Jean-Francois Marquis

A Citywide Protocol for Primary PCI in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND If primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed promptly, the procedure is superior to fibrinolysis in restoring flow to the infarct-related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The benchmark for a timely PCI intervention has become a door-to-balloon time of less than 90 minutes. Whether regional strategies can be developed to achieve this goal is uncertain. METHODS We developed an integrated-metropolitan-area approach in which all patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were referred to a specialized center for primary PCI. We sought to determine whether there was a difference in door-to-balloon times between patients who were referred directly from the field by paramedics trained in the interpretation of electrocardiograms and patients who were referred by emergency department physicians. RESULTS Between May 1, 2005, and April 30, 2006, a total of 344 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were referred for primary PCI: 135 directly from the field and 209 from emergency departments. Primary PCI was performed in 93.6% of patients. The median door-to-balloon time was shorter in patients referred from the field (69 minutes; interquartile range, 43 to 87) than in patients needing interhospital transfer (123 minutes; interquartile range, 101 to 153; P<0.001). Door-to-balloon times of less than 90 minutes were achieved in 79.7% of patients who were transferred from the field and in 11.9% of those transferred from emergency departments (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Guideline door-to-balloon-times were more often achieved when trained paramedics independently triaged and transported patients directly to a designated primary PCI center than when patients were referred from emergency departments.

Point-of-care genetic testing for personalisation of antiplatelet treatment (RAPID GENE): a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept trial

BACKGROUND Prospective assessment of pharmacogenetic strategies has been limited by an inability to undertake bedside genetic testing. The CYP2C19*2 allele is a common genetic variant associated with increased rates of major adverse events in individuals given clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used a novel point-of-care genetic test to identify carriers of the CYP2C19*2 allele and aimed to assess a pharmacogenetic approach to dual antiplatelet treatment after PCI. METHODS Between Aug 26, 2010, and July 7, 2011, 200 patients were enrolled into our prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept study. Patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndrome or stable angina were randomly assigned to rapid point-of-care genotyping or to standard treatment. Individuals in the rapid genotyping group were screened for the CYP2C19*2 allele. Carriers were given 10 mg prasugrel daily, and non-carriers and patients in the standard treatment group were given 75 mg clopidogrel daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of CYP2C19*2 carriers with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (P2Y12 reactivity unit [PRU] value of more than 234) after 1 week of dual antiplatelet treatment, which is a marker associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events. Interventional cardiologists and data analysts were masked to genetic status and treatment. Patients were not masked to treatment allocation. All analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01184300. FINDINGS After randomisation, 187 patients completed follow-up (91 rapid genotyping group, 96 standard treatment). 23 individuals in each group carried at least one CYP2C19*2 allele. None of the 23 carriers in the rapid genotyping group had a PRU value of more than 234 at day 7, compared with seven (30%) given standard treatment (p=0·0092). The point-of-care genetic test had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 92·3-100) and a specificity of 99·3% (96·3-100). INTERPRETATION Point-of-care genetic testing after PCI can be done effectively at the bedside and treatment of identified CYP2C19*2 carriers with prasugrel can reduce high on-treatment platelet reactivity. FUNDING Spartan Biosciences.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug Device in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Contraindications to Anticoagulation Therapy

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the results associated with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug (ACP) (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and absolute contraindications to anticoagulation therapy. BACKGROUND Few data exist on the late outcomes after LAAC in patients with absolute contraindications to warfarin. METHODS A total of 52 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation underwent LAAC with the ACP device in 7 Canadian centers. Most patients received short-term (1 to 3 months) dual-antiplatelet therapy after the procedure and single-antiplatelet therapy thereafter. A transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 74% of patients at the 6-month follow-up. No patient was lost to follow-up (≥ 12 months in all patients). RESULTS The mean age and median (interquartile range) CHADS2 score were 74 ± 8 years and 3 (2 to 4), respectively. The procedure was successful in 98.1% of the patients, and the main complications were device embolization (1.9%) and pericardial effusion (1.9%), with no cases of periprocedural stroke. At a mean follow-up of 20 ± 5 months, the rates of death, stroke, systemic embolism, pericardial effusion, and major bleeding were 5.8%, 1.9%, 0%, 1.9%, and 1.9%, respectively. The presence of mild peridevice leak was observed in 16.2% of patients at the 6-month follow-up as evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. There were no cases of device thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at high risk of cardioembolic events and absolute contraindications to anticoagulation, LAAC using the ACP device followed by dual-/single-antiplatelet therapy was associated with a low rate of embolic and bleeding events after a mean follow-up of 20 months. No cases of severe residual leak or device thrombosis were observed at the 6-month follow-up.

