Jean Chavaudra

Radiation dose, chemotherapy and risk of soft tissue sarcoma after solid tumours during childhood.

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is one of the most frequent second primary cancer that occurs during the first 20 years following treatment for a solid cancer in childhood. Our aim was to quantify the risk of STS as a second malignant neoplasm and to investigate its relationship with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A cohort study of 4,400 3‐year survivors of a first solid cancer diagnosed during childhood in France or the United Kingdom, between 1942 and 1985, was followed 15 years on average. In a partially nested case‐control study, we matched 25 cases of STS and 121 controls for sex, type of first cancer, age at first cancer and duration of follow‐up. Sixteen STS occurred in the cohort, as compared to 0.3 expected from the general population (Standardized Incidence Radio, SIR = 54 (95%CI: 34–89)). The SIR was 113 (95% CI: 62–185) after chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (13 STS), whereas it was 28 (95%CI: 2–125) after chemotherapy alone (1 STS) and 19 (95%CI: 3–60) after radiotherapy alone (2 STS). After adjustment for treatment, there was no evidence of variation in the annual excess of incidence or in the SIR with either age at first cancer or time since 1st cancer. In the case‐control study, the risk of a STS was increased with the square of the dose of radiation to the site of STS development and with the administration of Procarbazine. The increased risk of soft tissue sarcoma that occurred after childhood cancer is independently related to exposure to radiotherapy and Procarbazine. A closer surveillance of children treated with this treatment combination is strongly recommended.

Second malignant neoplasms after a first cancer in childhood: temporal pattern of risk according to type of treatment

SummaryThe variation in the risk of solid second malignant neoplasms (SMN) with time since first cancer during childhood has been previously reported. However, no study has been performed that controls for the distribution of radiation dose and the aggressiveness of past chemotherapy, which could be responsible for the observed temporal variation of the risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the treatment on the long-term pattern of the incidence of solid SMN after a first cancer in childhood. We studied a cohort of 4400 patients from eight centres in France and the UK. Patients had to be alive 3 years or more after a first cancer treated before the age of 17 years and before the end of 1985. For each patient in the cohort, the complete clinical, chemotherapy and radiotherapy history was recorded. For each patient who had received external radiotherapy, the dose of radiation received by 151 sites of the body were estimated. After a mean follow-up of 15 years, 113 children developed a solid SMN, compared to 12.3 expected from general population rates. A similar distribution pattern was observed among the 1045 patients treated with radiotherapy alone and the 2064 patients treated with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy; the relative risk, but not the excess absolute risk, of solid SMN decreased with time after first treatment; the excess absolute risk increased during a period of at least 30 years after the first cancer. This pattern remained after controlling for chemotherapy and for the average dose of radiation to the major sites of SMN. It also remained when excluding patients with a first cancer type or an associated syndrome known to predispose to SMN. When compared with radiotherapy alone, the addition of chemotherapy increases the risk of solid SMN after a first cancer in childhood, but does not significantly modify the variation of this risk during the time after the first cancer.

Radiation and genetic factors in the risk of second malignant neoplasms after a first cancer in childhood

BACKGROUND Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are associated with an increased risk of second malignant neoplasm (SMN). An association between SMN and familial aggregation has also been shown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of familial factors in the risk of SMN and their potential interaction with the effect of treatment. METHODS We devised a case-control study of 25 children with SMN (cases) and 96 children with no SMN after a cancer treatment (controls), taken from a cohort of 649 children treated at our institution between 1953 and 1985. A complete family history was obtained for patients and controls and a familial index defined to evaluate the degree of familial aggregation. The radiation dose given at 151 sites in the body was estimated for each radiotherapy course for each child. FINDINGS Among family members of the 25 SMN cases, there were ten with early-onset (< or = 45 years) cancer, compared with eight among relatives of the 96 controls. Compared with patients who had no family history of early-onset cancer, those with one or more affected family members had an odds ratio for SMN of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-17.1; p = 0.02). Adjustment for local radiation dose and exclusion of patients known to be predisposed to SMN (carriers of p53 mutation and those with Recklinghausens disease) did not affect this risk substantially. INTERPRETATION Both genetic factors and exposure to ionising radiation have independent effects on the risk of SMN. Follow-up of children treated for cancer should be especially vigilant when there is a family history of early-onset cancer.

