Jean-François Blair

Carotid artery duplex scanning in preoperative assessment for coronary artery revascularization: The association between peripheral vascular disease, carotid artery stenosis, and stroke

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to identify high-risk populations for severe carotid artery disease (SCD) and neurologic events (NE) after nonemergency isolated coronary artery bypass graft procedures (CABG). METHODS Between February 1989 and July 1992, 387 patients underwent preoperative carotid artery duplex scanning as part of a preoperative assessment for nonemergency cardiac procedures. Of these patients, 376 had isolated CABG, and 11 had combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG. Patient demographics, risk factors, and preoperative neurologic symptoms were recorded and analyzed. Severe carotid artery disease was defined as a 80% or greater stenosis of either internal carotid artery by carotid artery duplex scanning. Patients were evaluated for neurologic events (cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, amaurosis fugax, or reversible ischemic neurologic deficits) during the in-hospital postoperative period. RESULTS The prevalence of SCD was 8.5% (33 patients). The 33 patients with SCD were significantly older (65.6 +/- 6.5 years vs 62.5 +/- 10.4 years, p = 0.02), had previous CEA (27.3% vs 2.0%, p = 0.00001), had preoperative neurologic symptoms (21.2% vs 5.9%, p = 0.002), and had peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (63.6% vs 16.9%, p = 0.00001). The sensitivity of PVD for SCD is 63.6% (n = 21/33) (specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 25.9%, negative predictive value 96.1%). In patients undergoing CABG alone, those who had postoperative NE were older (69.6 +/- 6.7 years vs 62.5 +/- 10.3 years, p = 0.036) and more likely to have PVD (50% vs 19.7%, p = 0.034), SCD (40% vs 4.9%, p = 0.001) and previous CEA (40% vs 2.7%, p = 0.0002). The incidence of postoperative NE in patients with SCD was 18.2% vs 1.7% in patients without SCD (p = 0.001). The sensitivity of SCD for NE was 40% (n = 4/10) (specificity 95.1%, positive predictive value 18.2%, negative predictive value 98.3%). CONCLUSIONS PVD may be helpful to identify patients at high risk for severe carotid artery stenosis. Postoperative NE in patients with CABG are associated with increasing age, carotid artery stenosis greater than 80%, previous CEA, and PVD.

Arterial trauma during central venous catheter insertion: Case series, review and proposed algorithm

BACKGROUND Percutaneous catheterization is a frequently-used technique to gain access to the central venous circulation. Inadvertent arterial puncture is often without consequence, but can lead to devastating complications if it goes unrecognized and a large-bore dilator or catheter is inserted. The present study reviews our experience with these complications and the literature to determine the safest way to manage catheter-related cervicothoracic arterial injury (CRCAI). METHODS We retrospectively identified all cases of iatrogenic carotid or subclavian injury following central venous catheterization at three large institutions in Montreal. We reviewed the French and English literature published from 1980 to 2006, in PubMed, and selected studies with the following criteria: arterial misplacement of a large-caliber cannula (>/=7F), adult patients (>18 years old), description of the method for managing arterial trauma, reference population (denominator) to estimate the success rate of the therapeutic option chosen. A consensus panel of vascular surgeons, anesthetists and intensivists reviewed this information and proposed a treatment algorithm. RESULTS Thirteen patients were treated for CRCAI in participating institutions. Five of them underwent immediate catheter removal and compression, and all had severe complications resulting in major stroke and death in one patient, with the other four undergoing further intervention for a false aneurysm or massive bleeding. The remaining eight patients were treated by immediate open repair (six) or through an endovascular approach (two) for subclavian artery trauma without complications. Five articles met all our inclusion criteria, for a total of 30 patients with iatrogenic arterial cannulation: 17 were treated by immediate catheter removal and direct external pressure; eight (47%) had major complications requiring further interventions; and two died. The remaining 13 patients submitted to immediate surgical exploration, catheter removal and artery repair under direct vision, without any complications (47% vs 0%, P = .004). CONCLUSION During central venous placement, prevention of arterial puncture and cannulation is essential to minimize serious sequelae. If arterial trauma with a large-caliber catheter occurs, prompt surgical or endovascular treatment seems to be the safest approach. The pull/pressure technique is associated with a significant risk of hematoma, airway obstruction, stroke, and false aneurysm. Endovascular treatment appears to be safe for the management of arterial injuries that are difficult to expose surgically, such as those below or behind the clavicle. After arterial repair, prompt neurological evaluation should be performed, even if it requires postponing elective intervention. Imaging is suggested to exclude arterial complications, especially if arterial trauma site was not examined and repaired.

