Jean Chastre
University of Paris
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jean Chastre.
The Lancet | 2010
Lila Bouadma; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Florence Tubach; Christophe Cracco; Antonio Alvarez; Carole Schwebel; Frédérique Schortgen; Sigismond Lasocki; Benoit Veber; Monique Dehoux; Maguy Bernard; Blandine Pasquet; Bernard Regnier; Christian Brun-Buisson; Jean Chastre; Michel Wolff
BACKGROUND Reduced duration of antibiotic treatment might contain the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in intensive care units. We aimed to establish the effectiveness of an algorithm based on the biomarker procalcitonin to reduce antibiotic exposure in this setting. METHODS In this multicentre, prospective, parallel-group, open-label trial, we used an independent, computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly assign patients in a 1:1 ratio to procalcitonin (n=311 patients) or control (n=319) groups; investigators were masked to assignment before, but not after, randomisation. For the procalcitonin group, antibiotics were started or stopped based on predefined cut-off ranges of procalcitonin concentrations; the control group received antibiotics according to present guidelines. Drug selection and the final decision to start or stop antibiotics were at the discretion of the physician. Patients were expected to stay in the intensive care unit for more than 3 days, had suspected bacterial infections, and were aged 18 years or older. Primary endpoints were mortality at days 28 and 60 (non-inferiority analysis), and number of days without antibiotics by day 28 (superiority analysis). Analyses were by intention to treat. The margin of non-inferiority was 10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00472667. FINDINGS Nine patients were excluded from the study; 307 patients in the procalcitonin group and 314 in the control group were included in analyses. Mortality of patients in the procalcitonin group seemed to be non-inferior to those in the control group at day 28 (21.2% [65/307] vs 20.4% [64/314]; absolute difference 0.8%, 90% CI -4.6 to 6.2) and day 60 (30.0% [92/307] vs 26.1% [82/314]; 3.8%, -2.1 to 9.7). Patients in the procalcitonin group had significantly more days without antibiotics than did those in the control group (14.3 days [SD 9.1] vs 11.6 days [SD 8.2]; absolute difference 2.7 days, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.1, p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION A procalcitonin-guided strategy to treat suspected bacterial infections in non-surgical patients in intensive care units could reduce antibiotic exposure and selective pressure with no apparent adverse outcomes. FUNDING Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France, and Brahms, Germany.
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2012
Philipp Schuetz; Matthias Briel; Mirjam Christ-Crain; Daiana Stolz; Lila Bouadma; Michel Wolff; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jean Chastre; Florence Tubach; Kristina B Kristoffersen; Long Wei; Olaf Burkhardt; Tobias Welte; Stefan Schroeder; Vandack Nobre; Michael Tamm; Neera Bhatnagar; Heiner C. Bucher; Beat Mueller
This individual patient data meta-analysis of clinical trials investigating procalcitonin algorithms for antibiotic decision making found no increased risk of death or setting-specific treatment failure but did find significantly lower antibiotic exposure across different acute respiratory infections and clinical settings.
Critical Care | 2009
Charles Edouard Luyt; Marc Clavel; Kalpalatha K. Guntupalli; Jay A. Johannigman; John I. Kennedy; Christopher Wood; K Corkery; Dennis Gribben; Jean Chastre
IntroductionAminoglycosides aerosolization might achieve better diffusion into the alveolar compartment than intravenous use. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate aerosol-delivered amikacin penetration into the alveolar epithelial lining fluid (ELF) using a new vibrating mesh nebulizer (Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS), Nektar Therapeutics), which delivers high doses to the lungs.MethodsNebulized amikacin (400 mg bid) was delivered to the lungs of 28 mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative VAP for 7-14 days, adjunctive to intravenous therapy. On treatment day 3, 30 minutes after completing aerosol delivery, all the patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage in the infection-involved area and the ELF amikacin concentration was determined. The same day, urine and serum amikacin concentrations were determined at different time points.ResultsMedian (range) ELF amikacin and maximum serum amikacin concentrations were 976.1 (135.7-16127.6) and 0.9 (0.62-1.73) μg/mL, respectively. The median total amount of amikacin excreted in urine during the first and second 12-hour collection on day 3 were 19 (12.21-28) and 21.2 (14.1-29.98) μg, respectively. During the study period, daily through amikacin measurements were below the level of nephrotoxicity. Sixty-four unexpected adverse events were reported, among which 2 were deemed possibly due to nebulized amikacin: one episode of worsening renal failure, and one episode of bronchospasm.ConclusionsPDDS delivery of aerosolized amikacin achieved very high aminoglycoside concentrations in ELF from radiography-controlled infection-involved zones, while maintaining safe serum amikacin concentrations. The ELF concentrations always exceeded the amikacin minimum inhibitory concentrations for Gram-negative microorganisms usually responsible for these pneumonias. The clinical impact of amikacin delivery with this system remains to be determined.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01021436.