Long-Term Cardiovascular Mortality After Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate long-term cardiovascular mortality and its relationship to the use of radiotherapy for breast cancer. BACKGROUND Cardiovascular diseases are among the main long-term complications of radiotherapy, but knowledge is limited regarding long-term risks because published studies have, on average, <20 years of follow-up. METHODS A total of 4,456 women who survived at least 5 years after treatment of a breast cancer at the Institut Gustave Roussy between 1954 and 1984 were followed up for mortality until the end of 2003, for over 28 years on average. RESULTS A total of 421 deaths due to cardiovascular diseases were observed, of which 236 were due to cardiac disease. Women who had received radiotherapy had a 1.76-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34 to 2.31) higher risk of dying of cardiac disease and a 1.33-fold (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.80) higher risk of dying of vascular disease than those who had not received radiotherapy. Among women who had received radiotherapy, those who had been treated for a left-sided breast cancer had a 1.56-fold (95% CI: 1.27 to 1.90) higher risk of dying of cardiac disease than those treated for a right-sided breast cancer. This relative risk increased with time since the breast cancer diagnosis (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed that radiotherapy, as delivered until the mid-1980s, increased the long-term risk of dying of cardiovascular diseases. The long-term risk of dying of cardiac disease is a particular concern for women treated for a left-sided breast cancer with contemporary tangential breast or chest wall radiotherapy. This risk may increase with a longer follow-up, even after 20 years following radiotherapy.

Malignant breast tumors after radiotherapy for a first cancer during childhood.

PURPOSE To assess the specific role of treatment and type of first cancer (FC) in the risk of long-term subsequent breast cancer (BC) among childhood cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a cohort of 1,814 3-year female survivors treated between 1946 and 1986 in eight French and English centers, data on chemotherapy and radiotherapy were collected. Individual estimation of radiation dose to each breast was performed for the 1,258 patients treated by external radiotherapy; mean dose to breast was 5.06 Gy (range, 0.0 to 88.0 Gy) delivered in 20 fractions (mean). RESULTS Mean follow-up was 16 years; 16 patients developed a clinical BC, 13 after radiotherapy. The cumulative incidence of BC was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.0% to 4.5%) 30 years after the FC and 5.1% (95% CI, 2.1% to 8.2%) at the age of 40 years. The annual excess incidence increased as age increased, whereas the standardized incidence ratio decreased. On average, each Gray unit received by any breast increased the excess relative risk of BC by 0.13 (< 0.0 to 0.75). After stratification on castration and attained age, and adjusting for radiation dose, FC type, and chemotherapy, a higher risk of a subsequent BC was associated with Hodgkins disease (relative risk, 7.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 30.9). CONCLUSION The reported high risk of BC after childhood Hodgkins disease treatment seems to be due not only to a higher radiation dose to the breasts, but also to a specific susceptibility.

Frequency Distribution of Second Solid Cancer Locations in Relation to the Irradiated Volume Among 115 Patients Treated for Childhood Cancer

PURPOSE To provide better estimates of the frequency distribution of second malignant neoplasm (SMN) sites in relation to previous irradiated volumes, and better estimates of the doses delivered to these sites during radiotherapy (RT) of the first malignant neoplasm (FMN). METHODS AND MATERIALS The study focused on 115 patients who developed a solid SMN among a cohort of 4581 individuals. The homemade software package Dos_EG was used to estimate the radiation doses delivered to SMN sites during RT of the FMN. Three-dimensional geometry was used to evaluate the distances between the irradiated volume, for RT delivered to each FMN, and the site of the subsequent SMN. RESULTS The spatial distribution of SMN relative to the irradiated volumes in our cohort was as follows: 12% in the central area of the irradiated volume, which corresponds to the planning target volume (PTV), 66% in the beam-bordering region (i.e., the area surrounding the PTV), and 22% in regions located more than 5 cm from the irradiated volume. At the SMN site, all dose levels ranging from almost zero to >75 Gy were represented. A peak SMN frequency of approximately 31% was identified in volumes that received <2.5 Gy. CONCLUSION A greater volume of tissues receives low or intermediate doses in regions bordering the irradiated volume with modern multiple-beam RT arrangements. These results should be considered for risk-benefit evaluations of RT.

