Jean-Christophe Duchmann

Temporary placement of partially covered self-expandable metal stents for anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: a prospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND Management of anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation deserves optimization. OBJECTIVE To evaluate placement and removal of partially covered self-expandable metal stents (PCSEMSs) in this setting. DESIGN Prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled study. SETTING Three French academic hospitals with liver transplantation units and tertiary referral endoscopy centers. PATIENTS Twenty-two patients (18 men, 4 women, aged 49.7 ± 12 years) with anastomotic biliary stricture. Seventeen (77.3%) presented stricture recurrence after plastic stenting. INTERVENTIONS PCSEMSs were placed across the stricture for 2 months and then removed. Patients were followed by clinical examination and liver function tests 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after PCSEMS removal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT The ability to remove PCSEMS. RESULTS PCSEMS placement was successful in all patients, after sphincterotomy in 21 patients. Stent-related complications included minor pancreatitis (3 patients), transient pain (1 patient), and cholangitis (1 patient). Stent removal was achieved in all patients but 2 whose stents had migrated distally. Partial stent dislocation was noted in 5 patients (upward in 4, downward in 1). Complications associated with stent removal were minor, including self-contained hemorrhage (1 patient) and fever (1 patient). The stricture persisted at the end of treatment in 3 patients (13.6%), all of whom had stent migration or dislocation. Recurrence of anastomotic stricture after initial success occurred in 9 of 19 patients (47.4%) within 3.5 ± 2.1 months. Sustained stricture resolution was observed in 10 of 19 patients (52.6%), 45.6% from an intent-to-treat perspective. LIMITATIONS Uncontrolled study with limited follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Temporary placement and removal of PCSEMSs in anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation is feasible, although sometimes demanding. Stent migration may impair final outcome.

Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS A new core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling has recently been developed. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to compare this needle with a standard needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic masses referred to 17 centers for EUS-guided sampling were included. Each patient had two passes with a standard 22G needle and a single pass with a 22G core needle performed in a randomized order. Samples from both needles were separately processed for liquid-based cytology and cell-block preparation and were assessed independently by two blinded expert pathologists. The primary endpoint was the accuracy of the detection of malignancy. The reference standard was based on further cytohistological analysis obtained under ultrasound or computed tomography scanning, endoscopic or surgical guidance, and/or by clinical follow-up with repeated imaging examinations for at least 12 months. The secondary endpoints were the rate of technical failure and the quality of the cytohistological samples obtained. RESULTS Of the 80 patients included (49 men; mean age 67.1 ± 11.1), 87.5 % had final malignant diagnoses (adenocarcinoma n = 62, 77.5 %). There was no difference between the needles in diagnostic accuracy (standard needle 92.5 % vs. core needle 90 %; P = 0.68) or technical failure. Both pathologists found the overall sample quality significantly better for the standard needle (expert 1, P = 0.009; expert 2, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic accuracy of EUS sampling for solid pancreatic masses using standard and core needles seems comparable but with a better overall histological sample quality for the former. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01479803.

Pancreatoscopy-guided intracorporeal laser lithotripsy for difficult pancreatic duct stones: a case series with prospective follow-up (with video)

Pancreatic stones develop in patients with chronic pancreatitis, with as many as 90% of alcoholic chronic pancreatitis patients bearing ductal stones during long-term follow-up. 1 Main pancreatic duct calculi can lead to an outflow obstruction with increased parenchymal pressure, upstream dilation (ie, toward the tail of the pancreas), and ischemia. Untreated stones can also trigger bouts of acute pancreatitis sometimes associated with life-threatening adverse events. Pain is the predominant symptom in most patients with obstructive chronic pancreatitis, often alleviated only by narcotics and inducing anorexia, malabsorption, and weight loss. It is only with main pancreatic duct decompression from impacted stones that such adverse events can be avoided. 2,3 Small stones can be extracted by using various endoscopic techniques during ERCP, such as pancreatic sphincterotomy with balloon or basket sweeping, pancreatic duct stricture dilation, or stent placement. Larger and impacted stones typically require lithotripsy or surgery. Endoscopic lithotripsy options include (1) mechanical lithotripsy, for which data are scarce but suggest that this procedure may carry an increased risk of adverse events when compared with lithotripsy for biliary stones 2 ; (2) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), which overcomes the problem of size by fragmenting calculi and reducing the stone burden, thus facilitating endoscopic duct clearance 3 ; (3) contact lithotripsy by using pancreatoscopy with a mother-baby endoscope system. 4 Directcontact lithotripsy of biliopancreatic stones can be achieved by means of electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or pulseddye laser, both of which must be done under direct vision. Scant clinical outcome data are available regarding the application of these methods for pancreatic duct stone fragmentation. 5 Our aim was to evaluate the endoscopic treatment at our center by intracorporeal laser lithotripsy (ILL) with a single-operator mini-endoscope (SpyGlass; Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) during ERCP, for its performance, feasibility, and safety in the treatment of difficult main pancreatic duct stones.

