A agonist with buspirone in humans

The partial agonist buspirone has a REM (rapid eye movement) suppressing effect on human sleep probably via a 5HT1A receptor in the pontine area. Eptapirone is a new 5HT1A agonist with a greater intrinsic effect than buspirone. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of eptapirone on sleep architecture, particularly REM sleep, in normal volunteers and compare it with buspirone and placebo. This was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled four-way crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers. Volunteers were screened to ensure that they had normal overnight sleep EEG (electroencephalogram) and were extensive CYP 2D6 metabolizers. Sleep was recorded on pairs of nights on four occasions, with medication being taken before the second night. Treatments were eptapirone 1.5mg at 10 AM, eptapirone 1.5mg at 11 PM, buspirone 20mg at 11 PM and placebo. Standard measures of sleep were derived and compared among the four treatments using ANOVA. REM sleep was significantly suppressed supporting the proposition that activation of post-synaptic 5HT1A receptors reduces REM sleep. Sleep fragmentation increased by both drugs. REM sleep suppression was significantly greater with morning eptapirone than with buspirone. Wakefulness in sleep was significantly greatest after morning eptapirone. REM sleep effects were greatest after evening eptapirone, suggesting a greater effect on central serotonin receptors than that of buspirone.