Pain and Quality of Life Assessment after Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients at Low Risk

PURPOSE To compare functional autonomy, quality of life (QOL), and pain control after endovascular and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty patients with a low surgical risk profile and anatomic compatibility for stent-graft therapy were randomized to receive OR or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Technical and clinical success as well as mortality were assessed in both groups and compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Functional autonomy and QOL were assessed by Karnofsky score and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Pain control was assessed by a numeric rating scale and Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire. QOL outcomes by means of the SF-36 and pain questionnaires were compared with use of mixed-effects models for repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS All procedures were technically successful in both groups. Three late clinical failures requiring surgical conversion or repeated intervention were observed in the EVAR group and one was observed in the OR group. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of functional autonomy or QOL. No difference in pain level was evident during the early postoperative period, whereas the pain level was lower in the OR group after 1 month. Opioid analgesic drug consumption was significantly greater in the OR group during the postoperative period. Mean hospitalization duration was shorter in the EVAR group than in the OR group (4.5 days +/- 2.4 vs 11.5 days +/- 8.1; P= .001). CONCLUSION EVAR has no advantage over OR in patients at low risk in terms of functional autonomy, QOL, and pain control. However, EVAR was associated with shorter hospitalization durations compared with OR.

Regional anesthesia for carotid surgery: less intraoperative hypotension and vasopressor requirement.

Regional anesthesia (RA) is the gold standard of neuromonitoring during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Recent data show that RA for CEA is associated with fewer postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to assess hemodynamic stability and vasoactive drug use for CEA performed under RA versus general anesthesia (GA). All patients undergoing CEA from January 2005 to January 2006 were identified from our prospective database. Electronic and paper charts were reviewed. Intraoperative monitoring data were reviewed retrospectively. Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) <100 mm Hg and deemed prolonged if it lasted more than 10 min. Hypertension was defined as SBP >160 mm Hg. BP variation was defined as the difference between the highest and lowest SBP, and bradycardia as heart rate (HR) below 60. The data were expressed as means +/- standard deviation. Seventy-two consecutive patients underwent CEA: 25 under RA and 47 under GA. There was no difference in preoperative HR and BP. Most patients had symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (80% in RA vs. 85% in GA, nonsignificant). Intraoperatively, RA was associated with less BP variation (60 +/- 27 vs. 78 +/- 22 mm Hg, p = 0.005), bradycardia (5% vs. 63%, p < 0.001), hypotension (20% vs. 70%, p < 0.01), and prolonged hypotension (0% vs. 23%, p = 0.009) and more hypertension (80% vs. 47%, p = 0.007). Vasopressor requirements were less frequent under RA (20% vs. 77%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in hypotension or hypertension episodes seen in the postoperative recovery room. RA was associated with less hypotension and less vasopressor used during CEA compared to GA. The improved hemodynamic stability may account for the lower incidence of complications after CEA.

Comparison of Streptokinase and Urokinase in Local Thrombolysis of Peripheral Arterial Occlusions for Lower Limb Salvage

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of streptokinase (SK) and urokinase (UK) in the treatment of local thrombolysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Over a 24-month period, 40 patients with 45 lower limb arterial occlusions of less than 45 days duration underwent intraarterial fibrinolysis. Twenty occlusions were treated with recombinant UK and tissue culture-derived UK, and 25 occlusions were treated with SK. The study was retrospective, but the two groups were very homogeneous in terms of vascular surgical history, medical risk factors, and occlusion characteristics. RESULTS Complete lysis (95% or more) was achieved in 84% of SK infusions and 89% of UK infusions. Endoluminal and surgical interventions as well as clinical outcomes of SK and UK treatment were comparable. However, infusion time was significantly longer for SK treatment: 28.5 hours versus 19.1 hours for UK treatment (P = .035). Complication rates were not statistically significantly different. Average length of stay in the intensive care unit was identical (2.2 days) for both groups, and the difference in hospital stay was not statistically significant (7.7 days for SK vs 8.7 days for UK). CONCLUSION At the concentrations and doses used, the efficacy and safety of SK and UK were comparable, despite longer SK infusion time.

Totally laparoscopic aortic surgery : Comparison of the apron and retrocolic techniques in a porcine model

This study evaluated the learning curve for a second-year general surgery resident and compared 2 totally laparoscopic aortic surgery techniques in 10 pigs: the transretroperitoneal apron approach and the transperitoneal retrocolic approach. Five end points were compared: success rate, percentage of conversion, time required, laparoscopic anastomosis quality, and learning curve. The first 3 interventions required an open conversion. The last 7 were done without complications. Mean dissection time was significantly higher with the apron approach compared with the retrocolic approach. The total times for operation, clamping, and arteriotomy time were similar. All laparoscopic anastomoses were patent and without stenosis. The initial learning curve for laparoscopic anastomosis was relatively short for a second-year surgery resident. Both techniques resulted in satisfactory exposure of the aorta and similar mean operative and clamping time. Training on an ex vivo laparoscopic box trainer and on an animal model seems to be complementary to decrease laparoscopic anastomosis completion time.