Critical Care Medicine | 2014
Thibaut Petroni; Anatole Harrois; Julien Amour; Guillaume Lebreton; Nicolas Bréchot; Sébastien Tanaka; Charles Edouard Luyt; Jean Louis Trouillet; Jean Chastre; Pascal Leprince; Jacques Duranteau; Alain Combes
Objectives:This study was designed to assess the effects on macrocirculation and microcirculation of adding an intra-aortic balloon pump to peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe cardiogenic shock and little/no residual left ventricular ejection. Design:A prospective, single-center, observational study where macrocirculation and microcirculation were assessed with clinical-, Doppler echocardiography–, and pulmonary artery–derived hemodynamic variables and also cerebral and thenar eminence tissue oxygenation and side-stream dark-field imaging of sublingual microcirculation. Setting:A 26-bed tertiary ICU in a university hospital. Patients:We evaluated 12 consecutive patients before and 30 minutes after interrupting and restarting intra-aortic balloon pump. Interventions:Measurements were performed before, and 30 minutes after interrupting and restarting intra-aortic balloon pump. Measurements and Main Results:Stopping intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with higher pulmonary artery-occlusion pressure (19 ± 10 vs 15 ± 8 mm Hg, p = 0.01), increased left ventricular end-systolic (51 ± 13 vs 50 ± 14 mm, p = 0.05) and end-diastolic (55 ± 13 vs 52 ± 14 mm, p = 0.003) dimensions, and decreased pulse pressure (15 ± 13 vs 29 ± 22 mm Hg, p = 0.02). Maximum pulmonary artery-occlusion pressure reduction when the intra-aortic balloon pump was restarted was observed in the seven patients whose pulmonary artery-occlusion pressure was more than 15 mm Hg when intra-aortic balloon pump was off (–6.6 ± 4.3 vs –0.6 ± 3.4 mm Hg, respectively). Thenar eminence and brain tissue oxygenation and side-stream dark-field–assessed sublingual microcirculation were unchanged by stopping and restarting intra-aortic balloon pump. Conclusions:Restoring pulsatility and decreasing left ventricular afterload with intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with smaller left ventricular dimensions and lower pulmonary artery pressures but did not affect microcirculation variables in cardiogenic shock patients with little/no residual left ventricular ejection while on peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Chest | 2012
Charles-Edouard Luyt; Alain Combes; Marie-Hélène Becquemin; Catherine Beigelman-Aubry; Stéphane N. Hatem; Anne-Laure Brun; Nizar Zraik; Fabrice Carrat; P Grenier; Jean-Christophe M. Richard; Alain Mercat; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Jean Chastre
BACKGROUND No data on long-term outcomes of survivors of 2009 influenza A(H1N1) (A[H1N1])-associated ARDS are available. The objective of this study was to compare the 1-year outcomes of survivors of A(H1N1)-associated ARDS, according to use or no use of extracorporeal lung assist (ECLA), using its need as an ARDS severity surrogate. METHODS Survivors of ARDS (12 with ECLA use vs 25 without, corresponding to 75% and 54% of the eligible patients for each group, respectively) selected from the Réseau Européen de Ventilation Artificielle (REVA) registry had previously been healthy, with only pregnancy and/or moderate obesity (BMI ≤ 35 kg/m²) as known risk factors for A(H1N1) infection. Lung function and morphology, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and psychologic impairment were evaluated. RESULTS At 1 year post-ICU discharge for the ECLA and no-ECLA groups, respectively, 50% and 40% reported significant exertion dyspnea, 83% and 64% had returned to work, and 75% and 64% had decreased diffusion capacity across the blood-gas barrier, despite their near-normal and similar lung function test results. For both groups, exercise test results showed diminished but comparable exercise capacities, with similar alveolar-arterial oxygen gradients at peak exercise, and CT scans showed minor abnormal findings. HRQoL assessed by the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey was poorer for both groups than for a sex- and age-matched general population group, but without between-group differences. ECLA and no-ECLA group patients, respectively, had symptoms of anxiety (50% and 56%) and depression (28% and 28%) and were at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (41% and 44%). CONCLUSIONS One year post-ICU discharge, a majority of survivors of A(H1N1)-associated ARDS had minor lung disabilities with diminished diffusion capacities across the blood-gas barrier, and most had psychologic impairment and poorer HRQoL than a sex- and age-matched general population group. ECLA and no-ECLA group patients had comparable outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01271842; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov
Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2018
Philipp Schuetz; Yannick Wirz; Ramon Sager; Mirjam Christ-Crain; Daiana Stolz; Michael Tamm; Lila Bouadma; Charles Edouard Luyt; Michel Wolff; Jean Chastre; Florence Tubach; Kristina B Kristoffersen; Olaf Burkhardt; Tobias Welte; Stefan Schroeder; Vandack Nobre; Long Wei; Heiner C. Bucher; Djillali Annane; Konrad Reinhart; Ann R. Falsey; Angela R. Branche; Pierre Damas; Maarten Nijsten; Dylan W. de Lange; Rodrigo O. Deliberato; Carolina Ferreira Oliveira; Vera Maravic-Stojkovic; Alessia Verduri; Bianca Beghé
BACKGROUND In February, 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the blood infection marker procalcitonin for guiding antibiotic therapy in patients with acute respiratory infections. This meta-analysis of patient data from 26 randomised controlled trials was designed to assess safety of procalcitonin-guided treatment in patients with acute respiratory infections from different clinical settings. METHODS Based on a prespecified Cochrane protocol, we did a systematic literature search on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase, and pooled individual patient data from trials in which patients with respiratory infections were randomly assigned to receive antibiotics based on procalcitonin concentrations (procalcitonin-guided group) or control. The coprimary endpoints were 30-day mortality and setting-specific treatment failure. Secondary endpoints were antibiotic use, length of stay, and antibiotic side-effects. FINDINGS We identified 990 records from the literature search, of which 71 articles were assessed for eligibility after exclusion of 919 records. We collected data on 6708 patients from 26 eligible trials in 12 countries. Mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in procalcitonin-guided patients than in control patients (286 [9%] deaths in 3336 procalcitonin-guided patients vs 336 [10%] in 3372 controls; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·83 [95% CI 0·70 to 0·99], p=0·037). This mortality benefit was similar across subgroups by setting and type of infection (pinteractions>0·05), although mortality was very low in primary care and in patients with acute bronchitis. Procalcitonin guidance was also associated with a 2·4-day reduction in antibiotic exposure (5·7 vs 8·1 days [95% CI -2·71 to -2·15], p<0·0001) and a reduction in antibiotic-related side-effects (16% vs 22%, adjusted OR 0·68 [95% CI 0·57 to 0·82], p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION Use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic treatment in patients with acute respiratory infections reduces antibiotic exposure and side-effects, and improves survival. Widespread implementation of procalcitonin protocols in patients with acute respiratory infections thus has the potential to improve antibiotic management with positive effects on clinical outcomes and on the current threat of increasing antibiotic multiresistance. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2017
Philipp Schuetz; Yannick Wirz; Ramon Sager; Mirjam Christ-Crain; Daiana Stolz; Michael Tamm; Lila Bouadma; Charles Edouard Luyt; Michel Wolff; Jean Chastre; Florence Tubach; Kristina B Kristoffersen; Olaf Burkhardt; Tobias Welte; Stefan Schroeder; Vandack Nobre; Long Wei; Heiner C. Bucher; Neera Bhatnagar; Djillali Annane; Konrad Reinhart; Angela R. Branche; Pierre Damas; Maarten Nijsten; Dylan W. de Lange; Rodrigo O. Deliberato; Stella Ss Lima; Vera Maravic-Stojkovic; Alessia Verduri; Bin Cao
Archive | 2007
Jean Chastre; Michel Wolff; Jean-Yves Fagon; Sylvie Chevret; Franck Thomas; Delphine Wermert; Eva Clementi; Jesus Gonzalez; Dominique Jusserand; Dominique Perrin; Fabienne Fieux; Sylvie Aubas
Archive | 1990
Jean-Yves Fagon; Jean Chastre; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Yves Domart; Marie-Christine Dombret; Marylin Bornet; Claude Gibert
Evidence-based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal | 2013
Philipp Schuetz; Beat Müller; Mirjam Christ-Crain; Daiana Stolz; Michael Tamm; Lila Bouadma; Charles Edouard Luyt; Michel Wolff; Jean Chastre; Florence Tubach; Kristina B Kristoffersen; Olaf Burkhardt; Tobias Welte; Stefan Schroeder; Vandack Nobre; Long Wei; Neera Bhatnagar; Heiner C. Bucher; Matthias Briel