Effectiveness of combined endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and stenting in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer.

Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) can be coupled with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the same setting when biliary and/or duodenal stenting are required. Aims Our aim was to examine the effectiveness of EUS-FNA combined with stenting during the same session in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA of a pancreatic mass with symptoms of biliary (±upper digestive) obstruction were included. Consecutive patients undergoing biliary and/or duodenal stenting without EUS-FNA during the same period were used as controls. Procedure-related complications were the primary outcome measure. Duration of the procedure, ability to achieve biliary/duodenal stenting, the yield of EUS-FNA, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results A total of 122 patients underwent combined EUS-FNA and stenting and 68 underwent stenting alone (control group). In the combined group, histological proof of cancer was obtained in 88.52% at first EUS-FNA and 95.08% after a second EUS-FNA. Biliary stent placement was successful in 97.5 and 98% in the combined and the control groups, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the groups for length of stay after endoscopy and for procedure-related mortality and morbidity within 30 days. The median time from endoscopy to chemotherapy in the combined group was 12 days. Conclusion Combined EUS-FNA and biliary and/or duodenal stenting is feasible in almost all patients with suspected pancreatic cancer, with no additional hazard and a high histological yield.

Temporary placement of fully covered self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of benign biliary strictures.

Background Endoscopic treatment of benign biliary strictures (BBS) can be challenging. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) in BBS. Methods Ninety-two consecutive patients with BBS (chronic pancreatitis (n = 42), anastomotic after liver transplantation (n = 36), and post biliary surgical procedure (n = 14)) were included. FCSEMS were placed across strictures for 6 months before endoscopic extraction. Early success rate was defined as the absence of biliary stricture or as a minimal residual anomaly on post-stent removal endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Secondary outcomes were the final success and stricture recurrence rates as well as procedure-related morbidity. Results Stenting was successful in all patients. Stenting associated complications were minor and occurred in 22 (23.9%) patients. Migration occurred in 23 (25%) patients. Stent extraction was successful in all but two patients with proximal stent migration. ERCP after the 6 months stenting showed an early success in 84.9% patients (chronic pancreatitis patients: 94.7%, liver transplant: 87.9%, post-surgical: 61.5%) (p = 0.01). Final success was observed in 57/73 (78.1%) patients with a median follow-up of 12 ± 3.56 months. Recurrence of biliary stricture occurred in 16/73 (21.9%) patients. Conclusions FCSEMS placement is efficient for patients with BBS, in particular for chronic pancreatitis patients. Stent extraction after 6 months indwelling, although generally feasible, may fail in a few cases.

Comparative evaluation of two porcine ex vivo models for training in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections

Introduction  EUS-guided cystoenterostomy (EUCE), a technique used for the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and peri-enteric collections, requires specific skills for which dedicated models are needed. Based on a compact EASIE model (Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy), we developed two ex vivo porcine models of retrogastric cysts and evaluated learning performance within the frame of a structured training program. Material and methods  The first model was made of porcine colon (i. e. “natural cyst”), the second one with an ostomy bag (i. e. “artificial cyst”). All procedures were achieved with an EUS scope under fluoroscopy. Both models were evaluated prospectively over a 2-day session involving 14 students and five experts. The primary end point was overall satisfaction with each model. Results  The “natural cyst” and “artificial cyst” were prepared within 10 and 16.5 minutes ( P  = 0.78), respectively. Model grading showed a non-significant trend for overall satisfaction in favor of the artificial model ( P  = 0.06). As secondary end points, difference was not significant for impression of realism ( P  = 0.75) whereas the “artificial cyst” was graded significantly better by experts and students in terms of ability to teach procedural steps ( P  = 0.01) and ease of puncture ( P  = 0.03). Moreover, experts considered the ability to improve students’ proficiency to be superior with the “artificial cyst” ( P  = 0.008). Conclusion  Both “artificial” and “natural cysts” are efficient for EUCE training in terms of overall satisfaction. However, the “artificial cyst” model appears to make the procedure easier with a higher ability to teach procedural steps and improve the students’ proficiency. Larger applications of this model are needed to validate as a standard of training.