Risks of brain tumour following treatment for cancer in childhood: modification by genetic factors, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

A cohort of 4,400 persons treated for various cancers of childhood in France and the UK was followed up over an extended period to assess risks of subsequent brain tumour in relation to the radiotherapy and chemotherapy that the children received for their first cancer. Elevated risks of subsequent brain tumours were associated with first central nervous system (CNS) tumour (two‐sided p =0.0002) and neurofibromatosis (two‐sided p =0.001). There was also elevated brain tumour risk (two‐sided p =0.003) associated with ionising radiation exposure, the risk being concentrated among benign and unspecified brain tumours. The radiation‐related risk of benign and unspecified brain tumours was significantly higher than that of malignant brain tumours (two‐sided p≤ 0.05); there was no significant change of malignant brain tumour risk with ionising radiation dose (two‐sided p > 0.2). In general, there were no strong associations between alkylating agent dose and brain tumour risk. The only significant association between brain tumour risk and alkylating agent dose was in relation to compounds used (bleomycin, chloraminophen) that are thought not to deliver substantial doses to the brain; the statistical significance of the trend with dose depended on a single case, and thus must be considered a weak result. Int. J. Cancer 78:269–275, 1998. Published 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Estimation of the radiation dose delivered to any point outside the target volume per patient treated with external beam radiotherapy

The methodology we have developed to study dose distribution outside the target volume during external beam radiotherapy allows us to determine the dose received by the patient arising from leakage radiation and scattered radiation from both the head of the treatment machine and from the treatment room. It also allows us to evaluate the dose due to photon scattering in the patient by means of a dedicated 3-D algorithm permitting computations for the whole body of the patient and taking into account height, sex and anatomical data at the time of the treatment, dosimetric data and lung heterogeneity parameters. This methodology offers solid criteria for recommendations concerning radiation protection.

The ESTRO-QUALity assurance network (EQUAL)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ESTRO has set up a Quality Assurance network (EQUAL) to check the dose delivered on axis in reference and non-reference conditions for external radiotherapy. The external audits covered by the network are based on measurements made with mailed thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). MATERIAL AND METHODS The TLD consist of LiF powder type DTL 937 read with a PCL 3 automatic TLD reader. The participating centres are instructed to deliver to the TLDs absorbed doses of 2 Gy calculated with the Treatment Planning System used in clinical routine. A maximum of three photon energies by participating centre have been checked with 10 on-axis points per beam. The quantities checked include the reference beam output, beam output variation with collimator opening, depth dose data and wedge transmission factor. RESULTS During the 1998 EQUAL programme 102 centres have been checked corresponding to 235 beams (28 (60)Co beams and 207 X-ray beams). About 3% of the outputs in reference conditions show deviations outside tolerance level (>+/-5%). A similar rate of deviation is noted for the percentage depth doses. A rate of deviation (6%) has been observed for the beam output variation (open and wedged beams) and the wedge transmission factor. The analysis of the results shows that for 24 out of the 102 centres, a deviation outside tolerance level is observed at least in one point, mainly for the large and rectangular field sizes and for the wedged beams. CONCLUSIONS The results for the EQUAL programme show the importance of a quality assurance network in Radiotherapy especially for the non reference points even if they are only located on the beam axis (In order to participate in this network, please contact EQUAL secretariat or download the attached application form ESTRO web site: Dr I.H. Ferreira or Mrs Aline Mechet, EQUAL-ESTRO, Physics Department, Institut Gustave-Roussy 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, F-94805 Villejuif Cedex, France. e-mail:equal@igr.fr or http://www.estro.be/).

Results of a european randomized trial of Etanidazole combined with radiotherapy in head and neck carcinomas

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Etanidazole, a hypoxic cell sensitizer, combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods and Materials: A total of 374 patients from 27 European centers were included in this trial between 1987 and 1990. Treatment was either conventional radiotherapy alone (between 66 Gy in 33 fractions and 74 Gy in 37 fractions, 5 fractions per week), or the same radiotherapy dose plus Etanidazole 2 g/m 2 , three times weekly for 17 doses. A minimization procedure, balancing for center, site, and T stage (T1-T3 vs. T4) was used for randomization. Results: Among the 187 patients in the Etanidazole group, 82% received at least 14 doses of the drug. Compliance to the radiotherapy protocol was 92% in the Etanidazole group and 88% in the control group; the main cause of deviation was acute toxicity, which was observed at an equal rate in the two treatment groups. Fifty-two cases of Grade 1 to 3 peripheral neuropathy were observed in the Etanidazole group vs. 5 cases, all of Grade 1, in the control group (p < 0.001). The 2-year actuarial loco-regional control rates were 53% in the Etanidazole group and 53% in the control group (p = 0.93), and the overall 2-year survival rates were 54% in each group (p = 0.99). Conclusion: Adding Etanidazole to conventional radiotherapy did not afford any benefit for patients with head and neck carcinoma. This study failed to confirm the hypothesis of a benefit for patients with N0-N1 disease, which had been suggested by the results of a previous study (10).