Reduction in allogeneic blood products with routine use of autotransfusion in open elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Background and objectives: Concern about allogeneic blood product cost and complications has prompted interest in blood conservation techniques. Intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT) is currently not used routinely by vascular surgeons in open elective infrareanl abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The objective of this study is to review our experience with IAT and its impact on blood transfusion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients treated electively over a 4-year period and compared 2 strategy related to IAT, routine use IAT (rIAT) versus on-demand IAT (oIAT). Outcomes measured were number of units of allogeneic red blood cells and autologous red blood cells transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively, preoperative, postoperative, and discharge hemoglobin levels; postoperative infections; length of postoperative intensive care stay; and length of hospital stay. T-independent and Fisher exact test were used. Results: A total of 212 patients were included, 38 (18%) in the rIAT and 174 (82%) in the oIAT. Groups were similar except for an inferior creatinine and a superior mean aneurysm diameter for the rIAT group. Patients in the rIAT group had a lower rate of transfusion (26% vs 54%, P = .002) and a lower mean number of blood unit transfused (0.8 vs 1.8, P = .048). These findings were still more significant for AAA larger than 60 mm (18% rIAT vs 62% oIAT, P = .0001). Postoperative hemoglobin was superior in the rIAT group (107 vs 101 g/L, P = .01). Mean postoperative intensive care length of stay was shorter for the rIAT group (1.1 vs 1.8 days, P = .01). No difference was noted for infection, mortality, or hospital length of stay. Conclusion: The rIAT reduced the exposure to allogeneic blood products by more than 50%, in particular for patients with AAA larger than 60 mm. These results support the use of rIAT for open elective infrarenal AAA repair.

Endovascular Embolization of Symptomatic Arteriovenous Fistulas Secondary to Lower-limb In Situ Venous Bypass Grafts

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of symptomatic arteriovenous (AV) fistulas associated with femoropopliteal in situ venous bypass grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients underwent embolization of symptomatic AV fistulas associated with lower-limb bypass with use of the saphenous vein (n = 16) or femoral vein (n = 5). The procedures were performed with microcatheters and metallic coils. Indications for embolization were venous congestion (n = 15) and arterial insufficiency (n = 6). Eight patients had persistent lower-limb edema, seven had painful inflammatory skin thickening, three had intermittent claudication, and three had nonhealing ulcers. RESULTS Forty-four AV fistulas were embolized. Symptoms of venous congestion regressed completely in 12 of 15 patients (80%). Partial symptom improvement was achieved in three other patients (20%), two of whom had persistent lower-limb edema and bypass with use of the femoral vein. Five of six patients with ischemic symptoms (83%) had complete symptom relief. One patient (17%) whose ischemic ulcer did not recover despite successful embolization of AV fistulas required an amputation 4 months later. Overall, 17 of 21 patients (81%) showed complete recovery of clinical symptoms. There was no bypass occlusion during follow-up (mean, 17.5 months; range, 1-45 months). CONCLUSIONS Embolization of symptomatic AV fistulas secondary to lower-limb in situ venous bypass is a safe and efficient alternative to surgical ligature. Complete regression of clinical symptoms is less likely when the bypass is performed with use of the femoral vein.

Carotid Endarterectomy After Systemic Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

Objective: Vascular specialists are increasingly being requested to perform carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for stroke patients, raising concerns about hemorrhagic complications. Few case series and registry reports have assessed the question, focusing on comparison with symptomatic patients. The goal was to evaluate the hemorrhagic and overall outcomes of patients undergoing CEA after IVT and to compare them with a similar population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 170 consecutive patients who have undergone CEA after stroke in our center from January 2011 to December 2016; 26 (15.1%) of them had undergone previous IVT. A comparative analysis between the non-IVT and the IVT groups was performed. Overall time between diagnosis of stroke and referral to a vascular specialist was also analyzed. Results: Age, sex, and cardiovascular comorbidities were similar in both groups. Median time between IVT and CEA was 8 days (Q1-Q3, 5-15 days), with nine (41%) patients undergoing CEA <7 days after IVT. There were two (1.4%) intracranial hemorrhages in the non-IVT group vs one (3.8%) in the IVT group (P 1⁄4 .950). The overall combined stroke and death rate was 5.3%, with 4.9% in the non-IVT group vs 7.7% in the IVT group (P 1⁄4 .913). Postoperative cervical hematoma requiring reoperation occurred similarly in both groups (2.1% vs 3.8%; P 1⁄4 1). Median modified Rankin score at 30 to 90 days of follow-up was 1 (Q1-Q3, 0-2), and it was similar in both groups (P 1⁄4 .156). Median time between diagnosis of stroke and referral to a vascular specialist was higher for patients in peripheral centers (4 days; Q1-Q3, 2-7 days) compared with university vascular centers (1 day; Q1-Q3, 0-3 days; P < .001). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, CEA after IVT showed similar hemorrhagic and overall outcomes compared with the overall strokeCEA population.