Effects of late percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of an occluded infarct-related coronary artery on left ventricular function in patients with a recent (<6 weeks) Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (total occlusion post-myocardial infarction intervention study [TOMIIS]—A pilot study)

The effect of late percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of an occluded infarct-related artery on left ventricular ejection fraction was studied in patients with a recent, first Q-wave myocardial infarction in a prospective, randomized study. Forty-four patients (31 men and 13 women, mean age 58 +/- 12 years) with an occluded infarct-related coronary artery were randomized to PTCA (n = 25) or no PTCA (n = 19). Patients received acetylsalicylic acid, a beta blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor unless contraindicated. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined at baseline and 4 months. Coronary angiography was repeated at 4 months. Baseline ejection fraction measured 20 +/- 12 days after myocardial infarction was 45 +/- 12% in both groups. PTCA was performed 21 +/- 13 days after the event. The primary PTCA success rate was 72%. One patient in each group died before angiographic follow-up, which was completed in 37 of the remaining 42 patients (88%; 21 with and 16 without PTCA). At 4 months, the infarct-related artery was patent in 43% of PTCA patients and in 19% of no PTCA patients (p = NS). Reocclusion occurred in 40% of patients after successful PTCA. Secondary analyses showed that the change in left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly greater in patients with a patent infarct-related artery (+9.4 +/- 6.2%) than in those with an occluded artery (+1.6 +/- 8.8%; p = 0.0096). Baseline ejection fraction also independently predicted improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT)

OBJECTIVES We sought to directly compare primary stenting with accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND Thrombolysis remains the standard therapy for AMI. However, at some institutions primary angioplasty is favored. Randomized trials have shown that primary angioplasty is equal or superior to thrombolysis, while recent studies demonstrate that stent implantation improves the results of primary angioplasty. METHODS Patients presenting with AMI were randomly assigned to primary stenting (n = 62) or accelerated t-PA (n = 61). The primary end point was the composite of death, reinfarction, stroke or repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR) for ischemia at six months. RESULTS The primary end point was significantly reduced in the stent group compared with the accelerated t-PA group, 24.2% versus 55.7% (p < 0.001). The event rates for other outcomes in the stent group versus the t-PA group were as follows: mortality: 4.8% versus 3.3% (p = 1.00); reinfarction: 6.5% versus 16.4% (p = 0.096); stroke: 1.6% versus 4.9% (p = 0.36); recurrent unstable ischemia: 9.7% versus 26.2% (p = 0.03) and repeat TVR for ischemia: 14.5% versus 49.2% (p < 0.001). The median length of the initial hospitalization was four days in the stent group and seven days in the t-PA group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with accelerated t-PA, primary stenting reduces death, reinfarction, stroke or repeat TVR for ischemia. In centers where facilities and experienced interventionists are available, primary stenting offers an attractive alternative to thrombolysis.

Acute coronary artery occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty treated by redilation of the occluded segment

Acute occlusion of a coronary artery during percutaneous coronary angioplasty usually results in unremitting ischemia requiring emergency surgical intervention. Seven patients are described, in whom complete occlusion occurred during coronary angioplasty as a result of coronary artery dissection. Despite this, it was possible to reintroduce the balloon catheter immediately and redilate the vessel with abrupt reversal of clinical and electrocardiographic manifestations of ischemia. Six patients had no subsequent evidence of myocardial infarction. The seventh had a slight elevation of serum creatine kinase and transient electrocardiographic changes. All patients were discharged from the hospital without further intervention. Four patients had elective coronary artery bypass surgery (greater than 4 weeks after angioplasty) and three have remained asymptomatic or in improved condition since the coronary angioplasty. It is concluded that sudden occlusion of a coronary artery during coronary angioplasty can be safely treated by redilation in the acute stage.

Usefulness of mean platelet volume as a biomarker for long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Larger size platelets have enhanced reactivity. The mean platelet volume (MPV) is a marker of platelet activation and is usually measured as part of blood testing. The aim of the present study was to investigate the utility of the MPV as a biomarker in prognosticating the long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The baseline MPV values from consecutive patients undergoing PCI were screened. Of the 1,432 patients, the composite primary end point of mortality or myocardial infarction at 1 year occurred in 80 (5.6%). The patients in the highest tertile (MPV >9.1 fL) had an increased frequency of the primary end point compared to those in the mid (8.1 to 9.1 fL) and lowest (<8.1 fL) tertiles (9.0%, 4.5%, and 3.5%, respectively; p <0.01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated diabetes (odds ratio 2.44, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 4.00) and highest tertile of MPV (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.47 to 3.99) as the best predictors of adverse outcomes. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, the preprocedural MPV and troponin levels demonstrated a comparable predictive relation to the primary end point (receiver operator characteristics curve analysis, area under the curve 0.64, p = 0.01; and 0.63, p = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, an elevated MPV was a strong independent predictor of long-term outcomes after PCI. The preprocedural MPV had prognostic value similar to that of troponin in patients with acute coronary syndrome. These findings could be of importance in the clinical evaluation of patients before PCI and the design of future studies assessing antiplatelet therapies.

Reduction in Mortality as a Result of Direct Transport From the Field to a Receiving Center for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine whether mortality complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was impacted by the design of transport systems. BACKGROUND It is recommended that regions develop systems to facilitate rapid transfer of STEMI patients to centers equipped to perform primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet the impact on mortality from the design of such systems remains unknown. METHODS Within the framework of a citywide system where all STEMI patients are referred for primary PCI, we compared patients referred directly from the field to a PCI center to patients transported beforehand from the field to a non-PCI-capable hospital. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 180 days. RESULTS A total of 1,389 consecutive patients with STEMI were assessed by the emergency medical services (EMS) and referred for primary PCI: 822 (59.2%) were referred directly from the field to a PCI center, and 567 (40.8%) were transported to a non-PCI-capable hospital first. Death at 180 days occurred in 5.0% of patients transferred directly from the field, and in 11.5% of patients transported from the field to a non-PCI-capable hospital (p < 0.0001. After adjusting for baseline characteristics in a multivariable logistic regression model, mortality remained lower among patients referred directly from the field to the PCI center (odds ratio: 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.31 to 0.88, p = 0.01). Similar results were obtained by using propensity score methods for adjustment. CONCLUSIONS A STEMI system allowing EMS to transport patients directly to a primary PCI center was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Our results support the concept of STEMI systems that include pre-hospital referral by EMS.

Transradial Versus Transfemoral Artery Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Extremely Obese

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2). BACKGROUND Coronary angiography is most commonly performed via femoral artery access; however, the optimal approach in extremely obese (EO) patients remains unclear. METHODS Between January 2007 and August 2010, a cohort of consecutive EO patients who underwent coronary angiography was identified in our centers registry of angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Of 21,103 procedures, 564 (2.7%) were performed in unique EO patients: 203 (36%) via the transradial approach; and 361 (64%) via the transfemoral approach. RESULTS The primary outcome, a combined endpoint of major bleeding, access site complications, and nonaccess site complications, occurred in 7.5% of the transfemoral group and 2.0% of the transradial group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10 to 0.88, p = 0.029), an endpoint driven by reductions in major bleeding (3.3% vs. 0.0%, OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0 to 0.71, p = 0.015), as well as access site injuries (4.7% vs. 0.0%, OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0 to 0.48, p = 0.002). There were no differences in nonaccess site complications (1.7% vs. 2.0%, OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.41 to 5.55), but transradial access procedures were associated with an increase in procedure time and patient radiation dose (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Transfemoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with more bleeding and access site complications when compared with a transradial approach. Important reductions in procedural associated morbidity may be possible with a transradial approach in EO patients.

Predictors of long-term outcome after stent implantation in a saphenous vein graft

Stenting of saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions is associated with significant clinical events at late follow-up. We sought to determine predictors of clinical outcome after this procedure. One hundred twenty-eight balloon-expandable stents were implanted in the SVGs of 106 patients. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were analyzed. All grafts, including those not stented, were scored for extent of disease involving the luminal surface of the graft, and for the presence of low profile lesions (< 50% graft stenosis) and/or high profile lesions (> or = 50% graft stenosis). The in-hospital success rate was 98.1%. Before discharge, no patient died, required bypass surgery, or had repeat angioplasty of the same graft. Follow-up was obtained on all the patients. At a median of 18 months, 15% had died, 17% had experienced myocardial infarction, 20% had required repeat bypass surgery, and 37% needed repeat angioplasty to either the same site or a different lesion. Event-free survival was recorded in only 44% of the patients. The cumulative Kaplan-Meier survival at 2.4 years was 78.7%. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, predictors of survival were the absence of a high profile lesion in any nonstented patent graft (p = 0.004), and the use of lipid-lowering agents at follow-up (p = 0.01). Stenting SVG lesions can be performed with a high degree of procedural success, but at long-term follow-up there is a high rate of cardiac events. The absence of a high profile lesion in any nonstented patent graft is the strongest predictor of survival.